簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 趙偉成
論文名稱: 軟體可用性評估方法論之建立與驗證 : 以企業資源規劃軟體為例
指導教授: 王明揚
口試委員:
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工學院 - 工業工程與工程管理學系
Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management
論文出版年: 2003
畢業學年度: 91
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 107
中文關鍵詞: 可用性易學性易用性方法論企業資源規劃
外文關鍵詞: Usability, Learnability, Ease of use, Methodology, Enterprise Resource Planning
相關次數: 點閱:3下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 雖然現存許多關於軟體可用性(Usability)評估技術之學術研究,但具實用性的系統化可用性評估模式卻很少,因此本研究應用系統工程的觀點,將整個評估程序視為一個系統化之程序,並建立一套系統化的軟體可用性評估方法論。旨在讓軟體設計者瞭解,不同的設計階段需考量不同的可用性評估技術,藉由不斷的評估、改善與維持的循環,軟體系統才能符合預期的設計目標,並達成易學性(Learnability)、易用性(Ease of use)的境界。
    為了驗證本研究所提出之軟體可用性評估方法論的可行性,吾人將方法論(Methodology)實際運用於個案公司企業資源規劃(Enterprise Resource Planning,ERP)軟體之可用性評估,在評估的過程中整理出軟體介面設計的評估準則與軟體系統之啟發式評估問卷,並證實此方法論的實用性,期待此方法論可廣為推行,並從實際運用中發現尚待改進的缺失,然後可進行修改,以使此方法論盡善盡美。


    There are a lot of academic researches focusing on the aspect of analyzing the usability of software; yet, curiously, few on the practical analytical mode. This research, therefore, from the aspect of applied system engineering, takes the whole evaluation procedure as a systematic one and further establishes a systematic software on analyzing usability of software.
    The aim of this research is for the software programmer to realize there are various techniques for analyzing utilities on different stages of programming. By a sequential analysis, improvement, and maintenance, the software can be programmed to be more reliable as expected and, further, to be more learnable and easier of use.

    To testify the reliability of this research, the methodology being adopted is to run a program on analyzing the usability of the software, Enterprise Resource Planning in the elected company. On the process of analyzing, the standards of the interfaces and the questionnaires can be organized and the utilities can be testified.

    目 錄 摘 要 i Abstract ii 誌謝辭 iii 目 錄 iv 圖 目 錄 v 表 目 錄 vi 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究動機 2 第三節 研究目的 3 第四節 研究步驟 4 第五節 論文架構 5 第二章 文獻探討 6 第一節 企業資源規劃之簡介 6 第二節 系統工程 9 第三節 人與電腦互動 11 第四節 資料分析方法 20 第三章 軟體可用性評估方法論之建立 23 第一節 定義模組 24 第二節 轉換定義模組與確認定義模組 26 第三節 分析模組 28 第四節 轉換分析模組與確認分析模組 30 第五節 綜合實驗模組 31 第六節 資料蒐集模組 32 第七節 資料處理模組 37 第八節 問題定義模組 38 第四章 方法論之個案驗證 39 第一節 個案評估之準備 39 第二節 個案介面之評估實驗 41 第三節 個案系統之評估實驗 47 第四節 實用方法論之建議 56 第五章 實驗結果討論 57 第六章 結論與建議 62 參考文獻 64 附錄一:軟體介面設計原則之整理 68 附錄二:介面可用性評估之問卷 75 附錄三:介面可用性評估問卷之統計結果 81 附錄五:系統可用性問題之層級分析程序問卷 84 附錄六:系統可用性問題之層級分析程序問卷數據 97

    參考文獻
    1.整合性軟體可用性評估技術之研究,許程維,清華大學工業工程與工程管理系碩士論文,1996
    2.人體計測資料庫之可用性設計與評估,張正憲,清華大學工業工程與工程管理系碩士論文,1997
    3.李青蓉、魏丕信、施郁芬、邱昭彰編著,人機介面設計,空中大學,1998
    4.Jenny Preece 著,A Guide to Usability—Human Factors in Computing,陳建豪 譯,人機介面與互動入門—電腦之人因工程,和碩科技文化,台北市,1998
    5.徐村和,模糊德菲層級分析法,模糊系統學刊,v4(1),pp.59-72,1998
    6.蘇郁琇,台灣地區企業採用企業資源規劃系統(ERP)之影響因素研究,國立台灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文,民國88 年
    7.詹榮昌,全球資訊網網站人機介面可用性評估方法之研究,銘傳大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文,2000
    8.吳萬益、林清河,企業研究方法,華泰圖書出版公司,pp.385,2000年12月出版
    9.洪郁修、張育銘、陳建旭,電子通訊產品軟體介面評估系統之發展研究,工業設計,29:2=105 ,pp.226-230,2001
    10.管倖生、林彥呈,從使用性工程觀點評估電子商務網頁之研究--以台鐵網頁售票系統為例,科技學刊,10:2 pp.137-149,2001
    11.唐宏霖、李信儀,選擇適合需求的ERP軟體注意要點,會計研究月刊,190 ,pp.14-15,2001
    12.諾里斯,Norris Grant著,劉世平譯,ERP與電子化/企業強化競爭力的致勝武器,商周出版,城邦文化發行,2001
    13.Hall A.D., A Methodology for Systems Engineering: D.Van Nostrand Company,1962
    14.Hall A.D., Systems Engineering from an Engineering Viewpoint, IEEE Trans. on Syst. Sci. Cybern., Vol. SSC-1,Nov., pp.4-8, 1965
    15.Hall A.D., Three-Dimensional Morphology of Systems Engineering, IEEE Trans. on Syst. Sci. Cybern., Vol. SSC-5, pp.156-160, April 1969
    16.Alan V.K., A New Role for Treasury in The Age of ERP, TMA Journal, pp.59-60, May/June 1999
    17.Blanchard B.S. and Fabrycky W.J., Systems Engineering and Analysis.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1981
    18.Benjamin S. B and Fabrycky W. J., System engineering and analysis, third edition
    19.Cohill A.M. , Gilfoil D.M. and Pilitsis, J.V. Measuring the utility of application software. In H.R. Hartson & D.Hix,Eds. Advances in Human Computer Interaction, Vol. 2. Ablex Publishing Corp., Norwood, N.J.,1988
    20.Computerworld, ERP: Corporate Cleanup, pp.74~78, Mar.1999
    21.Denning S., Hoiem D., Simpson, M. and Sullivan, K., The Value of Thinking-Aloud Protocols in Industry : A Case Study at Microsoft Corporation, Proceedings of Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting,pp.1285-1289, 1990
    22.Hix D and Schulman B. S., Human computer interface development tools: methodology for their evaluation, Communications of The ACM, Vol.34. , No.3, 1991
    23.Davis and Cosenza, Business Research for Decision Making , third edition , pp.56, 1993
    24.Dzida and Wolfgang, Standards for user-interfaces, Computer Standards & Interfaces, Vol. 17, Issue. 1, pp.89-97, 1995
    25.Günther G., Hamborg K.C.、Ivo Düntsch, Evaluation of software system
    26.Grudin J., Utility and usability, Research issues and development contexts, Interacting with Computer, p209-217, 1992
    27.Han S. H. , Hwan Y. M. and Hong K. J., Sang W., Usability of consumer electronic products ,International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics ,Vol: 28, Issue: 3-4, pp.143-151, 2001
    28.Kenneth D. B., Methods of Social Research,1993
    29.Karl T. U. and Steven D. E, Product Design and Development, 1995
    30.Lewis C., Using the "Thinking-Aloud" Method in cognitive Interface Design., Research Report PC9265, IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY, USA. Lindgaard, G. (1994). Usability testing and system evaluation. London: Chapman & Hall.,1982
    31.Lewis C. and Wharton, C., Cognitive walkthroughs, In M. Helander, T. Landauer & P. Prabhu (Eds.), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, Second Edition, pp.717-732, Amsterdam. Elsevier ,1997
    32.Lawrence S. G., Reinventing ERP After Y2K, Automotive Manufacturing & Production, PP.68-70, Nov 1999
    33.Mack, R. L. and Nielsen, J., Usability inspection methods, ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 25(1),pp.28-33, January 1993
    34.Nielsen J., and Molich, R., Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces, Proc. ACM CHI’90 Conf. (Seattle,WA,1-5 April),pp.249-256, 1990
    35.Nielsen J., Finding usability problems through heuristic evaluation, CHI’92 Conference Proceedings, pp.373-380, 1992
    36.Nielsen J., Usability Engineering. AP Professional, Academic Press, San Diego, USA. , 1993
    37.Ohnemus K. R. and Biers D.W., Retrospective versus concurrent thinking-out-loud in usability testing. In Proceeding of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, pp.1127-1131, 1993
    38.Pitkow J. E. and Margaret M. R.,Using the Web as A Survey Tool: Results from the second WWW User Survey, Journal of Networks and ISDN System, Vol.27, no.6, 1996
    39.Park K. S and Hwan L. C., A structured methodology for comparative evaluation of user interface designs using usability criteria and measures,International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol : 23, Issue: 5-6, pp. 379-389, 1999
    40.Roberts T.L. and Moran T.P. , The evaluation of text editors : Methodology and empirical results. Commun. ACM 26,4.265-283,1983
    41.Robert N. W, Up and Running in Nine Months, Management Accounting, PP.20-27, Dec 1998
    42.Saaty T.L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill Inc,America,1980
    43.Soken, N., R., Vora B. P.,and Metz, S., Methods for Evaluating Usability , Honeywell, Dec., 1993
    44.Sweeney, M. M., and Shackel B., Evaluation user-computer interaction: a framework. Int. J. Man-Machine Studies, 38, pp.689-771,1993
    45.Thomas G. O’Brien, Samuel G. Charlton,“Handbook of Human Factors Testing and Evaluation”,Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,Inc.,pp.28,1996
    46.Tasker R., What’s ERP, Charter, PP.46-49, Oct .1999
    47.Virzi R. A., Streamlining the design process: Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting, pp.291- 294, 1990
    48.Virzi, R. A., Refining the test phase of usability evaluation: How many subjects is enough? 1992
    49.William G. Z., Business Research Methods, sixth edition, pp.60, 1999
    50.Maryland Universities, Available at: http://www.cs.umd.edu/zzj/UsabilityHome.html
    51.San Jose State Universities, Available at: http://www.best.com/~jthom/usability/general.html

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (國家圖書館:臺灣博碩士論文系統)
    QR CODE