研究生: |
陳伯青 Chen. Bo Ching |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
台灣閩南語「遘」的語法化和詞彙化 Kau3 in Taiwanese Southern Min:A Case Study of Grammaticalization and Lexicalization |
指導教授: |
連金發
Chinfa Lien |
口試委員: |
曹逢甫
張群 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
人文社會學院 - 語言學研究所 Institute of Linguistics |
論文出版年: | 2015 |
畢業學年度: | 103 |
語文別: | 英文 |
論文頁數: | 120 |
中文關鍵詞: | 遘 、有夠 、語法化 、閩南語 、夠額 、無夠 |
外文關鍵詞: | kau3, u7-kau3, grammaticalization, Southern Min, kau3-giah8, bo5-kau3 |
相關次數: | 點閱:3 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
關於語法化「降類」的研究通常指出一個範疇性的斜坡:主要範疇(>中間範疇)>次要範疇 (Hopper and Traugott 2003: 107)。關於此一範疇性斜坡的完整架構,前人的研究無論是從語法方面或是語意方面的探討皆已汗牛充棟(Heine and Kuteva 2002)。然而,關於主要範疇>次要範疇或主要範疇>中間範疇不完整斜坡的情形則較少被討論。本篇論文主要以台灣閩南語的kau3「遘」為基底來討論此些不完整結構。台灣閩南語的kau3「遘」有五種用法。主要動詞、介詞、動詞補語、形容詞以及副詞。前兩種表示「到達」的意思、後三種則表示「足夠」的意思。而且形容詞和副詞的kau3「遘」進一步和u7「有」或 bo5「無」詞彙化為一個單詞。本文語料主要以早期閩南語和現代閩南語為本。早期閩南語包括明清閩南語戲文和日治時期的語苑;而現代閩南語則以胡萬川先生編撰的閩南語故事集以及閩南語電視劇為主。方法論上則以語法化的觀點討論現代台灣閩南語kau3「遘」的五種用法的關連,並指出這五種用法是kau3「遘」進行語法化的結果。本文將會將重點放在此五種用法的動態關聯,亦即提供研究者有關於kau3「遘」的意義和其語法化路經及分布的關聯。
Researchers of grammaticalization have often suggested that decategorialization
can be manifested as a cline of categoriality, statable as: major category
(>intermediate category) > minor category (Hopper and Traugott 2003: 107).
Previous studies investigated the full schema from a variety of perspectives and
considerable concerns have arisen over the semantic and syntactic behavior, which
yield fruitful results (Heine and Kuteva 2002). However, researches which have
documented the fragmented schema, major category > minor category and major
category >intermediate category, are scant. Therefore, the aim of this thesis attempts
to discuss kau3 as an intriguing word showing the phenomenon of the fragmented
schema in Taiwanese Southern Min (henceforth TSM).
Kau3 can be classified into five main groups. To start with, kau3 is a main verb
‘arrive’. Next, kau3 is a preposition ‘at’, and ‘to’. Next, kau3 is a complement meaning
‘enough’. Next, kau3 is an adjective ‘enough’. Lastly, kau3 is an adverb ‘enough’, as
well. The last two kau3 denoting enough mostly follows u7 ‘have’ or bo5 ‘not have’
successively. Put differently, the last two uses of kau3 are complement in semantic
aspect, but kau3 gets lexicalized with verb in syntactic frame into an adjective and an
adverb.
The research involves reviewing the corpora that comprise the early and modern
SM data. Early Southern Min data include nine SM playscripts and Go En; modern
Southern Min data includes SM story series compiled by Hu Wan Chuan et al, and
transcripts of SM soap operas. The analysis of this study was based on
grammaticalization to indicate the relationship between the five sets of categories
kau3. Result of this study shows the grammaticalization paths of the five sets of
categories kau3.
To conclude, this paper may be of importance to account for the dynamic
relationship between the five sets of categories kau3, and providing researchers with a
better understanding of how the meaning about kau3 is related to its
grammaticalization paths and distribution.
Bolinger, Dwight. 1977. Meaning and Form. London: Longman.
Boyland, Joyce.1996. Morphosyntactic Change in Progress: a Psycholinguistic Approach. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of California, Berkeley .
Bybee, Joan. 1985. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Bybee, Joan. 2003. Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of frequency. In Brian Joseph and Richard Janda (eds.), Handbook of historical linguistics, 602-623. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Bybee, Joan L., and William Pagliuca. 1987. The evolution of future meaning. In Ramat et al., eds., 108-122.
Bybee, Joan, and Sandra Thompson. 1997. Three frequency effects in syntax. In Matthew L. Juge and Jeri L. Moxley, eds., Berkeley Linguistics Society 23: General Session and Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Structure, 65-85. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Chen, Fajin. 1992. Quanzhou Fangyan De Shubu Jiegou (Predicate-complement Structure in Quanzhou Fangyan). Fangyang 3:181-185.
Haiman, John. 1985. Natural Syntax: Iconicity and Erosion. Cambridge University Press.
Haiman. John. 1994. Ritualization and the development of language. In Pagliuca, ed. , 3-28.
Haspelmath, Martin. 1997. From Space to TIme: Temporal Adverbials in the World's Languages. LINCOM Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 3. Munich: LINCOM EUROPA.
Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi, and Friederike Hünnemeyer. 1991a. Grammaticalization: a Conceptual Framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi, and Friederike Hünnemyer. 1991b . From cognition to grammar - evidence from African languages. In Traugott and Heine, eds., vol. I: 149-87.
Hopper, Paul. 1991. On some principles of grammaticization. In Traugott and Heine. eds .. vol. I: 17-35.
Hopper, Paul J. and Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heine, Bernd and Tania Kuteva. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, George. 1987. Woman, Fire, and Dangerous Thing: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1977. Syntactic reanalysis. In: Li, C.N. ed., Mechanisms of Syntactic Change. Austin: University of Texas Press. 57-139.
Laury. Ritva. 1997. Demonstratives in Interaction: the Emergence of a Definite Article in Finnish. Studies in Discourse and Grammar 7. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Li, Rulong. 2001. Minnan Fangyan De Jiegou Zhuci (Structural Particle in Min Dialect). Yuyan Yanjiu 43:48-56.
Li, Rulong. 2007. Minnan Fangyan De Jieci (Preposition in Min Dialect). Minnan Fangyan Yufa Yanjiu 98-116. Fujian: Fujian People’s Publishing House.
Lin, Liantong. 1995. Fujian Yongchun Fangyan De Shubushi (Predicate-complement Structure in Yongchun Dialect of Fujian). Zhongguo Yuwen 249:455-460.
Liu, Danqing. 2001. Yufahua Zhong De Gengxin, Qianghua Yu Diejia (Renewal, Reinforcement and superposition in Grammaticalization). Yuyan Yanjiu 2:71-81.
Liu, Fang. 2009. “Dao” De Yufahua Ji Xiangguan Wenti (Grammaticalization of“Dao” and Related Issue). Journal of Ningxia University(Humanities & Social Sciences Edition) 31(2):32-36.
Svorou, Soteria. 1993. The Grammar of Space. Typological Studies in Language 25. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Talmy, Leonard. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. 3, ed. by Timothy Shopen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 57-149.
Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics, vol 1: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Tao, Zhenwei. 2006. Grammaticalization of “Dao” (Arrive) Journal of Hebei Polytechnic University(Social Science Edition) 6(2): 155-157.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: an example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65: 31 -55.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1995a. The role of the development of discourse markers in a history of Grammaticalization. Paper presented at ICHL XII, Manchester.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1995b. Subjectification in grammaticalization. In Dieter Stein and Susan Wright, eds. , Subjectivity and Subjectivisation in Language. 31-54.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wu, Shouli. 2001a. Ming Jiajing Kan Li Jing Ji Xiwen Jiaoli (Annotated Texts of the Romance of Li Jing Ji of Ming Jiajing Edition (JJ)). Taipei: Congyi Workshop..
Wu, Shouli. 2001b. Ming Wanli Kan Li Zhi Ji Xiwen Jiaoli (Annotated Texts of the Romance of Li Zhi Ji of Ming Wanli Edition (WL)). Taipei: Congyi Workshop..
Wu, Shouli. 2001c. Qing Shunzhi Kan Li Zhi Ji Xiwen Jiaoli (Annotated Texts of the Romance of Li Zhi Ji of Qing Shunzhi Edition (SZ)). Taipei: Congyi Workshop.
Yang, Xiufang. 1991. Taiwan Minnanyu Yufagao (Grammar of Taiwan Southern Min in Manuscript). Taipei: Da-an Publisher.
Zeng, Haiqing. 2009. On the grammaticalization of“Dao” —A Discussion with Mr. Liu Ziyu of Peking University. Journal of Anhui University(Philosophy and Social Sciences) 33(6): 79-84.
Dictionaries:
Carstairs, Douglas. 1873. Chinese-English Dictionary of the Vernacular or Spoken Language of Amoy, London Trübner & Co.
Zhongguo shehui kexueyuan yuyan yanjiusuo cidian bianji. 1998. (ed.) Xiandai Hanyu Cidian (ModernChinese Dictionary). Revised edition. Beijing: Shangwu Yishuguan.