研究生: |
吳昭瑩 Wu, Chao-Tin |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
利用人因方法評估不同揹負方式之生理與心物反應 The Ergonomic Evaluations of Physical and Psychophysical Responses among Different Carrying Methods |
指導教授: |
王茂駿
Wang, Mao-Jiun 張堅琦 Chang, Chien-Chi |
口試委員: |
盧俊銘
Lu, Jun-Ming 石裕川 Shih, Yuh-Chuan 邱敏綺 Chiu, Min-chi |
學位類別: |
博士 Doctor |
系所名稱: |
工學院 - 工業工程與工程管理學系 Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management |
論文出版年: | 2016 |
畢業學年度: | 104 |
語文別: | 英文 |
論文頁數: | 100 |
中文關鍵詞: | 嬰兒背帶 、背包 、壓力 、肌電圖 、膚溫 、Borg量表 、關節角度 、地面反作用力 |
外文關鍵詞: | Backpack, Body Tactile Pressure, GRF, Preferred Walking Speed |
相關次數: | 點閱:1 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
攜帶「襁褓」中的嬰兒與攜帶貨物(或私人物品)是兩大重要的攜帶功能。在現今繁忙的社會中,使用背負工具使人可以空出做家事或工作並且同時照顧嬰兒或攜帶物品。然而背負相關的文獻多著墨在背負重量(如背包、書包等),背負時的速度與背負嬰兒的相關研究幾乎無人探究。本研究目的在於找出男性與女性在使用背包或嬰兒背帶時的生理與心理反應,以及生物力學的差異。
本研究分為兩個部分,第一個部分為比較男女在使用傳統嬰兒背帶與兩款一般具有背包特性的背帶之生理與心理反應資訊。實驗共招募10位女性與10位男性。受試者背負兩種不同重量的嬰兒娃娃(7kg 與10kg)行走20分鐘。生理反應包含壓力、肌肉活動度、膚溫差及心搏差。心理反應則以Borg身體疲勞程度評比測得。數據分析結果顯示,三款嬰兒背帶在肩部平均壓力、肌肉活動度與心搏率(運動強度)上並無顯著差異。身體疲勞程度量表在頸部、左肩、右肩及上背對款式有顯著差異,其中以一款肩部帶子有軟墊的背帶表現較另兩款好。而在不同嬰兒重量下,肌肉活動度與肩部平均壓力則有不同。男女的差異則顯示在肌肉活動度上,男性使用較多肩部的力量而女性使用較多腰部的力量。根據實驗結果,對於傳統背帶與背帶設計提出相關建議,以期得到符合使用者期望的產品。
第二部分的研究則是針對男女在一般後背包使用不同重量與不同行走速度時的差異。實驗共招募20位受試者(10位女性與10位男性),此階段在測量男女在不同背包重量與行走速度時的步態相關與心理主觀反應的差異。步態相關反映包括步長,步數,兩腳著地時間,行走時下肢關節角度變化,地面反作用力,肌肉活動度。心理主觀反應則使用Borg身體疲勞程度評比測得。受試者背負不同重量(0%, 10%, 15% 與 20% 體重) 與不同速度 (80%, 100% 與120% 最適行走速度)共12個實驗組合下,測試立即效果。 結果顯示重量在背負行走中是比較主要的影響因子,重量越重近端關節(骨盆與髖關節)相較於遠端關節(膝關節與踝關節)有較大的改變,腹直肌活動度增加但背直肌活動度減少。主觀反應也顯示隨著重量增加肩頸上背的主觀疲勞程度增加。而男女在不同走路速度與負重情況下的反應主要顯示在骨盆的活動度上,女性的骨盆活動度在矢狀面比較小,而在額狀面比較大。根據此研究結果提供了背包重量的建議,並且針對不同性別提出不同的負重訓練建議。
Care of pre-weaned infants and transporting goods (or personal belongings) were the two major function of carrying activity. In today’s busy world, using carrying devices could free the hands of the person and help them to manage the daily activities while taking care of their baby or carrying their goods. Studies regarding carrying were mostly focused on backpack weight. There were few study investigated walking speed or baby carrier effects. The purpose of this study was to investigate the physiological and biomechanical responses in men and women while carrying the baby or backpack.
The first study compared gender differences using the baby sling and front worn harness carrier in the physiological and psychophysical responses. Ten females (aged 23-32 years) and ten males (aged 23-35 years) were recruited to participate in this study. Each subject was asked to carry two different weighted baby dummies (7kg and 10kg) using 3 different baby carriers and walk for 20 minutes. Body tactile pressures were measured. The physiological responses, which were recorded during walking included average surface electromyography (sEMG), skin temperature change, heart rate change and exercise intensity. Immediately after walking, the Borg’s rating scale of perceived exertion was used to collect the psychophysical responses. The traditional baby sling and the two front worn harness carrier showed little differences in sEMG activities, body tactile pressure and exercise intensity. Carrying two different weighted baby dummies caused significant differences in sEMG and body tactile pressure. Gender differences were found in sEMG activities, where men used more upper back muscles and women used more low back muscles. Based on the findings of this study, recommendations about the improved baby carrier design are proposed.
The second study examined the backpack load effect on gender walking gait and speed parameters. Twenty subjects (10 males, 10 females) with ages ranging from 21-28 years were involved in a backpack carrying task. The load was specified at 0%, 10%, 15% and 20% of their body weight. The three walking speed levels included preferred walking speed (PWS), 80% PWS and 120% PWS. The response measures included lower extremity joint motion, surface electromyography (sEMG) activities and ground reaction force (GRF) during walking. The results indicated that the load effect was a dominant factor. The increase in backpack weight produced a decrease in pelvis anterior tilt, hip extension and an increase in pelvis posterior tilt. The rectus abdominis muscle activity increased, but the erector spinae and semitendinosus activities decreased with increasing backpack weight. The vertical GRF component increased with the increase in backpack weight. Shoulder area perceived exertion discomfort was the highest at 20% BW load. Post hoc test results showed less difference between 10% BW and 15% BW, but greater differences between 20% BW and the lower weights. Gender differences were found in pelvic ROM, where women had smaller ROM in sagittal plane but larger ROM in frontal plane. In conclusion, people used different muscles with a change in gait pattern to accommodate a heavier backpack. The results from this study provide very useful recommendations for backpack weight and training recommendations for different gender.
References
[1] Hewes GW. Food Transport and the Origin of Hominid Bipedalism. American Anthropologist. 1961;63:687-710.
[2] Kramer P. The Behavioral Ecology of Locomotion. In: Meldrum DJ, Hilton C, editors. From Biped to Strider: Springer US; 2004. p. 101-15.
[3] Hewes GW. Hominid bipedalism: Independent evidence for the food-carrying theory. Science. 1964;146:416-8.
[4] Wall‐Scheffler CM, Geiger K, Steudel‐Numbers KL. Infant carrying: The role of increased locomotory costs in early tool development. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 2007;133.
[5] Knapik J, Harman E, Reynolds K. Load carriage using packs: A review of physiological, biomechanical and medical aspects. Applied Ergonomics. 1996;27:207-16.
[6] Knapik JJ, Reynolds KL, Harman E. Soldier load carriage: historical, physiological, biomechanical, and medical aspects. Military Medicine. 2004;169:45-56.
[7] Chatterjee T, Bhattacharyya D, Pal M, Majumdar D. Cardiorespiratory changes with compact backpack system and distributed mode of load carriage. Indian journal of physiology and pharmacology. 2012;56:130-6.
[8] Hong Y, Brueggemann G-P. Changes in gait patterns in 10-year-old boys with increasing loads when walking on a treadmill. Gait & Posture. 2000;11:254-9.
[9] Wang Y, Pascoe DD, Weimar W. Evaluation of book backpack load during walking. Ergonomics. 2001;44:858-69.
[10] Chansirinukor W, Wilson D, Grimmer K, Dansie B. Effects of backpacks on students: measurement of cervical and shoulder posture. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy. 2001;47:110-6.
[11] Al-Khabbaz YSSM, Shimada T, Hasegawa M. The effect of backpack heaviness on trunk-lower extremity muscle activities and trunk posture. Gait & Posture. 2008;28:297-302.
[12] Bauer DH, Freivalds A. Backpack load limit recommendation for middle school students based on physiological and psychophysical measurements. Work-a Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation. 2009;32:339-50.
[13] Majumdar D, Pal MS, Majumdar D. Effects of military load carriage on kinematics of gait. Ergonomics. 2010;53:782-91.
[14] Majumdar D, Pal MS, Pramanik A. Kinetic changes in gait during low magnitude military load carriage. Ergonomics. 2013;56:1917-27.
[15] Haisman MF. Determinants of load carrying ability. Applied Ergonomics. 1988;19:111-21.
[16] Browning RC, Kram R. Effects of obesity on the biomechanics of walking at different speeds. Medicine and science in sports and exercise. 2007;39:1632-41.
[17] Browning RC, Kram R. Energetic Cost and Preferred Speed of Walking in Obese vs. Normal Weight Women. Obesity Research. 2005;13:891-9.
[18] Browning RC, Baker EA, Herron JA, Kram R. Effects of obesity and sex on the energetic cost and preferred speed of walking. Journal of applied physiology. 2006;100:390-8.
[19] Bhambhani Y, Maikala R. Gender differences during treadmill walking with graded loads: biomechanical and physiological comparisons. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 2000;81:75-83.
[20] Martin PE, Nelson RC. The effect of carried loads on the walking patterns of men and women. Ergonomics. 1986;29:1191-202.
[21] Richards J. http://www.slingbabies.co.nz/Site/History_2.ashx
[22] Hunziker UA, Barr RG. Increased carrying reduces infant crying: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics. 1986;77:641-8.
[23] Gathwala G, Singh B, Balhara B. KMC facilitates mother baby attachment in low birth weight infants. Indian journal of pediatrics. 2008;75:43-7.
[24] Tessier R, Cristo M, Velez S, Giron M, de Calume ZF, Ruiz-Palaez JG, et al. Kangaroo mother care and the bonding hypothesis. Pediatrics. 1998;102:e17.
[25] WHO. Kangaroo mother care: A practical guide. World Health Organization; 2003.
[26] Motmans R, Tomlow S, Vissers D. Trunk muscle activity in different modes of carrying schoolbags. Ergonomics. 2006;49:127-38.
[27] Yuk G-CP, Rae-Joon; Lee, Hyun-Young; Lee, Myoung-Hee; Lee, Jeon-Hyeong; Kuk, Jung-Seok; Jang, Jong-Sung;. The Effects of Baby Carrier and Sling in Muscle Activation of Trunk, Low Extremity and Foot Pressure. Journal of the Korean Society of Physical Medicine. 2010;5:223-31.
[28] Fiolkowski P, Horodyski M, Bishop M, Williams M, Stylianou L. Changes in gait kinematics and posture with the use of a front pack. Ergonomics. 2006;49:885-94.
[29] Bettany-Saltikov J, Cole L. The effect of frontpacks, shoulder bags and handheld bags on 3D back shape and posture in young university students: an ISIS2 study. Studies in health technology and informatics. 2012;176:117-21.
[30] Kim K, Yun KH. The effects of body posture by using Baby Carrier in different ways. Journal of the Korean Society of Physical Medicine. 2013;8:193-200.
[31] Bhambhani Y, Buckley S, Maikala R. Physiological and biomechanical responses during treadmill walking with graded loads. European Journal of Applied Physiology & Occupational Physiology. 1997;76:544-51.
[32] Datta SR, Chatterjee BB, Roy BN. Maximum permissible weight to be carried on the head by a male worker from eastern India. Journal of applied physiology. 1975;38:132-5.
[33] Harman E, Han K-H, Frykman P, Johnson M, Russell F, Rosenstein M. The effects on gait timing, kinetics, and muscle activity of various loads carried on the back. Medicine and science in sports and exercise. 1992;24(5):S129.
[34] Lloyd R, Cooke CB. The oxygen consumption associated with unloaded walking and load carriage using two different backpack designs. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 2000;81:486-92.
[35] Hong Y, Li JX, Wong AS, Robinson PD. Effects of load carriage on heart rate, blood pressure and energy expenditure in children. Ergonomics. 2000;43:717-27.
[36] Shymon S, Hargens AR, Minkoff LA, Chang DG. Body posture and backpack loading: an upright magnetic resonance imaging study of the adult lumbar spine. European Spine Journal. 2014;23:1407-13.
[37] Andriacchi TP, Alexander EJ. Studies of human locomotion: past, present and future. Journal of Biomechanics. 2000;33:1217-24.
[38] Chambers HG, Sutherland DH. A Practical Guide to Gait Analysis. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2002;10:222-31.
[39] Kinoshita H. Effects of different loads and carrying systems on selected biomechanical parameters describing walking gait. Ergonomics. 1985;28:1347-62.
[40] Lloyd R, Cooke CB. Kinetic changes associated with load carriage using two rucksack designs. Ergonomics. 2000;43:1331-41.
[41] Pascoe DD, Pascoe DE, Wang YT, Shim D-M, Kim CK. Influence of carrying book bags on gait cycle and posture of youths. Ergonomics. 1997;40:631-40.
[42] Harman E, Hoon K, Frykman P, Pandorf C. The effects of backpack weight on the biomechanics of load carriage. DTIC Document; 2000.
[43] Birrell SA, Haslam RA. The effect of military load carriage on 3-D lower limb kinematics and spatiotemporal parameters. Ergonomics. 2009;52:1298-304.
[44] Chow DHK, Kwok MLY, Au-Yang ACK, Holmes AD, Cheng JCY, Yao FYD, et al. The effect of backpack load on the gait of normal adolescent girls. Ergonomics. 2005;48:642-56.
[45] Connolly BH, Cook B, Hunter S, Laughter M, Mills A, Nordtvedt N, et al. Effects of backpack carriage on gait parameters in children. Pediatric Physical Therapy. 2008;20:347-55.
[46] Hong Y, Cheung C-K. Gait and posture responses to backpack load during level walking in children. Gait & Posture. 2003;17:28-33.
[47] Tilbury-Davis DC, Hooper RH. The kinetic and kinematic effects of increasing load carriage upon the lower limb. Human movement science. 1999;18:693-700.
[48] LaFiandra M, Wagenaar RC, Holt KG, Obusek JP. How do load carriage and walking speed influence trunk coordination and stride parameters? Journal of Biomechanics. 2003;36:87-95.
[49] Devroey C, Jonkers I, De Becker A, Lenaerts G, Spaepen A. Evaluation of the effect of backpack load and position during standing and walking using biomechanical, physiological and subjective measures. Ergonomics. 2007;50:728-42.
[50] Hsiang SM, Chang CC. The effect of gait speed and load carrying on the reliability of ground reaction forces. Safety Science. 2002;40:639-57.
[51] Holt KG, Wagenaar RC, Kubo M, LaFiandra ME, Obusek JP. Modulation of force transmission to the head while carrying a backpack load at different walking speeds. Journal of Biomechanics. 2005;38:1621-8.
[52] Chung MJ, Wang MJ. The change of gait parameters during walking at different percentage of preferred walking speed for healthy adults aged 20-60 years. Gait & Posture. 2010;31:131-5.
[53] Smith LK, Lelas JL, Kerrigan DC. Gender differences in pelvic motions and center of mass displacement during walking: stereotypes quantified. Journal of women's health & gender-based medicine. 2002;11:453-8.
[54] Cho S, Park JM, Kwon OY. Gender differences in three dimensional gait analysis data from 98 healthy Korean adults. Clinical Biomechanics. 2004;19:145-52.
[55] Chiu M-C, Wang M-J. The effect of gait speed and gender on perceived exertion, muscle activity, joint motion of lower extremity, ground reaction force and heart rate during normal walking. Gait & Posture. 2007;25:385-92.
[56] Kellis E, Arampatzi F. Effects of sex and mode of carrying schoolbags on ground reaction forces and temporal characteristics of gait. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics B. 2009;18:275-82.
[57] Silder A, Delp SL, Besier T. Men and women adopt similar walking mechanics and muscle activation patterns during load carriage. Journal of Biomechnics. 2013;46:2522-8.
[58] Deppa SW, Allen ED. Human Factors Gone Awry - Why Current Efforts Fail To Adequately Address Suffocation Hazards of Infant Sling Carriers. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 2014;58:534-8.
[59] Criswell E. Cram's introduction to surface electromyography: Jones & Bartlett Publishers; 2010.
[60] SENIAM. Surface ElectroMyoGraphy for the Non-Invasive Assessment of Muscles: Biomedical Health and Research Program (BIOMED II) of the European Union.
[61] Karvonen MJ, Kentala E, Mustala O. The effects of training on heart rate; a longitudinal study. Annales Medicinae Experimentalis et Biologiae Fenniae. 1957;35:307-15.
[62] Borg G. Borg's perceived exertion and pain scales. Champaign: Human kinetics; 1998.
[63] Rohlmann A, Zander T, Graichen F, Schmidt H, Bergmann G. How does the way a weight is carried affect spinal loads? Ergonomics. 2014;57:262-70.
[64] Neves EB, Moreira TR, Lemos RJ, Vilaça-Alves J, Rosa C, Reis VM. The influence of subcutaneous fat in the skin temperature variation rate during exercise. Research on Biomedical Engineering. 2015;31:307-12.
[65] Astrand P, Rodahl K. Evaluation of physical work capacity on the basis of tests. Textbook of work physiology. 1977:333-65.
[66] Dingwell J, Marin L. Kinematic variability and local dynamic stability of upper body motions when walking at different speeds. Journal of Biomechanics. 2006;39:444-52.
[67] Chow DH, Kwok ML, Au-Yang AC, Holmes AD, Cheng JC, Yao FY, et al. The effect of backpack load on the gait of normal adolescent girls. Ergonomics. 2005;48:642-56.
[68] Smith B, Ashton KM, Bohl D, Clark RC, Metheny JB, Klassen S. Influence of carrying a backpack on pelvic tilt, rotation, and obliquity in female college students. Gait & Posture. 2006;23:263-7.
[69] Goh JH, Thambyah A, Bose K. Effects of varying backpack loads on peak forces in the lumbosacral spine during walking. Clinical Biomechanics. 1998;13:S26-S31.
[70] Simpson KM, Munro BJ, Steele JR. Backpack load affects lower limb muscle activity patterns of female hikers during prolonged load carriage. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology. 2011;21:782-8.
[71] Dianat I, Sorkhi N, Pourhossein A, Alipour A, Asghari-Jafarabadi M. Neck, shoulder and low back pain in secondary schoolchildren in relation to schoolbag carriage: should the recommended weight limits be gender-specific? Applied Ergonomics. 2014;45:437-42.
[72] Suzuki Y, Nomura T, Casadio M, Morasso P. Intermittent control with ankle, hip, and mixed strategies during quiet standing: a theoretical proposal based on a double inverted pendulum model. Journal of theoretical biology. 2012;310:55-79.
[73] Winter DA. Human balance and posture control during standing and walking. Gait & Posture. 1995;3:193-214.