世界各國對於專利交易情形之發展已日漸頻繁，因此自有其必要探討、分析專利價值與各專利因素之間之相關性，以利於建構專利價值模型。本研究之對象係為工業技術研究院所有之專利，以分析其專利價值與各專利因素間之相關性。

　　本研究先整理先前文獻關於專利價值與各專利因素之相關性之探討及專利因素影響專利價值之理論，以確立本研究所欲分析之專利因素及欲使用之研究方法。在研究方法上，本研究使用先前研究所使用之迴歸分析，或更進一步言之，主要以對數迴歸分析為主。本研究先利用單一迴歸分析找出與專利價值具有顯著相關性之顯著專利因素，再基於該等顯著專利因素以多元迴歸分析之。透過前述分析可發現本研究選定之專利因素在單一迴歸及多元迴歸上之分析結果，得以實證先前文獻之理論，並額外發現先前文獻無法證明顯著性之部份專利因素之顯著性。

　　由於本研究之研究方法之先天限制，本研究僅能得出在迴歸模型中專利價值與專利因素之相關性而非因果關係，因此專利價值與專利因素間之因果關係，仍有待未來研究闡述，以連同本研究之成果成為未來制定專利價值模型時之參考依據。

Patent transaction is becoming frequent through whole world, hence it’s necessary to study and analyze the relation among patent value and various patent indicators to develop patent value model. The subjects of this article are patents owned by Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI), these patents are analyzed for statistical relation among their patent value and patent indicators.

This article reviews prior references discussing on relations among patent value and patent indicators and theories of how patent indicators affect patent value, to establish analytical method of this research and choose patent indicators about to be analyzed by this research. About the analytical method, this article is conducted on regression analysis used by prior research, more specifically, on logarithmic regression analysis, essentially. At first, this article use simple regression analysis to retrieve those indicators with significant relation with patent value then apply multivariate regression analysis on those indicators. By this method, this article reveals the result of chosen indicators at simple regression level and at multivariate regression level to empirically prove theories from prior references. Additionally, this article discovers the significance of some indicator found as being insignificant in prior references.

Due to natural restrain on the analytical method used in this article, this article can only establish the relation of patent value with patent indicators rather than the causality thereof. Such causality shall only be investigated in future for being references for designing patent value model with the result contributed by this article.

中文文獻

吳耀宏：〈分析美國化工產業的專利範疇、RTA、平均專利年齡對市值之影響〉（台北：國立臺北大學企業管理學系碩士論文，2013）。取自臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
林惠玲（2002）。研究發展、專利權與經濟效益：台灣1996-2000年追蹤資料之驗證。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告。（編號：NSC 90-2415-H-002-021-SSS），未出版。
陳郁婷、周延鵬、王承守、鄧穎懋：《跨國專利侵權訴訟之管理》〔台北：元照出版有限公司，2008〕，頁9-10。
陳順宇：《迴歸分析》〔台北：三民書局，2009〕，頁4-2。
葉柏宏：〈以專利訴訟進行專利價值影響因素之研究〉（新竹：科技管理學系（所）碩士論文，2007），頁50。取自臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
詹炳耀：《專利鑑價》〔台北：經濟部智慧局，2009〕，頁5-6。
謝宇：《迴歸分析》〔台北：五南圖書，2013〕，頁207-210。
譚克平：〈極端值判斷方法簡介〉，《台東大學教育學報》第19卷第1期〔2008年6月〕，頁131-150。

英文文獻

Abrams, D. S., Akcigit, U., and Popadak, J. (2013). Patent Value and Citations: Creative Destruction or Strategic Disruption? (No. w19647). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Alan Pilkington, Linda L. Lee, Casey K. Chan and Seeram Ramakrishna. (2009). Defining key inventors: A comparison of fuel cell and nanotechnology industries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(1), 118-127.
Alba Martinez-Ruiz and Thomas Aluja-Banet. (2009). Toward the definition of a structural equation model of patent value: PLS path modelling with formative constructs. REVSTAT–Statistical Journal, 7(3), 265-290.
Alex Coad and Rehka Rao. (2006). Innovation and market value: a quantile regression analysis. Economics Bulletin, 15(13). Retrieved from http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/23518/1/EB-06O10012A.pdf (last visited Aug. 12, 2015).
Alfonso Gambardella, Dietmar Harhoff and Bart Verspagen. (2008). The value of European patents. European Management Review, 5(2), 69-84.
Allison, John R. and Lemley, Mark A. and Moore, Kimberly A. and Trunkey, R. Derek. (2003). Valuable Patents. Georgetown Law Journal, 92, 435.
Ariel Pakes and Mark Schankerman. (1984). The rate of obsolescence of patents, research gestation lags, and the private rate of return to research resources. In R&D, patents, and productivity (pp. 73-88). University of Chicago Press.
Carlos J. Serrano (2005). The Market for Intellectual Property: Evidence from the Transfer of Patents (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/seminarpapers/special14022005.pdf (last visited Aug. 11, 2015).
Dietmar Harhoff, Francis Narin, Frederic M. Scherer and Katrinl Vopel. (1999). Citation frequency and the value of patented innovation. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(3), 511-515.
Ernst, H., Leptien, C. and Vitt, J. (2000). Inventors are not alike: the distribution of patenting output among industrial R&D personnel. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 47(2), 184-199.
F. Russell Denton and Paul J. Heald. (2002). Random Walks, Non-Cooperative Games, and the Complex Mathematics of Patent Pricing. Rutgers L. Rev., 55, 1175, at 1183-1190.
Holger Ernst. (2003). Patent information for strategic technology management. World patent information, 25(3), 233-242.
James Bessen. (2008). The Value of U.S. Patents by Owner and Patent Characteristics. Research Policy, 37(5), 932-945.
Jean O. Lanjouw and Mark Schankerman. (1999). The quality of ideas: measuring innovation with multiple indicators (No. w7345). National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6784543.pdf (last visited Aug. 12, 2015).
Manuel Trajitenberg. (1990). A Penny for Your Quotes: Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations. The Rand Journal of Economics, 172-187.
Marc Baudry and Béatrice Dumont. (2006). Patent Renewals as Options: Improving the Mechanism for Weeding Out Lousy Patents. Review of Industrial Organization, 28(1), 41-62. doi: 10.1007/s11151-006-0001-0.
Mark Schankerman and Ariel Pakes. (1985). Estimates of the Value of Patent Rights in European Countries During thePost-1950 Period. NBER Working Paper No. 1650.
Markus Reitzig. (2003). What do patent indicators really measure. A Structural Test of ‘Novelty’and ‘Inventive Step’as Determinants of Patent Profitability, 2003-1. Retrieved from http://www.druid.dk/uploads/tx_picturedb/ds2004-1283.pdf (last visited Aug. 12, 2015).
Markus Reitzig. (2004). Improving patent valuations for management purposes—validating new indicators by analyzing application rationales. Research Policy, 33(6), 939-957.
Markus Reitzig. (2006). Valuing Patents and Patent Portfolios from a Corporate Perspective: Theoretical Considerations, Applied Needs and Future Challenges. The Management of Intellectual Property (pp. 293-317), at 298. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.elgaronline.com/view/9781845421120.00024.xml (last visited Aug. 12, 2015).
Mikael Collan and Markku Heikkilä. (2011). Enhancing patent valuation with the pay-off method. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16(5), 377-384, at 383.
Mikael Collan, Robert Fullér and József Mezei. (2009). A fuzzy pay-off method for real option valuation. Advances in Decision Sciences, 2009. Retrieved from http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/ads/2009/238196.pdf (last visited Aug. 12, 2015).
Ming-Cheng Wu and Chun-Yao Tseng. (2006). Valuation of patent–a real options perspective. Applied Economics Letters, 13(5), 313-318.
Nicholas Bloom and John Van Reenen. (2002). Patents, real options and firm performance. The Economic Journal, 112(478), C97-C116.
Nicolas van Zeebroeck. (2011). The puzzle of patent value indicators. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 20(1), 33-62.
Robert Pitkethly. (1997). The Valuation of Patents: A review of patent valuation methods with consideration of option based methods and the potential for further research. Judge Institute Working Paper WP 21/97, at 28.
Ruiz, A. M. and Banet, T. A. (2008). Structural model of patent and market value, an application in energy patents. working paper, Laboratory of Information Analysis and Modelling, Department of Statistical and Operational Research–Technical University of Catalonia (January 2008). Retrieved from http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Tomas_Aluja-Banet/publication/265242652_Structural_Model_of_Patent_and_Market_Value_An_Application_in_Energy_Patents/links/551a82310cf26cbb81a2e4df.pdf (last visited Aug. 12, 2015).
Scott Mathews. (2009). Valuing risky projects with real options. Research-Technology Management, 52(5), 32-41.
Shyam Sreekumaran Nair, Mary Mathew and Dipanjan Nag. (2011). Dynamics between patent latent variables and patent price. Technovation,31(12), 648-654, at 651.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. (2003), Intellectual Assets: Valuation and Capitalization, at 31. Retrieved from http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/ie/enterp/documents/valuationpub.pdf (last visited Aug. 12, 2015).
Victoria J. Hodge and Jim Austin. (2004). A survey of outlier detection methodologies. Artificial Intelligence Review, 22(2), 85-126.
Walter G. Park and Juan Carlos Cinarte. (1997). Intellectual property rights and economic growth. Contemporary Economic Policy, 15(3), 51-61.

網路資料

Anthony King and ChemistryWorld, Cystic Fibrosis Charity Sells Drug Rights to Pharma for $3.3 Billion, Scientific American, http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/cystic-fibrosis-charity-sells-drug-rights-to-pharma-for-3-3-billion/ (last visited Aug. 11, 2015).
Association of University Technology Managers, Highlights of AUTM’s U.S. Licensing Activity Survey: FY2013, http://www.autm.net/AM/Template.cfm?Section=FY_2013_Licensing_Activity_Survey&Template=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=13870 (last visited Aug. 11, 2015).
BBC News (Apr. 6, 2000). Sticking around - the Post-it note is 20. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/701661.stm (last visited Aug. 12, 2015).
Center for Global Innovation/Patent Metrics, Patent/copyright infringement lawsuits/licensing awards, http://www.bustpatents.com/awards.html (last visited Aug. 11, 2015).
Endmemo, Kurtosis Calculator, http://www.endmemo.com/statistics/kurtosis.php (last visited Aug. 13, 2015).
Endmemo, Skewness Calculator, http://www.endmemo.com/statistics/skewness.php (last visited Aug. 13, 2015).
Gene Quinn, The Cost of Obtaining a Patent in the US, http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2015/04/04/the-cost-of-obtaining-a-patent-in-the-us/id=56485/ (last visited Aug. 12, 2015).
Michael Kan, Lenovo buys mobile-related patents for $100 million, PCWorld, http://www.pcworld.com/article/2110720/lenovo-buys-mobilerelated-patents-for-100-million.html (last visited Aug. 11, 2015).
PricewaterhouseCoopers, 2014 Patent Litigation Study: As case volume leaps, damages continue general decline, http://www.pwc.com/en_US/us/forensic-services/publications/assets/2014-patent-litigation-study.pdf (last visited Aug. 11, 2015).
Richards Patent Law, How much does a patent cost?, http://www.richardspatentlaw.com/faq/have-an-idea/how-much-does-a-patent-cost/ (last visited Aug. 12, 2015).
TecEsq, Trends in Patent Litigations, http://www.tecesq.com/images/reports/1418415410.pdf (last visited Aug. 11, 2015).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, USPTO Fee Schedule, http://www.uspto.gov/learning-and-resources/fees-and-payment/uspto-fee-schedule (last visited Aug. 12, 2015).
World Bank, Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BX.GSR.ROYL.CD/countries?display=graph (last visited Feb. 5, 2015).
World Intellectual Property Organization, WIPO IP Facts and Figures, http://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_943_2014.pdf (last visited Aug. 6, 2015).
Worldwatch Institute. Life-Cycle Studies: Post-it Notes. http://www.worldwatch.org/node/6387 (last visited Aug. 12, 2015).
台灣股市資訊網，http://goodinfo.tw/StockInfo/index.asp （最後瀏覽日：2015年8月13日）。
USPTO, US Classes by Number with Title Menu, http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/classification/selectnumwithtitle.htm (last visited Aug. 31, 2015).