研究生: |
呂紹酉 Lu, Shao-Yu |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
韓國代購的養成與實踐:臺灣女性創業的資源拼裝與性別協商 The Cultivation and Practice of Korean Daigou: Resource Bricolage and Gender Negotiation in Taiwanese Women’s Entrepreneurship |
指導教授: |
沈秀華
Shen, Hsiu-Hua |
口試委員: |
張晉芬
Chang, Chin-Fen 王宏仁 Wang, Hong-Zen 黃宗儀 Huang, Tsung-Yi 鄭志鵬 Cheng, Chih-Peng |
學位類別: |
博士 Doctor |
系所名稱: |
人文社會學院 - 社會學研究所 Institute of Sociology |
論文出版年: | 2025 |
畢業學年度: | 113 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 212 |
中文關鍵詞: | 代購 、女性創業 、性別協商 、性別化 、資源併裝 、韓國東大門 、快時尚 、工作與家庭 |
外文關鍵詞: | Daigou, Women's Entrepreneurship, Gender Negotiation, Gender Dynamics, Resource Bricolage, Dongdaemun Market, Fast Fashion, Work-Family Balance |
相關次數: | 點閱:2 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
跨國代購是一個高度女性化的經濟活動。過去的研究把代購視為一種依循消費者指示、暫時性和被動式的經濟活動,不具備持續性與創造性的創業精神。近年來的主流論述甚至指出,代購行業在全球化和物流科技的進步下,會喪失其中介和橋樑的關鍵角色,從而削弱其成長性,甚至可能導致代購行業的逐漸萎縮或被完全取代。本研究指出,這些觀點與論述雖强調市場與科技變革的重要性,但卻忽視了女性作爲創業主體在代購過程中的專業性與創造性。
本研究聚焦於一些從事韓國代購的臺灣女性經驗,透過她們往返臺灣與韓國東大門之間的代購實踐,去探問臺灣女性在創業過程中,如何協商市場經濟需求與社會性別規範之間的張力,並在此過程中如何應對來自跨國市場、在地消費需求、個人發展與家庭照顧責任之間的多重壓力?
研究方法採用深度訪談與參與觀察,訪談52位韓國代購者,並進行韓國東大門與臺灣女性的參與觀察,分析她們的代購養成過程。透過拼裝(bricolage)概念,呈現代購者在東大門快時尚基礎設施與生產消費機制中,動員社會資源,習得相關知識與技能以及協商性別化創業過程的限制。
透過這些經驗資料的整理與分析,研究發現,臺灣女性對於從事代購的創業精神與實踐是一個性別化過程:(1)整體而言,代購創業的運作是一個性別化的循環過程,行動者透過女性的日常生活經驗與社會網絡,拼裝多元社會資源,並在動機、採購、銷售與顧客回饋等流程中建構出有利於女性的創業風格。(2)透過資源拼裝所創造的性別化創業風格,不僅是商品美學的展現,也是女性在代購市場中確立競爭優勢的行動策略。這種創業風格的發展受到資金、商品等物質資源的影響,同時依賴物流體系、批發市場(檔口)、銷售平台與社群網絡等性別化的社會資源來運作。(3)女性代購者在代購的基礎設施、女性同行、親友與顧客等支持之間建立動態的合作與競爭機制。同時,也必須協調個人親密關係與家庭照顧責任,並在性別框架內發展出兼顧靈活性的買賣專業技能。(4)代購創業並未實質削弱傳統家父長制對女性的約束,而是在性別規範與經濟壓力的雙重夾擊下,女性更努力地拼裝社會資源,為自身創造有限的協商空間,從而鬆動不對等的性別關係去尋求經濟機會與個人發展。
本研究貢獻在於拓展性別與創業的研究議程,透過女性為主體敘事的視角,展現她們在有限資源的條件下,運用東大門快時尚基礎設施進行代購技能的養成,形成以女性網絡為核心的支持與競爭的創業系統。然而,在零工經濟與彈性工時日益普及的勞動趨勢下,代購雖為女性提供相對靈活的工作安排,卻也加深她們在經濟自主與性別規範間的結構性困境。這種彈性並非純粹的自主選擇,而是鑲嵌於傳統性別分工體制,使女性需持續協商市場競爭壓力、個人親密關係與家庭照顧責任,去鬆動性別不平等的社會關係。
Daigou—the transnational practice of purchasing and reselling international products on behalf of customers—has emerged as a significant and highly feminized form of economic activity in East Asia. Existing studies often frame daigou as an informal, temporary labor practice that passively responds to consumer demand, lacking entrepreneurial creativity and long-term viability. Moreover, market-determinist perspectives suggest that technological advancements in e-commerce and logistics will render daigou obsolete. This dissertation challenges these assumptions, arguing that such narratives obscure the entrepreneurial agency and strategic adaptability of women engaged in daigou. Rather than serving as passive intermediaries, daigou practitioners actively reconfigure economic opportunities within gendered labor dynamics and transnational marketplaces.
Focusing on Taiwanese women engaged in daigou in South Korea, this dissertation examines their business activities between Taiwan and Seoul’s Dongdaemun wholesale market. It situates their work within the broader structural contexts of fast-fashion production, cross-border trade, and gendered labor regimes. By tracing how these women navigate market structures while negotiating the gendered social expectations embedded in familial and societal roles, this study contributes to sociological debates on gender, labor, and informal economies in global capitalism. Through this lens, daigou emerges as a site of gendered entrepreneurship, where women exercise agency and adaptability within, rather than in opposition to, structural constraints.
Methodologically, this dissertation employs in-depth interviews and participant observation with 52 Taiwanese daigou practitioners to analyze their entrepreneurial trajectories. Drawing on the concept of bricolage from Anthropology and Cultural Studies—the process of assembling diverse resources to address emerging challenges—this study examines how these women mobilize personal networks, acquire industry-specific knowledge, and navigate logistical obstacles within the transnational trade system of Dongdaemun. Their entrepreneurial strategies encompass managing currency exchange, wholesale procurement, and transnational shipping, while simultaneously balancing caregiving responsibilities and societal expectations. Far from a simple act of reselling, daigou is a dynamic and evolving form of entrepreneurship that demands continuous innovation, adaptability, and resilience.
This dissertation advances four key arguments. First, daigou operates as a gendered entrepreneurial cycle in which practitioners engage in bricolage, leveraging social resources and gendered networks to sustain their businesses. Second, the entrepreneurial style that emerges from bricolage is not merely an aesthetic curation of goods but a strategic practice that enables women to establish competitive advantages in the daigou market. This style is co-constructed through financial, material, and social resources, including digital sales platforms, logistics networks, and wholesale relationships. Third, the acquisition of daigou-related skills reflects a gendered form of professionalization, as women develop expertise in commerce, currency exchange, and supply chain management while balancing family obligations. Finally, despite economic precarity and patriarchal gender norms, daigou practitioners actively restructure their work through creative resource recombination, carving out new spaces for economic participation.
This dissertation contributes to sociological research on gender and entrepreneurship by providing a nuanced analysis of how informal economic practices emerge and evolve within the specific cultural and economic contexts of East Asia. Through a female-centered narrative perspective, it illustrates how women, despite limited resources, leverage the fast-fashion infrastructure of Dongdaemun to develop their purchasing agent skills, forming a female-centered entrepreneurial system characterized by both support and competition. However, as gig economies and flexible work arrangements expand, daigou exemplifies how flexible employment options offer women economic opportunities while simultaneously entrenching structural dilemmas between autonomy and gendered labor expectations. This flexibility is not merely an individual choice but is embedded in enduring gendered divisions of labor, requiring women to continuously negotiate market competition pressures, intimate relationships, and caregiving responsibilities in their efforts to challenge and reshape gendered social inequalities.
中文書目
Lévi-Strauss, C. (克洛德‧列維-斯特勞斯)。2006[1989]。《野性的思維》。于李幼蒸譯,一版。北京:中國人民大學出版社。
王長偉。(1994年5月23日)。〈台韓「黃金航線」南韓也搶破頭﹥,《大紀元》。<https://www.epochtimes.com/b5/4/9/2/n647698.htm>(上網日期:2022年5月5日)
王美珍。2014。〈「韓國時尚」攻台,五分埔商家全面備戰〉。《遠見雜誌》。546:60-66。
仝澤蓉,(2020年4月16日)。〈創業達人要當服飾店老闆〉。《聯合晚報》,B6版。
古詩苹。2011。《時裝設計產業知慧財產保護之研究》。台北:政治大學知慧財產研究所碩士論文。
何秀玲,(2020年4月29日)。〈時尚品牌被電商直播打敗〉。《經濟日報》,A5版/焦點。
何淑貞。(1992年3月5日)。〈「單幫客」發現發財新路線,從臺灣帶成本到大陸可賺三倍〉。《經濟日報》,7版。
吳姿誼(2019)。《韓國連線:社群媒體時代下韓國批貨賣家的文化勞動》。臺灣師範大學大眾傳播研究所碩士論文。
宋依宸、陳心瑜,(2015年7月13日)。〈韓國快時尚來襲 迷妹搶包一口氣買50個〉。《聯合報》,6版。
周嘉瑩,(2005年4月29日)。〈巧扮宋慧喬 妳仔細瞧瞧 浪漫滿屋 青春無敵 適穿對象:不作做的妳〉。《聯合報》,D6版。
---,(2006年6月29日a)。〈女生服飾吹韓風〉。《聯合報》,C3版。
---,(2006年10月8日b)。〈裝學生妹 永遠18歲〉。《聯合報》,B2版。
林上祚,(2015年3月9日)。〈女生服飾吹韓風〉。《聯合報》,AA3版。
林品萱,(2016年10月31日)。〈韓劇嬌點女星演繹秋冬K-Fashion〉。《聯合報》,10。
林韋伶(2012)。《信賴、秘密與價值:跑單幫的交易地理》。新竹:清華大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
邱金蘭。(1993年4月26日)。〈自己帶貨易被罰 代工運費課稅輕〉。《經濟日報》,5版。
修瑞瑩。(2002年6月29日)。〈韓流熱、熱到不行〉。《聯合晚報》,6版。
廖敏如、彭慧明。(2002年5月12日)。〈愛買族,開e店購錢去〉。《聯合報》,9版。
張志隆、邱綺瑩(2010)。《韓國批貨賺到翻》。台北:早安財經文化有限公司。
張為竣,(2017年11月6日)。〈賣衣兼代購 顧客需求最大〉。《聯合報》,B6版。
張慧慈、林慶隆、彭致翎、陳怡臻、徐蔚芳(2015)。《社會學名詞》。台北:國家教育研究院。
許如婷(2023)。〈後韓流的跨國文化景觀:台灣「韓迷」的文化消費與身分交疊〉。《台灣學誌》 22:1-25。
許韶芹,(2006年11月16日)。〈網路賣女裝 月營收30萬〉。《聯合報》,B3版。
陳英姿,(2003年7月9日)。〈西門町 年輕人創業天堂〉。《聯合報》,B5版。
黃宗儀、胡俊佳(2022)。〈「硬著頭皮」為母則強:在韓臺灣女性婚姻移民之母職實踐〉。《地理學報》 103:3-35。
黃偉宙(2014)。《服飾採買決勝創業術:新手、老鳥、網拍、開店都必備的韓國&中國批貨實戰寶典!》。台北:麥浩斯出版社。
劉毓儒(2011)。《我是日貨族:日貨連線認同與消費之研究》。臺北:東吳大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
蔡益彬(1993年3月6日)。〈大趨勢 新富女 錢力、權力、崛起中的決策新女性〉。《經濟日報》,31版。
聯合報。(1986年11月19日)。〈舶來品市場,風水輪流轉〉。《經濟日報》,10版。
---。(1987年11月19日)。〈舶來品來自韓國,仔細查也是仿冒〉。《聯合報》,7版。
羅建怡(2014年3月6日)。〈來自星星的效應 掀赴韓追星熱〉。《聯合報》,C8版。
英文書目
Adiku, G. A. 2017. Negotiating transnational intimacy: A study of Ghanaian couples. Ghana Social Science Journal, 14(1), 161-192.
Ahl, H. 2006. Why research on women entrepreneurs needs new directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 595–621.
Baitas, M. 2022. The traders of Central Bazaar, Astana: motivation and networks. In S. Fehlings, & H. H. Karrar (eds.), Informal Markets and Trade in Central Asia and the Caucasus (pp. 33-45). London: Routledge.
Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. 2005. Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative science quarterly, 50(3), 329-366.
Baker, T., Miner, A. S., & Eesley, D. T. 2003. Improvising firms: Bricolage, account giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process. Research policy, 32(2), 255-276.
Bauman, Z. 2013. Liquid love: On the frailty of human bonds. London: John Wiley & Sons.
Bloch, A. 2011. Emotion work, shame, and post-Soviet women entrepreneurs: Negotiating ideals of gender and labor in a global economy. Identities, 18(4), 317-351.
Brown-Glaude, W. R. 2011. Higglers in Kingston: Women's Informal Work in Jamaica. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
Campbell, J. L. 2020. Institutional change and globalization. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Chung, S. 2020. A hint of crisis resilience of industrial agglomeration: The production networks and spatial characteristics of Dongdaemun fashion industry. Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea, 23(1), 18-34.
Cieślewska, A. 2013. From shuttle trader to businesswomen: the informal bazaar economy in Kyrgyzstan. In J. Morris, & A. Polese (eds.), The Informal Post-Socialist Economy: Embedded Practices and livelihood (pp. 121-134). London: Routledge.
Clark, S. C. 2000. Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Human relations, 53(6), 747-770.
Desai, M. 2008. Gender and the politics of possibilities: Rethinking globablization. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Deuze, M. 2006. Participation, remediation, bricolage: Considering principal components of a digital culture. The information society, 22(2), 63-75.
Eder, M., & Öz, Ö. 2010. From cross-border exchange networks to transnational trading practices? The case of shuttle traders in Laleli, Istanbul. in M. L. Djelic, & S. Quack (eds), Transnational communities: shaping global economic governace. (pp. 82-104). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eggart, C. 2023. ‘They Called Us Spekulyanty’: Shame and Pride in the Biographies of Female Shuttle Traders in Post-Soviet Russia. Europe-Asia Studies, 75(10), 1677-1697.
Fehlings, S. (2022). Traders, Informal Trade and Markets Between the Caucasus and China. Singapore: Springer Nature.
Fligstein, N. 2001. The architecture of markets: An economic sociology of twenty-first-century capitalist societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Freeman, C. 1997. Reinventing higglering across transnational zones: Barbadian women juggle the triple shift. In C. L. Springfield (eds.), Daughters of Caliban: Caribbean Women in the Twentieth Century (pp. 68-95). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
---. 2001. Is local: global as feminine: masculine? Rethinking the gender of globalization. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 26(4), 1007-1037.
---. 2015. Entrepreneurial selves: Neoliberal respectability and the making of a Caribbean middle class. London: Duke University Press.
Garni, A. 2014. Transnational Traders: El Salvador's Women Couriers in Historical Perspective. Sociological Forum, 29(1), 165-188.
Gaughan, J. P., & Ferman, L. A. 1987. Toward an understanding of the informal economy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 493(1), 15-25.
Grabowska, I. 2018. Social skills, workplaces and social remittances: a case of post-accession migrants. Work, Employment and Society, 32(5), 868-886.
Holmes, M., & Why, M. 2004. An equal distance? Individualisation, gender and intimacy in distance relationships. The Sociological Review, 52(2), 180-200.
Jun, M. S. 2005. Local Production Systems, endogenous development and internationalization: The case of the Korean garment district, Dongdaemun. The University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Kasfir, S. L. 1996. African Art in a Suitcase. Transition, 69, 146-158.
Kim, M. 2014. Exploratory study on global marketing strategy for the Dongdaemun fashion district. Journal of the Korean Society of Costume, 64(3), 47-61.
Landolt, P. 2001. Salvadoran economic transnationalism: Embedded strategies for household maintenance, immigrant incorporation, and entrepreneurial expansion. Global Networks, 1(3), 217-242.
Lauri, J. 2021. Feminism means business: Business feminism, sisterhood and visibility. NORA-Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 29(2), 83-95.
Marques, M. M., Santos, R., & Araújo, F. 2001. Ariadne’s thread: Cape Verdean women in transnational webs. Global Networks, 1(3), 283-306.
Martin, F. 2017. Rethinking network capital: Hospitality work and parallel trading among Chinese students in Melbourne. Mobilities, 12(6), 890-907.
Morgan G. 2001. Transnational communities and business systems. Global Networks, 1, 113-30
Morokvasic, M. 2003. Transnational mobility and gender: a view from post-wall Europe. In M. Morokvasic-Müller, U. Erel, & K. Shinozaki (eds.), Crossing Borders and Shifting Boundaries: Vol. I: Gender on the Move (pp. 101-133). Wiesbaden: Springer.
---. 2004. ‘Settled in mobility’: engendering post-wall migration in Europe. Feminist review, 77(1), 7-25.
Mukhina, I. 2014. Women and the birth of Russian capitalism: A history of the shuttle trade. DeKalb, Illinois: Northern Illinois University Press.
Muzvidziwa, V. 2001. Zimbabwe's cross-border women traders: multiple identities and responses to new challenges. Journal of contemporary African studies, 19(1), 67-80.
Öz, Ö. 2004. Clusters and competitive advantage: The Turkish experience. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Park, S. Y. 2021. Stitching the 24-hour city: life, labor, and the problem of speed in Seoul. New York: Cornell University Press.
Piart, L. 2013. Transition, Migration, Capitalism: Female Uzbek Shuttle Traders in Istanbul. In L. Marlène (eds.), Migration and Social Upheaval as the Face of Globalization in Central Asia. Social Sciences in Asia: Vol. 34(pp. 333-354). Leiden: Brill.
Peberdy, S. A. 2000. Border Crossings: Small Enterpreneurs and Cross‐border Trade between South Africa and Mozambique. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 91(4), 361-378.
Portes, A., Guarnizo, L. E., & Haller, W. J. 2002. Transnational entrepreneurs: An alternative form of immigrant economic adaptation. American sociological review, 67(2), 278-298.
Ribeiro, A., Rezaei, S., & Dana, L. P. 2012. Gender and family in transnational entrepreneurship. International Journal of Business and Globalisation, 8(3), 409-420.
Sasunkevich, O. 2013. ‘Business as casual': Shuttle trade on the Belarus-Lithuania border 1. In M. Jeremy & P. Abel (eds.), The informal post-Socialist economy (pp. 135-151). London: Routledge.
Schumpeter, J. A. 2000. Entrepreneurship as innovation. Entrepreneurship: The social science view, 51-75.
Seo, Y., Cruz, A. G. B., & Fifita, I. M. 2020. Cultural globalization and young Korean women’s acculturative labor: K-beauty as hegemonic hybridity. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 23(4), 600-618.
Shen, H. H. 2012. Transnational or Compatriotic Bourgeoisie? Taiwanese Business and Its Contesting Citizenship across the Taiwan Strait. In K.S. Chang and B. S. Turner (eds.). Contested citizenship in east asia, (pp.115-132). London and New York: Routledge.
---. 2014. Staying in Marriage across the Taiwan Strait: Gender, Migration, and Transnational Family. In S. D. Deborah and S. L. Friedman (eds.). China.Wives, Husband, and Love: Marriage and Sexuality in Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Urban China, (pp.262-284). Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press.
Simone, A. 2004. People as infrastructure: Intersecting fragments in Johannesburg. Public culture, 16(3), 407-429.
Smallbone, D., & Welter, F. 2012. Cross-border entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 24(3-4), 95-104.
Steel, G. 2021. Going global–going digital. Diaspora networks and female online entrepreneurship in Khartoum, Sudan. Geoforum, 120, 22-29.
Stoykova, N. 2015. Shuttling More than Goods: Collective Support among Turkish-Bulgarian Shuttle Traders. Claremont-UC Undergraduate Research Conference on the European Union: Vol. 2015, Article 9. DOI: 10.5642/urceu.201501.09 Available at: https://scholarship.claremont.edu/urceu/vol2015/iss1/9
Tsai, E. 2023. Sourcing and Tapping South Korea's Fast Fashion: The Transnational Trade and Trade-Offs of Taiwanese Fashion Entrepreneurs in the Early 2010s. Situations: Cultural Studies in the Asian Context, 16(1), 77-110.
Visscher, K., Heusinkveld, S., & O'Mahoney, J. 2018. Bricolage and identity work. British journal of management, 29(2), 356-372.
Voydanoff, P. 2007. Work, family, and community: Exploring interconnections. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Walther, O. J. 2015. Business, brokers and borders: The structure of West African trade networks. The Journal of Development Studies, 51(5), 603-620.
Xie, Z. 2018. Mobilities, communication, and Asia Im/materializing cross-border mobility: A study of Mainland China–Hong Kong Daigou (Cross-border shopping services on global consumer goods). International Journal of Communication, 12, 14.
Yükseker, D. 2002. Business relations into/from gendered social relations: Exchange in the transnational suitcase trade market of Laleli. New Perspectives on Turkey, 27, 77-106.
---. 2004. Trust and gender in a transnational market: the public culture of Laleli, Istanbul. Public Culture, 16(1), 47-65.
---. 2007. Shuttling goods, weaving consumer tastes: Informal trade between Turkey and Russia. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(1), 60-72.
Zhang, L. 2017. Fashioning the feminine self in “prosumer capitalism”: Women's work and the transnational reselling of Western luxury online. Journal of Consumer Culture, 17(2), 184-204.
Zhao, X.. 2018. Im/materializing cross-border mobility: A study of mainland China–Hong Kong Daigou (Cross-border shopping services on global consumer goods). International Journal of Communication, 12, 4052-4065.
---. 2021. Digital labour in transnational mobility: Chinese international students’ online boundary work in daigou. New Media & Society, 23(9), 2554-2574.