2001年美國聯邦巡迴法院的判決彰顯了學生保障個人研究成果的一大勝利；相關師生糾紛之判決亦凸顯出美國立法機關與學術單位對學術研究成果歸屬之重視。然而，我國相關於台灣師生之合作現況或其智慧財產權歸屬狀態之討論，仍十分少見。本文的目的就是檢視我國師生之間智慧財產人格權糾紛的嚴重性，並進一步探究學術研究成果人格權糾紛之產生原因。首先，透過問卷調查之方式，本文對我國師生合作之現況、相關智慧財產權之權利歸屬以及學術研究成果人格權糾紛之嚴重性做一研究與分析。本文接而從法規規範與師生權力關係兩方面切入學術研究成果人格權糾紛產生原因之探討。透過台美現行法規之研究，本文釐清智慧財產之人格權與所有權的混淆，並加以闡明現今共同發明人與著作人之認定條件。其次，本文說明師生新契約關係；透過師生活動與關係界面之交易成本分析，本文指出師生關係的不速配為學術研究成果人格權糾紛產生之因。最後，基於人格權之不可轉讓性與師生之間不對等的談判權力，本文提出一保障師生學術研究成果之人格權機制，以有效解決我國學術研究成果人格權糾紛之問題。

In 2001, the Federal Circuit finally addressed the issues of academic work by strictly protecting the rights of graduate students and student researchers. The related judgments show U.S. Congress and courts respect the idea contributions of graduate students and the importance of academic work assignment. However, there are few studies related to the collaboration between professor and student or the assignment of authorship and inventorship of academic work in Taiwan. Today, I want to explore the co-inventorship and co-authorship dispute over academic work in Taiwan. First, I use questionnaire to exam the collaboration between professor and student and the seriousness about co-inventorship and co-authorship dispute over academic work in Taiwan. Second, I analyze Taiwan and U.S Intellectual Property Law to show the mix between inventorship/authorship and ownership. I also illustrate the requirement for being a co-inventor or a co-author. Then, I state a new relationship between professor and student and point out the unmatched interface of professor-student relationship is one factor to cause the co-inventorship and co-authorship dispute over academic work. Last, I purpose one protection mechanism to reconcile the co-authorship and co-inventorship dispute over academic work in Taiwan.

1. 黃春興、干學平著,《經濟學原理—牽成繁榮與追求進步》,民國83年
2. 李世堅,“我國著作權共有制度之研究”,東吳大學法研所碩士論 文, 民國83年7月
3. 謝銘洋, “研究成果之智慧財產權歸屬與管理--兼述德國之相關制度”, 國立台灣大學法學論叢, 民國83年6月, p389-427
4. 陳曉慧, “受雇人著作之研究”, 國立台灣大學法研所碩士論文,民國85年6月
5. 謝銘洋, “學術研究的「名份」問題—研究成果發表時的著作權歸屬與行使問題”,傳播研究簡訊, 民國88年3月, p1-4
6. 郭美杏, “智慧財產共有之研究”,國立台灣大學法研所碩士論文,民國87年6月
7. 劉孔中, “著作人格權一些新舊問題的探討”, 律師雜誌,民國90年3月, p21-35
8. 謝銘洋, “著作人格權與一般人格權之關係”, 月旦法學, 民國90年12月, p24-25
9.劉孔中, “著作人格權之比較研究”, 國立台灣大學法學論叢, 民國91年7月, p1-42

10.中國專利局專利管理部編(1993),《中國專利糾紛案例選編》，標準協會
11.林惠玲(2002),“研究發展、專利權與經濟效益”，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告
12.黃春興、干學平(2002),《交易面向、自生能力、與經濟學家的角色》,Working Paper.Http://Www.Econ.Nthu.Edu.Tw/Wp/0214C.Pdf
13.呂清雄、陳怡榮(2003) ,“美國新進專利判決介紹—誰可以成為「發明人」.國家衛生研究院簡訊2003.10,P12-25

14.Astala, Melissa (2003), “Wronged By A Professor? Breach Of Fiduciary Duty As A Remedy In Intellectual Property Infringement Cases”, 3 Hous. Bus. & Tax L.J. 31
15.Austin, Graeme W.(2005), “The Berne Convention As A Canon Of Construction: Moral Rights After Dastar”, New York University Annual Survey Of American Law, 61 N.Y.U. Ann. Surv. Am. L. 111
16.Buchanan, James M. (1986) “Rights, Efficiency, and Exchange: The Irrelevance of Transaction Cost,” in Liberty, Market and State, p.92-107
17.Barzel, Yoram (1982) “Measurement Cost and the Organization of Markets,” Journal of Law and Economics, P.27-48
18.Brazel, Yoram(1989) Economic Analysis of Property rights. Cambridge：Cambridge University Press
19.Carlson, Dale & Barney, James R. (1999), “The Division Of Rights Among Joint Inventors: Public Policy Concerns After Ethicon V. U.S. Surgical”, 39 IDEA 251.
20.Coase, R. H. (1988) “The Nature Of The Firm”、“The Problem Of Social Cost",In The Law, The Firm, And The Market. Chicago: The University Of Chicago Press
21.Dam, Kenneth W., (1994) “The Economic Underpinnings Of Patent Law",JLS, Vol. XXIII, P.246-71.
22.Dreyfuss, Rochelle Cooper (2000),”Collaborative Research: Conflicts on Authorship, Ownership, and Accountability”, 53 Vand. L. Rev. 1162
23.Guledjian, Tigran (1999), “ Teaching the Federal Circuit New Tricks: Updating the Law Of Joint Inventorship In Patents”, Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 32 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 1273
24.Grimshaw, Kyle (2001), “A Victory For The Student Researcher: Chou V. University Of Chicago”, 2001 Duke L. & Tech Rev. 35.
25.Hart, Oliver, and Moore, John (1990) “Property Rights and the Nature of the Firm,” Journal of Political Economy, 98 (6), 1119-58.
26.Hart, Oliver, and Moore, John (2000) “On the Design of Hierarchy: Coordination vs. Specialization,” Working Paper
27.Hayek, Friedrich A (1948),“The Use of Knowledge in Society”in Individualism and Economic Order, p.77-91
28.Huang, Teresa (2005), “Entertainment Law And New Media: V. Copyright in Entertainment Law And New Media: A. Note And Brief: Gaiman V. Mcfarlane: The Right Step In Determining Joint Authorship for Copyrighted Material”, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 20 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 673
29.Kan, Steven S. “The Initial Right To Patent Ownership”, Draft
30.Kan, Steven S. (1993) “Entrepreneurship, Transaction Costs, and Subjectivist Economics,” Journal of Enterprising Culture, Vol.1, No.2, p.159-82.
31.Konency, Philip(1999) “Windfall Property Rights For The Left Out Co-Invnetor :Who Gets Let Into The Patent”, Santa Clara Computer And High Technology Law Jouranl, 16 Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. L.J. 141
32.Matt, Joshua (2002), “Searching For an Efficacious Joint Inventorship Standard”, Boston College Law Review, 44 B.C. L. Rev. 245
33.McCutcheon, Carmen J. (2003), “Fairly or Greed: Mandating University Responsibility Toward Student”, Duke Law & Technology Review. 2003 Duke L. & Tech. Rev. 26
34.Mcsherry, Corynne (2001) Who Owns Academic Work? : Battling For Control Of Intellectual Property. Harvard University Press
35.Mewman, Nathan(2002),“Trade Secret And Collective Bargaining”,Employee Rights And Employment Journal, 6 Empl. Rts. & Employ. Pol'y J. 1
36.Monheit, Rivka (1999) “The importance of correct inventorship”, Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 7J. Intell. Prop. L. 191
37.Okuley, John J.(2003) “Resolution Of Inventorship Disputes: Avoiding Litigation Through Early Evation”, Ohio State Journal On Dispute Resolution, 18 Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol. 915
38.Patel, Sandip H. (1996), “Graduate Students’ Ownership and Attribution Rights in Intellectual Property”, Indiana Law Journal, 71 Ind. L.J. 481
39.Sung, Lawrence M. (2000),” Collegiality and Collaboration In The Age Of Exclusivity”, DePaul Journal of Health Care Law, 3 DePaul J. Health Care L. 411
40.Williamson, Oliver E. (1985), “The Economic Institutions of Capitalism”, New York: The Free Press p163-206
41.Williamson, Oliver E. (1975) Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: The Free Press.