隨著鑑識科學、數位資料庫、影像技術、社群媒體以及透過機器學習進行資料分析等科技發展，轉型正義脈絡下檔案的科技化為推動轉型正義進程、市民社會動員及民主鞏固帶來了新的可能性。在國際人權機構與各國轉型正義實踐中，愈來愈重視科技方法於轉型正義檔案的運用。本文旨在探討為何應在轉型正義脈絡中推動檔案科技化，並從規範框架與功能基礎層面論證其正當性。進一步地，本文亦分析不同轉型正義脈絡下的實踐經驗與異同，並以此為基礎，檢視台灣轉型正義檔案科技化的現況，提出適用於台灣脈絡下的法制與政策建議。

本文主張，轉型正義檔案科技化的規範框架是植基在「真相權」與「科技近用權」的權利保障，並以此證成國家運用資源推動檔案科技化的正當性。本文認為，從功能角度，檔案科技化具有兩項重要作用：一是，科技應用可克服轉型正義進程在時間與空間上的限制，提升對過去人權侵害行為的調查效能；其次，科技化的檔案有助於轉型後國家的民主鞏固的成果。

在國際實踐中，本文以西班牙、阿根廷、哥倫比亞等後威權國家，以及前南斯拉夫國際刑事法庭在後衝突脈絡下的經驗為研究對象，探討檔案科技化在不同情境中的功能。本文發現，在後威權脈絡下，轉型正義科技化的檔案填補了記憶的斷層，促進真相追尋與賠償效率；在後衝突脈絡下，檔案科技化則提升國際人權法庭的效能，強化在地人權倡議與國際司法之間的連結。

基於以上分析，本文建議台灣應參考其他地區人權體系，從創建與恢復檔案、加強檔案永續管理、提升檔案的可及性與可參與性等方面，建立完整的檔案科技化法制框架。在政策實踐上，應採用地理資訊系統（GIS）、光學字元辨識（OCR）等技術，促進檔案的整合與傳播。同時，建議發展以鑑識科技為核心的政策與法律，針對威權時期加害體系的真相追尋提供具體指引與行動方向。

Thanks to advances in forensic science, digital databases, digital media, social media, and analysis driven by machine learning, the application of archive technologies has opened new possibilities for transitional justice, civil society mobilization, and democratic consolidation. International human rights institutions and national initiatives are increasingly recognizing the importance of technological methods in managing these archives. This master’s thesis explores the need for the application of archive technologies and its normative and functional legitimacy. Using comparative experiences, it evaluates Taiwan’s current practices and proposes legal and policy recommendations.

The normative framework for the application of archive technologies is rooted in the protection of the right to truth and the right to access to and participate in science, legitimizing state efforts and allocation of resources. Functionally, it serves two key roles: overcoming spatial and temporal challenges to transitional justice, enhancing investigation into human rights violations, and supporting democratic consolidation by improving the accessibility and usability of historical records.

This master's thesis conducts a case study of post-authoritarian jurisdictions, including Spain, Argentina, and Colombia, alongside the post-conflict legal framework of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, to examine the role of archive technologies in transitional justice contexts. The findings of this thesis suggest that in post-authoritarian contexts, the application of archive technologies bridges gaps in memory, facilitates truth-seeking, and enhances reparations, while in post-conflict settings, it strengthens international tribunals and local human rights advocacy.

From this analysis, Taiwan should adopt a comprehensive legal framework for the application of archive technologies, focusing on creation, restoration, sustainable management, and accessibility. Policy should prioritize geographic information systems, optical character recognition, and forensic methodologies to enhance archival integration and dissemination, advancing forensic-based truth-seeking in authoritarian-era perpetrator systems.

一、中文文獻
中研院近代史研究所編印（1992），《二二八事件資料選輯（一）》，中研院近代史研究所。
李怡俐（2016），《當代轉型正義的制度與規範脈絡：兼論南韓與臺灣的經驗比較》，元照。
促進轉型正義委員會（2022），《任務總結報告－第三部：促會規畫之推動轉型正義方案》。
陳翠蓮（2021），〈政治檔案的開放之路〉，陳翠蓮等著，《政治檔案會說話：自由時代公民指南》，頁25-26，國家人權博物館。
陳進金、陳翠蓮、蘇慶軒、吳俊瑩、林正慧（2021），《政治檔案會說話：自由時代公民指南》，國家人權博物館、臺灣民間真相和解促進會。
國家發展委員會檔案管理局（2020），《文書檔案智慧鏈結計畫》。
國家發展委員會（2022），《國家發展委員會111年辦理所屬檔案管理局員額評鑑情形報告》。
國家發展委員會檔案管理局（2024），《國家檔案徵集計畫（113 至 116 年）》
賴澤涵（1994），《二二八事件研究報告》，時報出版。
吳乃德（2006），〈轉型正義和歷史記憶：台灣民主化的未竟之業〉，《思想季刊》，2期，頁1-34。
吳建亨（2018），〈一種正義，各自表述：時間、檔案、書寫〉，《共再生的記憶──重建臺灣藝術史學術研討會論文集》，頁246。
李怡俐（2016），〈拉丁美洲在轉型正義上的困境與出路：以美洲人權法院的回應為中心〉，《臺大法學論叢》，45卷3期，頁827-909。
李淑君（2018），〈「例外狀態」下的「失調姿態」：白色恐怖監獄中的女性政治受難者失調身體〉，《淡江中文學報》38期，頁113-148。
李建良（2022），〈轉型正義法制的續造與轉型〉，《台灣法律人》，13期，頁179-184。
林秋燕、連秀芬（2020），〈政治檔案條例立法之解析與影響〉，《檔案半年刊》，19卷1期，頁4-23。
林秋燕（2021），〈數位時代下檔案管理的挑戰與機會〉，《檔案半年刊》，20卷2期，頁4-17。
林秋燕、魏正卓、錢曉珊（2024），〈政治檔案條例修法與展望〉，《檔案半年刊》，23卷1期，頁6-23。
林巧敏、王立勛（2021），〈黨史檔案數位典藏作業及其數位人文工具應用經驗〉，《圖資與檔案學刊》，98期，頁172-205。
林昕璇（2021），〈AI自主性武器系統在國際法上適用之研析〉，《軍法專論》，67卷4期，頁20-44。
柳嘉信（2014），〈西班牙的轉型正義─從「選擇遺忘」到「歷史記憶」〉，《台灣國際研究季刊》，10卷2期，頁83-105。
高佩珊（2022），〈數位人權保障研究－以歐盟個人資料保護規則為例〉，《長庚人文社會學報》，15期2卷，頁177-214。
陳百齡（2021），〈尋找戒嚴時期言論獲罪者的身影：政府檔案初探研究〉，《傳播文化與政治》，14期，頁1-37。
陳紀安、蔡季廷（2017），〈前南斯拉夫國際刑事法庭的政策對波赫刑事司法體系結構轉型之影響〉，《臺灣民主季刊》，十四卷一期，頁53-94。
陳宛妤（2022），〈台灣轉型正義法制之形成——以黨產條例及促轉條例為中心〉，《台灣法律人》，10期，頁3-14。
陳建佑（2023），〈人工智慧監管法律－獨漏自主性武器之規範？〉，《全國律師》，27卷6期，頁37-50。
郭姿妙（2018），〈國家檔案多媒體類數位化作業實務：以錄音帶為例〉，《檔案半年刊》，17卷2期，頁130-139。
張郁蔚（2016），〈檔案數位化對檔案應用服務之影響〉，《檔案半年刊》，15卷2期，頁98-109。
許啟義（2005），〈論檔案應用請求權〉，《檔案季刊》，4卷3期，頁48-56。
許煜（2017），〈未來的檔案－論第三預存的概念〉，《現代美術學報》，35期，頁9-25。
簡笙簧（2011），〈蔣中正檔案形成與管理概述（上）〉，《檔案與微縮》，103期，頁1-7。
黃瀚萱（2020），〈政府治理智慧化：自然語言處理的可能性，《國土及公共治理季刊》8卷3期，頁30-37。
蔣佳蓉、戴芳伶、許尹馨（2022），〈OCR與機器學習在檔案內容辨識之初探〉，《檔案半年刊》21卷2期，頁64-87。
蘇慧婕（2020），〈歷史揭露與人格權保障──從德國前東德國安部文件法的沿革分析臺灣政治檔案條例〉，《月旦法學雜誌》，307期，頁78-102。
蔡佳翰（2020），《論實踐轉型正義脈絡之「真相知情權」－以促進轉型正義條例與政治檔案條例為中心》，國立政治大學法律學研究所碩士論文。
促進轉型正義委員會（2022），《任務總結報告－第三部：促會規畫之推動轉型正義方案》。
周婉窈（2016），〈試論檔案、檔案利用以及學者的位置－寫給年輕的歷史人〉，臺灣與海洋亞洲，載於：https://tmantu.wordpress.com/2016/04/16/file/
法務部(2016)，《《公民與政治權利國際公約》執行情形-簽約國根據《公約》第40條提交的第二次國家報告》，頁54，載於：https://covenantswatch.org.tw/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/2017-ICCPR-State-Report_CH.pdf
兩公約報告國際審查委員會(2017)，《對中華民國（臺灣）政府關於落實國際人權公約第二次報告之審查-國際審查委員會通過的結論性意見與建議》，頁4，載於：https://covenantswatch.org.tw/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/2017-ICCPR-ICESCR-CORs_CH.pdf
陳士伯（2004），〈檔案數位化之探討〉，載於： https://pearl.archives.gov.tw/UserFiles/Publish/FCKImages/File/study/11.qxd.pdf
陳昱齊（2018），〈轉型正義的基本功：「政治檔案內容分析」的重點〉，政策想想，載於：https://www.thinkingtaiwan.com/content/6708
國家發展委員會（2022），〈整合、創新及智慧 文書檔案智慧鏈結計畫展現第2年成果〉，載於：https://www.ndc.gov.tw/nc_27_36472
廖昱涵（2020），〈發抖回憶白色恐怖疲勞審訊：「眼一瞇巴掌就飛過來」政治受難者至今仍不知犯下何罪〉，沃草，載於：https://watchout.tw/reports/raiJUuYv7UOTeBWjTNaV
廖昱涵（2020），〈學者李禎祥：威權時期國民黨特務殘忍刑求，「年輕耐打」是政治受難者唯一武器〉，沃草，載於：https://watchout.tw/reports/xCyCF7Tg4xgkLMlmhXa4

蘇峯楠（2016），〈數位典藏：一項高度專業的文物保存工作〉，故事，載於：https://storystudio.tw/article/gushi/%E6%95%B8%E4%BD%8D%E5%85%B8%E8%97%8F%EF%BC%9A%E4%B8%80%E9%A0%85%E9%AB%98%E5%BA%A6%E5%B0%88%E6%A5%AD%E7%9A%84%E6%96%87%E7%89%A9%E4%BF%9D%E5%AD%98%E5%B7%A5%E4%BD%9C

二、英文文獻
RUTI G. TEITEL, TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE (2000).
JACQUES DERRIDA, MAL D’ARCHIVES (1995).
JANINE CLARK, INTERNATIONAL TRIALS AND RECONCILIATION: ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA (2014).
KATHRYN SIKKINK, THE JUSTICE CASCADE: HOW HUMAN RIGHTS PROSECUTIONS ARE CHANGING WORLD POLITICS 4-6 (2012).
Andrew Hoskins, Memory of Mulititude: The End of Collective Memory, in DIGTAL MEMORY STUDIES: MEDIA PASTS IN TRANSITION 85-109 (Andrew Hoskins ed. 2017).
Christopher Lamont & Medlir Mema, Digital Transitional Justice: Unpacking the Black Box, in HANDBOOK ON THE POLITICS AND GOVERNANCE OF BIG DATA AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE 139-166 (Andrej Zwitter & Oskar J. Gstrein eds. 2023).
Chris Tenove, Networking Justice: Digitally-Enabled Engagement in Transitional Justice by the Syrian Diaspora, in DIASPORA MOBILIZATIONS FOR TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE 141-161 (Maria Koinova & Dženeta Karabegović eds. 2020).
Janine Clark, Transitional Justice in Bosnia: The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, in THE DEVELOPMENT OF INSTITUTIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY 83-97 (Lilian A. Barria and Steven D. Roper eds., 2010).
Jens Boel, Perrine Canavaggio & Antonio Gonzalez Quintana, ARCHIVES AND TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE, IN ARCHIVES AND HUMAN RIGHTS 41-53 (Jens Boel et al. eds. 2021).
Julia Viebach, Principle 3. The Duty to Preserve Memory, IN THE UNITED NATIONS PRINCIPLES TO COMBAT IMPUNITY 71, 71-78 (Frank Haldemann et al. ed. 2018).
Manuel Melgar Camarzana, The Historical Memory Records Center: A Museum for Memory and the Recent History of Spain, in PUBLIC HUMANITIES AND THE SPANISH CIVIL WAR 69-92 (Alison Ribeiro et al. eds., 2018).
Merten Reglitz, The Human Right to Free Internet Access, 37(2) J. APPLIED PHILOSOPHY 314-331 (2019).
Michelle Bachelet, Foreword, in ARCHIVES AND HUMAN RIGHTS xviii-xix (Jens Boel & Perrine Canavaggio & Antonio Gonzalez Quintana eds. 2021).
Rachel López, Legalising Collective Remembrance after Mass Atrocities, in THE PERFORMANCE OF MEMORY AS TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE 23-41 (S. Elizabeth Bird & Fraser M. Ottanelli eds. 2020).
Paul Spence, Digitally Meditated Memory and the Spanish Civil War, in PUBLIC HUMANITIES AND THE SPANISH CIVIL WAR 189-216 (Alison Ribeiro et al. eds., 2018).
Sandra Milena Rios Oyola, Human Diginty and Transitional Justice, in THE PALGRAVE ENCYLOPEDIA OF PEACE AND CONFLICT STUDIES 478-484 (Oliver P. Richmond & Gezim Visoka eds. 2022).
Sandra Ristovska, Video and Witnessing at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, in THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION TO MEDIA AND HUMAN RIGHTS 357-365 (Howard Tumber & Silvio Waisbord eds. 2017).
Wendy Perla Kurtz, Visualizing Mass Grave Recovery: Ritual, Digital Culture and Geographic Information System, in PUBLIC HUMANITIES AND THE SPANISH CIVIL WAR 163-188 (Alison Ribeiro et al. eds., 2018).
Amy McDaniel Hill Cosimini, The Media of Memories: Argentine and Brazilian Transitional Justice as Seen on TV, (Ph. D. diss., University of Minnesota, 2019).
Alexander L. Boranine, Transitional Justice: A Holistic Interpretation, 60 J. INT’L. AFF.17-27 (2006).
Alice M. Panepinto, The right to the truth in international law: The significance of Strasbourg's contributions, 37(4) LEGAL STUD. 739-764 (2017).
Briony Jones, Ingrid Oliveira, Truth Commission Archives as‘New Democratic Spaces’, J. HUM. RTS. PRAC 6-24 (2016).
Bruce D’Arcus, Extraordinary Rendition, Law and the Spatial Architecture of Rights, 13(1) AN INT’L E-J. FOR CRITICAL GEOGRAPHIES 79-99 (2014).
Daniela Gavshon & Erol Gorur, Information Overload: How Technology Can Help Convert Raw Data into Rich Information for Transitional Justice Processes, 13(1) INT’L J. TRANSTIONAL JUST 71-97 (2019).
David Gauntlett, Media Studies 2.0: A Response, 1(1) INTERACTIONS STUD. IN COMM. AND CULTURE, 147-157 (2009).
David Pimentel, Technology in a War Crimes Tribunal: Recent Experience at the ICTY, 12(3) WM. & MARY BILL RTS. J. 715-729 (2004).
David Tolbert, Reflections on the ICTY Registry, 2(2) J. INT’L CRIM. JUST. 480-485 (2004).
Deirdre K. Mulligan & Daniel S. Griffin, Rescripting Search to Respect the Right to Truth, 2 GEO. L. TECH. REV. 557-584 (2018).
Denisa Kostovicova, et al., The “Digital Turn” in Transitional Justice Research: Evaluating Image and Text as Data in the Western Balkans, 70(1) COMP. SOUTHEAST EUR. STUD. 24-46 (2022).
Dermot Groome, The Right to Truth in the Fight against Impunity, 29(1) BERKELEY J. INT’L L. 175-201 (2011).
Despina Syrri, On Dealing with the Past, Transitional Justice and Archives, 2008(39) BALCANICA 221-241 (2008).
Eduardo Briceño-Florez & Kathryn Eccles, Museums as Platforms of Resistance: The Use of Technology in Conflict Memory, Transitional Justice and Peacebuilding, 74(3-4) MUSEUM INT’L 82-93 (2023).
Esmeralda Kolaneci & Erida Pejo, Transitional Justice Research in the Digital Age: Western Balkans Results, 6(4) SOC. & LEGAL STUDIOS 89-96 (2023).
Francisco Etxeberria & Fernando Serrulla, The Case of The Brains of La Pedraja Forensic Science and Historical Memory in Spain, 10 METODE SCI. STUD. J. 109-117 (2020).
Francisco Ferrandiz, Exhuming the Defeated: Civil War Mass Graves in 21st-Century Spain, 40(1) AM. ETHNOLOGIST 38-54 (2013).
Fredy Mora-Gamez, The Official Record of Victims as a Bordering Technology: Knowledge and (In)visibilities in Post-conflict Colombia, 32(3) SCI. AS CULTURE 344-362 (2023).
Georgina Blakeley, Digging up Spain's past: consequences of truth and reconciliation, 12(1) DEMOCRATIZATION 44-59.
Grażyna Baranowska & Aleksandra Gliszczyńska-Grabias,“Right to Truth” and Memory Laws: General Rules and Practical Implications, 47(1) POLISH POL. SCI. Y.B. 97-109 (2018).
Hans Morten Haugen, Human Rights and Technology—A Conflictual Relationship? Assessing Private Research and the Right to Adequate Food, 7 J. HUM. RTS 224-244 (2008).
Haochen Sun, Reinvigorating the Human Right to Technology, 41(2) MICH. J. INT’L L. 279-326 (2020).
Hesam Nourooz Pour, Transitional justice and online social platforms: Facebook and the Rohingya genocide, 31(2) INT’L J. L. & INFORMATION TECH 95-113 (2023).
Hun Joon Kim, Why Do States Adopt Truth Commissions After Transition?, 100(5) SOC. SCI. Q. 30-49 (2021).
Iavor Rangelov & Ruti G. Teitel, The Justice Archive: Transitional Justice and Digital Memory, 11(1) LONDON R. INT’L L. 83-109 (2023).
Iratxe Gillate & Janire Castrillo & Ursula Luna & Alex Ibañez-Etxeberria, Controversial Issues and Apps for Developing Social and Civic Competence. Analysis of the Effectiveness of Project 1936 in Initial Teacher Training, 28(1) REVISTA DE PSICODIDÁCTICA 51-58 (2023).
Iosif Kovras, Technologies of Justice: Forensics and the Evolution of Transitional Justice, 29(1) EUR. J. INT’L RELATIONS 29-52 (2023).
Iva Vukušić, Archive of Mass Violence: Understanding and Using ICTY Trial Records, 70(4) COMP. SOUTHEAST EUROP. STUD. 585-607 (2022).
Jacques Derrida, Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression, 25(2) DIACRITICS 9-63 (Eric Prenowitz Trans., 1995).
James A. Sweeney, The Elusive Right to Truth in Transitional Human Rights Jurisprudence, 67(2) INT’L & COMP. L. Q. 353-387-.
Jody Lyneé Madeira, When It’s So Hard to Relate: Can Legal Systems Mitigate the Trauma of Victim-Offender Relationships?, 46 HOUSTON L. R. 401-465 (2009).
Lawrence S. Owens, Timoteo Mendieta Alcal ́a and the Pact of Forgetting: trauma analysis of execution victims from a Spanish Civil War mass burial site at Guadalajara, Castilla la Mancha, 3 FORENSIC SCI. INT’L SYNERGY 1-19 (2021).
Lisa Park, Satellite Views of Srebrenica: Tele-visuality and the Politics of Witnessing, 7(4) SOC. IDENTITIES 585-611 (2001).
Lucia Mokra & Bibiana Wertlen, Emerging Use of Modern Technologies for Human Rights Protection, 4(1) J. ETHIC AND L. TECH. 91-104 (2022).
Luis Martin Cabrera & Andrea R. Davis, The Spanish Civil War Memory Project: Constructing and Enhancing Digital Archive, 43(1) DIGITAL HUMANITIES, 134-149 (2018).
Marco Aurelio Guimarães et al., Forensic investigation, truth and trust in the context of transitional justice in Brazil, 3(2) HUMAN REMAINS AND VIOLENCE 74-97 (2017).
Marloes van Noorloos, A Critical Reflection on the Right to the Truth about Gross Human Rights Violations, 21 HUM. RTS. L. R. 874-898 (2021).
Martin Kovanic, Transitional Justice Dynamics in Slovakia: From Silence to the Nation’s Memory Institute, 7(4) CEU POL. SCI. J. 385-410 (2012).
Matilde Eiroa & Raúl Magallón Rosa, History and Memory in Digital Culture. Methodological Innovations and Networks of Stories, 7(2) CULTURE & HISTORY DIGITAL J. 1-2 (2018).
Michelle E Anderson, Community-Based Transitional Justice Via the Creation and Consumption of Digitalized Storytelling Archives: A Case Study of Belfast’s Prisons Memory Archive, 13(1) INT’L J. TRANSTIONAL JUST 30-49 (2019).
Mitchell F. Rice, Information and communication technologies and the global digital divide: Technology transfer, development, and least developing countries, 1(1) COMP. TECH. TRANSFER & SOC. 72–88 (2003).
Nadia Alonso-Lopez & Pavel Sidorenko-Bautista, Spanish Historical Memory Coverage on TikTok: Profiles, Content and Messages, 13(2) REVISTA MEDITERRÁNEA DE COMM. 117-134 (2022).
Natalia Maystorovich Chulio, Democratising Collective Memory Through Forensic Exhumations in Spain, 68(3) AUSTL. J. POL. & HIST. 410-427.
Patrick Lenta, Transitional Justice and Retributive Justice, 22 ETHICAL THEORY & MORAL PRAC. 385-398(2019).
Patrick Vinvk, Transitional Justice in the Age of Social Media, 13(1) INT’L J. TRANSITIONAL JUST. 105-112 (2019).
Phuong N Pham & Jay D. Aronson, Technology and Transitional Justice, 13 INT’L J. TRANSTIONAL JUST. 1-6 (2019).
Ronen Yaël, Bosnia and Herzegovina: The Interaction between the ICTY and Domestic Courts in Adjudicating International Crimes, 8 DOMAC 1-86 (2011).
Ruti G. Teitel, Transitional Justice Geneology, 16 HARV. HUM. RTS. J. 69-94 (2003).
Patricia Lundy, Paradoxes and challenges of transitional justice at the ‘local’ level: Historical enquiries in Northern Ireland, 6(1) CONTEMP. SOC. SCI. 89-105 (2011).
Paul Mason, Reflections of International Law in Popular Culture Justice Seen to Be Done? Electronic Broadcast Coverage of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting, 95 PROC. ANN. MEETING 210-215 (2001).
Yasmin Naqvi, The right to the truth in international law: fact or fiction?, 88(862) INT’L R. OF THE RED CROSS, 245-273.
Yi-Ting Li , Mechanisms and Contexts of Transitional Justice in Spain and Taiwan: A Comparison, 6(3) TAIWAN HUM. RTS. J. 61-88 (2023).
Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Principles on Public Policies on Memory in the Americas, RESOLUTION 3/2019. https://www.oas.org/en/iachr/decisions/pdf/Resolution-3-19-en.pdf
Human Rights Committee, Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties under Article 40 of the Covenant, CCPR/C/ESP/CO/5 (2009).
Human Rights Council, Right to the truth Report of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, A/HRC/5/7 (2007).
Human Rights Council, Right to the truth Report of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, A/HRC/12/19 (2009).
UN Commission on Human Rights, Right to Truth, Human Rights Resolution 2005/66. https://www.refworld.org/legal/resolution/unchr/2005/en/38671
United Nations OHCHR & UC Berkeley Human Right Center, BERKELEY PROTOCOL ON DIGITAL OPEN SOURCE INVESTIGATIONS (2022).
United Nations, Report of the Special Rapporteur in the field of cultural rights The right to enjoy the benefits of scientific progress and its applications, A/HRC/20/26 (2012).
United Nations, Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Report on the seminar on the right to enjoy the benefits of scientific progress and its applications, A/HRC/26/19 (2014).
United Nations Human Rights Council, Resolution adopted by the Human Rights Council on 1 July 2016 32/13 The promotion, protection and enjoyment of human rights on the Internet, A/HRC/RES/32/13 (2016).
United Nations, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence, A/HRC/39/53 (2018).
United Nations, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Promotion of Truth, Justice, Reparation and Guarantees of Non-recurrence, Sustainable Development Goals and Transitional Justice: Leaving no Victim Behind, A/77/162 (2022).
United Nations, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence, Memorialization processes in the context of serious violations of human rights and international humanitarian law: the fifth pillar of transitional justice, A/HRC/45/45 (2020).
United Nations, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence, Bernard Duhaime, A/HRC/57/50 (2024).
United Nations, Secretary-General’s report on the rule of law in conflict and post-conflict societies, S/2004/616 (2004).
United Nations, Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence, Contemporary Perspectives on Transitional Justice Issues (2022).
United Nations, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Promotion of Truth, Justice, Reparation and Guarantees of Non-recurrence, A/HRC/30/42 (2015).
United Nation Security Council, Resolution 827, S/RES/827 (1993).
Alambre Estudio, Eibar 1936-37 | Gida, https://apps.apple.com/hk/app/eibar-1936-37-gida/id1099110318.
Amnesty International, Damning evidence of war crimes as Israeli attacks wipe out entire families in Gaza (2023). https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2023/10/damning-evidence-of-war-crimes-as-israeli-attacks-wipe-out-entire-families-in-gaza/
Amnesty International, Ukraine: Deadly Mariupol theatre strike ‘a clear war crime’ by Russian forces – new investigation (2022). https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2022/06/ukraine-deadly-mariupol-theatre-strike-a-clear-war-crime-by-russian-forces-new-investigation/
Antonio González Quintana, Archival Policies in the Protection of Human Rights (2009). https://www.ica.org/sites/default/files/archival_policies_in_the_protection_of_human_rights_0_0.pdf
ASOCIACIÓN PARA LA RECUPERACIÓN DE LA MEMORIA HISTÓRICA (ARMH), What is the Association for the Recovery of Historical Memory (2015). https://memoriahistorica.org.es/who-are-we/
Defensoria del Pueblo, Projecto de Digitalizacion del Archivo Historico de Familiaries de Desaparecidos y Detenidos por Razones Politicas (2019). https://defensoria.org.ar/noticias/finalizo-la-primera-etapa-del-proyecto-de-digitalizacion-del-archivo-historico-de-familiares-de-desaparecidos-y-detenidos-por-razones-politicas/
Denise Chow & Yuliya Talmazan, Watching from Space, Satellites Collect Evidence of War Crimes, NBC News (2022). https://www.nbcnews.com/science/science-news/ukraine-satellites-war-crimes-rcna26291
Eduardo Suárez, How Bellingcat collects, verifies and archives digital evidence of war crimes in Ukraine, Reuters (2023). https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/news/how-bellingcat-collects-verifies-and-archives-digital-evidence-war-crimes-ukraine
EyeWitness, What we do. https://www.eyewitness.global/our-work
Filip Rudic, Dossier Documents Serbian State Involvement in Driving Out Croats, Balkan Insight (2019). https://balkaninsight.com/2019/01/31/state-involvement-in-crimes-against-croats-in-serbia-dossier-01-31-2019/-
Humanitarian Law Center, ‘Dossiers’. http://www.hlc-rdc.org/?cat=290&lang=de.
Human Rights Working Group, Basic Principles on the role of Archivists and Records Managers in support of Human Rights (2016). https://www.ica.org/sites/default/files/ICA%20HRWG%20Basic%20Principles_endorsed%20by%20PCOM_2016_Sept_English.pdf
ICTY, Courtroom Technology, https://www.icty.org/en/about/registry/courtroom-technology.
ICTY, ICTY Marks Official Closure with Moving Ceremony in The Hague (2017), https://www.icty.org/en/press/icty-marks-official-closure-with-moving-ceremony-in-the-hague
ICTY, Outreach-Programme, https://www.icty.org/en/outreach/outreach-programme.
ICTY, Registry, https://www.icty.org/en/about/registry.
ICTY, Witnesses, https://www.icty.org/en/sid/158.
International Center of Transitional Justice, Transitional Justice in the Former Yugoslavia (2009). https://www.ictj.org/sites/default/files/ICTJ-FormerYugoslavia-Justice-Facts-2009-English.pdf
International Council of Archive, Principles of Access to Archives 8-9 (2012). https://www.ica.org/app/uploads/2023/12/ICA_Access-principles_EN.pdf
Jean O. Lanjouw, Patents, Price Controls and Access to New Drugs: How Policy Affects Global Market Entry 3 (Ctr. for Glob. Dev., Working Paper No. 61, 2005). https://www.cgdev.org/sites/default/files/2679_file_WP61.pdf.
Jon Elster, Memory and Transitional Justice, “Memory of War” Workshop, MIT, (2003). https://web.mit.edu/rpeters/papers/elster_memory.pdf
Lana O'Sullivan, The Berkeley Protocol is Setting International Standards for Digital Open Source Investigations, RESET Digital for Good (2024). https://en.reset.org/the-berkeley-protocol-is-setting-international-standards-for-digital-open-source-investigations/
Larry Rohter, Exposing the Lagacy of Operation Condor, The New York Times (2014). https://archive.nytimes.com/lens.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/01/24/exposing-the-legacy-of-operation-condor/
Laura Maria Rojas Morales, Colombia's measures for armed conflict victim reparations and land restitution, PATHFINDERS (2023). https://www.sdg16.plus/policies/colombias-measures-for-armed-conflict-victim-reparations-and-land-restitution/#policy-reference-9
Leith Jeroudi, Surveillance and Human Rights, Geneva Centre for Human Rights Advancement and Global Dialogue (2023). https://gchragd.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/GCHRAGD-SURVEILLANCE-AND-HUMAN-RIGHTS-background-paper.pdf
Legado de la Comisión de la Verdad (Colombian), Analítica de datos (información y recursos). https://www.comisiondelaverdad.co/analitica-de-datos-informacion-y-recursos#c1
Legado de la Comisión de la Verdad (Colombian), Huellas de desaparición Los casos de Urabá, Palacio de Justicia y territorio Nukak, https://www.comisiondelaverdad.co/violaciones-de-derechos-humanos-infracciones-al-derecho-internacional-humanitario-y/huellas-de
Legado de la Comisión de la Verdad (Colombian), Procesamiento de Lenguaje Natural (NLP). https://www.comisiondelaverdad.co/analitica-de-datos-informacion-y-recursos#c2
Legado de la Comisión de la Verdad (Colombian), Desarrollo Software, https://www.comisiondelaverdad.co/etiquetas/desarrollo-software?page=0
Louis Joinet, The Administration Justice and The Human Rights of Detainees Question of the impunity of perpetrators of human rights violations (civil and political) Revised final report prepared by Mr. Joinet pursuant to Sub-Commission decision 1996/119, E/CN.4/Sub.2/1997/20/Rev.12. 1. (1997). https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/g97/141/42/pdf/g9714142.pdf
Marcela Palacio Puerta, Transitional Justice, Truth, and Copyright: The Case of Colombia, PIJIP Research Series no. 95 (2023). https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1097&context=research
Memoria Abierta, MAPAS IMPRIMIBLES DE CENTROS CLANDESTINOS DE DETENCIÓN, https://memoriaabierta.org.ar/wp/mapas-imprimibles/
Michael L. Evans et al., Atrocity’s Archives: The Role of Archives in Transitional Justice (Workshop Summary and Conclusion Mar. 27-28, 2018), https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/migrated/atrocitys_archives_guidance_note-23july18.pdf
National Centre of Historical Memory (Colombian), BASTA YA! Colombia: Memories of War and Dignity. (2013). https://centrodememoriahistorica.gov.co/descargas/informes2016/basta-ya-ingles/BASTA-YA-ingles.pdf
Paresh Dave & Jeffery Dastin, Exclusive: Ukraine has started using Clearview AI’s Facial Recognition During War, Reuters (2022). https://www.reuters.com/technology/exclusive-ukraine-has-started-using-clearview-ais-facial-recognition-during-war-2022-03-13/
Paula O’Donnell, “Reflections on Resistance” Memoria Abierta preserves the documentary legacies of heroes who faced down the junta, Not Even Past (2022). https://notevenpast.org/reflections-on-resistance-memoria-abierta-preserves-the-documentary-legacies-of-heroes-who-faced-down-the-junta/
Philipp Kastner, Cyberjustice in the Context of Transitional Justice (2013). https://www.cyberjustice.ca/files/sites/102/WP009_TransitionnalJusticeAndCyberjustice_en.pdf
Sam Dubberley & Başak Çali, Investigating War Crimes: Open Source Research, Global Investigative Journalism Network (2023). https://gijn.org/resource/reporters-guide-to-investigating-war-crimes-open-source-research/
Syrian Network for Human Rights, Satellite Images Obtained by SNHR Prove the Extent of Massive Destruction Inflicted on Khan Sheikhoun City (2019). https://snhr.org/blog/2019/09/16/54236/
The KGF Research Project, Leiden Guidelines on the Use of Digitally Derived Evidence, C. Aerial and Satellite Images, https://leiden-guidelines.netlify.app/guidelines/c-aerial-satellite-images/#fn:134.
Trial International, The Smartphone App Capturing the Worst Atrocities (2019). https://trialinternational.org/latest-post/the-smartphone-app-capturing-the-worst-atrocities/
United Nations, The right to access to and participate in science Special Rapporteur in the field of cultural rights (2024). https://www.ohchr.org/en/special-procedures/sr-cultural-rights/right-access-and-participate-science
University of Warwick Modern Records Centre, Trabajadores : The Spanish Civil War through the eyes of organised labour, https://warwick.ac.uk/services/library/mrc/archives_online/digital/scw/
UV News, Researchers from the University design the first Digital Laboratory for Novels on Spanish Historical Memory (2023). https://www.uv.es/uvweb/uv-news/en/news/researchers-university-design-first-digital-laboratory-novels-spanish-historical-memory-1285973304159/Novetat.html?id=1286327435046&plantilla=UV_Noticies/Page/TPGDetaillNews
Vanessa Buschschlüter, 'False positives': Colombian army apologises for killing civilians, BBC News (2023). https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-67005102
Victoria Ginzberg, Todo está guardado en la memoria, Pagina 12 (2007). https://www.pagina12.com.ar/diario/elpais/1-86854-2007-06-20.html