研究生: |
張明芬 Chang, Ming-Fen |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
談輕動詞、施用及處置結構的內外之分: 以北四縣客語為例 The Ins and Outs of Light Verbs and Disposable Constructions: A View from Northern Sixian Hakka |
指導教授: |
蔡維天
Tsai, Wei-tien |
口試委員: |
連金發
Lien, Chinfa 楊中玉 Yang, Chung-Yu |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
人文社會學院 - 語言學研究所 Institute of Linguistics |
論文出版年: | 2013 |
畢業學年度: | 101 |
語文別: | 英文 |
論文頁數: | 123 |
中文關鍵詞: | 施用結構 、處置結構 、輕動詞 、製圖理論 |
外文關鍵詞: | applicative, disposal construction, light verb, cartographic approach |
相關次數: | 點閱:1 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
摘要
這篇論文主要探討在北四縣客語中,施用結構(Applicative construction)、
處置結構(Disposal construction)以及輕動詞(Light verb)的語義及句法特性。並從製圖理論(Cartographic Approach)的角度描繪出這些結構在句法上的位置。再者,從句法位置可觀察出無論是施用結構、處置結構及輕動詞組都能呈現與國語相似的特性-¬內外之分(Tsai 2011a)。
在北四縣客語的施用及處置結構中,皆由顯性的標記lau來分別引介施用論元及處置論元。首先,在施用結構中,由顯性施用標記lau來引介論元的結構稱為外蒙受結構(Outer affective),位在句子頂端的補語層(CP);而由非典雙賓句組成的內蒙受結構(Inner affective)則位處中階施用結構中輕動詞組的邊緣地帶(vP)。此外,相較於施用結構,處置標記lau在北四縣客語中被分析為輕動詞的一種,所以內、外處置結構(Inner/ Outer disposal)皆位在低於內蒙受結構的輕動詞位置。至於輕動詞組,根據謂語屬性的不同,同樣也能觀察到內外分布的差異: 外輕動詞(Outer light verb)與使事性(causality)有關,在句法位置上處於左緣結構;相對來說,內輕動詞(Inner light verb)與工具、地點、目的相關連則位處輕動詞組的邊緣地帶。
最後,本文藉著施用結構、處置結構及輕動詞的互動組成之多重結構,描繪出北四縣客語內外之分的地貌圖,並由CP與vP的內外分布顯示漢語的分析性展現在語法結構的各個層次。
Abstract
This thesis aims to map out inner-outer dichotomy in terms of applicative, disposal construction and light verbs in Northern Sixian Hakka under the cartographic approach (Rizzi 1997, Cinque1999), and further specifies the interactions of the multiple constructions among these categories. By observing the semantic and syntactic properties of applicative and disposal constructions, as well as light verbs in Northern Sixian Hakka, and by identifying how these properties are similar to those used in Mandarin (Tsai 2011a), we propose that these structures form the basis of an inner-outer dichotomy. The arguments of both the applicative and disposal constructions are introduced by the explicit marker lau. An applicative construction with the explicit marker lau is an outer affective, and is situated in the high applicative of the CP periphery. By contrast, an inner affective comprising pseudo double object constructions without the explicit marker lau is distributed to the middle applicative in the vP periphery. Moreover, disposal lau behaves as a light verb and both inner and outer disposals are distributed within the vP and lower than inner affective. Furthermore, light verbs can be divided into inner and outer groups according to their predicate types; an outer light verb that is associated with causality is arranged within the left periphery, whereas an inner light verb that is related to an instrument, location, or reason is situated within the vP phase. Based on this topography, the interaction of these constructions verifies the split-CP (Rizzi 1997) and the existence of vP periphery in Northern Sixian Hakka.
References
Baker, Mark. 1988. Incorporation. Chicago: Chicago University Press. 1997 Thematic Roles and Syntactic Structure. In L. Haegeman,ed., Elements of Grammar. Handbook of Generative Syntax, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 73-137
Belletti, Adriana. 2004. Aspect of the low IP area. In The Structure of CP and IP, ed. by L.Rizzi, 16-51. Oxford:Oxford University Press
Bresen, Joan, and Lioba Moshi. 1990. Object asymmetries in comparative Bantu syntax. Linquistic Inquiry 21.147-186
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1968. A Grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley et alibi: University of California Press.
Cuervo, M. 2003. Datives at Large. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.
Cheng, Kuang-Xiu. 2011. Five affective constructions in Mandarin Chinese. MA thesis, National Chi Nan University
Cheng, Lisa L.-S. 2007. Verb Copying in Mandarin Chinese. Ms. Leiden University
Chomsky, Noam; 1995, The Minimalist Program, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Chung, Jui-yi. 2007. A comparative study of affective construction: A case on Mandarin Chinese and Hakka. MA thesis, National Tsing Hua University
Chung, Jui-yi. 2012. On the vP periphery and Disposal-Affective Alternations: A case study of jiong construction in Hakka
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Advers and Functional Heads, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Collins, Chris. 1991. Why and how come. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 15:31-45. Cambridge: MIT
Gu, Yang. 1992. The Syntax of Resultative and Causative Compounds in Chinese. Ph D. dissertation. Cornell University.
Hale, Kenneth and S. J. Keyser. 1990. 'On the Syntax of Argument Structure,' ms. MIT.
Hale, Kenneth and S J. Keyser. 1991. On the syntax of argument structure. Lexicon Project Working Papers, Center for Cognitive Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. PhD Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass
Huang, C.-T. James. 1991. 'On Verb Movement and Some Syntax-Semantics Mismatches in Chinese,' in Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium of Chinese Languages and Linguistics, Academia Sinica, Taipei.
Huang, C. -T. James. 1994. Verb Movement and Some Syntax-Semantics Mismatches in Chinese. Chinese Languages and Linguistics 2:587-613
Huang, C. -T. James. 1997. On Lexical Structure and Syntactic Projection. Chinese Languages and Linguistics 3:45-89
Huang, C. -T. James. 2006. Resultatives and unaccusatives: a parametric view. Bulletin of the Chinese Linguistic Society of Japan 253:1-43
Huang, C. -T. James, Y.-H. Andrey Li, Yafei Li. 2009. The Syntax of Chinese. New York: Cambridge University Press
Larson, Richard K. 1990. Double object revised: Reply to Jackendoff. Linguistic Inquiry 21:589-632
Lai, Huei-ling. 2001. On Hakka BUN: A Case of Polygrammaticalization. Language and Linguistics 2.2:137-153
Lai, Huei-ling. 2003a. The semantics extension of Hakka LAU. Language and Linguistics 4.3:533-561
Lai, Huei-ling. 2003b. Hakka LAU constructions: A constructional approach. Language and Linguistics 4.2:357-378
Li, Jinxi, and Shiru Liu. 1955. Zhongguo yufa jiaocai [Teaching materials on Chinese Grammar]. Beijing: Wushinian chubanshe.
Li, Charles and Sandra Thompson: 1981. Mandarin Chinese: a functional reference grammar, University of California Press, Berkeley, California.
Li, Y.-H Andrey 2001. The ba construction. Ms.USC
Lin, T.-H. Jonah. 2001. Light Verb Syntax and the Theory of Phrase Structure. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Irvine.
McGinnis, Martha. 2001. Variation in the Phase Structure of Applicatives. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 1: 105-146.
Machobane, Malillo. 1989. Some restrictions of transitivizing morphemes in Sesotho. Ph.D. Dissertation, McGill University, Montréal.
Marantz, Alec. 1984. On the nature of grammatical relation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Marantz, A. 1993. Implications of asymmetries in double object constructions. In S. Mchombo,ed., Theoretical aspects of Bantu grammar. Stanford: CSLI Publications
Pylkkanen, L., 2000. What Applicative Heads Apply To. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium. U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics, Volume 6.4.
Pylkkanen, L., 2002. Introducing Arguments. PhD Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Ramchand, Gillian. 2003. First Phase Syntax. Ms. University of Oxford.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery. Elements of Grammar, ed.by L.Haegeman, 281-338. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Tsai,W.ei-Tian Dylan. 2007a. Four Types of Affective Constructions in Chinese. Paper presented in FOSS-5, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Taiwan, April 2007.
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan 2007b Two Types of Light Verbs in Chinese. paper presented in IACL-15/NACCL-19, Columbia University, New York City, May 2007.
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 2008. Left Periphery and How-Why Alternations. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17: 83-115
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan 2009 High Applicatives are not High Enough: A Cartographic Solution. Paper presented in FOSS-6, National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan,
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan 2011a "A Tale of Two Peripheries: Evidence from Chinese adverbials, light verbs, applicatives and object fronting," paper presented in the International Symposium on the Interfaces of Grammar, Chinese Social Science Academy, China, October 2011.
Tsao, F.-F. &Chang, Y.-J. 2010. Relexification in Disposal Constructions: An Investigation into Southern Min, Hakka, and Mandarin Chinese. Paper presented at The 43rd International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics. Lund University, Sweden, October 16-18 2010.
江敏華.2006.〈東勢客家話「同」與「分」的語法特徵及二者之間的關係〉(Grammatical characteristics of tung and bun in Dongshi Hakka and relatedness of the two markers).《語言暨語言學》(Language and Linguistics) 7.2: 339-364。
江敏華.2007.〈東勢客家話的動補結構初探〉(AHCI, SSCI), Journal of Chinese Linguistics 35.2:225-266。
陸儉明. 2002. 〈再談”吃了他三個蘋果”一類結構的性質〉,《中國語文》,第4期,317-325頁
蔡維天. 2000.〈為甚麼問怎麼樣,怎麼樣問為甚麼〉,《漢學研究》,第18卷特刊,41-59頁
蔡維天. 2005. 〈談漢語的蒙受結構〉,「動詞與賓語問題」國際學術研討會,華中師範大學,中國
蔡維天 2011b〈從語法化看漢語蒙受結構的源起〉,第六屆漢語語法化問題國際學術討論會,陝西師範大學,2011年8月。
曹逢甫 .2001. 客家話動詞組結構研究:時貌、情貌,把字句與被字句