簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 黃嘉若
chia-Jo Huang
論文名稱: 製造系統的績效評估
Performance evaluation of manufacturing systems
指導教授: 許棟樑
D. Daniel Sheu
口試委員:
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 工學院 - 工業工程與工程管理學系
Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management
論文出版年: 2006
畢業學年度: 94
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 111
中文關鍵詞: 製造管理筆記型電腦半導體製造分析層級法馬氏田口方法
外文關鍵詞: Manufacturing management, Notebook computer, Semiconductor manufacturing, Analytic hierarchy process, Mahalanobis-Taguchi system
相關次數: 點閱:2下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 製造管理的意義是有效的利用資源,來製造出品質最佳、產量最多、成本最低的產品,才能獲得顧客的最大滿意度。所以優良的製造管理是確保產品高品質、高良率與高利潤的重要因素。本論文首先簡介台灣兩個重要的製造系統,也就是半導體製造業及筆記型電腦製造業。並探討評估績效指標的方法及重要製造系統的績效指標架構及決策分析的手法。
    本研究利用兩個案例來說明製造管理實際運用的情況。案例一為四家晶圓製造廠所參與的績效管理評估系統,分別用AHP、Fuzzy AHP以及Fuzzy MADA來進行評估,希望能提供給晶圓製造業參考,進而了解晶圓製造產業的優勢與劣勢,以提昇公司管理之績效。案例二為評估七家筆記型電腦廠的製造管理績效。這兩個案例分別利用馬氏田口方法(Mahalanobis-Taguchi System),針對績效指標進行篩選來簡化AHP的層級架構,以找到完整而精簡的製造系統的績效指標架構,並驗證與先前的系統具有相同的鑑別力,最後提出結論與未來的研究方向。


    Manufacturing management is aimed at efficiently utilizing resources to produce products with best quality and lowest cost at maximum output, so that customers will have optimum satisfaction. Excellent manufacturing management is an important factor to guarantee a high quality, high yield and high profit product. In this dissertation, two major manufacturing systems and their hierarchy of performance indices are introduced. The methods of performance evaluation and decision analysis are discussed. Lots of performance indices are applied to evaluate the effectiveness of manufacturing management.
    Is this study, two cases are presented to study practice of manufacturing management. The first case is a performance evaluation system involved by four wafer fabs, through an understanding of strength and weakness of wafer manufacturing, the companies can increased their manufacturing management performance. Three decision analysis methods are used to evaluate their performance, they are AHP、Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy MADA. In the second case, the manufacturing performance of seven notebook computer factories are evaluated. Finally, Mahalanobis-Taguchi System is proposed to reduce the number of performance indices of the AHP hierarchy in order to simplify the performance evaluation, and we are going to verify that the simplified version of AHP hierarchies will have the same performance evaluation capability as before, then the final discussion and research suggestion are presented.

    中文摘要…………………………………………………………… 3 英文摘要…………………………………………………………… 4 致謝詞……………………………………………………………… 6 圖目錄……………………………………………………………… 7 表目錄……………………………………………………………… 7 目錄………………………………………………………………… 10 第一章 緒論……………………………………………………… 12 1.1 製造管理的重要性 ………………………………... 12 1.2 台灣重要的製造系統簡介…………………………. 13 1.2.1 筆記型電腦製造業 ………………………… 13 1.2.2 半導體製造業 ……………………………… 14 1.3 論文架構 …………………………………………... 16 第二章 文獻探討………………………………………………… 17 2.1 績效評估……………………………………………. 17 2. 1.1 績效評估方法………………………………. 18 2.1.2 績效指標模型架構…….……………………. 21 2.1.2.1晶圓製造廠的績效指標模型架構…… 21 2.1.2.2筆記型電腦製造廠的績效指標……… 25 2.2 分析層級法…………………………………………. 31 2.3 模糊理論介紹………………………………………. 34 2.3.1 模糊集合與模糊數………………………….. 35 2.3.2 模糊數的運算……………………………….. 38 第三章 研究方法與理論……………………………………….. 39 3.1 研究方法……………………………………………. 39 3.2 資料的標準化………………………………………. 42 3.3 成對比較矩陣的建立………………………………. 42 3.4 成對比較矩陣中一致性的檢定……………………. 43 3.5 模糊分析層級法……………………………………. 45 3.6 模糊數排序的解模糊化……………………………. 46 3.7 模糊多屬性分析……………………………………. 49 3.8 馬氏田口方法………………………………………. 50 3.8.1 馬氏距離…………………………………….. 51 3.8.2 利用直交表進行績效指標的篩選………….. 52 第四章 製造系統的績效評估案例……………………………… 56 4.1 案例1:半導體晶圓製造廠績效評估………………. 56 4.1.1建立績效指標的層級架構…………………... 56 4.1.2問卷數據表…………………………………... 64 4.1.3資料分析…………………………………….. 69 4.1.4 層級分析評估………………………………. 70 4.1.5 分析結果……….……………………………. 73 4.1.5.1 AHP分析結果………………………... 73 4.1.5.2 Fuzzy AHP分析結果…………………. 74 4.1.5.3 Fuzzy MADA分析結果………………… 77 4.1.5.4簡化AHP的層級架構…………………. 79 4.1.5.5 簡化後層級架構的驗證…………….. 86 4.1.6 結論…………………………………………. 89 4.2案例2: 筆記型電腦製造廠的績效評估……………. 89 4.2.1績效評估層級架構..…………………………. 90 4.2.2 分析結果……………………………………. 93 4.2.2.1 利用AHP來進行評估………………… 93 4.2.2.2 利用不同的權重進行敏感度分析….. 95 4.2.2.3 利用Fuzzy AHP來進行評估……….. 96 4.2.2.4 利用Fuzzy MADA來進行評估………………………….. 97 4.2.2.5 簡化AHP的層級架構…………………. 99 4.2.2.6 簡化系統後的驗證………………... 104 第五章: 結論與未來研究方向………………………………. 106 5.1 結論…………………………………………………. 106 5.2 未來的研究方向……………………………………. 107 參考文獻………………………………………………………… 108

    [1] 王小璠,"多準則決策分析”,滄海書局,2005。
    [2] 吳振寧,「台灣半導體廠設備管理指標模型建立與評比」, 國
    立清華大學工業工程與工程管理系碩士論文,1999年。
    [3] 郭奕桓,”台灣半導體廠設備管理標竿:黃光區”,國立清華大
    學工業工程與工程管理系碩士論文,2001年。
    [4] 詹文男,”筆記型電腦研究報告”,財團法人資訊工業策進會發
    行,1994年。
    [5] 電子技術編輯群編,”表面黏著技術”,電子技術出版社,1992
    年。
    [6] 黃世豪,電子化企業經營績效評估之研究,大葉大學資訊管理研
    究所碩士論文,2000。
    [7] 謝豪駿,”台灣筆記型電腦業製造管理標竿:印刷電路板組
    裝”,國立清華大學工業工程與工程管理系碩士論文,1998年。
    [8] D. H. Besterfield, Carol Besterfield-Michna, Glen H.
    Besterfield, Mary Besterfield-Sacre, Total Quality
    Management, Prentice Hall, 1995.
    [9] J. J. Buckley, “Fuzzy Hierarchical Analysis”, Fuzzy
    Sets and Systems, Vol 17, No. 3, pp233-247, 1985.
    [10]C. Caplice and Y. Sheffi, “A Review and Evaluation of
    Logistics Metrics,” The International Journal of
    Logistics Management, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp11-28, 1994.
    [11]A. Charnes, V. V. Cooper and E. Rhodes, “Measuring the
    Efficiency of Decision Making Units”, European Journal
    of Operation Research, Vol. 2, No. 6, pp. 429-444,
    1978.
    [12]S. J. Chen and Hwang, C. L., Fuzzy Multiple Attribute
    Decision Making – Method and Application, a State –
    of – Art Survey, New York: Springer – Verlag, 1992.
    [13]C. H. Cheng and D. L. Mon, “Fuzzy System Reliability
    Analysis by Interval Confidence”, Fuzzy Sets and
    Systems, Vol. 58, pp29-35, 1993.
    [14]C. Douligeris and I. J. Pereira, A Telecommunications
    Quality Study Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process,
    IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Vol.
    12, No. 2, pp241-250, 1994.
    [15]P. Drucker, Management Tasks, Responsibilities,
    Practices, Harper & Row, New York, 1973.
    [16]H. Evans, G. Ashworth, M. Chellew, A. Davidson and D.
    Towers, “Exploiting Activity-Based Information: Easy
    as ABC,” Management Accounting, London, pp24, 1996.
    [17]J. Korpela and M. Tuominen, Benchmarking Logistics
    Performance with an Application of the Analytic
    Hierarchy Process, IEEE Transactions on Engineering
    Management, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp323-333, 1999.
    [18]C. J. Huang and D. D. Sheu , A Fuzzy AHP Evaluation of
    Manufacturing Management Performance for Notebook
    Computer Plants in Taiwan,, Proceeding of the 5th
    Annual International Conference on Industrial
    Engineering, Theory, Application and Practice. Dec. 13-
    15, 2000, Paper No. 150, 2000.
    [19]G. J. Klir and T. A. Folger, Fuzzy Sets, Uncertainty
    and Information, Prentice Hall, 1988.
    [20]Y. J. Lai and C. L. Hwang, Fuzzy Mathematical
    Programming, Springer-Verlag, 1992.
    [21]R. C. Leachman and D. A. Hodges , “Benchmarking
    Semiconductor Manu facturing”, IEEE Transactions on
    Semiconductor Manufacturing, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp158-169,
    1996.
    [22]D. Mon, “Evaluating Weapon System Using Fuzzy Analytic
    Hierarchy Process Based on Entropy Weight”,
    Proceedings of 1995 International Conference on Fuzzy
    Systems, Vol. 2, pp591-598.
    [23]S. Ohnishi and H. Imai, “Evaluating for a Stability of
    Fuzzy Decision Making Using a Sensitivity Analysis”,
    1998 Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information
    Processing Society-NAFIPS, pp86-90.
    [24]Peng, S. L. . Assessing Manufacturing Management
    Performance for Notebook Plants in Taiwan: Model
    Construction and Application, M. S. thesis, National
    Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, 1999. (In
    Chinese)
    [25]S. P. Robbins, Management, Prentice-Hall, pp168-173,
    1994.
    [26]T. J. Ross, Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications,
    McGraw-Hill New York, 1995.
    [27]T. L. Saaty,”The Analytic Hierarchy Process”,McGraw-
    Hill, 1980.
    [28]T. L. Satty, “A Scaling Method for Priorities in
    Hierarchy Structures”, Journal of Mathematical
    Psychology, 3, pp243-281, 1979.
    [29]R. S. Schuler, V. L. Huber, Personnel and Human
    Resource Management, St. Paul, MN: West Pub. 1990.
    [30]D. Sheu and Shieh, A., Benchmarking Manufacturing
    Management for Taiwan’s Notebook Industry: Printed
    Circuit Board Assembly, The 3rd Annual International
    Conference on Industrial Engineering Theories,
    Applications and Practices, Dec. 28-31, 1998, Hong
    Kong.
    [31]D. Sheu, S. Peng, “Assessing Manufacturing Management
    performance for Notebook Computer Plants in Taiwan”,
    The 4th Annual International Conference on Industrial
    Engineering Theories, Applications and Practices. Nov.
    17-20, 1999, San Antonio, Texas, U. S. A..
    [32]A. Shieh, Benchmarking Manufacturing Management for
    Taiwan’s Notebook Manufacturers: Printed Circuit Board
    Assembly, M. S. thesis, National Tsing-Hua University,
    Hsinchu, Taiwan, 1998. (In Chinese)
    [33]T. Wakabayashi, K Itoh, T. Mitamura and A. Ohuchi, “A
    Framework of an Analytic Hierarchy Process Method Based
    on Ordinal Scale”, Proceeding of the Fifth IEEE
    International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 1,
    pp355-360.
    [34]M. L. Wang, H. F. Wang and C. L. Lin, “Ranking Fuzzy
    Number Based on Lexicographic Screening Procedure”,
    International Journal of Information Technology and
    Decision Making, December 4(4), pp663-678, 2005.
    [35]R. Yager, A New Methodology for Ordinal Multi-objective
    Decisions Based on Fuzzy Sets, Decision Sci., Vol. 12,
    pp589-600, 1981.
    [36]L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy Sets”, Information and Control,
    Vol. 8, pp338-353, 1965.
    [37]H. J. Zimmermann, Fuzzy Set and Its Application, Kluwer
    Academic Publishers, 1991, 2nd Edition.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)

    QR CODE