簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 游博治
Yu, Po-Chih
論文名稱: 腦造影在死刑量刑判斷上運用之檢討
A Review of Using Neuroimaging in the Sentencing Phase of Death Penalty Cases in Taiwan
指導教授: 范建得
Fan, Chien-Te
謝煜偉
Yu-Wei Hsieh
口試委員: 李茂生
Mau-Sheng Lee
吳建昌
Chien-Chang Wu
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 科技管理學院 - 科技法律研究所
Institute of Law for Science and Technology
論文出版年: 2014
畢業學年度: 102
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 180
中文關鍵詞: 神經科學腦造影自由意志刑事責任死刑量刑精神障礙教化可能性
外文關鍵詞: Neuroscience, Neuroimaging, Free Will, Criminal Responsibility, Death Penalty, Sentencing, Mental Disorder, Possibility of Rehabilitation
相關次數: 點閱:1下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 腦造影技術的進步讓我們得以一窺人類行為之腦部活動,並造就神經科學的快速發展,作為人類行為規範之法律也因此受到了來自神經科學的挑戰。然而,觀察到人類行為「是」如何經由腦部活動所做成,與「應」如何於法律上評價其行為,兩者究屬不同層次之問題。因此,「該」如何正確地將兩者搭配謀合,並將其運用於我國死刑量刑之判斷上,乃本文所欲檢討之議題。

    本文將先就腦造影技術之原理及其侷限性進行介紹,並以使用前揭技術對反社會人格違常與精神病態個體之研究為主,整理前額葉皮質與杏仁核兩區域之結構或功能異常與其行為之發現。接著從美國學術界的觀點出發,說明神經科學發現對自由意志、刑事責任與刑罰理論之挑戰與批判,再對美國司法實務上已將腦造影運用於死刑量刑判斷之案件進行觀察,並輔以學術上之檢討。最後在分析我國最高法院之死刑案件判決後,本文認為神經科學與腦造影在我國死刑案件的判斷上有個人責任、社會責任與教化可能性共三個切入點。而唯有對各切入點在死刑量刑判斷之層次有所釐清,未來在引入神經科學與腦造影作為減輕量刑之論述時,始能避免被推論至錯誤之方向。


    The development of neuroimaging techniques has enabled us to watch the brain activity of human behavior, and made remarkable progress in neuroscience. The law, as the norm of human behavior, has therefore been challenged by neuroscience. However, the observation of how human behavior ‘is’ produced by brain activity and how ‘ought’ we evaluate this behavior under the law, these are two questions at different levels. Therefore, this thesis aims at reviewing how ‘should’ we cooperate the two things properly and use this in the sentencing phase of death penalty cases in Taiwan.

    This thesis introduces the basis of neuroimaging techniques and its limitations at first. Then it focus on the neuroimaging studies of Antisocial Personality Disorder and Psychopath individuals, and highlights the findings of structural or functional abnormalities of prefrontal cortex and amygdala and their behaviors. Next, it illustrates the challenges and critics of the neuroscientific findings to free will, criminal responsibility and theories of punishment from United States’ academic perspective, and observes the cases which introduced neuroimages in the capital sentencing phase in U.S. jurisdictions with academic reviews. After analyzing the death penalty cases of the Supreme Court in Taiwan, this thesis concludes that neuroscience and neuroimages can be use in the sentencing phase of death penalty cases on three points: individual responsibility, society’s responsibility, and the possibility of rehabilitation. Only the level of each point being clarify before introducing the neuroscience and neuroimages to mitigate the sentence, can it avoid being infer to the wrong direction.

    第一章 序論 1 第一節 研究動機與問題意識 1 第一項 研究動機-神經科學與法律在美國之發展 1 第二項 問題意識 5 第一款 該如何賦予腦造影法律上之意義 5 第二款 腦造影能否積極地阻卻刑事責任 6 第三款 腦造影能否消極地作為減刑事由 8 第四款 腦造影能否與如何運用於我國死刑量刑程序 9 第二節 研究方法 10 第三節 論文架構 10 第二章 腦造影技術與人類行為之探究 14 第一節 腦造影技術 14 第一項 結構性造影技術 15 一、電腦斷層掃描 15 二、磁振造影 15 三、擴散張量造影 16 第二項 功能性造影技術 17 一、腦電波儀與腦磁波儀 17 二、正子放射斷層掃描與單光子放射電腦斷層掃描 19 三、功能性磁振造影 20 第二節 腦造影技術之侷限性 22 一、結構性造影與功能性造影並不相同 22 二、功能性造影尚無法準確地讀取心智 23 三、群體平均與個體之腦造影並不相同 23 四、功能性磁振造影的顏色並無本質上之意涵 24 五、功能性造影並不會不證自明 24 六、正常或異常之分類為複雜之概念 25 七、基礎率非常重要但經常無從得知 25 八、關聯性並非因果關係 26 九、大腦會改變 26 第三節 使用腦造影技術對人類行為之研究 27 第一項 腦部概說 27 第二項 前額葉皮質 30 第三項 杏仁核 35 第四節 小結 38 第三章 神經科學對刑事責任之挑戰及批判-以STEPHEN J. MORSE之理論為中心 40 第一節 神經科學對刑事責任之挑戰-JOSHUA GREENE & JONATHAN COHEN之論述 40 第一項 自由意志與應報理論之關聯性 41 第二項 刑事責任與常人之直覺 42 第三項 神經科學與透明的瓶頸 44 第四項 俗民心理學的揚棄 45 第五項 自由意志、責任能力與預防理論 48 第六項 結論 51 第二節 刑法學界對前述挑戰之批判-STEPHEN J. MORSE之理論為中心 51 第一項 自由意志非法律上之問題 52 第一款 法律上人的概念與俗民心理學 52 第二款 自由意志並非責任能力及其抗辯之標準 54 第三款 自由意志並非刑事責任之基礎,而其爭議得以相容論作為其回應 56 一、決定論 56 二、相容論 57 第四款 與刑事責任無關之事由 59 一、因果關係本身並非抗辯之事由 59 二、因果關係不等於強迫 61 三、可預測性本身並非抗辯或減刑之事由 61 四、二元論 62 五、精神狀態的無用論 62 第二項 非行動理論無法挑戰人類之能動性 63 第一款 非行動理論之概念爭議 63 第二款 非行動理論之證據 64 第三款 拒絕非行動理論之理由 67 第四款 非行動理論之影響 68 第三項 全然採擇預防理論之再思考 70 第三節 刑事責任的反思 71 第四章 腦造影在美國刑事審判程序上之運用-以死刑量刑為例 78 第一節 腦造影在刑事法上之解讀 79 第一項 錯誤的解讀方法-大腦過度解讀症狀 79 第一款 大腦與複雜的、有意圖的行為間之關聯 79 第二款 內部與外部之批評 80 第三款 誤認責任之標準 81 第四款 規範與實證 81 第五款 對神經科學現況過度自信 82 第二項 正確的解讀方法-認知法律療法 85 第二節 美國死刑量刑程序與基準 87 第一項 死刑量刑程序 90 第二項 死刑量刑基準 91 第三節 腦造影在死刑量刑程序之運用 94 第一項 Brian Dugan案 95 第二項 Grady Nelson案 97 第三項 John Charles Mccluskey案 99 第四節 腦造影在死刑量刑程序運用之分析 101 第一項 腦造影作為減輕量刑之因素 102 第二項 腦造影作為加重量刑之因素 104 第三項 辯護人未取得腦造影而作為重審之事由 107 第四項 腦造影作為無受刑能力之證明 109 第五節 神經科學對青少年可責性之影響 113 第一項 聯邦最高法院判決 114 第二項 聯邦最高法院判決評析 120 第三項 神經科學在少年司法制度得以扮演之角色 123 第六節 將腦造影運用於死刑量刑之論述與訴訟策略 124 第一項 聯邦最高法院論述之類推適用 124 第二項 訴訟策略 127 第五章 論腦造影在我國死刑量刑判斷上運用之可能 131 第一節 我國一般量刑程序與基準 132 第二節 我國死刑量刑程序與基準 134 第一項 死刑量刑程序之正當法律程序 134 第二項 死刑量刑基準 137 第一款 精神或智能障礙 137 第二款 教化可能之有無 141 第三節 腦造影作為我國死刑量刑判斷之可能 144 第一項 行為人因素審酌-反社會行為與家庭和社會環境 144 第二項 教化可能性-人格定型、再犯率與矯治 147 第四節 小結 153 第六章 結論 156 參考文獻 166

    中文部分

    專書

    David Eagleman著,蔡承志譯(2013),躲在我腦中的陌生人:誰在幫我們選擇、決策?誰操縱我們愛戀、生氣,甚至抓狂?,臺北: 漫遊者文化。
    Michael S. Gazzaniga、Richard B. Ivry、George R. Mangun著,周曉林、高定國等譯(2011),認知神經科學:關于心智的生物學,北京:中國輕工業。
    Michael S. Gazzaniga著,吳建昌等譯(2011),倫理的腦,臺北:原水文化。
    Michael S. Gazzaniga著,鍾沛君譯(2013),我們真的有自由意志嗎?:意識、抉擇與背後的大腦科學,臺北:貓頭鷹。
    Ronald J. Comer著,林美吟譯(2012),變態心理學,臺北:心理。
    林山田(2008),刑法通論(下),臺北:林山田發行:元照總經銷,增訂十版。
    張文貞、David T. Johnson、Saul Lehrfreund 與 Parvais Jabbar(2014),台灣死刑報告:簽署公民與政治權利公約後的國家義務。
    梅錦榮(2011),神經心理學,臺北:科技圖書,第二版。
    黃榮堅(2012),基礎刑法學(下),臺北:元照出版社,四版。
    蘇俊雄(1998),刑法總論(II),臺北:自版。
    蘇俊雄(2000),刑法總論(III),臺北:自版。

    專書論文

    李茂生(1998),近代刑法中個人責任主義的反思,收於:權力、主體與刑事法-法邊緣的論述,頁64-91,臺北:翰蘆圖書。
    李茂生(2000),刑罰制度處罰了誰?-一種左派出發的後現代思維,收於:司法與人權-民間司改研討會論文集(三),臺北:桂冠圖書。
    李茂生(2008),遺傳基因與犯罪-自然科學的發現及其社會意義,收於:法務部編印,刑事政策與犯罪研究論文集(11),頁111-137,臺北:法務部。

    期刊論文

    吳昌衛、郭柏呈、梁庚辰(2011),跨越心與腦的鴻溝-國科會人文處MRI講習課程引介,人文與社會科學簡訊,13卷1期,頁122-133。
    李茂生(2013),量刑因子的調查與辯論,法官協會雜誌,第15卷,頁100-113。
    謝煜偉(2013),簡評近來有關死刑案件之最高法院判決,全國律師月刊,第17卷第7期,頁5-21。
    謝煜偉(2014),「永山基準」台灣版?-死刑量刑基準的具體化/最高院102台上5251判決,台灣法學雜誌,第249期,頁212-217。
    謝煜偉(2014),重新檢視死刑的應報意義,中研院法學期刊,第15期,頁1-68。
    羅伃君、曾文毅(2011),腦影像技術在腦與心智醫學的應用與發展,台灣醫學,15卷4期,頁384-390。

    研討會論文

    謝煜偉(2013),論死刑案件量刑事由之評價:從最高法院言詞辯論常態化談起,2013最高法院死刑上訴案件言詞辯論研討會,財團法人法律扶助基金會主辦、台北律師公會人權委員會、民間司法改革基金會協辦,頁5-22。

    判決

    最高法院一○一年度台上字第四五○六號判決
    最高法院一○二年度台上字第一七○號判決
    最高法院一○二年度台上字第四四六號判決
    最高法院一○二年度台上字第五三一號判決
    最高法院一○二年度台上字第二三九二號判決
    最高法院一○二年度台上字第二五七三號判決
    最高法院一○二年度台上字第二五七五號判決
    最高法院一○二年度台上字第四二八九號判決
    最高法院一○二年度台上字第五一二三號判決
    最高法院一○二年度台上字第五二五一號判決

    網路文獻

    李茂生,刑法總則講義第一冊(2012年版),http://www.law.ntu.edu.tw/main.php?mod=document&func=do_get_document&doc_id=283&site_id=0(最後瀏覽日:2014年9月1日)。
    衛生福利部,有關強制性侵罪犯化學去勢是否適合推動?,http://www.mohw.gov.tw/cht/DOPS/DM1_P.aspx?f_list_no=657&fod_list_no=1168&doc_no=2458(最後瀏覽日:2014年9月1日)。
    方永泉,範疇失誤,教育大辭書,2000年12月http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1313920/(最後瀏覽日:2014年9月1日)。

    英文部分

    專書

    Association AP (1974). Task force report 8: Clinical aspects of the violent individual. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
    Libet, Benjamin. (2004). Mind Time: The Temporal Factor in Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    專書論文

    Edersheim, Judith G., Brendel, Rebecca Weintraub. and Price, Bruce H. 2012. Neuroimaging, Diminished Capacity and Mitigation. Pp. 163-194 in Neuroimaging in Forensic Psychiatry: From the Clinic to the Courtroom, edited by Joseph R. Simpson. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
    Feld, Barry C., Casey, B. J. and Hurd, Yasmin L. 2013. Adolescent Competence and Culpability: Implications of Neuroscience for Juvenile Justice Administration. Pp. 179-215 in A Primer on Criminal Law and Neuroscience, edited by Stephen J. Morse and Adina L. Roskies. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    Focquaert,Farah., Glenn, Andrea L. and Raine, Adrine. 2013. Free Will, Responsibility, and the Punishment of Criminals. Pp. 247-274 in The Future Of Punishment, edited by Thomas.A. Nadelhoffer. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    Glenn, Andrea L., Yang, Yaling. and Raine, Adrian. 2012. Neuroimaging in Psychopathy and Antisocial Personality Disorder: Functional Significance and a Neurodevelopmental Hypothesis. Pp. 81-98 in Neuroimaging in Forensic Psychiatry: From the Clinic to the Courtroom, edited by Joseph R. Simpson. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
    Grafton, Scott T. 2010. Has Neuroscience Already Appeared in the Courtroom?. Pp. 54-59 in A Judge's Guide to Neuroscience: A Concise Introduction, edited by Michael S. Gazzaniga. Santa Barbara, CA: SAGE Center for the Study of the Mind.
    Kiehl, Kent A. 2010. Can neuroscience identify psychopaths?. Pp. 47-53 in A Judge's Guide to Neuroscience: A Concise Introduction, edited by Michael S. Gazzaniga. Santa Barbara, CA: SAGE Center for the Study of the Mind.
    Morse, Stephen J. & Newsome, William T. 2013. Criminal Responsibility, Criminal Competence, and Prediction of Criminal Behavior. Pp. 150-178 in A Primer on Criminal Law and Neuroscience, edited by Stephen J. Morse and Adina L. Roskies. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    Morse, Stephen J. 2004. New Neuroscience, Old Problems. Pp. 157-198 in Neuroscience and the Law: Brain, Mind, and the Scales of Justice, edited by Brent Garland. New York: Dana Press.
    Morse, Stephen J. 2013. Compatibilist Criminal Law. Pp. 107-132 in The Future Of Punishment, edited by Thomas.A. Nadelhoffer. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    Nugent, Kristen M. 2012. Neuroimaging and the Constitution. Pp. 275-302 in Neuroimaging in Forensic Psychiatry: From the Clinic to the Courtroom, edited by Joseph R. Simpson. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
    Roskies, Adina L. & Morse, Stephen J. 2013. Neuroscience and The Law: Looking Forward. Pp. 240-256 in A Primer on Criminal Law and Neuroscience, edited by Stephen J. Morse and Adina L. Roskies. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    Roskies, Adina L. 2013. Brain Imaging Techniques. Pp. 37-74 in A Primer on Criminal Law and Neuroscience, edited by Stephen J. Morse and Adina L. Roskies. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    Roskies, Adina L. 2013. Other Neuroscientific Techniques. Pp. 75-88 in A Primer on Criminal Law and Neuroscience, edited by Stephen J. Morse and Adina L. Roskies. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    Witzel, Joachim. 2012. Implications of Neuroimaging for Dangerousness Assessment. Pp. 195-200 in Neuroimaging in Forensic Psychiatry: From the Clinic to the Courtroom, edited by Joseph R. Simpson. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

    期刊論文

    Abram S. Barth (2007), A Double-Edged Sword: The Role of Neuroimaging in Federal Capital Sentencing, 33 AM. J.L. & MED. 501-522.
    Adam Lamparello (2011), Neuroscience, Brain Damage, and the Criminal Defendant: Who Does It Help and Where in the Criminal Proceeding is It Most Relevant?, 39 RUTGERS L. REC. 161-180.
    Adolphs R, Tranel D, Hamann S, Young AW, Calder AJ, Phelps EA, Anderson A, Lee GP, Damasio AR(1999), Recognition of facial emotion in nine individuals with bilateral amygdala damage, 37(10) NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA. 1111-1117.
    Aharoni E, Mallett J, Vincent GM, Harenski CL, Calhoun VD, Sinnott-Armstrong W, Gazzaniga MS, Kiehl KA (2014), Predictive accuracy in the neuroprediction of rearrest, 9(4) SOC NEUROSCI. 322-326.
    Aharoni E, Vincent GM, Harenski CL, Calhoun VD, Sinnott-Armstrong W, Gazzaniga MS, Kiehl KA (2013). Neuroprediction of future rearrest, 110(15) PROC NATL ACAD SCI U S A. 6223-6228.
    American Psychological Association (1978), Report of the Task Force on the Role of Psychology in the Criminal Justice System, 33 AM. PSYCHOLOGIST 1099-1113.
    Andrea L. Glenn & Adrian Raine (2014), Neurocriminology: implications for the punishment, prediction and prevention of criminal behaviour, 15 NAT. REV. NEUROSCI. 54-63.
    Avshalom Caspi, Joseph McClay, Terrie E. Moffitt, Jonathan Mill, Judy Martin, Ian W. Craig, Alan Taylor & Richie Poulton (2002), Role of Genotype in the Cycle of Violence in Maltreated Children, 297 SCIENCE. 851-854.
    Barkataki I, Kumari V, Das M, Taylor P, Sharma T(2006), Volumetric structural brain abnormalities in men with schizophrenia or antisocial personality disorder, 169(2) BEHAV BRAIN RES. 239-247.
    Benjamin Libet, Curtis A. Gleason, Elwood W. Wright & Dennis K. Pearl (1983), Time of Conscious Intention to Act in Relation to Onset of Cerebral Activity (Readiness-Potential) - The Unconscious Initiation of a Freely Voluntary Act, 106 BRAIN 623–642.
    Birbaumer N, Veit R, Lotze M, Erb M, Hermann C, Grodd W, Flor H (2005), Deficient fear conditioning in psychopathy: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study, 62(7) ARCH GEN PSYCHIATRY. 799-805.
    Brian J. Scholl & Patrice D. Tremoulet (2000), Perceptual Causality and Animacy. 4 TRENDS COGN. SCI. 299-309.
    Carlsmith KM, Darley JM, Robinson PH (2002), Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment, 83(2) J PERS SOC PSYCHOL. 284-299.
    Caspi A, McClay J, Moffitt TE, Mill J, Martin J, Craig IW, Taylor A, Poulton R (2002), Role of genotype in the cycle of violence in maltreated children, 297(5582) SCIENCE. 851-854.
    Chun Siong Soon, Marcel Brass, Hans-Jochen Heinze & John-Dylan Haynes (2008), Unconscious determinants of free decisions in the human brain, 11(5) NAT NEUROSCI 543-545.
    Coccaro EF, McCloskey MS, Fitzgerald DA, Phan KL (2007), Amygdala and orbitofrontal reactivity to social threat in individuals with impulsive aggression, 62(2) BIOL PSYCHIATRY. 168-178.
    Craig MC, Catani M, Deeley Q, Latham R, Daly E, Kanaan R, Picchioni M, McGuire PK, Fahy T, Murphy DG (2009), Altered connections on the road to psychopathy, 14(10) MOL PSYCHIATRY. 946-953.
    de Oliveira-Souza R, Hare RD, Bramati IE, Garrido GJ, Azevedo Ignácio F, Tovar-Moll F, Moll J (2008), Psychopathy as a disorder of the moral brain: fronto-temporo-limbic grey matter reductions demonstrated by voxel-based morphometry, 40(3) NEUROIMAGE.1202-1213.
    Dolan MC, Deakin JF, Roberts N, Anderson IM (2002), Quantitative frontal and temporal structural MRI studies in personality-disordered offenders and control subjects, 116(3) PSYCHIATRY RES. 133-149.
    Dosenbach NU, Nardos B, Cohen AL, Fair DA, Power JD, Church JA, Nelson SM, Wig GS, Vogel AC, Lessov-Schlaggar CN, Barnes KA, Dubis JW, Feczko E, Coalson RS, Pruett JR Jr, Barch DM, Petersen SE, Schlaggar BL (2010), Prediction of Individual Brain Maturity Using fMRI, 329 SCIENCE.1358-1361.
    Fritz Heider & Marianne Simmel (1944), An Experimental Study of Apparent Behavior, 57THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY 243-259.
    Glenn AL, Raine A, Schug RA (2009), The neural correlates of moral decision-making in psychopathy, 14(1) MOL PSYCHIATRY. 5-6.
    Gregory S. Berns, Sara Moore & C. Monica Capra (2009), Adolescent Engagement in Dangerous Behaviors Is Associated with Increased White Matter Maturity of Frontal Cortex, 4 PLOS ONE e6773.
    Hare B, Tomasello M. (2005), Human-like social skills in dogs?, 9(9) TRENDS COGN SCI. 439-344.
    Harenski CL, Harenski KA, Shane MS, Kiehl KA(2010), Aberrant neural processing of moral violations in criminal psychopaths, 119(4) J ABNORM PSYCHOL. 863-874.
    Henry T. Greely (2008), Neuroscience and Criminal Justice: Not Responsibility but Treatment, 56 U. KAN. L. REV. 1103-1138.
    Henry T. Greely (2012), Direct brain interventions to "treat" disfavored human behaviors: ethical and social issues, 91 CLIN PHARMACOL THER. 163-165.
    Hirono N, Mega MS, Dinov ID, Mishkin F, Cummings JL (2000), Left frontotemporal hypoperfusion is associated with aggression in patients with dementia, ;57(6) ARCH NEUROL. 861-866.
    Jeffrey Goldstein (1999), Emergence as a Construct: History and Issues, 1 EMERGENCE 49-72.
    Jessie A. Seiden (2004), The Criminal Brain: Frontal Lobe Dysfunction Evidence in Capital Proceedings, 16 CAP. DEF. J 395-420.
    John H. Blume & Emily C. Paavola (2011), Life, Death, and Neuroimaging: The Advantages and Disadvantages of the Defense's Use of Neuroimages in Capital Cases - Lessons from the Front, 62 MERCER L. REV. 909-931.
    John Matthew Fabian (2010), Neuropsychological and neurological correlates in violent and homicidal offenders: A legal and neuroscience perspective, 15 AGGRESS VIOLENT BEH. 209-223.
    Joshua Greene & Jonathan Cohen (2004), For the Law, Neuroscience Changes Nothing and Everything, 359 PHIL. TRANS. R. SOC. LOND. B 1775-1785.
    Kiehl KA, Smith AM, Hare RD, Mendrek A, Forster BB, Brink J, Liddle PF (2001), Limbic abnormalities in affective processing by criminal psychopaths as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging, 50(9) BIOL PSYCHIATRY. 677-684.
    Kiehl KA, Smith AM, Mendrek A, Forster BB, Hare RD, Liddle PF (2004), Temporal lobe abnormalities in semantic processing by criminal psychopaths as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging, 130(3) PSYCHIATRY RES. 297-312.
    Kimberly D. Phillips (2013), Empathy for Psychopaths: Using fMRI Brain Scans to Plea for Leniency in Death Penalty Cases, 37 LAW & PSYCHOL. REV. 1-47.
    Kuruoğlu AC, Arikan Z, Vural G, Karataş M, Araç M, Işik E (2006), Single photon emission computerised tomography in chronic alcoholism. Antisocial personality disorder may be associated with decreased frontal perfusion, 169(3) BR J PSYCHIATRY. 348-354.
    Laurence Steinberg & Elizabeth S. Scott (2003), Less Guilty by Reason of Adolescence: Developmental Immaturity, Diminished Responsibility, and the Juvenile Death Penalty, 58 AM. PSYCHOLOGIST 1009-1018.
    Laurence Steinberg (2013), The Influence of Neuroscience on US Supreme Court Decisions About Adolescents’ Criminal Culpability, 14 NAT REV NEUROSCI. 513-518.
    Lisa G. Aspinwall et al. (2012), The Double-Edged Sword: Does Biomechanism Increase or Decrease Judges’ Sentencing of Psychopaths?, 337 SCIENCE 846-849.
    Lyn M. Gaudet , Julia R. Lushing & Kent A. Kiehl (2014), Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Court, 5(2) AJOB NEUROSCI. 43-45.
    Meyer-Lindenberg A, Buckholtz JW, Kolachana B, R Hariri A, Pezawas L, Blasi G, Wabnitz A, Honea R, Verchinski B, Callicott JH, Egan M, Mattay V, Weinberger DR (2006), Neural mechanisms of genetic risk for impulsivity and violence in humans, 103(16) PROC NATL ACAD SCI U S A. 6269-6274.
    Michael J. Saks, N. J. Schweitzer, Eyal Aharoni, and Kent A. Kiehl (2014), The Impact of Neuroimages in the Sentencing Phase of Capital Trials, 11 J. EMPIRICAL LEGAL STUD. 105-131.
    Michael L. Perlin (2010), "Good and bad, I defined these terms, quite clear no doubt somehow": Neuroimaging and competency to be executed after Panetti, 28 BEHAV. SCI. LAW 671-689.
    Mobbs D, Lau HC, Jones OD, Frith CD (2007), Law, Responsibility, and the Brain, 5(4) PLOS BIOL 693-700.
    Müller JL, Sommer M, Wagner V, Lange K, Taschler H, Röder CH, Schuierer G, Klein HE, Hajak G (2003), Abnormalities in emotion processing within cortical and subcortical regions in criminal psychopaths: evidence from a functional magnetic resonance imaging study using pictures with emotional content, 54(2) BIOL PSYCHIATRY. 152-162.
    N. J. Schweitzer & Michael J. Saks (2011), Neuroimage Evidence and the Insanity Defense, 29 BEHAV SCI LAW. 592-607.
    N. J. Schweitzer, Michael J. Saks, Emily R. Murphy, Adina L. Roskies, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, & Lyn M. Gaudet (2011), Neuroimages as Evidence in a Mens Rea Defense: No Impact, 17 PSYCH. PUB. POL. AND L. 357-393.
    New AS, Hazlett EA, Buchsbaum MS, Goodman M, Reynolds D, Mitropoulou V, Sprung L, Shaw RB Jr, Koenigsberg H, Platholi J, Silverman J, Siever LJ (2002), Blunted prefrontal cortical 18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography response to meta-chlorophenylpiperazine in impulsive aggression, 59(7) ARCH GEN PSYCHIATRY. 621-629.
    O. Snead Carter (2007), Neuroimaging and the “Complexity” of Capital Punishment, 82 N.Y.U. L. REV. 1265-1339.
    Owen D. Jones, Anthony D. Wagner, David L. Faigman & Marcus E. Raichle (2013), Neuroscientists in court, NAT. REV. NEUROSCI.14,730–736.
    Owen D. Jones, Joshua W. Buckholtz, Jeffrey D. Schall & Rene Marois (2009), Brain Imaging for Legal Thinkers: A Guide for the Perplexed, 2009 STAN. TECH. L. REV. 5.
    Owen D. Jones, Rene’ Marois, Martha J. Farah & Henry T. Greely (2013), Law and Neuroscience, 33(45) J NEUROSCI. 17624-17630.
    Raine A, Buchsbaum M, LaCasse L (1997), Brain abnormalities in murderers indicated by positron emission tomography, 42(6) BIOL PSYCHIATRY. 495-508.
    Raine A, Lencz T, Bihrle S, LaCasse L, Colletti P (2000), Reduced prefrontal gray matter volume and reduced autonomic activity in antisocial personality disorder, 57(2) ARCH GEN PSYCHIATRY. 119-127.
    Raine A, Meloy JR, Bihrle S, Stoddard J, LaCasse L, Buchsbaum MS. (1998), Reduced prefrontal and increased subcortical brain functioning assessed using positron emission tomography in predatory and affective murderers, 16(3) BEHAV SCI LAW. 319-332.
    Richard J. Bonnie & Elizabeth S. Scott (2013), The Teenage Brain: Adolescent Brain Research and the Law, 22(2) CURR DIR PSYCHOL SCI. 158-161.
    Rilling JK, Glenn AL, Jairam MR, Pagnoni G, Goldsmith DR, Elfenbein HA, Lilienfeld SO(2007), Neural correlates of social cooperation and non-cooperation as a function of psychopathy, 61(11) BIOL PSYCHIATRY. 1260-1271.
    Robert M. Sapolsky (2004), The Frontal Cortex and the Criminal Justice System, 359 PHIL. TRANS. R. SOC. LOND. B 1787-1796.
    Rubia K, Overmeyer S, Taylor E, Brammer M, Williams SC, Simmons A, Andrew C, Bullmore ET (2000), Functional frontalisation with age: mapping neurodevelopmental trajectories with fMRI, 24(1) NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV REV. 13-19.
    Schneider F, Habel U, Kessler C, Posse S, Grodd W, Müller-Gärtner HW (2000), Functional imaging of conditioned aversive emotional responses in antisocial personality disorder, 42(4) NEUROPSYCHOBIOLOGY. 192-201.
    Seidenwurm D, Pounds TR, Globus A, Valk PE (1997), Abnormal temporal lobe metabolism in violent subjects: correlation of imaging and neuropsychiatric findings, 18(4) AJNR AM J NEURORADIOL. 625-631.
    Soderstrom H, Hultin L, Tullberg M, Wikkelso C, Ekholm S, Forsman A (2002), Reduced frontotemporal perfusion in psychopathic personality, 114(2) PSYCHIATRY RES. 81-94.
    Soderstrom H, Tullberg M, Wikkelsö C, Ekholm S, Forsman A (2000), Reduced regional cerebral blood flow in non-psychotic violent offenders, 98(1) PSYCHIATRY RES. 29-41.
    Stephen J. Morse (2006), Brain Overclaim Syndrome and Criminal Responsibility: A Diagnostic Note, 3 OHIO ST. J. CRIM. L. 397-412.
    Stephen J. Morse (2008), Determinism and the Death of Folk Psychology: Two Challenges to Responsibility from Neuroscience, 9 MINN. J.L. SCI. & TECH. 1-36.
    Stephen J. Morse (2013), Brain Overclaim Redux, 31 LAW & INEQ. 509-534.
    Thomas Douglas (2014), Criminal Rehabilitation through Medical Intervention Moral Liability and the Right to Bodily Integrity, 18 J ETHICS 101-122.
    Thomas Nadelhoffer, Stephanos Bibas, Scott Grafton, Kent A. Kiehl, Andrew Mansfield, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & Michael Gazzaniga (2010), Neuroprediction, Violence, and the Law: Setting the Stage, 5 NEUROETHICS 67-99.
    Thomas Søbirk Petersen (2014). (Neuro)predictions, Dangerousness, and Retributivism, 18 J ETHICS 137-151.
    Tiihonen J, Rossi R, Laakso MP, Hodgins S, Testa C, Perez J, Repo-Tiihonen E, Vaurio O, Soininen H, Aronen HJ, Könönen M, Thompson PM, Frisoni GB (2008), Brain anatomy of persistent violent offenders: more rather than less, 163(3) PSYCHIATRY RES. 201-212.
    Veit R, Flor H, Erb M, Hermann C, Lotze M, Grodd W, Birbaumer N (2002), Brain circuits involved in emotional learning in antisocial behavior and social phobia in humans, 328(3) NEUROSCI LETT. 233-236.
    Virginia Hughes (2010), Science in court: Head case, 464 NATURE 340-342.
    Volkow ND, Tancredi LR, Grant C, Gillespie H, Valentine A, Mullani N, Wang GJ, Hollister L. (1995), Brain glucose metabolism in violent psychiatric patients: a preliminary study, 61(4) PSYCHIATRY RES. 243-253.
    Völlm B, Richardson P, Stirling J, Elliott R, Dolan M, Chaudhry I, Del Ben C, McKie S, Anderson I, Deakin B (2004), Neurobiological substrates of antisocial and borderline personality disorder: preliminary results of a functional fMRI study, 14(1) CRIM BEHAV MENT HEALTH. 39-54.
    William G. Jungbauer & Christopher W. Bowman (2014), Daubert, Frye and DTI: Hijacking the Right to Trial by Jury, 5(2) AJOB NEUROSCI. 16-23.
    Yaling Yang & Adrian Raine (2009), Prefrontal Structural and Functional Brain Imaging findings in Antisocial, Violent, and Psychopathic Individuals: A Meta-Analysis, 174(2) PSYCHIATRY RES. 81–88.
    Yang Y, Raine A, Colletti P, Toga AW, Narr KL(2009), Abnormal temporal and prefrontal cortical gray matter thinning in psychopaths, 14(6) MOL PSYCHIATRY. 561-562.
    Yang Y, Raine A, Lencz T, Bihrle S, LaCasse L, Colletti P (2005), Volume Reduction in Prefrontal Gray Matter in Unsuccessful Criminal Psychopaths, 57(10) BIOL PSYCHIATRY. 1103-1108.
    Yang Y, Raine A, Narr KL, Colletti P, Toga AW (2009), Localization of deformations within the amygdala in individuals with psychopathy, 66(9) ARCH GEN PSYCHIATRY. 986-994.
    判決
    Atkins v. Virginia, 122 S.Ct. 2242 (2002).
    Barefoot v. Estelle, 103 S.Ct. 3383 (1983).
    Barnard v. Collins, 13 F.3d 871(5th Cir. 1994).
    California v. Ramos, 103 S.Ct. 3446 (1983).
    Clark v. Arizona, 126 S.Ct. 2709 (2006).
    Enmund v. Florida, 102 S.Ct. 3368 (1982).
    Ford v. Wainwright, 106 S.Ct. 2595 (1986).
    Godfrey v. Georgia, 100 S. Ct. 1759 (1980).
    Graham v. Florida, 130 S.Ct. 2011 (2010).
    Grant v. Dretke, 151 Fed. Appx. 344 (5th Cir. 2005).
    Gregg v. Georgia, 183, 96 S.Ct. 2909 (1976).
    Hall v. Florida, 134 S. Ct. 1986 (2014).
    Jurek v. Texas, 96 S.Ct. 2950 (1976).
    Lockett v. Ohio, 98 S.Ct. 2954 (1978).
    Miller v. Alabama, 132 S.Ct. 2455 (2012)
    Panetti v. Quarterman, 127 S.Ct. 2842 (2007).
    Penry v. Lynaugh, 109 S.Ct. 2934 (1989).
    People v. Murtishaw, 48 Cal. 3d 1001 (1989)
    People v. Weinstein, 591 N.Y.S.2d 715 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1992).
    Roper v. Simmons, 125 S.Ct. 1183 (2005).
    State of Florida v. Grady Nelson, Case No. F05-00846, 11th Judicial Circuit Court, Miami-Dade County, Florida (2010).
    State v. Mercer, 672 S.E.2d 556 (S.C. 2009) (No.26582).
    State v. South, 427 S.E.2d 666 (S.C. 1993).
    Strickland v. Washington, 104 S.Ct. 2052 (1984).
    Thompson v. Oklahoma, 108 S.Ct. 2687 (1988).
    Tuilaepa v. California, 114 S.Ct. 2630 (1994).
    United States of America v. Lorne Allan Semrau, 693 F.3d 510 (6 Cir. 2012).
    United States of America v. Lorne Allan Semrau, U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee, No. 07–10074 (2010).
    United States v. Llera Plaza, 179 F.Supp.2d 464 (E.D Pa. 2001).
    Woodson v. North Carolina, 96 S.Ct. 2978 (1976).

    網路文獻

    Anand Giridharadas, India’s Novel Use of Brain Scans in Courts Is Debated, N.Y.TIMES, Sep. 14, 2008, http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/15/world/asia/15brainscan.html
    Deborah Yurgelun-Todd, lnside the Teenage Brain, Frontline (Interviews), http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/teenbrain/interviews/todd.html (2002)
    Greg Miller, Brain Exam May Have Swayed Jury in Sentencing Convicted Murderer, Science Insider (Dec. 14, 2010), http://news.sciencemag.org/technology/2010/12/brain-exam-may-have-swayed-jury-sentencing-convicted-murderer
    Greg Miller, Did Brain Scans Just Save a Convicted Murderer From the Death Penalty?, Wired (Dec.12, 2013), http://www.wired.com/2013/12/murder-law-brain/
    Greg Miller, fMRI Evidence Used in Murder Sentencing, Science Insider (Nov. 23, 2009), http://news.sciencemag.org/2009/11/fmri-evidence-used-murder-sentencing
    Mario D. Garrett, Brain Plasticity in Older Adults, Psychology Today (Apr. 27, 2013), http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/iage/201304/brain-plasticity-in-older-adults
    Michael Haederle, A Mind of Crime, Pacific Standard (Feb. 23, 2010), http://www.psmag.com/legal-affairs/a-mind-of-crime-8440/
    Nita A. Farahany, Blaming the Brain: Behavioral Sciences in the Courtroom, the barrister (Nov. 11, 2013), http://thebarrister.co/?p=217
    Regina Nuzzo, Brain scans predict which criminals are more likely to reoffend, Nature (Mar. 25, 2013), http://www.nature.com/news/brain-scans-predict-which-criminals-are-more-likely-to-reoffend-1.12672
    U.S. Department of Justice, John Charles Mccluskey Sentenced to Life in Prison for Carjacking and Murdering Oklahoma Couple (June 3, 2014), http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2014/June/14-crm-593.html

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE