研究生: |
吳東陽 Dong-Yang Wu |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
建立技術創業之組織知識本體論─以積體電路設計公司為例 Building Organizational Ontology for Technology Entrepreneurial Opportunities ─ The Case of IC Design Firm |
指導教授: |
朱詣尹
Yee-Yeen Chu |
口試委員: | |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
工學院 - 工業工程與工程管理學系 Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management |
論文出版年: | 2005 |
畢業學年度: | 93 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 77 |
中文關鍵詞: | IC設計 、技術創業 、本體論 |
外文關鍵詞: | IC design, Technology entrepreneurship, Ontology |
相關次數: | 點閱:2 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究主題是探討我國IC設計業之創業過程中對於機會確認、如何運用智慧資本補足知識落差等議題。在IC設計公司創業的過程中伴隨著知識在內部或外部間傳遞,配合著系統化、持續性地加以收集、整合、管理、學習與分享,以及有效的運用,而能不斷創新。故本研究以知識本體論為架構,透過產業案例,深入瞭解個案公司之知識連結與運用情況、現有知識管理情形、知識資本與市場連結網路等,探討新創事業如何建立知識的組合能力和機會的辨識能力,及在技術創業過程當中,如何運用本身的知識資本和創新組合在環境中發掘機會,確認在市場上的定位,並創造價值。
This research explores IC design industry’s opportunity recognition, technology entrepreneurship, and intellectual capital, as well as the transformation of knowledge gaps into local IC design firms’ competitive advantages. IC design firms’ innovation and entrepreneurial opportunities are generated by the systematical collection, integration, learning, and internal or external sharing of various types of knowledge, while continuously creating and utilizing new knowledge during the process.
This research focuses on building the ontology of organization knowledge with an analysis and synthesis of models in literature, in-depth interview of IC design firms, and ontological analysis of intellectual capital for fulfilling the knowledge gaps, leading to opportunity recognition and creation. The study explores the evolution of organization knowledge with the interaction with the social network in the case firms in order to improve their ability of knowledge combination and opportunity recognition in new environment. The resulting ontology framework is to represent the process the entrepreneurial case firms used to capitalize on their intellectual capital to confirm the opportunity and position in the market and create value.
1.Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R., & Ray, S., 2003. A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. Journal of Business Venturing.
2.Bourdieu, p., 1986. The forms of capital in J. G. Richardson. handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education.
3.Casson, M., 1982. The entrepreneur. Totowa, NJ: Barnes & Noble Books.
4.Choo, C. W., and Bontis, N., 2002., The strategic management of intellectual capital and organizational knowledge, Oxford University Press, New York.
5.Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A., 1990. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly.
6.Coleman, J. S., 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Society, 94: S95-S120.
7.Cristina, A., Garcia, B., Kunz, J., Ekstrom, M., & Kiviniemi, A., 2004. Building a project ontology with extreme collaboration and virtual design and construction, Advanced Engineering Informatics.
8.De Carolis, D., 2002. The role of social capital and organizational knowledge in enhancing entrepreneurial opportunities in high technology environments. The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge Published by Oxford University Press.
9.Drucker, P. F., 1985. Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles. Harper & Row, New York.
10.Edgington, T., Choi, B., Henson, K., Raghu, T.S., and Vinze, A., 2004. Adopting ontology to facilitate knowledge sharing, Communications of the ACM Vol. 47, No. 11
11.Fernandez-Breis, J. T., and Martinez-Bejar, R., 2002. A cooperative framework for integrating ontologies, Human-Computer Studies
12.Gartner, W., 1990. What are we talking about when we talk about entrepreneurship? Journal of Business Venturing, 5(1): 15–29.
13.Gilbert, M. and Gordey-Hayes, M., 1996. Understanding the Process of knowledge transfer to achieve successful technological innovation, Tcehnovation Vol.16, No.6, pp. 365-385
14.Gruber, T. & Olsen, G., 1994. An ontology for engineering mathematics. In J. Doyle, P .Torasso & E. Sandwall, Eds . Proceedings Fourth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning , pp . 258 – 269. San Mateo, CA :Morgan Kaurmann .
15.Gruninger, M. and Lee, J., 2002. Ontology applications and design. Communications of the ACM, Volume 45, Issue 2, Feb. 2002, pp.39-41
16.Jonathan T. Eckhardt, Scott A. Shane, 2003, Opportunities and entrepreneurship, Journal of Management 2003 29(3) 333–349
17.Kirzner, I., 1973. Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.Kitamura, Y., Kashiwase, M., Fuse, M., and Mizoguchi, R., 2004. Development of an ontological framework of functional design knowledge, Advanced Engineering Informatics
19.Kitamura, Y., Mizoguchi, R., 2003. Ontology-based description of functional design knowledge and its use in a functional way server, Expert System with Applications 24 (2003) 153–166
20.Kogut, B. and Zander, U., 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science 3(3):383-397
21.Leonard-Barton, D., 1992. Core Capability and Core Rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13.
22.McGuiness, D. L., Fikes, R., Rice, J . &Wilder, S., 2000. An environment for merging and testing large ontologies. In A. Cohn, F. Giunchiglia, & B. Selman, Eds. KR2000: Principles of knowledge representation and reasoning, San Francisco, USA, pp. 483–493.
23.Michael, G., and Jintae, L., Ontology applications and design, Communications of the ACM February 2002/Vol. 45, No. 2
24.Nahapiet, J., Ghoshal, S., 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital and the organization advance. Academy of Management Review.
25.Nonaka, I. and Konno, N., 1998. The concept of `ba': building a foundation for knowledge creation, California Management Review, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp.1-15
26.Nonaka, I., Toyama, R. and Konno, N., 2000. SECI, ba and leadership: a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation, Long Range Planning, Vol. 33, Issue. 1, pp. 5-34
27.Oakey, R.P., 2003. Technical entreprenenurship in high technology small firms: some observations on the implications for management. Technovation
28.Reimer, U., 1998. Knowledge integration for building organizational memories. Proceedings of the 11th Banff Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge Based Systems Workshop, Vol. 2, pp. KM-6.1-KM-6.20, Banff Canada.
29.Schumpeter, J., 1934. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. Harper & Row, New York.
30.Shane, S., 1999. Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organ. Sci. 11 (4), 448–469.
31.Sigrist, B., 1999. Entrepreneurial opportunity recognition. A presentation at the Annual UIC/AMA symposium at Marketing/Entrepreneurship Interface, Sofia-Antipolis, France.
32.Stevenson, H.H., Roberts, M.J., Grousbeck, H.I., 1985. New business ventures and the entrepreneur. Irwin, Homewood, IL.
33.Stojanovic, L., Maedche, A., Stojanovic, N. and Studer, R., 2003. Ontology evolution as reconfiguration-design problem solving. Proceedings of the international conference on Knowledge capture.
34.Uschold, M. and King, M., 1995. Towards a methodology for building ontologies,workshop on basic ontological issues in knowledge sharing, International Joint Conference on AI (IJCAI-95), Canada.
35.Von Hippel, E., 1994. Sticky information and the locus of problem solving: implications for innovation. Manage. Sci. 40 (4), 429–439.
36.Venkataraman, S., 1997. The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: an editor’s perspective. In: Katz, J., Brockhaus, R. (Eds.), Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth, vol. 3, pp. 119–138.
37.Yee-Yeen C. and Dong-Yang W., 2005. Building organizational ontology to identify technology entrepreneurial opportunities: the case of IC design firms. 14th International Conference on Management of Technology, Vienna, Austria.
38.Yin, R. K. 1989. Case study research: design and methods, London: Sage.