合成金修飾的氧化亞銅探討高度晶面相關的光催化性質

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表

研究生：	袁國智 Yuan, Guo-Zhi
論文名稱：	合成金修飾的氧化亞銅探討高度晶面相關的光催化性質 Highly Facet-Dependent Photocatalytic Properties of Cu2O Established through Formation of Au-Decorated Cu2O Nanocrystals
指導教授：	黃暄益 Huang, Hsuan-Yi
口試委員:	江昀緯裘性天黃暄益
學位類別：	碩士 Master
系所名稱：	理學院 - 化學系 Department of Chemistry
論文出版年：	2015
畢業學年度：	103
語文別：	英文
論文頁數：	72
中文關鍵詞：	氧化亞銅、光催化、晶面效應
外文關鍵詞：	cuprous oxide, photocatalysis, facet dependent
相關次數：	點閱：2 下載：0
分享至:	分享至facebook 分享至twitter

查詢本校圖書館目錄查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統勘誤回報

我們提出一個簡易的方法在氧化亞銅立方體、八面體、菱形十二面體的表面上沉積金納米粒子同時不破壞晶面。本研究的目的是測試傳統關於利用金屬助催化劑長在半導體粒子上的方式可提高半導體的光催化活性的認知。如果確實是如此，也必須確定哪些晶面提供了最好的活性，而非不管晶面效應所可能帶來的巨大影響，因為氧化亞銅立方體已被觀察到在甲基橙光催化中是沒有活性的。金修飾的氧化亞銅晶體已用各式各樣的方法鑑定，證實有微量的金粒子沉積在氧化亞銅晶體上。有金修飾的菱形十二面體和八面體的光催化表現優於同樣形貌但沒有金修飾的氧化亞銅晶體，然而金修飾的氧化亞銅立方體還是沒有活性。金修飾於小顆的氧化亞銅立方體上也沒有活性。此外，實驗結果顯示金-氧化亞銅菱形十二面體核殼結構的光催化活性是介於氧化亞銅菱形十二面體和金修飾的氧化亞銅菱形十二面體之間。我們也計算出各種氧化亞銅晶體的個別反應速率常數。EPR測量顯示羥基自由基的產量最高為菱形十二面體，次之為八面體。氧化亞銅立方體在可見光照射下不會產生羥基自由基。EPR的結果與光催化上的觀察相符。根據以上實驗結果，我們可以修正氧化亞銅的能帶圖，使不同晶面在接近表面的能帶彎曲程度有明顯的差異以解釋所觀察到的晶面相關的光催化活性。沒有催化活性的{100}晶面可以被理解為其表面層具有較高的能障阻擋光激發所產生的電子到達立方體表面，所以沒有生成自由基引起光降解。這項工作顯示出傳統認知需要被修改並考慮到半導體的晶面，不然有時候這樣的認知在實驗上可以是完全錯誤的。

We report a simple method for depositing Au nanoparticles on the surfaces of Cu2O cubes, octahedra, and rhombic dodecahedra with preservation of sharp facets. The purpose of this study is to test whether the conventional model of a metal cocatalyst anchored on a semiconductor particle can always enhance photocatalytic activity of the semiconductor. If so, it is also necessary to determine which facet gives the best activity. This is especially interesting for Cu2O cubes, which have been shown to be inactive toward photocatalysis of methyl orange. The Au-decorated Cu2O crystals have been characterized by various techniques. Au-decorated rhombic dodecahedra and octahedra outperformed their pristine counterparts, while Au-deposited cubes remained inactive. Au-decorated small cubes were also inactive. Furthermore, Au‒Cu2O core‒shell rhombic dodecahedra exhibited intermediate photocatalytic activity between those of rhombic dodecahedra and Au-decorated rhombic dodecahedra. Reaction rate constants for the various Cu2O crystals have been determined. EPR measurements showed highest production of hydroxyl radicals for rhombic dodecahedra and a lower level of radical generation for octahedra. Radicals were not produced from Cu2O cubes upon visible light irradiation. The EPR results match perfectly with photocatalysis observations. A modified band diagram has been constructed to account for the observed facet-dependent photocatalytic activity. The inactivity of the {100} face can be understood by considering its surface layer as constituted of a high barrier blocking photoexcited electrons from reaching the cube surface, so no radicals are produced to cause photodegradation. This work firmly shows that the conventional model needs to be modified taking into account of the surface facets of semiconductors, because sometimes this model can fail completely.

論文摘要    ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..I
ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS    III
TABLE OF CONTENTS    VI
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS     Ⅴ
LIST OF FIGURES    VIII
LIST OF TABLES    XIV

CHAPTER 1 Overview of the Dissertation and the Background Knowledge
1 The Background Knowledge    1
1.1 Photocatalysis    1
1.2 The Process for Photocatalytic Degradation of Methyl Orange Dye    6
2 Catalytic Properties with Specific Facets    8
3 The Method and Principle of Increasing Photocatalytic Activity    11
3.1 Metal/Semiconductor Heterostructures    11
3.2 Semiconductor/Semiconductor Heterostrutures    17
4 References    20

Chapter 2 Highly Facet-Dependent Photocatalytic Properties of Cu2O Established through Formation of Au-Decorated Cu2O Nanocrystals
1  Introduction    23
2  Experimental Section    25
2.1 Chemicals    25
2.2 Synthesis of Cu2O Nanocrystals and Au@Cu2O Rhombic Dodecahedra    .…26
2.3 Synthesis of Au-decorated Cu2O nanocrystals    30
2.4 Photocatalysis experiments    33
2.5 Hydroxyl radical generation detected using electron paramagnetic            resonance spectrometry (EPR)    34
2.6 Instrumentation    35
3 Results and discussion    37
4 Conclusion    68
5 References    70

                                

1. Ho, J.-Y.; Huang, M. H. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2009, 113, 14159–14164.
2. Huang, W.-C.; Lyu, L.-M.; Yang, Y.-C.; Huang, M. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 1261–1267.
3. Lyu, L.-M.; Wang, W.-C.; Huang, M. H. Chem.‒Eur. J. 2010, 16, 14167–14174.
4. Wu, J.-K.; Lyu, L.-M.; Liao, C.-W.; Wang, Y.-N.; Huang, M. H. Chem.‒Eur. J. 2012, 18, 14473–14478.
5. Wang, H.; Yang, J.; Li, X.; Zhang, H.; Li, J.; Guo, L. Small 2012, 8, 2802–2806.
6. Zhang, J.; Liu, J.; Peng, Q.; Wang, X.; Li, Y. Chem. Mater. 2006, 18, 867–871.
7. Bao, H.; Zhang, W.; Hua, Q.; Jiang, Z.; Yang, J.; Huang, W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 12294–12298.
8. Sun, S.; Song, X.; Sun, Y.; Deng, D.; Yang, Z. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2010, 114, 5073–5079.
9. Hara, M.; Kondo, T.; Komoda, M.; Ikeda, S.; Kondo, J. N.; Domen, K.; Hara, M.; Shinohara, K.; Tanaka, A. Chem. Commun. 1998, 2, 357–358.
10. Wei, H. M.; Gong, H. B.; Chen, L.; Zi, M.; Cao, B. Q. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2012, 116, 10510–10515.
11. Chanda, K.; Rej, S.; Huang, M. H. Chem.‒Eur. J. 2013, 19, 16036–16043.
12. Xu, Y.; Wang, H.; Yu, Y.; Tian, L.; Zhao, W.; Zhang, B. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2011, 115, 15288–15296.
13. Wang, W.-C.; Lyu, L.-M.; Huang, M. H. Chem. Mater. 2011, 23, 2677‒2684.
14. Cushing, S. K.; Li, J.; Meng, F.; Senty, T. R.; Suri, S.; Zhi, M.; Li, M.; Bristow, A. D.; Wu, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 15033–15041.
15. Silva, C. G.; Juárez, R.; Marino, T.; Molinari, R.; García, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 595–602.
16. Chang, I.-C.; Chen, P.-C.; Tsai, M.-C.; Chen, T.-T.; Yang, M.-H.; Chiu, H.-T.; Lee, C.-Y. CrystEngComm 2013, 15, 2363‒2366.
17. Swadzba-Kwásny, M.; Chancelier, L.; Ng, S.; Manyar, H. G.; Hardacre, C.; Nockemann, P. Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 219–227.
18. Tahir, D.; Tougaard, S. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 2012, 24, 175002–175009.
19. Yang, Y.-C.; Wang, H.-J.; Whang, J.; Huang, J.-S.; Lyu, L.-M.; Lin, P.-H.; Gwo, S.; Huang, M. H. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 4316‒4324.
20. Kuo, C.-H.; Yang, Y.-C.; Gwo, S.; Huang, M. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 1052‒1057.
21. Zheng, Z.; Huang, B.; Wang, Z.; Guo, M.; Qin, X.; Zhang, X.; Wang, P.; Dai, Y. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2009, 113, 14448–14453.
22. Bao, H.; Zhang, W.; Hua, Q.; Jiang, Z.; Yang, J.; Huang, W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 12294–12298.
23. Sroiraya, S.; Triampo, W.; Morales, N. P.; Triampo, D. J. Ceramic Processing Res. 2007, 9, 1–9.
24. Anzai, K.; Aikawa, T.; Furukawa, Y.; Matsushima, Y.; Urano, S.; Ozawa, T. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2003, 415, 251–256.
25. Tan, C.-S.; Hsu, S.-C.; Ke, W.-H.; Chen, L.-J.; Huang, M. H. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 2155−2160.

全文公開日期本全文未授權公開 (校內網路)
全文公開日期本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

相關論文