研究生: |
王佑 |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
結合策略地圖與資料包絡分析法之接單策略評選模式-以某手機零組件製造廠為例 Combining Strategy Map and Data Envelopment Analysis to Evaluate Order Acceptance Strategy - A Case Study of Cell Phone Components Manufacturer |
指導教授: | 劉志明 |
口試委員: | |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
工學院 - 工業工程與工程管理學系 Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management |
論文出版年: | 2006 |
畢業學年度: | 94 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 85 |
中文關鍵詞: | 接單策略 、策略地圖 、資料包絡分析法 、敏感度分析 |
外文關鍵詞: | Order acceptance policies, Strategy map, Data envelopment analysis, sensitivity analysis |
相關次數: | 點閱:1 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
有鑒於企業訂單的不斷湧入,在既有的工廠中,會因為產能的不足,無法承接訂單的所有訂購數量。經過考量後,可能會採取增建廠房或是外包來提升產能,以避免失去訂單,降低獲利。另外一種狀況則是這段期間市場需求降低(如季節性產品),此時擴建的廠房或是額外聘用的員工的產能就會閒置,隨意裁員又會造成許多營運、商譽、形象以及社會問題,造成更大的損失。由於上述種種原因,企業在考慮如何接單的問題上,必須考慮到許多複雜的因素與關係,因此企業需要一套接單決策輔助模式,來幫助企業在制定接單策略時,能夠全面考慮各項因素(顧客關係、獲利率、製造成本等)。
本研究結合了策略地圖與資料包絡分析法,建構一個接單策略評選模式。利用策略地圖分析企業整體的策略與流程,並根據策略地圖分析結果,展開與建立績效評估指標,再根據管理上的實際意義,給予各項評估指標適當的權重範圍。由於本研究的規劃時程屬於中長期規劃,因此必須判斷下個規劃期市場的需求屬於淡季或旺季,以制定相對應可能的接單策略,接著利用資料包絡分析法的數學模式,進行客觀的接單策略效率評比,評選出整體效率最佳的接單策略。最後考慮到中長期規劃時程內績效評估指標可能有所變動,進行敏感度分析,以了解在評估指標改變時,最佳接單策略是否有所改變。
為了驗證方法的實用性,本研究以國內某手機零組件製造公司之接單策略制定為例,依照上述之方法流程,選出整體效率最佳的接單策略。
In facing the growth of customer orders, a company usually need to face the problem that it cannot accept all the orders because of the lack of capacity. In order to avoid the lost orders and profit, some solutions may be to expanse the capacity, to work overtime, to outsource and so on. The other situation is that the market demand is less than the supply capacity, and so some capacity or employees are idled. Under this situation, the arbitrary lay-off of employees may result in bigger problems such as affecting the daily operations, corporate goodwill and image and so on. Based on the above reasons, a company has to consider a lot of complicated factors and relationships in conducting order acceptance. Therefore, it is desirable to develop an order acceptance decision-support model to evaluate the overall factors in conducting the order acceptance task.
This research has combined the strategy map and the data envelopment analysis method to construct an order acceptance decision-support model. First we analyze the overall corporation strategy and the core processes with the strategy map to construct performance indices, than certain weight is assigned for each performance index based on its practical meaning of management. The next step is to develop possible order acceptance policies (i.e. the decision making units, DMUs) according to the demand forecast, and than evaluate the overall efficiency for each DMU with the data envelopment analysis method to find the DMU which has the best overall efficiency. Finally, by performing sensitivity analysis, a company can find out the allowable variation range of each DMU and its performance evaluation index.
A case study of a cell phone component manufacturer is conducted to verify the feasibility of the proposed methodology. The results show that it can be used to find the most desirable order acceptance policy.
英文部分
1. Aaker, D. A. (1984), Strategy Market Management, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
2. Andersen, P., N.C. Petersen, “A Procedure for Ranking Efficient Units in Data Envelopment Analysis,” Management Science, 39, 1261-1264, 1993.
3. Balve, P., Wiendahl, H.H., and Westkamper, E., “Oder Management in Trasformable Business Structures-Basics and Concepts,” Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 17, 461-468, 2001.
4. Boussofiane, A., Dyson, R.G., and Thanassoulis, E., “Applied Data Envelopment Analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research, 52, 1-15, 1991.
5. Chan, H.K., Chan Felix, T.S., and Samaranayake, P., “Adaptive Make-to-Oder Strategy in Distributed Manufacturing Supply Chains,” IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics, 2005.
6. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., and Rhodes, E.L., “Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units,” European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444, 1978.
7. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Wei, Q.L., and Huang, Z.M., “Cone Ratio Data Envelopment Analysis and Multi-Objective Programming,” International Journal of System Science, 20(7), 1099-1118, 1989.
8. Cooper, W.W., Park, K.S., and Pastor, J.T., “Marginal Rates and Elasticities of Substitution with Additive Models in DEA,” The Journal of Productivity Analysis, 13(2), 105-123, 2000.
9. Copacino, W. C., Supply Chain Management: The Basic and Beyond, St. Lucie Press, Boca Raton, 1997.
10. Ehteshami, B., Petrakian, R. G., and Shabe, P. M., “Trade- off in cycle time management: hot lots,” IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 101-106, May 1992.
11. Farrell, M.J., “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency,” Journal of Royal Statistical Society, 120, 253-290, 1957.
12. Gopal, C. and H. Cypress, Integrated Distribution Management: Competing on Customer Service, Time, and Cost, Irwin, Homewood, IL, 1993.
13. Joachim Berlak and Bernhard Deifel, “Challenging the Unpredictable: Changeable Order Management Systems,” IEEE International Conference on Volume 3, 6-9 Oct, 2002.
14. Kaplan R. S., and Norton, D. P., “The Balanced Scorecard/Translating Strategy into Action”, Harvard Business School Press, 1996.
15. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, P.D., “The balanced scoreboard-measures that drives performance”, Harvard Business Review, January-February, pp. 71-9. 1992.
16. Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P., “The Strategy-focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment”, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA, 2001.
17. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P., The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA 02163, 1996.
18. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P., Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible outcomes, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA 02163, 2004.
19. Lewin, A.Y., Morey, R.C. and Cook,T.J., “Evaluating the Administrative Efficiency of Courts.” Omega: The International Journal of Management Science, Vol.10, No.4, P.401-411, 1982.
20. Lin, F. R. and M. J. Shaw, “Reengineering the Order Fulfillment Process in the Supply Chain Networks,” International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 10, No. 3, 1998, 197-229.
21. Narahari, Y., and Khan, L. M., “Performance analysis of scheduling policies in re-entrant manufacturing systems,” Computers & Operations Research, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 37-51, 1996.
22. Neely, A. and Bourne, M., “Why Measurement Initiatives Fail,” Measuring Business Excellence, pp. 3-7, 2000.
23. Ondrich, J., and Ruggiero, J., “Efficiency Measurement in the Stochastic Frontier Model,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.129, pp.434-436, 2001.
24. Roll, Y., Cook, W.D., and Golany, B., “Controlling Factor Weights in DEA,” IIE Transactions, 23(1), 2-9, 1991.
25. Seiford, L.M. and Zhu, J., “Identifying Excess and Deficits in Chinese Industrial Productivity (1953-1990). A Weight Data Envelopment Analysis Approach,” Omega: The International Journal of Management Science, 26(2), 279-296, 1998.
26. Tenhunen, J., Ukko, J., Markus, T. and Rantanen, H., “Applying Balanced Scorecard Principles on the SAKE-system: Case Telekolmio Oy,” Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Performance Management, pp.423-434, 2003.
27. Thompson, R.G., Lamotte, L.R., Oxspring, H., Davis, G.B., and Blaich, O.P., “Measuring the Value of Information: The Case of Data on the Cost of Production Cotton,” Annals of Operations Research, 2, 317-328, 1986.
28. Waller, M. A., D. Woolsey, and R. Seaker, “Reengineering Order Fulfillment,” The International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol 6, No.2, pp.1-10,1995.
29. Wu, M. C., and Chen, S. Y., “Multiple criteria decision-making model for justifying the acceptance of rush orders,” Production Planning and Control, Vol. 8, pp. 753-761, 1997.
30. Yu, C.Y. and Huang, H.P., “Development of the Order Fulfillment Process in the Foundry Fab by Applying Distributed Multi-Agents on a Generic Message-Passing Platform,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, Vol. 6, No. 4, December, 2001.
中文部份
1. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P.原著,朱道凱譯,平衡計分卡—資訊時代的策略管理工具,臉譜文化,1999。
2. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P.原著,陳正平譯,策略地圖—串聯組織策略從形成到徹底實施的動態管理工具,臉譜文化,2004。
3. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P.原著,劉珊如譯,策略核心組織—以平衡計分卡有效執行企業策略,臉譜文化,2001。
4. Niven, P.R.原著,于泳泓譯,平衡計分卡最佳實務/按部就班成功導入,商周出版社,2002。
5. 王立志,系統化運籌與關硬鏈管理,滄海書局,88年6月。
6. 李書行,「過程結果並重,個人群體兼顧—務實創新的策略性績效評估」,會計學月刊,第113期,頁15-23,民國84年。
7. 吳杉堯,「緊急訂單與動態排程對自動化製造系統的績效影響模擬研究」,高雄工專學報,第21 期,pp. 299-315,1991。
8. 吳炳松, “An Empirical Study on Measuring Bank Branch Operating Efficiency,” 高雄第一科技大學財務管理學系碩士論文,2001。
9. 孫遜,資料包絡分析法—理論與應用,揚智文化,2004。
10. 高強、黃旭男、Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,管理績效評估—資料包絡分析法,華泰文化,2003。
11. 陳亞男,「多廠生產規劃之供應鏈決策支援模式」,國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文,台北,2001。
12. 陳俊龍,「訂單式生產系統下承接緊急訂單之評估模式」,國立屏東技術學院資訊管理技術研究所碩士論文,1997。
13. 陳美棟,「訂單式生產系統之緊急訂單評估」,義守大學管理科學研究所碩士論文,高雄,2000。
14. 曾煥雯,「跨廠訂單分配模式之構建—應用模擬退火演算法」,元智大學工業工程研究所碩士論文,2000。
15. 黃旭男,「資料包絡分析法使用程序之研究及其在非營利組織效率評估上之應用」,國立交通大學管理科學研究所博士論文,1993。
16. 黃亭瑜,「行動電話效率分析—資料包絡分析法」,東吳大學經濟學系碩士論文,2001。
17. 黃淑菊,「多廠規劃下訂單分派模式之構建」,國立交通大學工業工程研究所碩士論文,新竹,2001。