簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 張凱盛
Chang, Kai-Sheng
論文名稱: 具彈性機制下之中國碳排放權交易市場整合分析
Analysis of China's Carbon Emission Trading Market Integration under Flexible Mechanism Designs
指導教授: 廖肇寧
Liao, Chao-Ning
口試委員: 周瑞賢
Chou, Jui-Hsien
黃韻勳
Huang, Yun-Hsun
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 科技管理學院 - 經濟學系
Department of Economics
論文出版年: 2021
畢業學年度: 109
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 54
中文關鍵詞: 排放權儲存機制排放權借用機制碳交易市場整合
外文關鍵詞: Emissions banking, Emissions borrowing, Carbon trading market integration
相關次數: 點閱:1下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 在面對日趨嚴重的氣候暖化下,中國為了兼顧經濟活動與碳排放減量的發展,積極的在許多地區試點推展碳排放權交易,因此,本研究將利用衰減因子與懲罰因子的設定,建構具儲存與借用設計的排放交易模型,對中國30個省市進行碳排放交易模擬,來探討在不同彈性機制市場下,各省市減量成本與交易價格的變化。此外,我們亦藉由逐次合併各單一交易市場成全國交易市場的過程中,來觀察碳交易市場整合程度對碳減量成本的影響,結果顯示排放權儲存或借用機制有明顯穩定市場價格與降低減排成本的效果,平均碳減排成本可因市場逐步整合而降低,減幅最高甚至可達64.3%。


    With the growing concerns of global warming, China has developed carbon emission trading to balance the development of economic growth and carbon emission reductions in several provinces and cities. This study used the setting of decay factor and penalty factor to construct an emission trading model with banking and borrowing designs for analyzing possible emissions abatement costs and market price changes under different flexible trading mechanisms in 30 Chinese provinces and cities. In addition, we also explore how the carbon reduction activities would change when the current local trading markets gradually merge into a national market. The result shows that the emission banking or borrowing design has significant effects of stabilizing market prices and reducing the carbon abatement costs. Furthermore, the average carbon abatement cost can be reduced by as high as 64.3% when more trading markets are integrated.

    摘要-------------------------i ABSTRACT--------------------ii 目錄-----------------------iii 圖目錄----------------------iv 表目錄-----------------------v 第一章 緒論------------------1 第一節 研究動機與目的---------1 第二節 研究流程---------------3 第二章 文獻回顧---------------4 第一節 排放權交易制度----------4 第二節 中國碳排放權交易市場----7 第三章 經濟模型--------------10 第四章 實證分析與結果---------15 第一節 資料來源與運用---------15 第二節 實證結果--------------21 第五章 結論------------------49 第一節 結論與建議-------------49 第二節 未來研究方向-----------50 參考文獻---------------------51

    一、中文書籍
    王波、王慧、王冀、王長科、王東阡、王艷姣…戴君虎 (2020)。中國氣候變化藍皮書2020。北京:中國氣象局氣候變化中心。

    二、中文期刊
    方愷、張琦峰、杜立民 (2021)。初始排放權分配對各省區碳交易策略及其減排成本的影響分析。環境科學學報41 (2),696-709。

    沈洪濤與黃楠 (2019)。碳排放權交易機制能提高企業價值嗎。財貿經濟40 (1),144-161。

    劉宇、溫丹輝、王毅、孫振清 (2016)。天津碳交易試點的經濟環境影響評估研究—基於中國多區域一般均衡模型TermCO2 。氣候變化研究進展12 (6),561-570。

    三、英文書籍
    Stern, N.(2006). The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Stocker, T.F., Qin, D., Plattner G.K., Tignor, M., Allen, S.K., Boschung, J., Midgley, P. M. (2013). Climate change 2013: the physical science basis contribution of Working Group I to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Tietenberg, T. H. (1985). Emissions trading: An exercise in reforming pollution policy. United States: Resources for the Future.

    四、英文期刊
    Cronshaw, M., & Kruse, J. (1996). Regulated firms in pollution permit markets with banking. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 9, 179–186.

    Cui, L. B., Fan, Y., Zhu, L., &Bi, Q . H. (2014). How will the emissions trading scheme save cost for achieving China's 2020 carbon intensity reduction target? Applied Energy, 136, 1043-1052.

    Fell, H., & Morgenstern, R.D. (2010). Alternative approaches to cost containment in a cap-and-trade system. Environmental and Resource Economics 47, 275–297.

    Godby, R.W., Mestelman, S., Muller, R.A., & Welland, J.D. (1997). Emissions trading with shares and coupons when control over discharges is uncertain. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 32, 359-381.

    Han, P., Cai, Q., Oda, T., Zeng, N., Shan, Y., Lin, X., &Liu, D. (2020). Assessing the recent impact of COVID-19 on carbon emissions from China using domestic economic data. Science of The Total Environment, 750.

    Holland, S. P., & Moore, M. R. (2013). Market design in cap and trade programs: Permit validity and compliance timing. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 66, 671–687.

    Kling, C., & Rubin, J. (1997). Bankable permits for the control of environmental pollution. Journal of Public Economics, 64, 101–115.

    Leiby, P., & Rubin, J. (2001). Intertemporal permit trading for the control of greenhouse gas emissions. Environmental and Resource Economics, 19, 229–256.

    Liao, C. N. (2009). Technology adoption decisions under a mixed regulatory system of tradable permits and air pollution fees for the control of total suspended particulates in Taiwan. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 35, 135–153.

    Lin, B., & Jia, Z. (2019) Impacts of carbon price level in carbon emission trading market. Applied Energy, 239, 157–70.

    Lin, B., Jia, Z. (2019). What are the main factors affecting carbon price in emission trading scheme? A case study in China. Science of The Total Environment, 654, 525–534.

    Liu, Y., Feng, S., Cai, S., Zhang, Y., Zhou, X., Chen, Y., & Chen, Z. (2013). Carbon emissions trading system of China: a linked market vs separated markets. Frontiers of Earth Science,7, 465–479.

    Liu, Y., Tan, X.J., Yu, Y., & Qi, S.Z.(2016). Assessment of impacts of Hubei pilot emission trading schemes in China: a CGE-analysis using term CO2 model. Applied Energy 189, 762–769.

    Ma, Z., Cai, S., Ye, W., & Gu, A.(2019). Linking emissions trading schemes: economic valuation of a joint China–Japan–Korea carbon market. Sustainability 11.

    Montgomery, W. D. (1972). Markets in licenses and efficient pollution control programs. Journal Economic Theory, 5, 395–418.

    Rubin, J. (1996). A model of intertemporal emission trading, banking, and borrowing. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 31, 269–286.

    Rubin, J. D., & Kling, C. (1993). An emission saved is an emission earned: An empirical study of emission banking for light-duty vehicle manufacturers. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 25, 257–274.

    Schennach, S.M. (2000). The economics of pollution permit banking in the context of Title IV of the 1990 clean air amendments. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 40, 189–210.

    Solomon, B.D. (1998). Five Years of Interstate SO2 Allowance Trading: Geographic Patterns and Potential Cost Savings. The Electricity Journal, 11, 58-70.

    Zhang, Y. J., Liang, T., Jin, Y. L., &Shen, B. (2020). The impact of carbon trading on economic output and carbon emissions reduction in China's industrial sectors. Applied Energy, 260.

    Zheng, J., Yang, M., Ma, G., Xu, Q., &He, Y. (2020). Multi-agents-based modeling and simulation for carbon permits trading in China: A regional development perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17.

    五、學位論文
    Chang, R. Y. (2020). Economic Analysis of a Global Permit Trading Market with Banking and Borrowing Designs for Greenhouse Gas Control. Ph.D dissertation, National Tsing Hua University.

    六、討論報告
    Burtraw, D., & Mansur, E. (1999). The effects of trading and banking in the SO2 allowance market (Discussion Paper 99-25). Retrieved from Resources for the Future website: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/10630

    七、網路資料
    中國國家統計局 (2018)。中國統計年鑒—2018。取自http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2018/indexch.htm

    China Emission Account & Datasets (2018). Emission Inventories for 30 Provinces 2017. Retrieved from https://www.ceads.net/data/province/

    The World Bank (2018). Groundswell: Preparing for Internal Climate Migration. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10986/29461

    QR CODE