簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 簡文強
CHIENG, WEN CHIANG
論文名稱: 跨國企業海外研發子公司創新績效之決定因素:Dunning折衷理論之延伸觀點
The Determinants of Innovation Performance in MNE R&D Subsidiaries: The Extended Perspective of Dunning’s Eclectic Paradigm
指導教授: 張元杰
CHANG, YUAN CHIEH
李亭林
LEE, TING LIN
口試委員: 陳信宏
CHEN, SHIN HORNG
吳學良
WU, HSUEH LIANG
林博文
LIN, BO WEN
李亭林
LEE, TING LIN
張元杰
CHANG, YUAN CHIEH
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 科技管理學院 - 科技管理研究所
Institute of Technology Management
論文出版年: 2014
畢業學年度: 102
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 122
中文關鍵詞: 跨國企業研發子公司折衷理論創新績效
外文關鍵詞: Multinational Enterprise, R&D subsidiary, Dunning’s Eclectic Paradigm, innovative performance
相關次數: 點閱:1下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 跨國企業研發國際化為最近二、三十年來興起的議題,除了在已開發國家設立海外研發子公司之外,愈來愈多跨國企業從廿一世紀開始擴大於開發中國家設立研發子公司。
    依據Dunning折衷理論所提出之所有權-區位-內部化優勢,本研究試圖延伸折衷理論的觀點,藉由探討上述三種優勢之間的互動關係對於跨國企業海外研發子公司創新績效的影響,了解影響所有權優勢及區位優勢內部化的決定因素與影響機制。經過收集自經濟部國外研發中心計畫受補助之26個ICT產業個案之2003年至2009年間運作資料,本研究從而建立一個系統動力模型。建模與模擬結果顯示,若跨國企業之海外研發子公司能夠有效地槓桿運用總公司與地主國所提供之各種資源條件,並發展其研發能力與技術組合,則該子公司之創新績效將可有效地提升。
    相對於傳統的折衷理論僅能為跨國企業研發國際化之「動機」提供解釋,運用系統動力模型方法,將可提供更具互動關係以及動態的觀點,亦即運用動態模擬,將可觀察到只要跨國企業之海外研發子公司能夠有效地將來自總公司的所有權優勢以及來自地主國的區位優勢予以內部化,則其創新績效將可順利達成。
    此外,本研究基於研究結論,提出管理上的意涵與對於政策的建言,期望提供理論上與實務上的貢獻。


    R&D internationalization of the multinational enterprises (MNEs) has emerged since decades ago. In addition to setting up R&D subsidiaries in the developed countries, MNEs have increasingly established their R&D subsidiaries in the developing countries since the beginning of the 21st century. Based on the ownership-location-internalization (OLI) advantages of Dunning’s Eclectic Paradigm, the study extends the Paradigm by considering the interrelationships of OLI advantages influencing innovation performance of MNE R&D subsidiaries. Internalizing determinants, mechanisms, and processes of both ownership advantage and location advantage are considered in the extended model. A dataset of 26 ICT-related MNE R&D subsidiaries funded by the Taiwanese MOEA’s MRDC Program from 2003 to 2009 is collected. The system dynamics models of the proposed extended model are constructed and simulated. The results indicate that MNE R&D subsidiaries can improve their innovation performance if they effectively develop R&D capabilities and R&D portfolio with the headquarters and local actors.
    The extend OLI model offers more interactive and dynamic perspectives than traditional Dunning’s eclectic paradigm which mainly focuses why MNEs conduct FDI activities abroad. The study concludes that MNE R&D subsidiaries can improve their innovation performance if they can effectively internalize ownership advantage of parent companies and location advantage of host countries. Some managerial and policy implications are provided.

    ABSTRACT i ACKNOWLEGEMENTS ii TABLE OF CONTENTS iii LIST OF FIGURES v LIST OF TABLES vi CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 The importance/motivation of the study 1 1.2 Research gap and research questions 3 1.3 Structure of the study 6 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 7 2.1 Trends and motives of R&D internationalization 7 2.2 Dunning’s Eclectic Paradigm - the OLI model 13 2.3 R&D-related OLI advantages 18 2.3.1 Ownership advantages 19 2.3.2 Location advantages 21 2.3.3 Internalization advantages 25 2.4 Innovation performance of MNEs R&D subsidiaries 28 2.5 Research framework 29 CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH METHOD 37 3.1 Multinational Innovative R&D centers in Taiwan (MRDC) Program 37 3.2 System dynamics 40 3.2.1 Definition of system dynamics 40 3.2.2 Characteristics of system dynamics 41 3.2.3 Basic model construction concepts 42 3.2.4 Model construction steps 43 3.3 Modelling determinants of innovation performance in an MNE R&D subsidiary 43 3.4 Data collection 49 CHAPTER 4 RESULTS 54 4.1 Model construction 54 4.1.1 R&D capability sub-system 56 4.1.2 Technology portfolio sub-system 69 4.1.3 NPD sub-system 75 4.2 Model verification 79 4.3 Basic simulations 81 4.4 Policy tests 83 4.4.1 Policy tests on Ownership advantage 84 4.4.2 Policy tests on Location advantage 86 4.4.3 Policy tests on Internalization advantage 89 CHAPTER 5 DISCUSSIONS 93 5.1 The OLI advantages and innovation performance of R&D subsidiaries 93 5.2 Observations on MNEs R&D subsidiaries in Taiwan 95 CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS 98 6.1 Conclusions 98 6.2 Limitations 99 6.3 Implications 101 References 104 Appendix 1 MNE R&D subsidiaries in Taiwan in order of established year 112 Appendix 2 The System Dynamics model of an MNE R&D subsidiary in Taiwan 114 Appendix 3 Simulation results of key factors in the model 115 Figure A. R&D capability from local engineer 115 Figure B. R&D capability from foreign experts 115 Figure C. R&D capability from technology payoff 115 Figure D. R&D level per engineer 116 Figure E. R&D level from education 116 Figure F. R&D level from training and coaching 116 Figure G. Learning from training 117 Figure H. Average training expense per engineer 117 Figure I. Annual training expense 117 Figure J. Learning from coaching 118 Figure K. Coaching from foreign experts 118 Figure L. Foreign expert coaching to each engineer 118 Figure M. R&D manpower 119 Figure N. Foreign experts 119 Figure O. Technology development experience 119 Figure P. Technology overlap between local partners and R&D subsidiary 120 Figure Q. Collaborative-R&D with local partners 120 Figure R. Success rate 120 Figure S. Technology sourcing mix 121 Figure T. Average cost of NPD 121 Figure U. Average R&D capability per engineer 121 Figure V. NPD success rate 122

    Achcaoucaou, F, Miravitlles, P and Leo’n-Darder, F (2014). Knowledge sharing and subsidiary R&D mandate development: a matter of dual embeddedness. International Business Review, 23 (1), 76-90.
    Adams, H, Bessant, J and Phelps, R (2006). Innovation management measurement: A Review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(1), 21-47.
    Almeida, R (1996). Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: Patent citation analysis in the US semiconductor industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17 (winter special issue), 155-165.
    Almeida, R and Fernandes, AM (2008). Openness and technological innovations in developing countries: Evidence from firm-level surveys. Journal Development Studies, 44(5), 701-727.
    Ambos, B and Ambos, TC (2011). Meeting the challenge of offshoring R&D: an examination of firm- and location-specific factors. R&D Management, 41(2), 107-119.
    Anand, J and Kogut, B (1997). Technological capabilities of countries: Firm rivalry and foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 28, 445-465.
    Asakawa, K and Som, A (2008). Internationalization of R&D in China and India: conventional wisdom versus reality. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25, 375-394.
    Athukorala, PC and Kohpaiboon, A (2010). Globalization of R&D by US-based multinational enterprises. Research Policy, 39, 1335-1347.
    Beugelsdijk, S (2007). The regional environment and a firm's innovative performance: A plea for a multilevel interactionist approach. Economic Geography, 83(2), 181-199.
    Beugelsdijk, S (2010). Introduction: place, space and organization-economic geography and the multinational enterprise. Journal Economic Geography, 10, 485-493.
    Birkinshaw, J (1999). The determinants and consequences of subsidiary initiative in multinational corporations. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Fall 1999, 9-36.
    Birkinshaw, J (2002). Managing internal R&D networks in global firms: what sort of knowledge is involved. Long Range Planning, 35, 245-267.
    Birkinshaw, J, Hood, N and Young, S (2005). Subsidiary entrepreneurship, internal and external competitive forces, and subsidiary performance. International Business Review, 14, 227-248.
    Birkinshaw, J and Hood, N (1998). Multinational subsidiary evolution: capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 773-795.
    Birkinshaw, J and Hood, N (2000). Characteristics of foreign subsidiaries in industry clusters. Journal of international business studies, first quarter, 31(1), 141-154.
    Blomkvist, K, Kappen, P and Zander, I (2010). Quo Vadis? The entry into new technologies in advanced foreign subsidiaries of the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 1525-1549.
    Bouquet, C and Birkinshaw, J (2008). Weight versus voice: How foreign subsidiaries gain attention from corporate headquarters. Academy of Management Journal, 51(3), 577-601.
    Broström, A, McKelvey, M and Sandström, C (2009). Investing in localized relationships with universities: What are the benefits for R&D subsidiaries of multinational enterprises? Industry & Innovation, 16(1), 59-78.
    Brown, G and Svenson, A (1998). Measuring R&D productivity. Research Technology Management, Nov-Dec, 30(5), 11-15.
    Bucar, M, Rojec, M and Stare, M (2009). Backward FDI linkages as a channel for transferring technology and building innovation capability: the case of Slovenia. European Journal of Development Research, 21, 137-153.
    Cantwell, J and Mudambi, R (2005). MNE competence creating subsidiary mandates. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 1109-1128.
    Chang, YC, Shih, CT, Chieng, WC and Su, CH (2010). Evaluating impacts of the MNE R&D Centre Programme on the national innovation system in Taiwan. Research Evaluation, 19(1), 67-79.
    Chang, YC, Shih, CT and Wei, YL (2005). Hooking up the local and innovation system: A study of MNE R&D Centers in Taiwan. Unpublished paper presented at Stanford SPRIE-STPRC workshop: Greater China Innovation Capabilities: Opportunities and Challenges, Tsing-Hua University, Beijing.
    Chang, YC, Shih, CT and Wei, YL (2008). Linking local and national innovation networks: multinational companies’ R&D centers in Taiwan. In: Greater China's quest for innovation, H. Rowen, M.G. Hancock and W. F. Miller (Eds.), CA: The Walter H. Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center, 129-145.
    Chen, S H (2004). Taiwanese IT firms’ offshore R&D in China and connection with the global innovation network. Research Policy, 33, 337-349.
    Chen, S H (2007). The national innovation system and foreign R&D: the case of Taiwan. R&D Management, 37 (5), 441-453.
    Chen, SH, Chen, YC and Wen, PC (2009). MNC’s offshore R&D mandate and host countries’ locational advantages: A comparison between Taiwan and China. China Information, 159-187.
    Chen, SH, Wen PC and Chen, HC (2012). Inter-organizational platform-based development and Global Innovation Network: the case of Taiwanese ICT industry. In: The Economic Geography of the IT Industry in the Asia Pacific Region, P. Cooke, Searle, G. and O’Connor, K. (Eds.), London and New York: Routledge.
    Chen, YC (2008). Why do multinational corporations locate their advanced R&D centres in Beijing? Journal of Development Studies, 44 ( 5), 622-644.
    Chieng, WC, Chang, YC and Lee, TL (2009). The evolution of MNE R&D centers in host countries: a survey in Taiwan. Paper presented in the DRUID summer conference 2009, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark, June 17-19, 2009.
    Chiesa, V (1996). Managing the internationalization of R&D. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 43(1), 7-23.
    Colakoglu, S, Yamao, S and Lepak, DP (2014). Knowledge creation capability in MNC subsidiaries: examining the roles of global and local knowledge inflows and subsidiary knowledge stocks. International Business Review, 23 (1), 91-101.
    Chuang, WB and Lin, HL (2011). Overseas R&D activities and intellectual property rights - a longitudinal study of multinational enterprises in emerging economies. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 23(2), 159-173.
    Criscuolo, P, Narula, R and Verspagen, B (2005). Role of home and host country innovation systems in R&D internationalization: a patent citation analysis. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 14(5), July, 417–433.
    Department of Industrial Technology (DoIT) (2006). White paper on Taiwan industrial technology. Taipei: Department of Industrial Technology, Ministry of Economic Affairs, Ch. 3-4, 495-504.
    Dunning, JH (1988). The eclectic paradigm of international production—a restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(1), 1-31.
    Dunning, JH (1988). Multinationals, technology and competitiveness. London: Unwin Hymm.
    Dunning, JH (2008). FDI. Growth and development, In: Multinational enterprises and the global economy, JH Dunning and Lundan, SM (Eds.), 2nd edition, Ch.10, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 318-329.
    Erturk, M (2011). Determinants and processes of new product development: a literature review. Journal of Academic Studies, 13, 15-38.
    Florida, R (1997). The globalization of R&D: results of a survey of foreign-affiliated R&D laboratories in the USA. Research Policy, 26(1), 85-103.
    Forrester, JW (1961). Industrial dynamics. Cambridge Mass: The MIT Press.
    Fors, G and Zejan, M (1996). Overseas R&D by multinationals in foreign centers of excellence, Working paper no. 111, The Economic Research Institute, Estocolmo: Stockholm School of Economics.
    Gassmann, O and Han, Z (2004). Motivations and barriers of foreign R&D activities in China, R&D Management, 34(4), 423-437.
    Gerybadze, A and Reger, G (1999). Globalization of R&D: Recent changes in the management of innovation in transnational corporations. Research Policy, Vol. 8(2-3), 251-274.
    Granstrand, O, Hakansson, L and Sjolander, S (1993). Internationalization of R&D: A survey of some recent research. Research Policy, 22, 413-430.
    Guellec, D and van Pottelsberghe, B (2001). The internationalization of technology analysed with patent data. Research Policy, Vol. 30, 1253–1266.
    Han, C. (2002) System Dynamics: A Key for exploring dynamic complexity. Taipei: Charles C. Han.
    Hedlund, G and Dag, R (1990). Action in heterarchies: New approaches to managing the MNC. In Managing the Global Firm, C. A. Bartlett, Doz, Y. and Hedlund, G. (Eds.), Orlando, Florida: Harcourt.
    Hegde, D and Hicks, D (2008). The maturation of global corporate R&D: Evidence from the activity of U.S. foreign subsidiaries. Research Policy, 37, 390-406.
    Hollenstein, H. (2005). Determinants of international activities: are SMEs different? Small Business Economics, 24( 5), 431-450.
    Hong, M and Chen, LS (2001). Quantitative and dynamic analysis of the OLI variables determining FDI in China, RURDS, 13( 2), 163-172.
    Hood, W and Young, S (1982). FIND Dunning J.H. Multinationals, technology and competitiveness. London: Unwin Hymm, Chap7.
    Hood, W, Young, S and Lal, D (1994). Strategic evolution with Japanese manufacturing plants in Europe: UK evidence, International Business Review, 3(2), 3-26.
    Kawai, N and Strange, R (2014). Subsidiary autonomy and performance in Japanese multinationals in Europe. International Business Review, 23, 504–515.
    Keegan, WJ (1995). Global marketing management. 5th Ed, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
    Kogut, B and Chang, SJ (1991). Technological capability and Japanese foreign direct investment in the United States. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 73(3), 401-413.
    Kuemmerle, W (1999a). The drivers of foreign direct investment into research and development: an empirical investigation. Journal of International Business, 30(1), 1-24.
    Kuemmerle, W (1999b). Foreign investment in industrial research in the pharmaceutical and electronics industrial-results from a survey of multinational firms. Research Policy, 28(23), 179-193.
    Kumar, N (2001). Determinants of location of overseas R&D activity of multinational enterprises: the case of US and Japanese corporations. Research Policy, 30, 159-174.
    Le Bas, C and Patel, P (2007). The determinants of home-base-augmenting and home-base-exploiting technological activities: some new results on multinationals locational strategies. SPRU Electronic Working Paper Series, No. 164, 1-25.
    Lee, TL and von Tunzelmann, N (2005). A dynamic analytic approach to national innovation systems: The IC industry in Taiwan. Research Policy, 34, 425-440.
    Liu, MC and Chen, SH (2012). MNCs offshore R&D networks in host country’s regional innovation system: the case of Taiwan-based firms in China. Research Policy, 41, 1107-1120.
    Manolopoulos, D, Papanastassiou, M and Pearce, R (2009) Technology sourcing in
    multinational enterprises and the roles of subsidiaries: An empirical investigation. In: The strategic development of multinationals: Subsidiaries and innovation. Papanastassiou, M and R. Pearce (Eds.). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Marin, A and Costa, I (2013). Subsidiaries in Brazil: the effects of global and local integration. International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development, 12(1), 43-70.
    Martin, A and Giuliani, E (2006). Global and local knowledge linkages: the case of MNE subsidiaries in Argentina. SPRU Electronic Working Paper Series, No.155, 1-58.
    MOEA (2003~2006). Survey of operations in foreign and overseas Chinese business and contribution analysis to Taiwan’s economic development, Investment Commission, MOEA, Taiwan.
    MOEA (2007). Industrial Statistical Survey, MOEA, Taiwan.
    Mowery, DC, Oxley, JE, and, Silverman, BS (1998). Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation: implications for the resource-based view of the firm. Research Policy, 27, 507-523.
    Mrinalini, N, Nath, P and Sandhya, GD (2013). Foreign direct investment in R&D in India. Current Science, 105 ( 6), 767-773.
    Mudambi, R, Piscitello, Land Rabbiosi, L (2014). Reverse knowledge transfer in MNEs: subsidiary innovativeness and entry modes. Long Range Planning, 47, 49-63.
    Mu, JF and Di Benedetto, A (2012). Networking capability and new product development. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 59 (1), 4-19.
    Nachum, L (2000). Economic geography and the location of TNCs: Financial and professional service FDI to the USA. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(3), 367-385.
    Narula, R (2014). Exploring the paradox of competence-creating subsidiaries: balancing bandwidth and dispersion in MNEs. Long Range Planning, 47, 4-15.
    OECD (1997). Facilitating international technology co-operation, Proceedings of the Seoul Conference, Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
    Paoliz, M and Guercini, S (1997). R&D internationalisation in the strategic behaviour of the firm. Steep discussion paper no. 39, Sussex: Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex.
    Pavilinek, P (2012). The Internationalization of Corporate R&D and the Automotive Industry R&D of East-Central Europe. Economic Geography, 88 (3), 279-310.
    Pavitt, K and Patel, P (1999). Global corporations and national systems of innovation: who dominates whom?. In Innovation policy in a global economy, Archibugi, D, J Howell and J Michie (Eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 94-119.
    Reddy, P (2000). Globalization of corporate R&D: Implications for innovation systems in host countries, London: Routledge, 17-56.
    Reddy, P (2005). R&D-related FDI in developing countries: implications for host countries, In: Globalization of R&D and developing countries-proceeding of an expert meeting, Geneva: UNCTAD, 89-108.
    Reilly, M and Scott, PS (2014). Subsidiary driven innovation within shifting MNC structures: Identifying new challenges and research directions. Technovation, 34, 190-202.
    Riaz, S, Rowe, WG, and Beamish, PW (2014). Expatriate-deployment levels and subsidiary growth: A temporal analysis. Journal of World Business, 49, 1-11.
    Ronstadt, RC (1978). International R&D: The Establishment and evolution of R&D abroad by seven U.S. MNCs. Journal of International Business Studies, Spring-Summer, 7-74.
    Rothaermel, FT and Alexandre, MT (2009). Ambidexterity in technology sourcing: the moderating role of absorptive capacity. Organization Science, .20 (4), 759-780.
    Serapio, J and Dalton, H (1999). Globalization of industrial R&D: an examination of foreign direct investment in R&D in the United States. Research Policy, 28, 303-316.
    Senge, PM (1990). The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday Press.
    Sterman, JD (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
    Stoian, C and Filippaios, F (2008). Dunning’s eclectic paradigm: A holistic, yet context specific framework for analysing the determinants of outward FDI evidence from international Greek investments. International Business Reviews, 17, 349-367.
    Taggart, JM (1998). Strategy shift in MNC subsidiaries. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 663-681.
    Tran, Y, Mahnke, V and Ambos, B (2010). The effect of quantity, quality and timing of headquarters-initiated knowledge flows on subsidiary performance. Management International Review, 50, 493-511.
    UNCTAD (2005). World investment report. Transnational corporations and internationalization of R&D. Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
    UNCTAD (2010). World investment report. Investing in a low-carbon economy. Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
    Westney, E (1992). Organizational change and the internationalization of R&D, In Transforming organization, Kochan TA and M Useem (Eds.), New York: Oxford University Press.
    Xue, L and Wang, D (2001). Globalization of R&D by multinational corporations in China: An empirical analysis. EAP Report Memorandum, No. 01-06, National Science Foundation, Tokyo Regional Office.
    Zander, I (1999). How do you mean “global”? An empirical investigation of innovation networks in the multinational corporation. Research Policy, 28, 195-213.
    Zhang, S and Pearce, R (2010). Sources of technology and the strategic roles of MNE subsidiaries in China. Multinational Business Review, Fall 2010, 18 (3), 49-72.
    Zhou, Y and Xin, T (2003). An innovative region in china: Interaction between multinational corporations. Economic Geography, 79 (2), 129-152.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)

    QR CODE