研究生: |
方梓仲 Tzu-Chung Fang |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
結合品質機能展開與模糊理論進行新產品需求分析-以紀念章為例 Combining QFD and Fuzzy Theory to Analyze New Product Requirements - A Case Study of Commemorative Medals |
指導教授: |
劉志明
Chih-Ming Liu |
口試委員: | |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
工學院 - 工業工程與工程管理學系 Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management |
論文出版年: | 2005 |
畢業學年度: | 93 |
語文別: | 英文 |
論文頁數: | 82 |
中文關鍵詞: | 紀念章 、新產品開發 、需求分析 、品質機能展開 、模糊理論 |
外文關鍵詞: | Commemorative Medals, New Product Development, Requirement Analysis, Quality Function Deployment, Fuzzy Theory |
相關次數: | 點閱:4 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
產品開發過程中,行銷人員與研發人員對於產品屬性與工程技術屬性之間的關聯性,憑藉的是模糊之經驗法則,但卻往往會造成技術屬性無法反應顧客需求之情形。因此,獲致經濟上的成功,必須要在新產品開發評估時,考慮到不同的顧客需求及工程技術屬性,並有能力去確認需求,快速創造符合需求之產品。要達到這些目的不單是行銷問題,也不僅是設計或製造的問題,而是一項跨越多重領域的活動,幾乎需要全公司所有功能部門的配合。因此,本研究試圖結合品質機能展開(Quality Function Deployment, QFD)與模糊理論,將顧客需求透過模糊化的方式予以表達,並以系統化流程建立產品與工程技術屬性的關聯性分析。最後,運用這些顧客需求與工程設計需求之關係,做為求得最佳工程設計需求組合的依據,並透過重要性權重予以分析,選擇最適的工程設計需求,以利於新產品設計與製作。
為了驗證方法的實用性,本研究以中央造幣廠鑄製之紀念章為例,依照方法論所提出的步驟,因應該廠經營型態之轉型,針對其製作紀念章之特殊性,找出其開發新產品時顧客需求之重要關鍵因素,建立一套分析之流程,以提供該廠往後規劃新產品時之自我檢核。
In the product development process, the marketing personnel and the R&D engineers usually rely on their past vague experience to analyze the relationship between product attributes and engineering design attributes. This may often result in the problem that the engineering attributes can not properly respond to customer requirements. Therefore, in order to achieve the economic goal, both customer requirements and engineering design attributes must be taken into consideration in the evaluation of a new product. Also the ability to confirm the final requirements needs to be developed for the purpose of rapidly creating the needed product. In order to achieve this purpose, it’s not only the problem of marketing or the problem of design or manufacturing, it’s a task which requires the cooperation of different functional departments. This study tries to combine the QFD method and fuzzy theory to treat customer requirements and to establish the relationship between product attributes and engineering attributes. Finally, using the relationship between customer requirements and engineering requirements, the optimal engineering design requirements can be found, the importance factors can be given, and the most appropriate engineer design requirements can be selected. The proposed method can be used in the design and construction of a new product.
In order to verify the practicability of the method, the development of commemorative medals of the Central Mint in Taiwan is taken as an example, the steps of the proposed method were followed. The result shows that the proposed method can effectively help the development of a new product.
1.Booz, A. and Hamilton, “New Product Management for the 1980’s,” NY, Allen and Hamilton Inc., 1982.
2.Chen, S. J. and Hwang, C. L., “Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications,” New York. 1992.
3.Chan, L. K. and Wu, M. L., “Quality Function Deployment: A Literature Review,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 143, pp. 463-497, 2002.
4.Crawford, C. M., “New Product Failure Rates: A Reprise,” The Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 5, pp. 17-24, 1988.
5.Cristiano, J. J., Liker, J. K., and White, C. C. III., “Key factors in the successful application of quality function deployment (QFD),” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 48, pp. 81–95, 2001.
6.Delgado, M., Herrera, F., Herrera, V. E., and Martinez, L., “Combining numerical and linguistic information in group decision making,” Journal of Information Sciences, Vol.107, pp. 177-194, 1998.
7.Dubois, D. and Prade, H., “Operation on fuzzy numbers,” International Journal of Systems Science, Vol. 9, pp. 613-626, 1978.
8.Fariborz, Y. P. and Rafael, A. C., “Quality function deployment for the good of soccer,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 137, pp. 642-656, 2002.
9.Govers, C.P.M., “What and how about quality function deployment (QFD),” International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 46-47, pp. 575-585, 1996.
10.Govers, C.P.M., “QFD is not only a tool but also a way of quality management,” International Journal Production Economics, Vol. 7, pp. 151-159, 2000.
11.Hauser, J. R. and Donald, C., “The House of Quality,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 66, pp. 63-73, 1988.
12.Hart, S., “Dimensions of success in new product development: an exploratory investigation,” Journal of Marketing Management, Vol.9, pp.35-46, 1995.
13.John, J. C., Jeffrey, K. L., and Celsea, C., “Customer-Driven Product Development Through Quality Function Deployment in the U.S. and Japan,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 17, pp. 286-308, 2000.
14.Kim, K. J., Herbert, M., and Anoop, D., Gerald, E., “Fuzzy multicriteria models for quality function deployment,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 121, pp. 504-518, 2000.
15.Kotler, P., “Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation and Control,” 9th ed., Prentice-Hall Inc., 1997.
16.Kuczmarski, T.D., “Management New Product: The Power of Innovation,” 2nd Eds. N.J., Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, 1992.
17.Lauterborn, R. F., Schultz, D. E., and Tannenbaum, S. I., “Integrated marketing communications,” Lincolnwood, Ill., NTC Business Books, pp. 77, 1992.
18.Moskowitz, H. and Kim, K. J., “QFD optimizer: a novice friendly quality Function Deployment decision support system for optimizing product designs,” Computers Industry Engineering, Vol. 3, pp. 641-655, 1997.
19.Mendel, J. M., “Fuzzy Logic Systems for Engineering: A Tutorial,” Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 83, No.3, 1995.
20.Prasad, B., “Review of QFD and reiated deployment techniques,” Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 17(3), pp. 221-234, 1998.
21.Pullman, M. E., Moore, W. L., and Wardell, D. G., “A comparison of quality function deployment and conjoint analysis in new product design,” The Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 19, No. 5, pp. 354-364, 2002.
22.Sullivan, L. P., “Policy Management through Quality Function Deployment,” Quality Progress, Vol.21, pp.18-20, 1988.
23.Sampson, P., “Can Consumer Create New Products?” Journal of the Market Research Society, Vol. 12, pp. 29-38, 1970.
24.Temponi, C., Yen J., and Tiao W. A., “House of quality: A fuzzy logic-based requirements analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 117, pp. 340-354, 1999.
25.Wang, J., “Improved Engineering Design Concept Selection Using Fuzzy Sets,” Computer Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 18-27, 2002.
26.Yang, Y. Q., Wang, S. Q., Dulaimi, M., and Low, S. P., ”A fuzzy quality function deployment system for buildable design decision-makings,” Automation in Construction, Vol. 12, pp 381-393, 2003.
27.Zadeh, L. A., “Fuzzy Sets”, Information and Control, Vol.8, pp.338-353, 1965.
28.張保隆、陳文賢、蔣明晃、姜齊、盧昆宏、王瑞琛,生產管理,台北,華泰文化事業股份有限公司,民86年。
29.劉水深,產品規格化與策略運用,台北市,民83年。
30.水野滋、赤尾洋二,品質機能展開,前程企業管理公司,1987。
31.水野滋、赤尾洋二,品質機能展開法,先鋒企業管理發展中心,1997。
32.赤尾洋二,新產品開發品質展開之實際應用,中國生產力中心QFD研發中心編譯,1991。
33.阮亨中、吳柏林,模糊數學與統計應用,俊傑圖書出版社,民89年。
34.張萬堂,國外廠商進入台灣紀念幣章市場之研究,台灣大學國際企業研究所碩士論文,民91年。