TFT-LCD的快速發展，已經成為顯示器的發展趨勢。就其產業供應鏈來分析，愈上游之廠商其技術與資金門檻愈高。面板廠商對於上游之關鍵原物料與零組件，積極的進行垂直整合的計畫，但是因為其關鍵技術難以取得與研發，一直無法有效實現。本研究針對TFT-LCD產業上游之玻璃基板供應商，以製程技術為基礎探討其供應商評選模式，以期探索出玻璃基板製造商對於其供應商評選模式是否有其優勢，可以在市場上保有寡占的地位。
供應商評選模式，最重要的前提為評選因子之確定。既有文獻上的供應商評選模式中的評選因子，主要皆以品質，價格，交期，服務等四大項目為架構，並伴隨衍生其他一般採購評選項目作為評估，且以產業別與採購項目作為切入點。本研究主要探討TFT-LCD之玻璃基板製造商之連續性製程設備機台供應商評選，並以製程技術角度切入，探討其評選因子是否有其獨到之處，以維持其長久之寡占市場的優勢。本研究發現，有關於人機介面與供應商合約之評選因子，既有文獻沒有納入供應商評選考量。在供應商評選因子確立之後，並藉由層級分析法(Analytic Hierarchy Process, AHP )與專家問卷訪談，演算出其評選權重，給予企業與學界一份具實證與參考價值之研究報告。

The TFT-LCD is the trend of the display development. TFT-LCD manufacturers are aggressive to integrate the supply chain of raw material and key component vertically, but because of the key technique of the TFT-LCD upstream is hard to be developed and researched, they can not integrate it efficiently. In this paper, we take the TFT-LCD Glass Substrate manufacturers as the subject to investigate the supplier selection of glass substrate manufacturers under the oligopoly market.
It is primarily critical to define the factors for the supplier selection. The general factors in the literature are the Quality, Cost, Delivery, and Service, and investigate the sub-factors under the four scope based on the different industry. This thesis has researched the selection factors of the Continuous Production Equipment Suppliers from the point of the manufacturing technique, and defined the Man-machined Interface and Contract as the new selection factors. Finally, AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is the model to calculate the selection percentage based on the questionnaires from the experts in the TFT-LCD glass substrate filed, and the conclusion is presented as Continuous Production Equipments Suppliers Selection model based on the Glass Substrate Manufacturers.

1.許世明，「台灣製造業採購管理之研究」，國立台灣科技大學， 民國89年。
2.簡禎富，2005，決策分析與管理:全面決策品質提升之架構與方法，雙葉書廊
有限公司出版，pp.232。
3.經濟部工業局，http://www.moeaidb.gov.tw/index-1024.html。
4. Al-Faraj, T., Alidi, A., and Al-Zayer, J., 1993, "Vendors Selection Via a
Spreadsheet Analytical Hierarchy Process", Computers and Industrial Engineering, Vol.25, No.1-4, pp.65-68.
5. Boer, L., Labro, E., & Morlacchi, P., 2001, “A review of methods supporting
supplier selection” ,European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management 7 75-89
6. Bonaccorsi, A. and Lippaini, A., 1994,”Strategic Partnerships in New Product
Development: an Italian Case Study”, Journal of Product Innovation Management,
11,pp.134-145
7. Bender, P., Brown, R., Isaac, M., and Shapiro, J., 1985, ”Improving Purchasing
Productivity at IBM with a Normative Decision Support System”, Interfaces,
Vol.15, No.3.
8. Cachon, G., Lariviere, M.A., 1999. Capacity choice and allocation: Strategic
behavior and supply chain performance.Management Science ,Vol.45 (8),
1091–1108.
9. Cachon, G., Lariviere, M.A., 2000. Supply chain coordination with revenue sharing contracts: Strengths and limitations. Working Paper, The Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
10. Chaudhry, S., F. Forst, and Zydiak, J., 1993,"Vendor Selection With Price Breaks",European Journal of Opertional Research", Vol.70, No.1, pp.52-56.

11. Choon, K., Kung, V. R. and Handfield, R. B., 1998,“Supply Chain Management: Supplier Performance and Firm Performance,” Journal of Supply Chain Management, pp. 2-9, Summer .
12. Croom, Simon R., 2001,The dyadic capabilities concept: examining the processes of key supplier involvement in collaborative product development, European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management 7 ,29-37
13. Degraeve, Z., Labro, E., Roodhooft, F., 2000. An evaluation of supplier selection methods from a Total Cost of Ownership perspective.European Journal of Operational Research ,125 (1), 34-59.
14. Dickson, G.W., “An Analysis of Vender Selection Systems and Decisions”,Journal
of Purchasing, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp.5-17. 1966.
15. Dowlatshahi, S.(1998)”Implementing early supplier involvement: a conceptual
framework”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management,18(2),pp143-167
16. Emmons, H.,& Gilbert, S.M., 1998. Note: The role of returns policies in pricing and inventory decisions for catalogue goods. Management Science 44 (2), 276–283.
17. Eppen, G.D.,& Iyer, A.V., 1997. Backup agreements in fashion buying—the value of upstream flexibility. Management Science 43 (11), 1469–1484.
18. Gregory, R., 1986, "Source Selection: A Matrix Approach", Journal of Purchasing
and Materials Management, Vol.22, No.2,.
19. Giannoccaro, Ilaria ,& Pontrandolfo, Pierpaolo, 2004, “Supply Chain Coordination
By Revenue sharing Contracts”, Int. J. Production Economics, Vol.89,pp.131-139.
20. Handfield, R.B., Ragatz, G.L., Peterson, K.J ,.and Monczka, .M., 1999, ”Involving Suppliers in New Product Development”, California Management Review, 42(1), pp59-82.
21. Holt, G.D., 1998. Which contractor selection methodology?. International Journal of Project Management 16 (3), 153-164.
22. Jain, Akhil., & Palekar, Udatta S.,2005, ”Aggregate production planning for a
continuous reconfigurable manufacturing process”,Computers & Operations Research 32 , 1213–1236
23. Katsikeasa, C.S., & Paparoidamis, N.G., Katsikea, E., 2004, “Supply source
selection criteria: The impact of supplier performance on distributor performance”, Industrial Marketing Management ,33 ,755–764
24. Kirwan, B., & Ainsworth, L.K., 1992, “A guide to task analysis. ” London: Taylor & Francis.
25. Lee, H., Whang, S., 1999. Decentralized multi-echelon supply chains: Incentives and information. Management Science 45 (5).
26. Meindl, Peter, and Chopra, Sunil, 2004, Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning, and Operation, Prentice Hall, 2nd edition.
27. McGinnis, M .A., and Rafeekh Meld Vallopra, 1999, Purchasing and supplier
involvement in process improvement: A source of competitive advantage , Journal of Supply Chain Management , 35(4): 42-50.
28. Monczka, and Trent, Handfield, 2002, “Purchasing and Supply Chain
Management ”, 2 end Edition, South-Western ,pp.28-29
29. Narasimhan, R., "An Analytical Approach to Supplier Selection", Journal of
Purchasing and Materials Management, 1983.
30. Nydick, R., and Hill, R., "Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process to Structure the
Supplier Selection Procedure", International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 1992.
31. Saaty, T.L ,1986,”Axiomatic Foundation of Analytic Hierarchy Process” ,
Management Science, Vol. 32,No.7, pp.841-855.

32. Seamster, T.L., Redding, R.E., & Kaempf, G.L., 1997. Applied cognitive task analysis in aviation. Brookfield, VT: Ashgate.
33. Simpson, P. M., Siguaw, Judy A., & White, Susan C., 2002, Measuring the
performanceof suppliers: An analysis of evaluation processes , Journal of Supply
ChainManagement, 38(1): 29-43.
34. Soukup, W., 1987,"Supplier Selection Strategies", Journal of Purchasing and
Materials Management, Vol.23, No.2.
35. Thompson, K., 1990, "Supplier Profile Analysis", Journal of Purchasing and
Materials Management", Vol.26, No.1.
36. Timmerman, E., 1986, "An Approach to Supplier Performance Evaluation",
Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management", Vol.22, No.4.
37. Tsay, A., 1999, The quantity flexibility contract and supplier–customer incentives. Management Science 45 (10).
38. Vonderembse, M. A., and Tracey, M., 1999. The impact of supplier selection
criteria and supplier involvement on manufacturing performance , Journal of Supply Chain Management , 35(3): 33-39.
39. Wasti, S.N., and Liker, J.K, 1997, ”Risky Business or Competitive Power Supplier
Involvement in Japanese Product Design”, Journal of Production Innovation
Management,14, pp.337-355
40. Weber, C.A., 1991. A decision support system using multicriteria techniques for
vendor selection. University Micro"lms International,Ann Arbor, MI.
41. Webber, C.A., Current, John R., & Benton, W. C., 1991,”Vendor Selection
Criteria and Methods, ”European Journal of Operation Research, Vol. 50, pp.2-18
42. Weng, Z.K., 1995, Channel coordination and quantity discounts. Management
Science 41 (9), 1509–1522.