對話機器人的技術發展日新月異，為教育領域帶來新的教學策略與憂慮，同時也使批判思考對於大學生漸趨重要。在此背景下，透過提問策略發展批判性思考，以反思當今社會的問題以及關注永續發展目標（SDGs）是大學生實踐批判思考的重要方式。
因此，本研究設計對話機器人結合提問策略探究大學生批判思考意向，以2021年至2022年間發生的柬埔寨人口販賣事件為例。研究參與者為國立清華大學和國立陽明交通大學的40名在學生，教育程度包括學士生組及研究生組。研究工具採用柬埔寨人口販賣事件相關新聞文本，結合PIRLs閱讀理解提問法及黃金圈理論，以Google App Script作為後端程式編譯器，綁定Google Sheet為微型資料庫，在Line前端平台創建「問吧，問Bot！」機器人虛實整合學習教材。此外，以前實驗設計作為研究方法，使用教材動機量表和大學生批判思考意向量表搜集量化數據，半結構式訪談搜集質性資料，在分析時進行整合與詮釋。
主要研究結果顯示本研究應用多模態對話介面設計原則，將對話機器人結合PIRLs閱讀理解提問法及黃金圈理論，設計為一套以柬埔寨人口販賣事件為主題的「問吧，問Bot！」機器人虛實整合學習教材。為批判性思考數位學習教材提供了一套設計原型，供後續使用者體驗進行迭代。該教材根據問卷分析及半結構式訪談結果，評估其依循ARCS動機模型，對於引發大學生學習動機具有正面影響。使用該教材時，大學生傾向選擇較高層次或開放式問題之提問策略，以期掌握更深入之學習內容。最後，分析其批判思考意向現況，可能受先備知識及教育程度所影響。

With the rapid technological advancements in chatbots, both new teaching strategies and concerns have emerged in the educational field. Concurrently, the importance of critical thinking for university students has escalated. This study aims to explore the role of chatbots integrated with questioning strategies in fostering critical thinking intentions among university students, using the human trafficking incident in Cambodia from 2021 to 2022 as a case study. The study involved 40 participants from National Tsing Hua University and National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, including both undergraduate and graduate students.
Research tools incorporated news articles related to Cambodian human trafficking and employed the PIRLs reading comprehension questioning methods and Golden Circle theory. Google App Script was used as the backend compiler, linked to Google Sheets as a micro-database, and a "Wen Ba, Wen Bot!" chatbot was created on the Line platform as a blended learning material. A pre-experimental research design was utilized, employing the Instructional Materials Motivational Survey and a College Students' Critical Thinking Intentions scale for quantitative data collection, along with semi-structured interviews for qualitative insights.
The main findings reveal that this study successfully utilized multimodal conversational interfaces, integrated with PIRLs reading comprehension questioning methods and Golden Circle theory, to create a "Wen Ba, Wen Bot!" chatbot focused on the Cambodian human trafficking issue. The study offers a prototype design for digital learning materials aimed at fostering critical thinking, serving as a basis for iterative user experience enhancements in subsequent research. The chatbot positively impacted university students' learning motivation, as indicated by assessments conforming to the ARCS Motivation Model. When using the material, students tended to opt for higher-level or open-ended questioning strategies, aiming for a deeper understanding of the content. Lastly, the analysis suggests that prior knowledge and level of education might influence students' critical thinking intentions.

英文
Adamopoulou, E., & Moussiades, L. (2020). An overview of chatbot technology. In IFIP international conference on artificial intelligence applications and innovations (pp. 373-383). Springer, Cham.
Alsaleh, N. J. (2020). Teaching Critical Thinking Skills: Literature Review. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 19(1), 21-39.
Behar-Horenstein, L. S., & Niu, L. (2011). Teaching critical thinking skills in higher education: A review of the literature. Journal of College Teaching & Learning (TLC), 8(2).
Bii, P. K., Too, J. K., & Mukwa, C. W. (2018). Teacher Attitude towards Use of Chatbots in Routine Teaching. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(7), 1586-1597.
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Handbook I: cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.
Borich, G. D. (2007). Effective Teaching Methods: Research-Based Practice 6th Ed.
Bradeško, L., & Mladenić, D. (2012). A survey of chatbot systems through a loebner prize competition. In Proceedings of Slovenian language technologies society eighth conference of language technologies (Vol. 2, pp. 34-37). sn.
Cecil, Pfeifer, J, & 劉夏青. (2016). 老師如何提問，學生才會思考. (第1版 ed.). 中國青年.
Chen, H. L., Vicki Widarso, G., & Sutrisno, H. (2020). A chatbot for learning Chinese: Learning achievement and technology acceptance. *Journal of Educational Computing Research*, *58*(6), 1161-1189.
Cotton, K. (1988). Classroom questioning. School improvement research series, 5, 1-22.
Crovari, P., Pidó, S., Garzotto, F., & Ceri, S. (2020). Show, don’t tell. reflections on the design of multi-modal conversational interfaces. In International Workshop on Chatbot Research and Design (pp. 64-77). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
DALE, R. (2016). The return of the chatbots. Natural Language Engineering, 22(5), 811-817. doi:10.1017/S1351324916000243
Ebadi, S., & Amini, A. (2022). Examining the roles of social presence and human-likeness on Iranian EFL learners’ motivation using artificial intelligence technology: A case of CSIEC chatbot. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-19.
Eleni Adamopoulou, Lefteris Moussiades,(2020) Chatbots: History, technology, and applications, Machine Learning with Applications, Volume 2, 2020, 100006, ISSN 2666-8270, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mlwa.2020.100006.
Enciso, O. L. U., Enciso, D. S. U., & Daza, M. D. P. V. (2017). Critical thinking and its importance in education: Some reflections. Rastros Rostros, 19(34), 78-88.
Fidan, M., & Gencel, N. (2022). Supporting the instructional videos with chatbot and peer feedback mechanisms in online learning: The effects on learning performance and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60(7), 1716-1741.
Følstad, A., Araujo, T., Law, E. L. C., Brandtzaeg, P. B., Papadopoulos, S., Reis, L., ... & Luger, E. (2021). Future directions for chatbot research: an interdisciplinary research agenda. Computing, 103(12), 2915-2942.
Fryer, L. K., Nakao, K., & Thompson, A. (2019). Chatbot learning partners: Connecting learning experiences, interest and competence. *Computers in human Behavior*, *93*, 279-289.
Garett, K., & Wulf, K. (1978). The relationship of a measure of critical thinking ability to personality variables and to indicators of academic achievement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38(4), 1181-1187.
Gopalan, V., Bakar, J. A. A., Zulkifli, A. N., Alwi, A., & Mat, R. C. (2017). A review of the motivation theories in learning. In Aip conference proceedings (Vol. 1891, No. 1). AIP Publishing.
Halpern, D. F. (1997). Critical thinking across the curriculum: A brief edition of thought and knowledge. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Holotescu, C. (2016). MOOCBuddy: a Chatbot for personalized learning with MOOCs. In RoCHI (pp. 91-94).
Hudgins, B. B., Riesenmy, M., Ebel, D., & Edelman, S. (1989). Children’s critical thinking: A model for its analysis and two examples. The Journal of Educational Research, 82(6), 327-339.
Huitt, W. (1998). Critical thinking: An overview. Educational psychology interactive, 3(6), 34-50.
Huitt, W. (2001). Motivation to learn: An overview. Educational psychology interactive, 12(3), 29-36.
Huitt, W. (2011). Bloom et al.'s taxonomy of the cognitive domain. Educational psychology interactive, 22, 1-4.
Kamii, C. (1991). Toward autonomy: The importance of critical thinking and choice making. School Psychology Review, 20(3), 382-388.
Kane, D. A. (2016). The role of chatbots in teaching and learning. E-learning and the academic library: Essays on innovative initiatives, 131.
Katz, D. M., Bommarito, M. J., Gao, S., & Arredondo, P. (2023). Gpt-4 passes the bar exam. Available at SSRN 4389233.
Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status, 1(1983), 383-434.
Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of instructional development, 10(3), 2-10.
Keller, J. M. (2010). The Arcs model of motivational design. Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach, 43-74.
Keller, J. M. (2010). Tools to support motivational design. Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach, 267-295.
Kipling, R. (2009). Just so stories for little children. Oxford University Press.ISO 690
Kuhail, M. A., Alturki, N., Alramlawi, S., & Alhejori, K. (2022). Interacting with educational chatbots: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 1-46.
Li, K., & Keller, J. M. (2018). Use of the ARCS model in education: A literature review. Computers & Education, 122, 54-62.
Lihyun Lin. (2022). Digital News Report 2022. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2022/taiwan
Lin, M. H., Chen, H. C., & Liu, K. S. (2017). A study of the effects of digital learning on learning motivation and learning outcome. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3553-3564.
Loorbach, N., Peters, O., Karreman, J., & Steehouder, M. (2015). Validation of the Instructional Materials Motivation Survey (IMMS) in a self‐directed instructional setting aimed at working with technology. British journal of educational technology, 46(1), 204-218.
Lund, B. D., & Wang, T. (2023). Chatting about ChatGPT: how may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries?. Library Hi Tech News.
Machinery, C. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence-AM Turing. Mind, 59(236), 433.
Marsden, E., & Torgerson, C. J. (2012). Single group, pre-and post-test research designs: Some methodological concerns. Oxford Review of Education, 38(5), 583-616.
Martin Powton.（2018）A Visual History Of Chatbots. Chatbots Magazine.
Matthew B. Hoy (2018) Alexa, Siri, Cortana, and More: An Introduction to Voice Assistants, Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 37:1, 81-88, DOI: 10.1080/02763869.2018.1404391
Minott, D., Ferguson, T., & Minott, G. (2019). Critical thinking and sustainable development. Encyclopedia of sustainability in higher education. Springer, Cham. https://doi. org/https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-319-63951-2.
Miri, B., David, B. C., & Uri, Z. (2007). Purposely teaching for the promotion of higher-order thinking skills: A case of critical thinking. Research in science education, 37, 353-369.
Molnár, G., & Szüts, Z. (2018). The role of chatbots in formal education. In 2018 IEEE 16th International Symposium on Intelligent Systems and Informatics (SISY) (pp. 000197-000202). IEEE.
Nappi, J. S. (2017). The importance of questioning in developing critical thinking skills. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 84(1), 30.
Norris, S. P., & Ennis, R. H. (1989). Evaluating Critical Thinking. The Practitioners' Guide to Teaching Thinking Series. Critical Thinking Press and Software, Box 448, Pacific Grove, CA 93950-0448; tele.
Okonkwo, C. W., & Ade-Ibijola, A. (2021). Chatbots applications in education: A systematic review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100033
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2014). Technical Report of the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC).
Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6 (1).
Sari, R., Sumarmi, S., Astina, I., Utomo, D., & Ridhwan, R. (2021). Increasing students critical thinking skills and learning motivation using inquiry mind map. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(3), 4-19.
Sinek, Simon. (2009). How great leaders inspire action. 〔Video〕.TED. https://www.ted.com/talks/simon_sinek_how_great_leaders_inspire_action/comments/transcript
Singh, J., Joesph, M. H., & Jabbar, K. B. A. (2019). Rule-based chabot for student enquiries. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1228, No. 1, p. 012060). IOP Publishing.
Stanfield, R. B. (Ed.). (2000). The art of focused conversation: 100 ways to access group wisdom in the workplace. New Society Publishers.
Törnberg, P. (2023). Chatgpt-4 outperforms experts and crowd workers in annotating political twitter messages with zero-shot learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.06588.
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
United Nations. (2017). Goal 16. The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2017.
Wallace, R.S. (2009). The Anatomy of A.L.I.C.E.. In: Epstein, R., Roberts, G., Beber, G. (eds) Parsing the Turing Test. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6710-5_13
Weiler, A. (2005). Information-seeking behavior in generation Y students: Motivation, critical thinking, and learning theory. The journal of academic librarianship, 31(1), 46-53.
Weizenbaum, J. (1966). ELIZA—a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Communications of the ACM, 9(1), 36-45.
Will Knight. (2016). Conversational Interfaces. MIT Technology Review.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 17(2), 89-100.
World Economic Forum, V. (2020). The future of jobs report 2020. Retrieved from Geneva.
Wu, W. H., & Liao, G. Z. (2022). Design of a Chatbot Learning System: Case Study of a Reading Chatbot. Bulletin of the Technical Committee on Learning Technology (ISSN: 2306-0212), 22(1), 2-7.
Yang, Y. T. C., & Wu, W. C. I. (2012). Digital storytelling for enhancing student academic achievement, critical thinking, and learning motivation: A year-long experimental study. Computers & education, 59(2), 339-352.
Yin, J., Goh, T. T., Yang, B., & Xiaobin, Y. (2021). Conversation technology with micro-learning: The impact of chatbot-based learning on students’ learning motivation and performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(1), 154-177.
ŽivkoviĿ, S. (2016). A model of critical thinking as an important attribute for success in the 21st century. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 232, 102-108.

中文
中央廣播電台. （2022）. 2022年台灣十大新聞回顧. https://www.rti.org.tw/news/view/id/2154930
王文科 & 張默. （2001）. 新聞採寫基礎. 浙江大學出版社.
行政院. （2022）. 臺灣永續發展目標修正本.
行政院國家永續發展委員會. （2022）. 台灣永續發展目標修訂本.
李文馨. （2022）. 柬埔寨詐騙／柬埔寨成跨國詐騙集團聚集地 台灣人為何淪為「豬仔」？. 公視新聞網. https://news.pts.org.tw/article/595242
林彥佑. （2018）. 人文素養的閱讀觀：閱讀策略與閱讀教學. 臺灣出版與閱讀, (107 年第 2), 136-142.
胡世雄, 江軍, 彭立言（2022）專案管理輕鬆學：PMP國際專案管理師教戰寶典(第三版). 博碩文化股份有限公司
胡雅茹. （2011）. 曼陀羅思考法. 晨星出版有限公司.
張倩. （2009）. 蘇格拉底問答法對現代課堂教學的啟示. 河南職業技術師範學院學報: 職業教育版, (6), 98-99
教育部（2018）十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校–社會領域。
教育部. （2014）. 十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱
教育部大學社會責任推動中心. （2023）. 關於USR計畫：聚焦社會議題，實踐永續發展.
許崇憲. （2022）. [大學生批判思考意向量表] 之編製. 測驗學刊, 69(2), 115-141.
許瓊文, 唐允中（2019）. 2019 台灣新聞媒體可信度研究. 財團法人台灣媒體觀察教育基金會.
陳欣希, 柯雅卿, 周育如, 陳明蕾, & 游婷雅. （2020）. 問好問題!: 從 PIRLS 測驗著手. 天衛文化圖書股份有限公司.
楊雅婷.（2004）.我國大學生批判思考能力與批判思考意向關係之實證研究. 國科會研究報告. NSC93-2520-S006-001
葉玉珠, 陳月梅, 謝佳蓁, & 葉碧玲. （2001）. [成人批判思考技巧測驗] 之發展. 測驗年刊, 48(2), 35-50.
葉玉珠. （2003）. 批判思考的涵意與有效教師行為. 清華大學通識教育季刊, 9(3), 151-170.
蕭心雅. （2018）. 以擴增實境技術為基礎的行動遊戲式學習系統-以古蹟導覽學習為例. 科技部專題研究報告成果計畫. 106-2813-C-156-004-E.
藍偉瑩. （2021）. 提問力：啟動探究思考的關鍵. 親子天下.