在現今民主的時代，人民的聲音逐漸被重視，因此政治家與領導人必須能夠提出具有影響力的政策，並用正確的方式行銷政策，方能促使民眾對於政策的理解，並拉近與人民的距離，使大家能夠對領袖有情，政策有感，進而改造完善的制度，提高社會的福祉。
而在政策分析中，問題建構是分析流程中極為重要且關鍵的步驟，正確的問題建構不僅能減少政策資源的浪費，也有助於策略的聚焦與選擇。
本研究藉由構框理論、問題建構、論述實踐等相關文獻探討以解釋如何以問題建構來構框，並將其運用至現今科技政策上以進行個案分析。

丘昌泰，1994，問題建構與政策分析：方法論的批判與重建，法商學報，30：76-131。
丘昌泰，2009，甚麼是公共管理個案教學方法？──教案、教師、教法、學員角度的解析，台中：行政院人事行政局地方行政研習中心。
丘昌泰，2010，公共政策：基礎篇，高雄市：復文書局。
洪世章、曾詠青，2014，「師出有名：如何做好政策行銷」，產業與管理論壇，第16期第2卷，（已接受）。
曾詠青，2012，國家創新系統下的科技政策形成之路-以籌備第九次全國科學技術會議為例，碩士論文，新竹市：國立清華大學。
游美惠，2000，內容分析、文本分析與論述分析在社會研究的運用，調查研究，8：5-42。
葉至誠，2000，社會科學概論，揚智文化事業有限公司 。
Ackoff, R. L.1974. Redesigning the Future: A Systems Approach to Societal Problems. New York, John Wiley 1974 .
Barley, S. R. and Tolbert, P. S. 1997. Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organization Studies, 18: 93–117.
Barsalou, L. W., & Hale, C. R. 1993. Components of conceptual representation: From feature lists to recursive frames. In I. Van Mechelen, J. Hampton, R. Michalski, & P. Theuns (Eds.), Categories and concepts: Theoretical views and inductive data analysis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Bateson, G. 1955. Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine
Beckert, J. 2010. How do fields change? The interrelations of institutions, networks, and Cognition in the dynamics of markets. Organization Studies, 31: 605–627.
Benford, R. D. and Snow, D. A. 2000. Framing processes and social Movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26: 611-639.
Benner, M. J., and Tripsas, M. 2012. The influence of prior industry affiliation on framing in nascent industries: The evolution of digital cameras. Strategic Management Journal, 33:277–302.
Blumer, H. 1971. Social problems as collective behavior. Social Problems, 18:298–306.
Bourdieu, P. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Brewer, G. and deLeon, P. 1983. The Foundations of Policy Analysis. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
Campbell, J.L., 2005. Social Movements and Organization Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Caronna, C. A. 2004. The misalignment of institutional “pillars”: Consequences for the U.S. health care field. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 45: 45–59.
Covaleski, M. A., Dirsmith, M. W., Heian, J. B., & Samuel, S. 1998. The calculated and the avowed: Techniques of discipline and struggles over identity in Big Six public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43:293–327.
Dunn, KL 1994. A winter collecting trip to Cooktown, Queensland. Victorian Entomologist, 24(5): 103-112
Fiss, P. C., and Zajac, E. J. 2006. The symbolic management of strategic change: Sensegiving via framing and decoupling. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6): 1173–1193.
Foucault, M. 1980. Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon.
George, E., Chattopadhyay, P., Sitkin, S. B., and Barden, J. 2006. Cognitive underpinnings of institutional persistence and change: A framing perspective. Academy of Management Review, 31:347–365.
Gephart, R. P. 2004. Qualitative research and the academy of management journal. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4):454-462.
Goffman, E. 1974. Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston, MA: North Eastern University Press.
Henisz, W., and Zelner, B. 2005. Legitimacy, interest group pressures and change in emerging institutions: The case of foreign investors and host country governments. Academy of Management Review, 20(3):361–382.
Hodgkinson, G. P., Bown, N. J., Maule, A. J., Glaister, K. W., and Pearman, A. D. 1999. Breaking the frame: An analysis of strategic cognition and decision making under uncertainty. Strategic Management Journal, 20:977–985.
Hoffman, A. J. 1999. Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the U.S. chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 351–371.
Howlett, Michael and Ramesh, R. 1995. Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems. Toronto, New York: Oxford University Press
Hung, S.-C., & Whittington, R. 2011. Agency in national innovation systems: Institutional entrepreneurship and the professionalization of Taiwanese IT. Research Policy, 40(4): 526-538.
Joep p. Cornelissen & Mirjam D. Werner. 2014. Putting framing in perspective: A review of framing and frame analysis across the management and organizational literature. Academy of Management Journal, 1: 181–235.
Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. 1984. Choices, values and frames. American Psychologist, 39:341–350.
Kaplan, S., and Tripsas, M. 2008. Thinking about technology: Applying a cognitive lens to technical change. Research Policy, 37(5): 790–805.
Knights, D. & Morgan, G. 1991. Strategic discourse and subjectivity: Towards a critical analysis of corporate strategy in organizations. Organization Studies, 12: 251–273.
Koopmans, R., and Statham, P. 1999. Ethnic and civic conceptions of nationhood and the differential success of the extreme right in Germany and Italy. In M. Giugni, D. McAdam, & C. Tilly (Eds.), How social movements matter (p. 225–251). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Maguire, S., Hardy, C. 2009. “Discourse and deinstitutionalization: The decline of DDT”. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 148-178.
Maitlis, S., & Sonenshein, S. 2010. Sensemaking in crisis and change: Inspiration and insights from Weick (1988). Journal of Management Studies, 47: 551–580.
Maitlis, S., and Christianson, M. 2013. Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. Annals of the Academy of Management.
McCammon, H. 2013. Discursive opportunity structure. In D. A. Snow, D. Della Porta, B. Klandermans, & D. McAdam (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell encyclopedia of social and political movements. Oxford: Willey–Blackwell.
Mrak, E. 1969. Report of the secretary’s commission on pesticides and their relationship to environmental health (parts I and II). Washington, DC: HEW
Odum, P. 1971. Fundamentals of ecology (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: Saunders.
Orlikowski, W. J., and Gash, D. C. 1994. Technological frames—making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 12(2): 174–207.
Parker, I. 1992. Discourse dynamics: Critical analysis for social and individual psychology. London: Routledge.
PSAC. 1963. The use of pesticides—President’s Science Advisory Committee report. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Raiffa, H. 1968. Decision analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Reckwitz A. 2002. Toward a theory of social practices. A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5: 243­263.
Ribicoff, A. 1966. Pesticides and public policy (Report of the Committee on Government Operations, U.S. Senate 89th Congress, 2nd session, report 1379). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Rittel, H. W. J. and M. M. Webber. 1973. Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning, Policy Science, 4: 155-169.
Rochefort, David A. and Roger W. Cobb, 1994. Problems of Problem Definition: Shaping the Policy Agenda. Lawrence, KS: University Press.
Ryan, C. 1991. Prime time activism: Media strategies for grassroots organizing. Boston, MA: South End.
Scott, W. R. 2001. Institutions and organizations (2nded.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Seo, M., Goldfarb, B., and Barrett, L. F. 2010. Affect and the framing effect within individuals across time: Risk taking in a dynamic investment simulation. Academy of Management Journal, 53:411–431.
Sonenshein, S. 2006. Crafting social issues at work. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 1158–1172.
Starbuck, W. H. 1983. Organizations as action generators. American Sociological Review, 48: 91–102.
Stone, Deborah A. 1988. Policy paradox and political reason. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. 1987. Rational choice and the framing of decisions. In R. M. Hogarth & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Rational choice: The contrast between economics and psychology . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Vaara, E. and Whittington, R. 2012. Strategy-as-practice: Taking social practices seriously. Academy of Management Annals. 6(1), 285-336.
Walsh, J. P. 1995. Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes from a trip down memory lane. Organization Science, 6(3):280–321.
Weber, K., & Glynn, M. A. 2006. Making sense with institutions: Context, thought and action in Karl Weick’s theory. Organization Studies, 27: 1639–1660.
Wicks, D. 2001. Institutionalized mindsets of invulnerability: Differentiated institutional fields and the antecedents of organizational crisis. Organization Studies, 22: 659–692.
Yin, R. K. 1994. Case study research: Design and methods, 2nd edition. London: Sage.