簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 黃可欣
Ko-hsin Huang
論文名稱: 戀愛中大學生之性別角色特質、人格特質與愛情態度之相關研究
A Study of the relationship among gender role attitude, personality and love attitude
指導教授: 王文秀
Wen-hsiu Wang
口試委員:
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 竹師教育學院 - 教育心理與諮商學系
Educational Psychology and Counseling
論文出版年: 2006
畢業學年度: 95
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 132
中文關鍵詞: 性別角色特質人格特質愛情態度人格五因素模式
外文關鍵詞: gender-role, personality, love attitudes, big-five
相關次數: 點閱:2下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討戀愛中大學生性別角色特質、人格特質與愛情態度之相關。以新竹以北公私立大學校院共617名大學生為研究參與者,採用問卷調查法,使用的工具包括「性別角色特質量表」、「人格特質量表」及「愛情態度簡表」。分別以單因子、二因子變異數分析及典型相關統計方法處理。本研究主要發現如下:
    不同背景變項之戀愛中大學生在愛情態度簡表上的差異情形:大三與大四的「熱情愛」及「現實愛」高於大一學生;戀愛1次者之「熱情愛」高於過去無戀愛經驗者;「有固定交往對象」之3組,其「熱情愛」高於「有對象,但尚未成為男女朋友」組。
    不同性別與性別角色特質之戀愛中大學生在愛情態度簡表上的差異情形:女生的「現實愛」高於男生、男生的「奉獻愛」高於女生;以性別角色態度而言,未分化組之「熱情愛」低於兩性化組;未分化組與女性化組之「遊戲愛」低於男性化組;未分化組、女性化組及男性化組之「奉獻愛」與「現實愛」均低於兩性化組;性別與性別角色特質之交互作用在「占有愛」及「友誼愛」上有顯著差異。
    不同性別與性別角色特質之戀愛中大學生在人格特質量表上的差異情形:不同性別在「外向性」及「神經質」的人格特質有差異;以性別角色特質而言,在「嚴謹性」方面:未分化組<女性化組<男性化組、兩性化組;在「外向性」方面:女性化組<未分化組<男性化組、兩性化組;在「親和性」方面:男性化組、未分化組<兩性化組<女性化組;性別與性別角色特質在人格特質上無交互作用。
    戀愛中大學生其人格特質與愛情態度之相關情形:戀愛中大學生人格特質「嚴謹性」越低、「神經質」越高,愈傾向「占有愛」;「嚴謹性」及「親和性」越高,愈傾向「熱情愛」、「現實愛」、「友誼愛」及「奉獻愛」;「嚴謹性」、「外向性」越高,愈傾向「現實愛」。
    本研究根據研究結果加以討論,並提供建議做為輔導工作及相關研究參考。


    The purpose of the study was to investigate the relationships among gender role attitude, personality and love attitude of 617 college students. They completed a questionnaire that included the Gender-role Attitude Scale, Personality Scale, and a short version of the Love Attitude Scale. One-way, two-way ANOVA and canonical correlation analysis were used to analyze the data. The main findings were as follows:
    Senior students distinctively possess higher “eros” and “pragma” than freshmen. Students who had ever fall in love possess higher “eros” than the others. Those who have ongoing relationships tend to possess higher ”eros” than the counterparts. Female students possess higher “pragma” than males, and male possess higher “agape” than females. There are clear distinctions in the possessions of “eros”, “ludus”, “pragma”, and “agape” between different gender roles attitudes. There is interaction between genders and gender roles.
    There are clear differences in the possession of “extraversion” and “neuroticism” between different sexes. There are clear distinctions in the possessions of “extraversion”, ”conscientiousness”, and “agreeableness” between different gender roles attitudes. There is no interaction between genders and gender roles.
    The lower “conscientiousness” and the higher “neuroticism” a student has, the higher “mania” he has. The higher “conscientiousness” and “agreeableness” a student has, the higher “eros”, ”pragma”, ”storge”, and ”agape” he has. The higher “conscientiousness” and “extraversion” a student has, the higher “pragma” he was.
    The findings and implication are discussed.

    謝 辭................................i 摘 要...............................ii Abstract.............................iii 目 錄...............................iv 圖目錄.................................vi 表目錄................................vii 第一章 緒論.............................1 第一節 研究動機..........................1 第二節 研究目的..........................8 第三節 研究問題與假設.....................8 第四節 名詞釋義..........................9 第五節 研究架構.........................11 第二章 文獻探討.........................13 第一節 愛情態度之理論與相關研究...........13 第二節 性別角色特質之理論與相關研究........31 第三節 人格特質之理論與相關研究...........40 第四節 性別角色特質、人格特質與愛情態度之相關探討...49 第三章 研究方法.........................53 第一節 研究對象.........................53 第二節 研究工具.........................54 第三節 實施程序.........................63 第四節 資料分析方法......................64 第四章 研究結果與討論....................66 第一節 不同背景變項之戀愛中大學生在愛情態度上之差異分析...66 第二節 不同性別與不同性別角色特質之戀愛中大學生在愛情態度之差異分析...73 第三節 不同性別與不同性別角色特質之戀愛中大學生在人格特質之差異分析...80 第四節 戀愛中大學生性別角色特質、人格特質與愛情態度相關分析...84 第五章 結論與建議........................93 第一節 結論.............................93 第二節 建議.............................94 參考文獻.................................99 附錄一 預試問卷.........................116 附錄二 正式研究問卷......................122 附錄三 Mini-Marker之題項與五大人格特質之關係...126 附錄四 預試分析.........................127

    中文部份
    王安娜譯(1994)。親密關係。台北:遠流。
    王慶福(1995)。大學生愛情關係徑路模式之分析研究。未出版之博士論文,國立彰化師範大學輔導研究所,彰化市。
    王慶福、王郁茗(2000)。當男孩愛上女孩:人際依附風格類型搭配、愛情關係與關係適應之研究。中華輔導學報,8,177-201。
    王慶福、王郁茗(2003)。性別、性別角色特質取向與愛情觀及愛情關係的分析研究。中山醫學雜誌,14(1),71-82。
    王慶福、林幸台、張德榮(1996)。愛情關係發展與適應之評量工具編制。中國測驗學會測驗年刊,43,227-240。
    王慶福、林幸台、張德榮(1995)。愛情關係及其影響因素的分析研究。中華輔導學報,3,92-126。
    江錦樺(2001)。人格特質與組織文化之適配性對工作績效之影響-以高科技F公司為例。未出版之碩士論文,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所,中壢市。
    李怡玲(2002)。台北市高中學生愛情態度及相關因素之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立台灣師範大學家政教育研究所,台北市。
    李美枝(1981)。性別角色特質問卷的編製及男女大學生四種性別角色特質類型在成就動機、婚姻事業及性態度上的比較。中華心理學刊,23(1),24-27。
    李美枝(1995)。女性心理學。台北:大洋。
    李美枝、鍾秋玉(1996)。性別與性別角色特質析論。本土心理學研究,12(6),260-299。
    李俊杰(2004)。組織生涯管理、員工個人生涯規劃、人格特質與工作滿意度之關聯研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立成功大學工業管理科學研究所,台南市。
    呂姿雯(2004)。女性雜誌讀者之閱讀行為、愛情態度及其解讀型態之研究—以女性雜誌中兩性互動論述為例。未出版之碩士論文,私立中國文化大學新聞研究所,台北市。
    沈利君(2002)。台北縣市國中學生愛情態度研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立台灣師範大學家政教育研究所,台北市。
    沈聰益(2003)。人格五因素模式預測保險業務員績效的效度-NEO-PI-R量表之跨文化檢驗與人際特質架構之實證探討。未出版之博士論文,國立交通大學經營管理研究所,新竹市。
    車薇(2003)。啟明學校高中職視覺障礙學生性別角色發展研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學人類發展與家庭研究所,台北市。
    吳昭儀(2003)。大學生的共依附與愛情態度之相關研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所,台北市。
    房美玉(2001)。半導體產業人力資源管理與組織競爭力之研究:由人力資源管理與薪酬制度對工作動機及工作表現的角度來探討。台北:行政院國家科學會專題研究。
    林邦傑(1981)。性別角色特質與自我防衛、生活適應、認知能力的關係。中華心理學刊,23(2),107-129。
    林季慧(2004)。性別、職業類別對組織中自尊的影響:以性別角色特質為調節因子。未出版之碩士論文,私立義守大學管理科學研究所,高雄縣。
    林宜旻(1994)。愛情類型、嫉妒與關係滿意度之相關研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立政治大學心理學研究所,台北市。
    林宜旻、陳皎眉(1995)。愛情類型、嫉妒與關係滿意度之相關研究。教育與心理研究,18,287-311。
    林素妃(2002)。知覺父母婚姻關係、性別角色特質與親密關係滿意度之分析研究-以大學生情侶為例。未出版之碩士論文,國立彰化師範大學諮商與輔導研究所,彰化市。
    林能白、邱宏昌(1999)。服務品質之研究─服務人員人格特質之影響分析與應用。管理學報,16(2),175-200。
    邱秀祝(1999)。國中女性教師性別角色特質之構成—十位女老師的實踐經驗研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立政治大學教育研究所,台北市。
    卓紋君(1998)。當今心理學界對愛情的研究與方向。中華心理衛生學刊,11(3),87-107。
    卓紋君(1999)。兩性親密關係探源。教師之友,40(3),40-45。
    卓紋君(2000)。台灣人愛情發展的歷程初探兼論兩性輔導之重點。諮商輔導文粹,5,1-29。
    卓紋君(2004)。台灣人愛情風格之分析研究。中華輔導學報,16,71-117。
    卓紋君、林芸欣(2003)。單戀者單戀歷程的分析研究。中華輔導學報,13,45-88。
    胡夢蕾(2004),餐旅學生人格特質與實習工作滿意度關係之研究。教育研究資訊,12(1),103-132。
    洪光遠、鄭慧玲譯(1998)。人格心理學。台北:桂冠。Pervin, L. A.原著。
    侯佳惠(2002)。成人學習者性別角色特質刻板印象之轉化學習歷程研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立中正大學,嘉義縣。
    郭靜晃、吳幸玲譯(1993)。發展心理學。台北:揚智。Philip & Barbara Newman原著。
    許儀貞(2003)。台灣成年女性在性別角色特質、共依附和自尊之相關研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所,台北市。
    張文雄(1993)。從類型論觀點探討大學生的愛情觀。東海學報,34,449-462。
    張令恬(1999)。原生家庭經驗對大學女生愛情關係的影響及其改變歷程之分析研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所,台北市。
    張芝綺(2004)。兩性教育融入生活課程之研究-以卡通作為改變性別刻版印象教材。未出版之碩士論文,國立台北師範學院社會科教育學研究所,台北市。
    張翊祥(2004)。團隊成員人格特質組合對團隊效能影響之研究─以團隊互動過程為中介變項。未出版之碩士論文,中原大學企業管理研究所,台北市。
    許雅婷(2002)。人格特質與團隊組合對知識分享.創新績效的影響。未出版之碩士論文,東吳大學企業管理研究所,台北市。
    張春興(2000)。張氏心理學辭典。台北:東華。
    陳金英、馬祖琳(2002)。臺灣大學生的愛情觀、愛情關係與適應之研究。中華家政學刊,34,71-88。
    陳皎眉(1996)。兩性關係。台北:國立空中大學。
    陳萱(1999)。戀戀風塵-愛情歷程之敘說。未出版之碩士論文,私立輔仁大學應用心理研究所,台北市。
    曾育齡(2005)。大學生身體意象與戀愛關係相關之研究。未出版之碩士論文,中國文化大學生活應用科學研究所,台北市。
    黃文三(1994)。青少年性別角色發展及其相關因素研究。未出版之博士論文,國立高雄師範大學教育系,高雄市。
    黃振恭(民92)。傳統與在職碩士班學生學習型態及人格特質之比較研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文,嘉義縣。
    黃彩霖(2003)。醫院行政人員的人格特質、工作壓力、工作投入、專業承諾及工作績效之相關性研究。未出版之碩士論文,私立南華大學管理研究所,嘉義縣。
    黃淵泰(2004)。高中生之性別角色特質、家庭氣氛及其家務參與之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立嘉義大學家庭教育研究所,嘉義市。
    黃德祥(2000)。青少年發展與輔導。台北:五南。
    游恆山譯(1990)。心理學。台北:五南。Zimbardo, P. G.原著。
    楊茜如(2000)。大學生愛情觀、性別角色特質與兩性關係及相關因素之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立彰化師範大學,彰化市。
    溫儒珞(2003)。台灣地區大一女生經前憂鬱症亞型的五大人格向度。未出版之碩士論文,國立成功大學行為醫學研究所,台南市。
    劉秀娟、林明寬譯(1996)。兩性關係:性別刻板化與角色。台北:揚智。Susan A. Basow原著。
    蔣美惠(2004)。探討保全人員生涯管理、人格特質及組織氣氛對工作滿足、自我效能與工作績效之關聯性研究-以台北市保全公司為例。未出版之碩士論文,私立南華大學管理研究所,嘉義縣。
    盧晴鈺(2003)。年輕女性生涯抱負之模式建構。未出版之碩士論文,國立成功大學教育研究所,台南市。
    魏延華(2000)。高中女學生閱讀少女愛情漫畫與愛情態度之關聯。未出版之碩士論文,私立世新大學傳播所,台北市。
    蘇倩雪(2001)。屏東地區高職學生性別角色特質態度、家庭價值觀與婚姻態度之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所,屏東市。
    英文部分
    Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    Arnold, M. E. & Thompson, B. (1996). Love style perceptions in relation to personality function. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 11(3), 425-438.
    Aron, A., Aron, E. N. & Paris, M. (1995). Falling in love: Prospective studies of self-concept change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(6), 1102-1112.
    Asendorpf, J. B. & Wilpers, S. (1998). Personality effects on social relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1531-1544.
    Bailey, W. C., Hendrick, C. & Hendrick, S. S. (1987). Relation of sex and gender role to love, sexual attitudes, and self-esteem. Sex Roles, 16, 637-648.
    Bem, S. C. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42(2), 155-162.
    Bem, S. C. (1975). Sex role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny. Journal of consulting and clinical Psychology, 31, 634-643.
    Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schematheory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88(4), 354-364.
    Bem, S. L. (1981). The BSRI and gender schema theory: A reply to Spence and Helmereich. Psychological Review, 88(4), 369-371.
    Berk, L. E. (1997). Development of sex-related differences and gender roles. Child Development (4th Ed.). USA: Allyn and Bacon.
    Blass, T. (1984). Social psychology and personality: Toward a convergence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1013-1027.
    Carlson, R. (1984). What’s social about social psychology? Where’s the person in personality research? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1304-1309.
    Cho, W. & Cross, S. E. (1995). Taiwanese love styles and their association with self-esteem and relationship quality. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 121(3), 283-309.
    Coleman, M. & Ganong, L. (1985). Love and sex roles: Do macho men and feminine woman make better lovers? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 170-176.
    Cook, E. P. (1985). Psychological Androgyny. New York: Pergamon Press.
    Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1988). From catalog to classification: Murray's needs and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 258–265.
    Costa Jr., P. T. & McCrae, R. R.(1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 653-665.
    Costa Jr., P. T., Terracciano & A., McCrae, R. R (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(2), 322-331.
    Davies, M. F. (1996). EPQ correlates of love styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 20(2), 257-259.
    Davies, M. F. (2001). Social desirable responding and impression management in the endorsement of love styles. Journal of psychology, 135(5) ,562-570.
    Davis, K. E. & Latty-Mann, H. (1987). Love styles and relationship quality: A contribution tovalidation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4, 409-428.
    Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-Factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
    Dion, K. L. & Dion, K. K. (1993). Gender and ethnocultural comparisonsin styles of love. Psychology of women Quarterly, 17, 463-473.
    Dwifht, S. A., Cumming, K. M. & Glenar, J. L.(1998). Comparison of criterion-related validity coefficients for the Mini-Markers and Goldberg's Markers of the Big Five Personality Factors. Journal of Personality Assessment ,70(3), 541-550.
    Endler, N. S. & Magnusson, D. (1976). Toward an interactional psychology of personality. Psychology Bulletin, 83, 956-947.
    Engel, G., Olson, K. R. & Patrick, C. (2002). The personality of love fundamental motives and traits related to component of love. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 839-853.
    Erwin, P. G.. (1999). Love attitudes and romantic involvement: A replication and extension. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 88, 317-318.
    Eysenck, H. J. (1970). Biological Dimensions of personality. In L. A. Pervin(1990) (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 244–276). New York: Guilford Press.
    Eysenck, H. J. (1992). Four ways five factors are not basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 667-673.
    Fischer, A. R., & Good, G. E.(1998).Perception of parent child relationships and masculine role conflicts of college man. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45(3),346-352.
    Fleeson, W. (2001). Toward a Structure-and Process-Intergrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(6), 1011-1027.
    Frey, K. & Hojjat, M.(1998). Are love styles related to sexual styles? Journal of Sex Research, 35(3), 265-27.
    Ganong, L. H. & Coleman, M. (1985). Sex, sex roles, and emotional Expressiveness. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 143(3), 405-411.
    Gatewood and Field (1998). Human Resource Selection (4th Ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “destructure of personality”. The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229.
    Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26-42.
    Guilford, D. W. (1959), Consistency of the Factorial Structures of Personality Ratings from Different Source. Journal of Abnormal and Social psychology, 44, 329-344.
    Gutierres, S. E., Kenrick, D. T. & Partch, J. J. (1999). Beauty, dominance, and the mating game: Contrast effects in self-assessment reflect gender differences in mate selection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(9), 1126-1134.
    Hahn, J. & Blass, T. (1997). Dating partner preferences: A function of similarity of love styles. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 12(3), 595-610.
    Hamachek, D. (1990). Evaluating self-concept and ego status in Erikson's last three psychosocial stages. Journal of Counseling and Development, 68, 677-683.
    Ben Hamida, S., Mineka, S. & Bailey, J. M.(1998) Sex Differences in Perceived Controllability of Mate Value: An Evolutionary Perspective. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 75(4), 953-966.
    Heaven, P. C. L., Silva, T. D., Carey, C. & Holen, J. (2004). Loving styles: Relationships with personality and attachment styles. European Journal of Personality, 18, 103-113.
    Hendrick, C. & Hendrick, S. S. (1986). A theory and method of love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 50, 392-402.
    Hendrick, C. & Hendrick, S. (1989). Research on love: Does it measure up? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 784-794.
    Hendrick, C. & Hendrick, S. S. (1991). Dimensions of love: A sociobiological interpretation. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 10, 206-230.
    Hendrick, C., Hendrick, S. S. & Dicke, A. (1998). The Love Attitudes Scale: Short Form. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(2),147-159.
    Hendrick, C. & Hendrick, S. S (1988). Lovers wear rose colored glasses. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 161-183.
    Hendrick, S. S. & Hendrick, C. (1995). Gender differences and similarities in sex and love. Personal Relationships. 2(1), 55-65.
    Hendrick, S. S., Hendrick, C. & Adler, N. L. (1988). Romantic relationships: Love, satisfaction, and staying together. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 54(6), 980-988.
    Holt, C. L. & Ellis, J. B. (1998). Assessing the current validity of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Sex Roles, 39, 929-941.
    Hook, Gerstein, Detterich & Gridley (2003). How Close Are We? Measuring Intimacy and Examining Gender Differences. Journal of Counseling and Development, 81(4), 462-472.
    Hughes, M., Morrison, K. & Asada, K. J. K. (2005). What's Love Got To Do with It? Exploring the impact of maintenance rules, love attitudes, and network support on friends with benefits relationships. Western Journal of Communication, 69(1), 49-66.
    Kanemasa, Y., Taniguchi J. & Daibo, I.(2004). Love styles and romantic love experiences in Japan. Social Behavior Personality, 32(3), 265-282.
    Katsurada, E. & Sugihara, Y. (1999). A preliminary validation of the Bem sex-role inventory in Japanese culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 641-645.
    Kirchmeyer, C. (2002). Change and stability in managers’ gender roles. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 929–939.
    Kunkel, A. & Burleson, B. (2003). Relational implications of communication skill evaluations and love styles. Southern Communication Journal, 68(3), 181–197.
    Kurdek, L. A. & Schmitt, J. P. (1986). Interaction of sex-role self-concept with relationship quarterly and relationship beliefs in married, heterosexual cohabiting, gay and lesbian couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(2), 365-370.
    Lacey, R. S., Reifman, R., Scott, J. P., Harris, S. M. & Fitzpatrick, J. (2004). Sexual-Moral Attitudes, Love Styles, and Mate Selection. Journal of Sex Research, 41(2), 121-128.
    Lasswell, T. E. & Lasswell, M. E. (1976). I love you but I am not in love with you. Journal of Marrige and Family Counseling, 2, 211-224.
    Lee, J. A. (1974). The styles of loving. Psychology today, 8(5), 44-51.
    Lee, J. A. (1977). A typology of styles of loving. Personality and social Psychology Bulletin, 3(2), 173-182.
    Lee, J. A. (1988). Love-Style. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The Psychology of Love (pp38-67). New York: Vail-Ballou press.
    Lee, Y. C. & Chen, Y. S. (1998). The temperamental characteristics of the Chinese adolescents in Taiwan. Journal of Adolescence, 21, 337-340.
    Lee, J. A. (1988). Love-Style. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The Psychology of Love . New York: Vail-Ballou Press.
    Levesque, R. J. (1993). The romantic experience of adolescents in satisfying love relationships. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 22(3), 219-249.
    Levy, M. B. & Davis, K. E. (1988). Love styles and attachment styles compared: Their relations to each other and to various relationship characteristics. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships, 5(4), 439-471.
    Macionis, J. J. (1993). Sociology. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Inc.
    Mallandain, I. & Davies, M. F. (1994).The colours of love: Personality correlates of love styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 17(4), 557-560.
    Masuda, M. (2003). Meta-analyses of love scales: Do various Love scales measure the same psychological constructs? Japanese Psychological Research, 45(1), 25-37.
    McCrae, R. R., Costa Jr, P. T., Martin, T. A., Oryol, V. E., Rukavishnikov, A. A., Senin, I. G., Hřebíčková, M. & Urbánek, T. (2004). Consensual validation of personality traits across cultures. Journal of Research in Personality, 38(2), 179-201.
    McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T. & Busch, C. M.,(1986). Evaluating comprehensiveness in personality systems: the California Q-set and the Five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 54, 430-446.
    Meeks, B. S., Hendrick, S. S. & Hendrick, C. (1998). Communication, love and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships, 15(6), 755-773.
    Middleton, C. F. (1993). The self and perceived-partner: Similarity as a predictor of relationship satisfaction. Dissertation Abstracts International. 54(4-B), 2275.
    Montgomery, M. J. & Sorell, G. T. (1997). Differences in love attitudes across family life stages. Family Relations, 46(1), 55-61.
    Mooradian, T. A. & Nezlek, J. B. (1996). Comparing the NEO-FFI and Saucier’s Mini-Markers as measures of the big five. Personality and Individual Differences , 21(2), 213-215.
    Moore, F. R., Cassidy, C., Smith, M. J. L. & Perrett, D. I.(2006).The effects of female control of resources on sex-differentiated mate preferences. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(3), 193-205.
    Morrow, G. D., Clark, E. M. & Brock, K. F. (1995). Individual and partner love styles: Implications for the quality of romantic involvements. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships, 12(3), 363-387.
    Neto, F., Pinto, M. C. (2003). The role of loneliness, gender and love status in adolescents' love styles. International Journal of Adolescence & Youth, 11(3), 181-191.
    Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, 574-583.
    Paunonen, S. V. (2003). Big five factors of personality and replicated predictions of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 411-424.
    Paunonen, S. V. & Ashton, M. C. (2001). Big five factors and facets and the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(3), 524 -539.
    Peabody, D. (1987). Selecting representative trait adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 59–77.
    Peabody, D. & Goldberg, L. R. (1989). Some determinants of factor structures from personality trait descriptors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 552–567.
    Pervin, L. A. (1993). Personality: Theory and Research (6th ed.), New York: John Wily & Sons.
    Pulkkinen, L. (1996). Female and male personality styles: A typological and development analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(6), 1288-1306.
    Risavy, C. F. (1996). Effects of gender, age, social class and relationship satisfaction on love styles. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 57(2-A), pp. 0591.
    Rosenman, M. F. (1978). Liking, loving, and styles of loving. Psychological Reports, 42, 1243-1246.
    Rotenberg, K. J. & Korol, S. (1995). The role of loneliness and gender in individuals' love styles. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 10(3), 537-546.
    Rubin, Z. (1970). Measurement of romantic love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 265-273.
    Rubinstein, G. (2005). The big five among male and female students of different faculties. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(7), 1495-1503.
    Saucier, G. (1994). Mini-markers: a brief version of Goldberg’s unipolar Big-Five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63(3), 506-516.
    Schweitzer, J. (1994). A comparison of early and middle adult age women's attitudes about love in intimate relationships. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 55(2-B), pp. 606.
    Shaffer, D. R. (1999). Developmental Psychology: Childhood and Adolescence (5th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
    Spence, J. T., Helmerich, R. L. & Stapp, J. (1975). Ration of self and peers on sex role attitudes and their relation to self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 29-39.
    Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93, 119-135.
    Tate, L. D.(2004). Personality traits associated with romantic relationships. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 65(4-B), pp2116.
    Vaillant, N. (2006). Sex Differences in Stipulated Preferences and Mate Search by Clients of a French Marriage Bureau. Psychological Reports. 98(1), 285-290.
    Wan, W. N., Luk, C. L. & Lai, C. L. (2000). Personality correlates of loving styles among Chinese students in Hong Kong. Personality and Individual Differences, 29(1), 169-175.
    White, J. K. (2003). The Five-Factor Model personality variables and relationship variables: A study of associations. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 64(3-B), 1476.
    White, J. K., Hendrick, S. S. & Hendrick, C. (2004). Big Five personality variables and relationship constructs. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(7), 1519-1530.
    Whitely, B. E. & J. R. (1983). Sex-role orientation and self- esteem: A critical meta-analytic review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 765-778.
    Widiger, T. A. & Trull, T. J. (1997). Assessment of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68(2), 228-250.
    Woll, S. B. (1989). Personality and relationship correlates of loving styles. Journal of Research in Personality, 23(4), 480-505.
    Zhang, J., Norvilitis, J. M., & Jin, S. (2001). Measuring gender orientation with the Bem Sex Role Inventory in Chinese culture. Sex Roles, 44, 237–251.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)

    QR CODE