在本論文中，我們利用飛秒雷射激發-探測光游離-光裂解技術(femtosecond pump-probe photoionization-photofragmentation spectroscopy)結合質譜偵測技術，研究2-苯基乙基-N,N-二甲基胺(PENNA)陽離子的電子轉移及相關動力學，並試圖與Schlag團隊的實驗結果做比較和探討。我們以1+1 REMPI技術(λpump = 265.9 nm)游離化PENNA，再藉由導入探測雷射(λprobe = 797.7 nm)得到PENNA離子碎裂強度隨時間變化的瞬時訊號。我們利用三組時間常數適解該瞬時訊號，分別是τ1≈ 0.15 ps、τ2≈ 18 ps與τ3≈ 56 ps。為了要進一步地指認何者為電子轉移，我們亦觀測苯乙醇(PEAL)、2-苯基乙基-N-甲基胺(MPEA)與2-苯乙胺(PEA)的離子瞬時訊號，其中PEAL在本實驗條件下並不會發生電子轉移，而MPEA與PEA分別為PENNA去掉一個和兩個甲基。利用PEAL陽離子損耗瞬時光譜適解出來的結果與其他三者比對，可以幫助我們排除不是電子轉移的時間常數，而MPEA與PEA的陽離子損耗瞬時光譜的適解，則可以讓我們觀察這個系統(包含PENNA)是否會有一系列具關聯性的變化。適解並比較分析的結果顯示出PENNA、MPEA與PEA陽離子都有一個次皮秒等級的τ_1，而此一成分在PEAL陽離子並未被觀察到，故我們將其指認為電子轉移。而PEAL陽離子我們只用兩組時間常數便可以很好地適解，其動態行為我們認為與PENNA+、MPEA+與PEA+上也會觀察到的τ2及τ3類似，是從陽離子FC態緩解到最穩定結構的過程。

We studied the ultrafast electron transfer (ET) dynamics in the cations of 2-phenylethyl-N,N-dimethylamine (PENNA) after photoionization using the femtosecond pump-probe photoionization-photofragmentation (fs-PIPF) spectroscopy compared our experimental results with these reported by the Schlag's group. We photoionized PENNA in a supersonic beam with fs pump pulses at 265.9 nm with 1+1 REMPI via its S1 origin using the phenyl group as the chromophor, producing PENNA cation predominately in its first excited state (D1). The resulting PENNA cations were then probed by a second fs pulse at ~800 nm by exciting the evolving ionic system to higher excited states, which enhance the fragmentation yield of the cation. We used a consecutive reaction kinetics model including three time steps to fit the parent ion depletion transient signals, and the results are τ_1≈ 0.15 ps, τ_2≈ 18 ps and τ_3≈ 56 ps. To identify which one corresponds to the ET reation, we also carried out similar experiments for 2-phenylethylalcohol (PEAL), 2-phenylethyl-N-methylamine (MPEA) and 2-phenylethylamine (PEA). The results show that PENNA+, MPEA+ and PEA+ transients all contain a sub-ps component that is not observed in PEAL+ transient. For this reason, we attributed the sub-ps time constant to the the ET reaction. The two time constants we used to fit the PEAL+ transient are like the τ_2 and τ_3 in PENNA+, MPEA+ and PEA+, and are assigned to the conformational relaxations from the cation FC state to the most stable conformation.

1. J. Barber and B. Andersson, Nature 370, 31 (1994).
2. G. D. Scholes, G. R. Fleming, A. Olaya-Castro, and R. van Grondelle, Nat Chem 3, 763 (2011).
3. A. Shah, B. Adhikari, S. Martic, A. Munir, S. Shahzad, K. Ahmad, and H.-B. Kraatz, Chem Soc Rev 44, 1015 (2015).
4. E. W. Schlag, S. Y. Sheu, D. Y. Yang, H. L. Selzle, and S. H. Lin, Angewandte Chemie-International Edition 46, 3196 (2007).
5. E. W. Schlag, S. Y. Sheu, D. Y. Yang, H. L. Selzle, and S. H. Lin, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97, 1068 (2000).
6. E. Meggers, M. E. Michel-Beyerle, and B. Giese, J Am Chem Soc 120, 12950 (1998).
7. K. Kawai and T. Majima, Accounts of Chemical Research 46, 2616 (2013).
8. S. S. Isied, M. Y. Ogawa, and J. F. Wishart, Chemical Reviews 92, 381 (1992).
9. M. R. Wasielewski, Chem. Rev. 92, 435 (1992).
10. M. Gilbert and B. Albinsson, Chem Soc Rev 44, 845 (2015).
11. F. D. Lewis, R. L. Letsinger, and M. R. Wasielewski, Acc. Chem. Res. 34, 159 (2001).
12. D. M. Adams, L. Brus, C. E. D. Chidsey, S. Creager, C. Creutz, C. R. Kagan, P. V. Kamat, M. Lieberman, S. Lindsay, R. A. Marcus, R. M. Metzger, M. E. Michel-Beyerle, J. R. Miller, M. D. Newton, D. R. Rolison, O. Sankey, K. S. Schanze, J. Yardley, and X. Y. Zhu, J Phys Chem B 107, 6668 (2003).
13. W. B. Davis, W. A. Svec, M. A. Ratner, and M. R. Wasielewski, Nature 396, 60 (1998).
14. J. Jortner, M. Bixon, H. Heitele, and M. E. Michelbeyerle, Chem Phys Lett 197, 131 (1992).
15. J. Jortner, M. Bixon, B. Wegewijs, J. W. Verhoeven, and R. P. H. Rettschnick, Chem. Phys. Lett. 205, 451 (1993).
16. P. F. Barbara, T. J. Meyer, and M. A. Ratner, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 13148 (1996).
17. J. Jiang, A. Alsam, S. Wang, S. M. Aly, Z. Pan, O. F. Mohammed, and K. S. Schanze, J. Phys. Chem. A 121, 4891 (2017).
18. Y. Shibano, H. Imahori, P. Sreearunothai, A. R. Cook, and J. R. Miller, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 1, 1492 (2010).
19. J. W. Ho, W. K. Chen, and P. Y. Cheng, J. Phys. Chem. 131, 134308 (2009).
20. C. C. Shen, T. T. Tsai, J. W. Ho, Y. W. Chen, and P. Y. Cheng, J. Phys. Chem. 141 (2014).
21. C. C. Shen, T. T. Tsai, J. Y. Wu, J. W. Ho, Y. W. Chen, and P. Y. Cheng, J Chem Phys 147 (2017).
22. R. Weinkauf, L. Lehr, and A. Metsala, J Phys Chem A 107, 2787 (2003).
23. J. Yao, H. S. Im, M. Foltin, and E. R. Bernstein, J Phys Chem A 104, 6197 (2000).
24. J. D. Cardoza, F. M. Rudakov, and P. M. Weber, J Phys Chem A 112, 10736 (2008).
25. W. Cheng, N. Kuthirummal, J. L. Gosselin, T. I. Solling, R. Weinkauf, and P. M. Weber, J Phys Chem A 109, 1920 (2005).
26. L. Lehr, T. Horneff, R. Weinkauf, and E. W. Schlag, J Phys Chem A 109, 8074 (2005).
27. R. Weinkauf, P. Schanen, A. Metsala, E. W. Schlag, M. Burgle, and H. Kessler, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 18567 (1996).
28. E. W. Schlag, H. L. Selzle, P. Schanen, R. Weinkauf, and R. D. Levine, J Phys Chem A 110, 8497 (2006).
29. S. T. Sun, B. Mignolet, L. Fan, W. Li, R. D. Levine, and F. Remacle, J Phys Chem A 121, 1442 (2017).
30. G. L. Closs, L. T. Calcaterra, N. J. Green, K. W. Penfield, and J. R. Miller, J Phys Chem-Us 90, 3673 (1986).
31. G. L. CLOSS and J. R. MILLER, Science 240, 440 (1988).
32. M. D. Johnson, J. R. Miller, N. S. Green, and G. L. Closs, J Phys Chem-Us 93, 1173 (1989).
33. W. Fu, K. K. Pushpa, W. Rettig, W. E. Schmid, and S. A. Trushin, Photoch Photobio Sci 1, 255 (2002).
34. 周威銧, 胞嘧啶之氣相超快激發態動態學研究：激發態衰減時間與激發能量的依存性, in 化學系. 2008, 國立清華大學: 新竹市. p. 106.
35. 陳依微, 酚-氨陽離子錯合物中之超快質子轉移反應動態學研究, in 化學系. 2011, 國立清華大學: 新竹市. p. 91.
36. 何智偉, 氣相飛秒化學反應動態學研究1.二甲基亞碸之超快三體光解反應動態學2.偶氮苯陽離子在異構化途徑之同調振動, in 化學系. 2008, 國立清華大學: 新竹市. p. 226.
37. Eldredge, B.A.A.P., General Chemistry: Principles, Patterns, and Applications, v. 1.0 (2 Volume Set).
38. R.E. Smalley, L. Wharton, and D.H. Levy, Acc. Chem. Res. 10, 139 (1977)
39. W.C. Wiley, and I.H. McLaren, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 26, 1150 (1955)