研究生: |
陳建豪 Chen, Chien-Hao |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
飛機航班之艙等配給決策方法 Seat Class Rationing Decision Methods for an Airline Flight |
指導教授: |
洪一峯
Hung, Yi-Feng |
口試委員: | |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
工學院 - 工業工程與工程管理學系 Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management |
論文出版年: | 2009 |
畢業學年度: | 97 |
語文別: | 英文 |
論文頁數: | 50 |
中文關鍵詞: | 座位配置 、決策支援 、非同質性卜瓦松 |
外文關鍵詞: | seat allocation, decision support, non-homogeneous Poisson |
相關次數: | 點閱:5 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
航空公司可以將飛機上同一艙等的相同座位以不同的價格販賣給顧客。由於每位顧客對於價格的接受程度不同,航空公司會根據需求預測,將顧客區分為數種費率等級;費率等級越高的顧客,表示其消費金額比其他費率等級顧客高。當有顧客來到時,決策者必須立即決定是否要滿足該顧客的訂位需求。為了增加飛機的收益,決策者會傾向拒絕部分低費率等級的顧客訂位需求並且保留座位給較高費率等級的顧客。
本論文考慮一個將顧客區分為多種等級的單一航班問題。顧客來到服從非同質性的卜瓦松過程;決策者的目標是最大化該航班的收益。本論文提出了兩種方法針對每一位來到顧客的訂位需求進行滿足與否其需求之即時判斷,此兩種方法分別是動態座位配給決策步驟(dynamic seat rationing decision procedure)以及期望收益價差決策步驟(expected revenue gap decision procedure)。根據模擬實驗的結果得知,期望收益價差方法相較於先前的研究方法而言,獲取的平均收益為最大,並且在不同的實驗條件下,期望收益價差方法皆有非常穩定的表現;同時,期望收益價差方法能夠在非常短的時間內,答覆顧客的訂位需求。
For the airline business, airliners are allowed to sell the seats of a same cabin for different prices. Normally, they allocate the seats of a cabin class into a number of the discrete fare classes based on the demand forecast of customers with different acceptable prices. A customer with demand in a higher fare class is willing to pay more. Each time when a customer with a fare class arrives, an airliner must decide whether to fulfill or reject the request immediately. In order to increase the revenue, the airliner may want to reject certain lower fare class customer requests and reserve the seats for future higher fare class customers.
The problem this study focuses on is rationing decision for a single-leg flight with multiple fare classes and the customer arrival process of an individual class is non-homogeneous Poisson. The objective is to maximize the revenue of a flight. This study develop two real-time decision procedures, dynamic seat rationing (DSR) and expected revenue gap (ERG) to help the airliner make a decision when a customer arrives. The simulation results show that ERG approach perform best among all test approaches and is very robust under various problem conditions. Also, it takes a very short computation time to execute on computer.
Badinelli, R.D. (2000), “An optimal, dynamic policy for hotel yield management”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 121, No. 3, pp. 476-503.
Belobaba, P.P. (1987), “Airline yield management: An overview of seat inventory control”, Transportation Science, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 63-73.
Bertsimas, D. and de Boer, S. (2005), “Simulation-based booking limits for airline revenue management”, Operations Research, Vol. 53, No. 1, pp. 90-106.
Brumelle, S.L. and Mcgill, J.I. (1993), “Airline seat allocation with multiple nested fare classes”, Operations Research, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 27-137.
Carroll, W.J. and Grimes, R.C. (1995), “Evolutionary change in product management: experiences in the car rental industry”, Interfaces, Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 84-104.
Curry, R.E. (1990), “Optimal airline seat allocation with fare classes nested by origins and destinations”, Transportation Science, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp193-207.
De Boer, S.V., Freling, R. and Piersma, N. (1999), “Mathematical programming for network revenue management revisited” Working paper, Econometric Institute, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Fink, A. and Reiners, T. (2006), “Modeling and solving the short-term car rental logistics problem”, Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 42, No. 4, pp. 272-292.
Glover, F., Glover, R., Lorenzo, J. and McMillan, C. (1982) “The passenger-mix problem in the scheduled airlines”, Interfaces, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 73-80.
Haerian, L., Homem-De-Mello, T. and Mount-Campbell, C.A. (2006), “Modeling revenue yield of reservation systems that use nested capacity protection strategies”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 104, No. 2, pp. 340-353.
Hung, Y.F. and Lee, T.Y. (2007), “Capacity rationing decision procedures with order profit as a continuous random variable”, unpublished paper, Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering management, National TsingHua University.
Lautenbacher, C.J. and Stidham, S. (1999), “The underlying Markov decision process in the single-leg airline yield management problem”, Transportation Science, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 136-146.
Lee T.C. and Hersh M. (1993), “A model for dynamic airline seat inventory control with multiple seat bookings”, Transportation Science, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 252-265
Liang, Y.G. (1999), “Solution to continuous time dynamic yield management model”, Transportation Science, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 117-123
Littlewood, K. (1972), “Forecasting and control of passenger booking”, AGIFORS Symposium Proc., Vol. 12, pp. 95-117.
Norman, E.D. and Mayer, K.J. (1997), “Yield management in Las Vegas casino hotels”, Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, Vol. 38, No. 5, pp. 28-33.
Pak, K. and Piersma, N. (2002), “An overview of OR techniques for airline revenue management”, Statistica Neerlandica, Vol. 56, No. 4, pp. 480-496.
Ross, Sheldon M. (2006), Simulation, 4th edition, Academic Press, California, U.S.A.
Smith, B.C., Leimkuhler, J.F. and Darrow, R.M. (1992), “Yield management at American airlines”, Interfaces, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 8-31.
Subramanian, J., Stidham, S. and Lautenbache, C.J. (1999), “Airline yield management with overbooking, cancellations, and no-shows”, Transportation Science, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 147-167.
Van Ryzin, G. and McGill, J. (2000), “Revenue management without forecasting or optimization: An adaptive algorithm for determining airline seat protection levels”, Management Science, Vol. 46, No. 6, pp. 760-775.
Williamson, E.L. (1992), “Airline network seat inventory control: Methodologies and revenue impacts”, Ph.D. thesis, Flight Transportation Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
You, P.S. (2001), “Airline seat management with rejection-for-possible-upgrade decision”, Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 35, pp. 507-524.