簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 何碧娜
Abinandhana
論文名稱: Investigating Relationships Among Intra-team trust,Reward systems and Knowledge Sharing Behavior in Indian Industries
團隊內部信任、獎酬系統及知識分享間關係之研究:以印度產業為例
指導教授: 劉玉雯
Liu, Sophia
口試委員: 李傳凱
Lee, Chuan-kai
史習安
Shih, Hsi-Ann
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 科技管理學院 - 國際專業管理碩士班
International Master of Business Administration(IMBA)
論文出版年: 2012
畢業學年度: 100
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 66
中文關鍵詞: Intra-team trustKnowledge sharing behaviorperformance based individual reward,knowledge sharing based individual rewardperformance based group reward
外文關鍵詞: Intra-team trust, Knowledge sharing behavior, performance based individual reward,, knowledge sharing based individual reward, performance based group reward
相關次數: 點閱:2下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • This study attempts to identify the possible relationship between intra-team trust and
    knowledge sharing behavior of employees in India. The study was conducted in the IT, ITES
    industries focusing on the team work behavior of employees. Three kinds of reward system:
    performance based individual reward, knowledge sharing based individual reward, and
    performance based group reward was examined as a moderator in the relationship between intrateam
    trust and knowledge sharing behavior.
    Findings show that there is a significant positive relationship between intra-team trust and
    knowledge sharing behavior of employees. However, there was no significant moderation effect
    from all three moderators in this study. Based on the results, managerial implications were
    discussed, suggestion for future research is provided based on the limitations, and a conclusion is
    obtained for this study.


    TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES....................................................................................................................................VII LIST OF FIGURES……………………………………………………………………………………...VIII CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION 1.1 The Nature of Knowledge Sharing................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Theories Governing Knowledge Sharing ......................................................................................... 2 1.3 Knowledge Sharing Based Reward Systems……………………………………………………….3 1.4 Research Objectives………………………………………………………………………………...4 1.5 Research Structure………………………………………………………………………………….5 CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 Knowledge Sharing Behavior........................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Intra-team Trust…………………………………………………………………………………….7 2.3 Performance based IBR System……………………………………………………………………9 2.4 Knowledge Based IBR System…………………………………………………………………...11 2.5 Performance Based GBR System………………………………………………………………....13 CHAPTER THREE: METHODS 3.1 Conceptual Framework…………………………………………………………………………...16 3.2 Hypotheses………………………………………………………………………………………..17 3.3 Measures…………………………………………………………………………………………..18 3.3.1 Intra-team Trust…………………………………………………………………………………18 3.3.2 Knowledge Sharing Behavior…………………………………………………………………...19 3.3.3 Performance Based IBR System………………………………………………………………..20 3.3.4 Knowledge Sharing Based IBR System………………………………………………………...20 3.3.5 Performance Based GBR System……………………………………………………………….21 3.3.6 Control Variables………………………………………………………………………………..21 3.4 Sample and Procedure…………………………………………………………………………….22 3.4.1 Sample…………………………………………………………………………………………..22 3.4.2 Procedure………………………………………………………………………………………..25 3.5 Data Analysis Methods……………………………………………………………………………26 3.5.1 Analysis of Reliability and Validity ……………………………………………………………26 3.5.2 Confirmatory Factor Analysis…………………………………………………………………..26 3.5.3 Pearson Correlation Analysis…………………………………………………………………...27 3.5.4 Hierarchical Linear Modeling…………………………………………………………………..27 CHAPTER FOUR: RESULTS 4.1 Outcome of Testing Reliability …………………………………………………………………..28 4.2 Confirmatory Factor Analysis…………………………………………………………………….29 4.2.1 Model Fit Results……………………………………………………………………………….29 4.2.2 Convergent Validity…………………………………………………………………………….30 4.3 Identifying and Assessing Multicollinearity……………………………………………………...32 4.3.1 Tolerance………………………………………………………………………………………..32 4.3.2 Variance Inflation Factor………………………………………………………………………..33 4.3.3 Discriminant Validity …………………………………………………………..........................34 4.4 Correlation Analysis………………………………………………………………………………35 4.5 Outcome of Testing Hypothesis by Hierarchical Linear Regression……………………………..37 4.6 Outcome of Moderation Effect……………………………………………………………………39 4.6.1 Hierarchical Linear Modeling Analysis………………………………………………………...39 4.6.2 Test Null Model…………………………………………………………………………………40 4.6.3 Random Model………………………………………………………………………………….40 4.6.4 Intercept as Outcome Model……………………………………………………………………41 4.6.5 Slope as Outcome Model……………………………………………………………………….42 4.7 Summary of Results for Hypotheses Testing……………………………………………………..46 CHAPTER FIVE: CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSIONS 5.1 Discussion on Research Findings…………………………………………………………………47 5.2 Managerial Implications…………………………………………………………………………..49 5.3 Limitations and Suggestions for Future Research………………………………………………...50 5.4 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………………...51 REFERENCES…………………………………………………………………………………………...52 APPENDICES……………………………………………………………………………………………58

    Ashutosh, M. (2011). Performance Based Reward and National Culture:An Empirical Evidence
    from Indian Culture. Synergy , IX (1), 1-13.
    Ba, S., Stallaert, J., & Whinston, A. B. (2001). Research Commentary: Introducing a Third
    Dimension in Information Systems Design—The Case for Incentive Alignment.
    Information Systems Research , 12 (3), 225-239.
    Balkin, D. B., & Montemayor, E. F. (2000). Explaining team-based pay: a contingency
    perspective based on the organizational life cycle, team design, and organizational
    learning literatures. Human Resource management Review , 10 (3), 249-269.
    Beer, M., & Nohira, N. (2000). Cracking the Code of Change. Harvard Business Review , 78 (3),
    133-141.
    Being. (2007, jun 11). The only thing unchanged is change. Retrieved April 4, 2001, from
    Blogspot: http://zencaroline.blogspot.com/2007/06/composite-reliability.html
    Breif Guide to use lisrel 8.50 for confirmatory Factor analysis. (n.d.). Retrieved may 10, 2011,
    from University of North Carolina website : www.unc.edu/~rcm/psy236/lisrel.intro.pdf
    Bock, G. W., & Kim, Y. G. (2002). Breaking the Myths of Rewards: An Exploratory Study of
    Attitudes about Knowledge Sharing. Information Resources Management Journal , 15 (2),
    14-21.
    Bock, G. W., Zmud, R. W., Lee, J. N., & Kim, Y. G. (2005). Behavioral Intention Formation in
    Knowledge Sharing : Examining the Rules of Extrinsic Motivators, Social -
    Psychological Forces And Organizational Climate. MIS Quarterly , 29 (1), 87-111.
    Bowen, D. E., & Ostroff, C. (2004). Understanding HRM-firm performance linkages: the role of
    the strength of the HRM system. Academy of Management Journal , 29 (2), 203-221.
    Bozionelos, Nikos, & Wang, L. (2007). An investigation on the attitudes of Chinese workers
    towards individually based performance-related reward systems. International Journal of
    Human Resource Management , 18 (2), 284-302.
    Burgess, D. (2005). What Motivates Employees to Transfer Knowledge Outside Their Work
    Unit? Journal of Business Communication , 42 (4), 324-348.
    Cabrera, A., Collins, W. C., & Salgado, J. F. (2006). Determinants of Individual Engagement in
    Knowledge Sharing. International Journal of Human Resource Management , 17 (2),
    245- 264.
    Choi, Y. S. (2000). An empirical study of factors affecting successful implementation of
    knowledge management. The University of Nebraska.
    Chowdhury, S. (2005). The Role of Affect- and Cognition-based Trust in Complex Knowledge
    Sharing. Journal Of Managerial Issues , XVII (3), 310-326.
    Constant, D., Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. (2006). What's Mine Is Ours, or Is It? A Study of
    Attitudes about Information Sharing. Information Systems Research, 5(4), 400-421.
    Cox, J. M., & Tippett, D. D. (2003). An Analysis of Team Rewards at the U.S. Army Corps of
    Engineers Huntsville Center. Engineering Management Journal , 15 (4), 11-18.
    Dass, M., & Kumar, P. (2011). The Impact Of Economic And Social Orientation On Trust
    Within Teams. Journal of Business & Economics Research , 9 (2), 1-17.
    DeJong, B. A., & Tom, E. (2010). HOW DOES TRUST AFFECT THE PERFORMANCE OF
    ONGOING TEAMS? THE MEDIATING ROLE OF REFLEXIVITY,MONITORING,
    AND EFFORT. Academy of Management Journal , 53 (3), 535-549.
    DeMatteo, J. S., Eby, L. T., & Sundstrom, E. (1998). Team-based rewards: Current empirical
    evidence and directions for future research. In B. M. Straw, & L. L. Cummings,
    Research in Organization Behaviour (pp. 141-183). Stamford: JAI press.
    DING, Z., NG, F., & CAI, Q. (2007). Personal constructs affecting interpersonal trust and
    willingness to share knowledge between architects in project design teams. Construction
    Management and Economics , 25, 937-950.
    Ellemers, N., Gilder, D. D., & Haslam, S. A. (2004). Motivating individuals and groups at work:
    a social identity perspective on leadership and group performance. Academy of
    Management Review , 29 (3), 459-478.
    Fey, C. F., & Furu, P. (2008). Top Management Incentive Compensation And Knowledge
    Sharing in Multinational Coporations. Strategic Management Journal , 29, 1301-1323.
    Gambetta, D. (1988). "Can We Trust Trust?". In D. Gambetta, & D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust:
    Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations (pp. 213-237). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    Hall, H. (2001). Social Exchange for Knowledge Exchange. United Kingdom: University of
    Leicester Management Centre.
    HENEMAN, R. L., GREENBERGER, D. B., & STEPHEN, S. (1988). THE RELATIONSHIP
    BETWEEN PAY FOR PERFORMANCE PERCEPTIONS AND PAY SATISFACTION.
    Personnel Psychology , 41, 745-759.
    Heneman, R. L., Ledford, G. E., & Gresham, M. T. (2000). The changing nature of work and its
    effects on compensation design and delivery. California: Jossey-Bass.
    Hofmann. (1997). An Overview of Logical and Rationale of Hierarchical Linear Models.
    Journal Of Management, 23, 723-744.
    Holste, J. S. A study of the effects of affect-based trust and cognition-based trust on intraorganizational
    knowedge sharing and use. Regent University.
    Husted, k., & Michailova, S. (2002). Diagnosing and Fighting Knowledge Sharing Hostility.
    Organization Dynamics, 31(1), 60-73.
    Jeremy, J. A., & Hun, M. P. (2009, feburary 11). CFA Using Lisrel. Retrieved April 10, 2011,
    from Indiana University Website: http://www.indiana.edu/~statmath/stat/all/cfa/cfa4.html
    Johnson, M. D. (2009). TEAM-BASED REWARDS: AN INTEGRATIVE THEORETICAL
    MODEL. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings (pp. 1-6). Seattle:
    Academy of Management.
    Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B. C., & Wei, K. K. (2005). Contributing knowledge to Electronic
    Knowledge Repositories : An E mpirical Investigation. MIS Quarterly , 29 (1), 113-143.
    Kim, H., & Gong, Y. (2009). The roles of tacit knowledge and OCB in the relationship between
    group-based pay and firm performance. Human Resource Management Journal , 19 (2),
    120-139.
    Kim, S., & Lee, H. (2006). Th e Impact of Organizational Context and Information Technology
    on Employee Knowledge-Sharing Capabilities. Public Administration Review , 370-385.
    Klein, K. J., Danscreau, F., & Hall, R. J. (1994). Level issues in theory developement, data
    collection and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 19, 195-229.
    Lee, D. J., & Ahn, J. H. (2007). Reward systems for intra-organizational knowledge sharing.
    European Journal of Operational Research , 938-956.
    Lewicki, R. J., McAllister, D. J., & Bies, R. J. (1998). Trust and distrust: new relationships and
    realities. Academy of Management Review , 23, 438-459.
    Liao, L.-F. (2006). A learning organization perspective on knowledge-sharing behavior and firm
    innovation. Human Systems Management , 25, 227-236.
    Lubit, R. (2001). Tacit knowledge and knowledge management: the keys to sustainable
    competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 29(4), 164-178.
    Maurer, T. J., & Tarulli, B. A. (1994). Investigation of Perceived Environment, Perceived
    Outcome, and Person Variables in Relationship to Voluntary Development Activity by
    Employees. Journal of Applied Psychology , 79 (1), 3-14.
    McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect and Cognition Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal
    Cooperation in Organizations. Academy of Management Journal , 38 (1), 24-59.
    Milkovich, G. T., & Newman, J. M. (2003). Compensation. Burr Ridge: Irwin McGraw Hill.
    Milkovich, G. T., & Newman, J. M. (2005). Compensation. Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
    Minbaeva, D. D., & Pederson, T. (n.d.). Governing Individual Knowledge Sharing Behavior.
    Motulsky, H. (n.d.). Multicollinearity in multiple regression. Retrieved May 1, 2011, from
    http://www.graphpad.com/articles/Multicollinearity.htm
    Newell, S., & Swan, J. (2000). Trust a nd inter-organizational networking. Human Relations , 53
    (10), 1287-1328.
    Newell, S., David, G., & Chand, D. (2007). An Analysis of Trust Among Globally Distributed
    Work Teams in an Organizational Setting. Knowledge and Process Management , 14 (3),
    158-168.
    Noe, R. A., & Wilk, S. L. (1993). Investigation of the Factors that Influence Employees
    Participation in Development Activities. Journal of Applied Psychology , 78, 291-302.
    O'Dell, C. (1986). Major findings from people, performance, and pay (American Productivity
    Center/American Compensation Association National Survey on Non-Traditional Reward
    and Human Resources Practices). Scottsdale: American Compensation Association.
    Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (1999). In J. pfeffer, & R. I. Sutton, The Knowledge-Doing Gap; how
    smart companies turn knowledge into action (p. 336). Boston: Harvard Business School
    press.
    Philips, K. D., & Smoot, D. T. (2001). Pay for Performance. In K. D. Philips, & D. T. Smoot,
    Handbook of Organizational Performance - Behavior Analysis & Management (pp. 255-
    276). Oxfordshire: Haworth press Inc.
    Purwanti, Y., Pasaribu, N. R., & Lumbantobing, P. (2010). Leveraging the Quality of
    Knowledge Sharing By Implementing Reward Program and Performance Management
    System. Proceedings of the European Conference on Intellectual Capital (pp. 499-503).
    Indonesia: Academic Conferences.
    Reychav, I., & Weisberg, J. (2009). Good for Workers, Good for Companies:How Knowledge
    Sharing benefitsHow Knowledge Sharing benefits Individual Employees. Knowledge and
    Process Management , 16 (4), 186-197.
    Robert Jr, L. P., Denis, A. R., & Hung, Y.-T. C. (2009). Individual Swift Trust and
    Knowledge-Based Trust in Face-to-Face and Virtual Team Members. Journal of
    Management Information Systems , 26 (2), 241-279.
    Rolland, N., & Chauvel, D. (2000). Knowledge Horizons: The Present and the Promise of
    Knowledge Management. (C. Despres, & D. Chauvel, Eds.) Boston: Butterworth
    Heinemann.
    Seongsu, K., Mone, M. A., & Kim, S. (2008). Relationships Among Self-Efficacy, Pay-for-
    Performance Perceptions, and Pay Satisfaction: A Korean Examination. Human
    Performance , 21, 158-179.
    Siemsen, E., Balasubramanian, S., & Roth, A. V. (2007, October). Incentives That Induce Task-
    Related Effort,Helping, and Know ledge Sharing in Workgroups. Management Science ,
    1533-1550.
    Smith, H. A., & Mckeen, J. D. (2004). Knowledge Management in Organizations:The State of
    Current Practice. In H. A. Smith, & J. D. Mckeen, Handbook on Knowledge Management
    2 (pp. 395-410). Ontario: Springer Science and Business Media.
    Srivatsava, V. (2011). Why are Workers Resistant to Sharing Knowledge? International
    Conference on Intellectual Capital (pp. 513-520). Melbourne: Academic Conferences
    limited.
    Staples, S. D., & Jane, W. (2008). Exploring the effects of trust, task interdependence and
    virtualness on knowledge sharing in teams. Information systems journal , 18, 617-640.
    Stapleton, D. C. (1997, january 1). Basic Concepts and Procedures of Confirmatory Factor
    Analysis. Retrieved May 2, 2011, from Ericae.net website - clearing house on Assessment
    and evaluation : http://ericae.net/ft/tamu/Cfa.htm
    Wageman, R., & Baker, G. (1997). Incentives and cooperation: The joint effects of task and
    reward interdependence on group performance. Journal of Organization behaviour , 18,
    139-158.
    Welbourne, T. M., & Cable, D. M. (1995). Group incentives and pay satisfaction:understanding
    the relationship through an identity theory perspective. Human Relations , 48 (6), 711-
    726.
    Williams, M. (2001). In Whom We Trust: Group Membership as an Affective Context For Trust
    Development. Academy of Management Review , 26 (3), 377-397.
    Wu, W., & Sukoco, M. b. (2010). Why Should i share? Examining consumers motives and trust
    on knowledge sharing. Journal of Computer Information Systems , 11-19.
    Yu, S. H., Kim, Y. G., & Kim, M. Y. (2007). Do We Know What Really Drives KM
    Performance. Journal of Knowledge Management , 11 (6), 39-53.
    Zand, D. E. (1972). Trust and Manageri al Problem Solving. Administrative Science Quarterly ,
    17, 229-239.
    Zander, U., Bruce, & Kogut. (1992). Knowledge of the Firm , Combinative Capabilities and the
    Replication of Technology. Organization Science , 3 (3), 383-397.
    .

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)

    QR CODE