研究生: |
許世哲 Shih-Che Hsu |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
電力公司訂定用戶供電可靠度地區性目標之方法研究 METHODS FOR SETTING REGIONAL RELIABILITY TARGETS OF AN ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM |
指導教授: |
陳士麟
Shi-Lin Chen 潘晴財 Ching-Tsai Pan |
口試委員: | |
學位類別: |
博士 Doctor |
系所名稱: |
電機資訊學院 - 電機工程學系 Department of Electrical Engineering |
論文出版年: | 2007 |
畢業學年度: | 96 |
語文別: | 英文 |
論文頁數: | 141 |
中文關鍵詞: | 可靠度 、系統平均停電時間 、系統平均停電次數 、解析式階層程序 |
外文關鍵詞: | Reliability, SAIDI, SAIFI, Analytic Hierarchy Process |
相關次數: | 點閱:1 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本論文提出一套新的程序用於訂定電力公司的用戶供電可靠度之地區性目標。一般而言,電力公司的管理階層係運用可靠度指標值來訂定公司的可靠度總體目標,譬如:運用系統平均停電時間指標、系統平均停電次數指標等。就平均停電時間值或平均停電次數值的降低而言,通常要求各區處的可靠度指標值與總體目標值降低相同的比率。如此,按照總體目標值相同降低比率的方式,對於因管理完善而致系統可靠度較佳的區處則不公平。
為解決此困難,本論文採用「解析式階層程序」提出一套新的作法,此法考量各個區處之間的差異,包括:地理環境、負載、線路、用戶、維護狀況與擴充預算之規模等條件。對於這些差異性因素:(1)設定量化指標,用於量測各個區處的現況或各區的指標值;(2)衡量各個差異因素對用戶停電時間或用戶停電次數之影響,據之對各個差異因素賦予相對權重。
由於每個差異因素的影響係個別予以評估,因此任何會造成區處目標失真的因素,在評估過程中可以有效地剔除。本論文依據「解析式階層程序」設計地區性差異模型及權重擷取程序,測試於台電系統,運用此法將台電公司的總體可靠度目標值合理分配至公司的6個供電區營運處以及22個區營業處。
本論文所提出的程序,經稍加修改,可擴大應用於設定不同電力公司合理的用戶供電可靠度目標值,且可作為不同電力公司的可靠度水準之比較基礎。
This thesis presents a new procedure for setting the target levels of reliability performance across service regions of an electric utility. Conventionally, the management board of utility companies sets corporate targets on reliability indices, such as the system average interruption duration index (SAIDI), the system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) etc., in terms of the SAIDI or SAIFI reduction, and then dispatches these corporate targets to the regional offices commonly at the same percentage of reduction as set for the corporate targets. Such an even distribution of corporate targets among regional offices is unfair in particular for the offices that have reached a good record through their managerial effort.
To overcome this difficulty, a new procedure based on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is designed, which accounts for the disparity among regions on a variety of factors including the geographic, load, circuit, customers, maintenance work and expansion budget conditions, by: (1) measuring the regional status of each factor, and (2) weighing the relative impact among factors on the regional SAIDI or SAIFI.
Because the weighted impact of each disparity factor is evaluated individually, any disparity factors which have clearly distorted the benchmarking in setting regional performance targets can be segmented effectively from the evaluation. The regional disparity model and the weight acquisition procedure, designed by following the AHP, have been tested in the field on dispatching Taipower’s corporate targets to her 6 transmission regions and 22 distribution districts. The disparity model, weighing procedure and field test results as well as the effectiveness and limitation of designed procedure are presented.
The proposed procedure, after slight modification, can be extended to setting the target levels on reliability performance across utilities, and can serve as the basis for benchmarking the reliability performance among utilities.
[1] J. Endrenyi, Reliability Modeling in Electric Power System. Toronto: Wiley, 1978.
[2] Standard Definitions for Use in Reporting Electric Generating Unit Reliability, Availability, and Productivity, ANSI/IEEE Standard 762-2005 (R2002), 2006.
[3] http://www.umsgroup.com/
[4] IEEE Guide for Electric Power Distribution Reliability Indices, IEEE Standard 1366-2003, May 2004.
[5] C. A. Warren and M. J. Adams, “Reliability on the regulatory horizon,” in Proc. IEEE T&D Conference and Exposition, 2001 IEEE/PES, Atlanta, GA, pp.926–930.
[6] http://www.vic.gov.au/
[7] http://www.esci.or.jp/
[8] http://www.kepco.co.kr/
[9] http://www.taipower.com.tw/
[10] A. Sundaram, “Distribution reliability indices tracking within the United States,” EPRI, Palo Alto, CA, Tech. Rep. 1008459, May 2003.
[11] http://www.canelect.ca/
[12] http://www.kansai.co.jp/
[13] http://www.kyuden.co.jp/
[14] R. D. Christie, “Statistical classification of major event days in distribution system reliability,” IEEE Trans. Power Delivery, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1336–1341, Oct. 2003.
[15] R. N. Allan, R. Billinton, A. M. Breipohl and C. H. Grigg, “Bibliography on the application of probability methods in power system reliability evaluation,” IEEE Trans. Power System, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 41–49, Feb. 1994.
[16] R. Billinton, R. J. Ringlee and A. J. Wood, Power-System Reliability Calculation. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 1973.
[17] R. Billinton and R. N. Allan, Reliability Evaluation of Power Systems. New York: Plenum Press, 1984.
[18] Peng Wang and Roy Billinton, “Reliability benefit analysis of adding WTG to a distribution system,” IEEE Trans. Energy Conversion, vol.16, no.2, pp.134-139, June, 2001.
[19] N. Balijepalli, S. S. Venkata and R. D. Christie, “Modeling and analysis of distribution reliability indices,” IEEE Trans. Power Delivery, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1950–1955, Oct. 2004.
[20] N. Balijepalli, S. S. Venkata and R. D. Christie, “Prediction distribution system performance against regulatory standards,” IEEE Trans. Power Delivery, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 350–356, Jan. 2004.
[21] Peng Wang, and Roy Billinton, “Reliability Cost/Worth Assessment of Distribution Systems Incorporating Time-Varying Weather Conditions and Restoration Resources,” IEEE Trans. Power Delivery, vol.17, no.1, pp.260-265, January, 2002.
[22] Peng Wang, Roy Billinton, and Lalit Goel, “Unreliability Cost Assessment of an Electric Power System Using Reliability Network Equivalent Approaches,” IEEE Trans. Power Systems, vol.17, no.3, pp.549-556, August, 2002.
[23] Roy Billinton, M. Fotuhi-Firuzabad, and T. S. Sidhu, “Determination of the Optimum Routine Test and Self-Checking Intervals in Protective Relaying Using a Reliability Model,” IEEE Trans. Power systems, vol.17, no.3, pp.663-669, August, 2002.
[24] Wenyuan Li, and Roy Billinton, “Common Cause Outage Models in Power System Reliability Evaluation,” IEEE Trans. Power systems, vol.18, no.2, pp.966-968, May, 2003.
[25] Roy R Billinton, and R. Acharya, “Major Event Day Segmentation,” IEEE Trans. Power systems, vol.21, no.3, pp.1463-1464, August, 2006.
[26] M. G. Da Silva, A. B. Rodrigues, C. L. C. de Castro A. C. Neto, E. A. Moutinho, N. S. A. Neto and A. B. Cavalcante, “An application of predictive reliability analysis techniques in Brazil’s northeast distribution networks,” Int. J. Electrical Power and Energy Systems, vol. 29, pp. 155–162, 2007.
[27] P. Wang, R. Billinton and L. Goel, “Probability distribution evaluation of distribution system reliability indices using a time sequential simulation technique,” in Conf. Rec. IEEE 2000 Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting, 15-19 June 2000, vol. 1, pp. 760–764.
[28] F. Li, R. E. Brown and L. A. A. Freeman, “A linear contribution factor model of distribution reliability indices and its applications in Monte Carlo simulation and sensitivity analysis,” IEEE Trans. Power System, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 1213–1215, Aug. 2003.
[29] Zhenfu Dong, Don O. Koval, and John E. Propst, “Reliability of Various Industrial Substations,” IEEE Trans. Industry Applications, vol.40, no.4, pp.989-994,July/August, 2004.
[30] A. A. Chowdhury, and Don O. Koval, “Probabilistic Models for Static Adequacy and Security Assessment of a Local Area Electricity Supply System,” in conf. Rec. IEEE 2007 Power Engineering Society General Meeting, pp.1-8.
[31] D. O. Konal, and A. A. Chowdhury, “Outage Data Concepts for Generation and Transmission Equipment,” in conf. Rec. IEEE 2006 Power Engineering Society General Meeting, pp.1-7.
[32] M. Fotuhi-Firuzabad, and Roy Billinton, “Impact of Load Management on Composite System Reliability Evaluation Short-Term Operating Benefits,” IEEE Trans. Power Systems, vol.15, no.2, pp.858-864, May, 2000.
[33] Mohan K. Pandey, and Roy Billinton, “Electric Power System Reliability Criteria Determination in a Developing Country—An Investigation in Nepal,” IEEE Trans. Energy Conversion, vol.15, no.3, pp.342-347, September, 2000.
[34] Ali. A. Chowdhury, and Don O. Koval, “Development of Probabilistic Models for Computing Optimal Distribution Substation Spare Transformers,” IEEE Trans. Industry Applications, vol.41, no.6, pp.1493-1498, November/December, 2005.
[35] A. A. Chowdhury, and D. O. Konal, “Reliability Cost-Benefit Evaluation of Transmission Capital Projects,” in conf. Rec. IEEE 2006 Power Engineering Society General Meeting, pp.1-6.
[36] A. A. Chowdhury, and D. O. Konal, “Probabilistic Assessment of Transmission System Reliability Performance,” in conf. Rec. IEEE 2006 Power Engineering Society General Meeting, pp.1-7.
[37] Mario A. Rios, Daniel S. Kirschen, Dilan Jayaweera, Dusko P. Nedic, and Ron N. Allan, “Value of Security: Modeling Time-Dependent Phenomena and Weather Conditions,” IEEE Trans. Power Delivery, vol.17, no.3, pp.543–548, August, 2002.
[38] Roy Billinton, Mahmud Fotuhi-Firuzabad, and Lina Bertling, “Bibliography on the Application of Probability Methods in Power System Reliability Evaluation 1996–1999,” IEEE Trans. Power Systems, vol.16, no.4, pp.595-602, November, 2001.
[39] A. A. Chowdhury and D. O. Koval, “Current practices and customer value-based distribution system reliability planning,” IEEE Trans. Industry Applications, vol.40, no.5, pp.1174–1182, Sept. 2004.
[40] A. A. Chowdhury and D. O. Koval, “Considerations of relevant factors in setting distribution system reliability standards,” in Conf. Rec. IEEE 2004 Power Engineering Society General Meeting, vol.1, pp.9–15.
[41] D. J. Schepers, “Reliability surveying – segmenting for comparability,” in Conf. Rec. IEEE 2002 Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting, vol.2, pp.643–645.
[42] S. L. Chen and M. Lauby, “Approaches of reducing the customer interruption duration in Taiwan power system,” EPRI, Palo Alto, CA, Final Rep., July 2004.
[43] S. C. Hsu, F. F. Lu, S. L. Chen Y. F. Chung, C. M. Lin and Mark Lauby, “Approaches of setting SAIDI target value for Taiwan power system,” Proc. 28th Annual IAEE International Conference, Taipei, Taiwan, June 3-6, 2005.
[44] Y. H. Chen, “Methods for setting SAIDI target for regional transmission office of Taipower,” M.S. thesis, Dept. Elect. Eng., Tsing Hua Univ., Hsinchu, Taiwan, 2004.
[45] Implementation Methods to Achieve System Reliability Targets Set for Regional Transmission Offices, Transmission Department of Taipower, Taipei, Taiwan, 2002.
[46] Forced System Interruption Statistics on Transmission and Substation Equipments, Transmission Department of Taipower, 2002.
[47] Rules for Processing Work Outage Statistic Data of Distribution Feeders, Distribution Construction Team of Taipower, Taipei, Taiwan, 2002.
[48] T. L. Saaty, Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with The Analytic Hierarchy Process (Vol. VI), RWS Publications, U.S.A., 1994.
[49] T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation (Vol. I), Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications, 1990.
[50] T. L. Saaty, Decision Making for Leaders, Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications, 1995.
[51] T. L. Saaty and Luis G. Vargas, Decision Making in Economic, Political, Social and Technological Environment (Vol. VII), Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications, 1994.
[52] T. L. Saaty, “Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process,” Management Science, Vol. 32, No. 7, July 1986, pp.841~855.
[53] T. L. Saaty, and M. Takizawa, “Dependence and independence: from linear hierarchies to nonlinear networks,” European Journal of Operations Research, Vol. 26, 1986, pp.229~237.
[54] T. L. Saaty, L. G. Vargas, “Inconsistency and rank preservation,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 28, No. 2, June 1984, pp.205~214.
[55] T. L. Saaty, “Absolute and relative measurement with the AHP: The most livable cities in the United States,” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Vol. 20, No. 6, 1986, pp.327~331.
[56] T. L. Saaty, “Exploring optimization through hierarchies and ratio scales,” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Vol. 20, No. 6, 1986, pp.355~360.
[57] T. L. Saaty, “A note on AHP and expected value theory,” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Vol. 20, No. 6, 1986, pp.397~398.
[58] D. M. DeTurck, “The approach to consistency in the analytic hierarchy process,” Mathematical Modeling, Vol. 9, No. 3-5, 1987, pp.345~352.
[59] P. T. Harker, “Alternative modes of questioning in the analytic hierarchy process,” Mathematical Modeling, Vol. 9, 1987, pp.353~360.
[60] B. L. Golden, and E. A. Wasil (eds.), “The analytic hierarchy process – applications and studies,” Springer-Verlag, NY, 1989.
[61] L. G. Vargas, “Reciprocal matrices with random coefficients,” Mathematical Modeling, Vol. 3, 1982, pp.69~81.
[62] T. Solver and L. Soder, “Comparison of incentives for distribution system reliability in performance-based regulation,” in Proc. 2004 IEEE Int. Conf. Electric Utility Deregulation, Restructuring and Power Technologies, 5-8 April 2004, vol. 2, pp. 485–490.
[63] L. R. Diaz, “Indicators models about service continuity,” presented at CIRED 16th Int. Conf. and Exhibition on Electricity Distributions, 18-21 June 2001.
[64] M. Henderson, “Reliability indices,” in Conf. Rec. IEEE 2000 Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting, 15-19 June 2000, vol. 1, pp. 623–624.
[65] B. Billinton, J. E. Billinton, “Distribution system reliability indices,” IEEE Trans. Power Delivery, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 561–568, Jan. 1989.
[66] R. J. Rusch and D. L. Metz, “Customer oriented reliability indices and data collection,” in Conf. Rec. IEEE 2000 Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting, 15-19 June 2000, vol. 1, pp. A1-1–A1-8.
[67] C. Murphy, R. Ballentine and H. Rooney, “In search of world class performance during fault situation,” presented at CIRED 16th Int. Conf. and Exhibition on Electricity Distributions, 18-21 June 2001.
[68] J. D. Bouford and C. A. Warren, “Incrementing averages, a methodology for showing the impact of OMS addition on reliability indices,” in Conf. Rec. IEEE 2006 Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 18-22 June 2006, pp. 1–5.
[69] N. Kagan and C. C. B. Oliveira, “Goal planning and risk analysis for distribution reliability indices,” presented at CIRED 16th Int. Conf. and Exhibition on Electricity Distributions, 18-21 June 2001.
[70] C. A. Warren, “Distribution reliability: what is it?” IEEE Industry Application Magazine, pp. 32–37, July/Aug. 1996.
[71] E. Mayer, “Benchmarking performance levels of distribution companies,” in Conf. Rec. IEEE 2001 Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting, 15-19 June 2001, vol. 1, pp. 524–525.
[72] C. A. Warren, D. J. Pearson and M. T. Sheehan, “A nationwide survey of recorded information used for calculating reliability indices,” IEEE Trans. Power Delivery, vol.18, no.2, pp.449–453, April, 2003.
[73] R. L. Robinson, D. F. Hall, C. A. Warren and V. G. Werner, “Collecting and categorizing information related to electric power distribution interruption events: Customer interruption data collection within the electric power distribution industry,” in Conf. Rec. IEEE 2006 Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 18-22 June 2006, pp. 1–5.
[74] V. G. Werner, D.F. Hall, R. L. Robinson and C. A. Warren, “Collecting and categorizing information related to electric power distribution interruption events: Data consistency and categorization for benchmarking surveys,” IEEE Trans. Power Delivery, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 480–483, Jan. 2006.
[75] B. G. Chatterton, D. F. Hall and C. A. Warren, “Benchmarking distribution network reliability in the future electricity distribution industry (EDI) of South Africa: An international overview, discussion, and summary of key lessons learnt,” in Proc. Inaugural IEEE PES 2005 Conf. and Expo. in Africa, Durban, South Africa, 11-15 July 2005, pp. 72–78.