研究生: |
彭中慧 |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
桃竹苗四縣市國民小學教師領導之研究 A Study on Teacher Leadership in Elementary Schools, in Taoyuan County, Hsinchu County, Hsinchu City and Miaoli County. |
指導教授: | 顏國樑 |
口試委員: | |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
|
論文出版年: | 2011 |
畢業學年度: | 99 |
語文別: | 中文 |
中文關鍵詞: | 教師領導 、國民小學教育人員 |
外文關鍵詞: | teacher leadership, education staff of elementary schools |
相關次數: | 點閱:1 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
桃竹苗四縣市國民小學教師領導之研究
摘 要
本研究旨在瞭解國民小學教師領導的內涵及桃竹苗四縣市國民小學教師領導的現況,並探討教師領導之困境與推動途徑。為達成研究目的,本研究以自編之「桃竹苗四縣市國民小學教師領導之研究」調查問卷,對桃竹苗四縣市國民小學教育人員進行問卷調查研究。總計發出697份問卷,回收607份,有效問卷共計604份,回收率為86.66%。問卷調查所得資料,分別以描述統計、t考驗及單因子變異數分析等統計方法進行分析。根據上述結果,本研究得到下列幾項結論:
一、 桃竹苗四縣市國民小學教育人員對整體教師領導有中高度知覺。
二、 桃竹苗四縣市國民小學教育人員對「提升學生學習」有中高度知覺。
三、 桃竹苗四縣市國民小學教育人員對「參與學校行政決定」知覺較低。
四、 不同背景變項之桃竹苗四縣市國民小學教育人員知覺教師領導的情形頗為不同。
五、 桃竹苗四縣市國民小學教育人員對於教師領導困境整體的知覺為中高度。
六、 不同背景變項之桃竹苗四縣市國民小學教育人員知覺教師領導困境的情形頗為不同。
七、 桃竹苗四縣市國民小學教育人員對於教師領導推動途徑整體的知覺為中高度。
八、 不同背景變項之桃竹苗四縣市國民小學教育人員知覺教師領導推動途徑的情形略微不同。
關鍵字:教師領導、國民小學教育人員
A Study on Teacher Leadership in Elementary Schools,
in Taoyuan County, Hsinchu County,
Hsinchu City and Miaoli County
Abstract
The study is intended to investigate the current situation of teacher leadership in elementary schools, in Taoyuan County, Hsinchu County, Hsinchu City and Miaoli County. In order to understand the content of teacher leadership in elementary schools, implementation difficulties and solutions, literature review and a questionnaire survey were conducted in this study. The subjects were education staff of elementary schools in Taoyuan County, Hsinchu County, Hsinchu City and Miaoli County with different background variables. There are 697 questionnaires were distributed and 607 were retrieved, among which 604 questionnaires were valid with the response, rate of 86.88%. Descriptive statistics, t-test, and one-way ANOVA were used to analyze the collected data. The results of the study were as follows:
1.The perception of education staff in elementary schools from Taoyuan County,
Hsinchu County, Hsinchu City and Miaoli County toward the whole teacher leadership is above the average.
2.The perception of education staff in elementary schools from Taoyuan County, Hsinchu County, Hsinchu City and Miaoli County toward “how to improve students’ learning” is above the average.
3.The perception of education staff in elementary schools from Taoyuan County, Hsinchu County, Hsinchu City and Miaoli County toward “their attitude to participation in decision making of school administration” is below the average.
4.Education staff of various background variables in elementary schools from Taoyuan County, Hsinchu County, Hsinchu City and Miaoli County has obvious different perceptions toward the whole teacher leadership.
5.Education staff in elementary schools from Taoyuan County, Hsinchu County,
Hsinchu City and Miaoli County toward the whole implementation difficulties
of teacher leadership is above the average.
6.Education staff of various background variables in elementary schools from Taoyuan County, Hsinchu County, Hsinchu City and Miaoli County has obvious different perceptions toward the implementation difficulties of teacher leadership.
7.The perception of education staff in elementary schools from Taoyuan County, Hsinchu County, Hsinchu City and Miaoli County toward the ways to motivate the whole teacher leadership is above the average.
8.Education staff of various background variables in elementary schools from Taoyuan County, Hsinchu County, Hsinchu City and Miaoli County has some difference toward the ways to motivate the whole teacher leadership.
At last, some specific suggestions for educational administrative authorities, elementary principals, schools, and further studies were submitted based on the results of this study.
Keywords: teacher leadership, education staff of elementary schools
參考文獻
壹、 中文部分
江志正(2007,10月)。永續領導的思考與實踐。載於國立臺北教育大學舉辦之「2007年臺灣教育學術」研討會論文集(頁684-696)。臺北市。
江志正(2008)。教師領導-學校本位管理中教師角色的重新思考與
實踐。2010年10月29日。取自
140.128.179.8/dyna/data/user/ckes028/files/200805280609553.ppt
方淑寬(2006)。國小學童個人因素、父母管教方式及級任教師領導行為對學校生活適應之探討-以臺北縣雙和區外籍配偶子女為例。銘傳大學教育研究所碩士在職專班論文,未出版,臺北市。
余宗勳(2005)。國小六年級學童成就動機、教師領導風格與學習適應關
係之研究。臺南大學教育學系輔導教學碩士班論文,未出版,臺南
市。
吳百祿(2010)。中小學教師領導者之理念及其對我國學校教育的啟示。教育政策論壇,13(2),129-158。
吳明隆(2005)。SPSS統計應用學習實務:問卷分析與應用統計。臺北市:知城。
吳明隆(2008)。SPSS操作與應用:變異數分析實務。臺北市:五南。
吳清山、林天祐(2005)。教育新詞書。臺北市:高等教育。
吳清山、林天祐(2008)。教師領導。教育研究月刊,173,136-137。
吳愛玲(1998)。臺北市國民小學級任教師領導行為類型與學生學習行為
之相關研究。臺北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,
臺北市。
呂美芳(2006)。國中教師領導風格、班級經營策略與班級經營效能之關
係研究。中華大學科技管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。
呂麗珠(2003)。國小級任教師領導風格與學生班級氣氛之研究。新竹師
範學院課程與教學碩士班碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。
李清榮(2005)。高雄市國小教師領導類型、班級氣氛與學習態度之研究。高雄師範大學成人教育研究所在職專班論文,未出版,高雄市。
李雅芳(2005)。國小高年級學童自我概念、父母管教方式、教師領導風
格與生活適應之相關研究。臺南大學教師在職進修輔導教學碩士論
文,未出版,臺南市。
李子建、宋萑(2006)。專業學習共同體與課程發展。課程.教材.教法,26(12),24–28。
周鈞(2003)。霍姆斯小組與美國教師教育改革。比較教育研究,11,37-40。
林欣儀(2009)。臺中市國民小學教師領導之研究。國立臺中教育大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺中市。
林思伶、蔡進雄(2005)。論凝聚教師學習社群的有效途徑。教育研究月刊,132,99-109。
林麗琴(1995)。國小教師領導型態與學生疏離感相關之研究。高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
邱皓政(2008)。量化研究法(二):統計原理與分析技術。臺北市:雙葉。
邱皓政(2009)。量化研究與統計分析:SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析(第三版)。臺北市:五南。
金小玫(2007)。臺北市立高級中學教師領導風格與學生學習滿意度關係之研究。輔仁大學教育發展與領導研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北縣。
金俊宏(2006)。國小高年級級任教師領導風格與其學生學習動機、課業成就關係之研究。國立中山大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
金建生(2007)。分布式機制的教師領導。教育發展研究,11,39-42。
金建生(2008)。英美澳加教師領導研究進展述要。比較教育研究,8,58-61。
施志雄(2006)。臺中縣國民中學兼職行政教師領導風格、教學效能與教學困擾之相關研究。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,彰化市。
秦夢群(1998)。教育行政:理論部分。臺北市:五南。
張以儒(2001)。綜合高中教師領導行為與班級經營效能關係之研究。彰化師範大學工業教育學系碩士論文,未出版,彰化。
張恕鳳(2006)。國小資優生自我概念、教師領導風格與學習適應關係之研究。臺南大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,未出版,臺南。
張德銳(2010)。喚醒沉睡的巨人-談教師領導在我國中小學的發展。載於臺北市立教育大學舉辦之「新紀元的教育行政發展」會議論文集(頁371-389),臺北市。
莊勝利(2005)。我國中小學校領導的新思維-教師領導。學校行政,40,17-29。
莊達勝(2006)。國小六年級學童知覺級任教師領導型態、班級氣氛與成就動機之相關研究。國立臺南大學教育學系輔導教學研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺南市。
連俊智(2007)。自學校領導實際析論組織學習:領導社群之觀點。中等教育,58(1),22-43。
郭騰展(2007a)。臺北縣國民小學教師領導與學校文化關係之研究。輔仁大學教育領導與發展研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北縣。
郭騰展(2007b)。學校領導的新典範-教師領導。學校行政,49,150-175。
陳木金(1997)。國民小學教師領導技巧、班級經營策略與教學效能關係之研究。政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,臺北市。
陳玉桂(2006)。學校革新中不可忽視的面向:談教師領導。學校行政,45,26-46。
陳志勇(2002)。屏東縣國小教師領導風格與班級經營效能關係之研究。屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東市。
陳弦希(2001)。國民小學級任教師領導技巧與學生情緒智商關係之研究。臺北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
陳佩英(2008)。教師領導之興起與發展。教育研究月刊,171,41-57。
陳珮英(2009)。一起學習、一起領導:專業學習社群的建構與實踐。中等教育,60(3),68-88。
陳怡潔(2006)。國中校長教學領導、教師領導與家庭教養文化對學生表現影響之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
陳靜、盧乃桂(2010)。正式與非正式的教師領導對教師專業發展的影響。教師教育研究,22(1),12-16。
單小琳(2001)。非線性組織變革對學校教育及領導的啟示。教育研究,89,20-31。
單小琳(2001)。建構式的領導初探:以兩所教育實驗國小的關鍵領導人為例。教育學刊,17,181-197。
黃金和(2007)。屏東縣國小教師領導風格與班級氣氛關係之研究。國立臺南大學教管所教育行政碩士論文,未出版,臺南市。
葉連祺(2004)。鳥瞰教育領導理念之叢林-教育領導理念之初步綜觀。教育研究月刊,124,96-108。
廖英昭(2005)。國小級任教師領導行為與班級經營效能關係之研究。嘉義大學國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
廖啟雄(2004)。國民小學教師領導與學生疏離感關係之研究。臺北師範學院教育政策與管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
劉保兄、劉小娟(2007)。教師領導教育:當代美國教師教育新趨勢。外國教育研究,34(12),44-48。
蔡進雄(2004)。論教師領導的趨勢與發展。教育資料與研究,59,92-98。
蔡進雄(2005a)。中小學教師領導理論之探討。教育研究,139,92-101。
蔡進雄(2005b)。學校領導理論研究。臺北:師大書苑。
鄭燕祥(2004)。教育領導與改革:新範式。臺北市:高等教育文化。
鄭燕祥(2006)。教育範式轉變:效能保證。臺北市:高等教育文化。
鄧菲(2009)。中小學教師領導的缺失分析及其糾正策略。新課程研究,157,12-14。
盧乃桂、陳静(2006)。作為教師領導的教改策略-從組織層面探討歐美的做法與啟示。教育發展研究,22(1),12-16。
賴志峰(2007)。學校領導的影響因素、實踐與效果:以一所特許學校的經驗為例。當代教育研究,15(4),93-128。
賴志峰(2008a)。分布式領導理論之探究-學校領導者、追隨者和情境的交互作用。國民教育研究學報,20,87-113。
賴志峰(2008b)。分布式領導的意義、構面與主張。教育研究月刊,171,28-40。
賴志峰(2008c)。一所公立國民中學的學校領導之探究:瞭解領導架構圖的應用。教育研究與發展期刊,4(3),139-172。
賴志峰(2009)。教師領導的理論及實踐之探析。教育研究與發展期刊,5(3),113-144。
賴志峰(2010)。學校領導新議題:理論與實踐。臺北市:高等教育。
謝文全(2007)。教育行政學。臺北市:高等教育。
謝秀伶(2007)。國民小學級任教師領導行為、家長參與及班級經營效能關係之研究。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義市。
謝雯惠(2006)。國小教師領導風格對班級經營策略與班級經營效能之影響。中華大學經營管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。
貳、英文部分
Barth, R. S. (1999). The teacher leader. Providence, RI: The Rhode Island Foundation.
Barth, R. S. (2001) Teacher leader.Phi Delta Kappan.
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.
Berry, B., Daughtrey, A., & Wieder, A. (2010). Teacher leadership: Leading the way to effective teaching and learning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 509719)
Boles, K.C., & Troen, K. (1992)School restructuring by teacher: A study of the teaching project at the Edward Devotion School. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco
Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
Bush, T. (1995). Theories of educational management (2nd ed.). London: Paul Chapman Publishing
Crowther, F., Kaagan, S. S., Ferguson, M., & Hann, L. (2002). Developing teacher leaders: How teacher leadership enhances school success. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Day, C., & Harris, A.(2003) Teacher leadership, reflective practice and school improvement. In Leithwood, K. ,& Hallinger, P. Second International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration (pp.45~72). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Frost, D., & Durrant, J. (2003).Teacher leadership: Rationale, strategy and impact. School Leadership and Management, 23(2),173-186.
Gabriel, J. G. (2005). How to thrive as a teacher leader. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Gigante, N. A. (2006). Teacher leadership in context: Its relationship with social, material, and human resources in schools implementing reform. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rutgers The State University of New Jersey.
Hargreaves, A. (1994).Changing teachers: Changing times. London: Cassel.
Hargreaves, A. (2000). Four ages of professionalism and professional learning. Teachers and Teaching: History and Practice, 6(2), 151-182.
Harris, A. (2002). School improvement: What’s in it for schools? London: Falmer Press.
Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership as distributed leadership: Heresy, fantasy or possibility? School leadership & management,23(3).313~324
Harris, A., & Muijs, D. (2005). Improving schools through teacher leadership. U.K.: Open University Press.
Harrison, J.W., & Lembeck, E. (1996). Emergent teacher leaders. In G. Moller & M. Katzenmeyer (Eds.). Every teacher is a leader. Realizing the potential of teacher leadership (pp.101-116). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hopkins, D. (2001).School improvement for real. London: Falmer Press.
Huffman, J. B., & Hipp, K. K. (2003). Reculturing schools as professional learning communities. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Education.
Katzenmeyer M., & Moller, G. (2001). Awakening the sleeping giant:Helping teachers develop as leaders (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Katzenmeyer, M., & Moller, G. (2001). Awakening the sleeping giant:Helping teachers develop as leaders (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
Lambert, L. (2003) Shifting conceptions of leadership: Towards a redefinition of leadership for the twenty- first century. Handbook of Educational Leadership and Management. (pp.43~72)
Lee, J. C. K., & Dimmock, C. (1999). Curriculum leadership and in management secondary schools: A Hong Kong case study. School Leadership and Management, 19(4), 455-481.
Leithwood, K., & Duke, D.L.(1999) A century’s quest to understand school leadership, In K, S Louis & J. Murphy ( Eds) . Handbook of Research on Educational Administration. (pp.45~72) San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (1998). Distributed leadership and student engagement in school. (ERIC ED424645).
Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (1999). Transformational school leadership effects: A replication. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10(4), 454-479.
Lieberman, A., Saxl, E. R., & Miles, M. B. (2006). Teacher leadership: Ideology and practice. In M. Fullan (Ed.), The Jossey-Bass reader on educational leadership (2nd ed.) (pp.403-420). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Little, J. W. (1988). Assessing the prospects for leadership. In A. Liberman (Ed.), Building a professional culture in schools (pp.78-106). New York: Teachers College Press.
Little, J. W. (2003). Constructions of teacher leadership in three periods of policy and reform activism. School Leadership and Management, 23 (4), 401-419.
Mangin, M. M., & Stoelinga, S. R. (2008). Teacher leadership: What it is and why it matters. In M. M. Mangin & S. R. Stoelinga (Eds.), Effective teacher leadership: Using research to inform and reform (pp.1-9). New York: Teachers College Press.
Markow, D., & Cooper, M. (2008). The metlife survey of the American teacher: Past, present and future. A survey of teachers, principals and students. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 504457)
Miller, B., Moon, J., & Elko, S. (2000). Teacher leadership in mathematics and science: Casebook and facilitator’s guide. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Moller, G., & Pankake, A. (2006). Lead with me: A principal’s guide to teacher leadership. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
Muijs, D., & Harris, A. (2003). Teacher Leadership: Improvement through Empowerment? Educational Management, Administration & Leadership,31(4),437-449.
Muijs, D., & Harris, A. (2006). Teacher lead school improvement : Teacher leadership in the UK. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 961–972
Murphy, J., & Hallinger, P. (1992). The principalship in an era of
transformation. Journal of Educational Administration,30(2), 77-88.
Murphy, J. (2005). Connecting teacher leadership and school improvement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Patterson, J., & Patterson, J.(2004).Sharing the lead. Educational Leadership,61(7),74-78.
Pounder, J. S. (2006). Transformational classroom leadership: The fourth wave of teacher leadership? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 34(4) , 533-545.
Reason, L. D. (2006). An investigation of the relationship between and transactional principal leadership behaviors and an orientation in teacher leadership. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Capella University.
Reeves, D. B. (2008). Reframing teacher leadership: To improve your school. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and
Curriculum Development.
Rice, E. M., & Schneider, G. T. (1994). A decade of teacher
empowerment : An empirical analysis of teacher
involvement in decision making, 1980-1991. Journal of
Educational Administration, 32 (2), 43-58.
Senge, P., Cambron-McCabe, N., Lucas, T., Smith, B., Dutton, J., & Kleiner, A. (2000). Schools that learn: A fifth discipline fieldbook for educators, parents, and everyone who cares about education. New York: Doubleday/Currency.
Sergiovanni, T. J.(2000).The lifeworld of leadership: Creating culture, community, and personal meaning in our schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Silva, D. Y., Gimbert, B.,& Nolan, J.(2000). Sliding the doors locking and unlocking possibilities for teacher leadership. Teacher College Record. 102(4), 777~804.
Simylie, M..A. (1992)Teacher’s report of their interactions with teacher leaders concerning to participate.Educational Evaluation and Police Analysis., 14, 53~67.
Soltis, J. F. (1987) Reforming teacher education: The impact of the Holmes Group Report. New York: Teachers College Press
Somech, A. (2005). Directive versus participative leadership: Two complementary approaches to managing school effectiveness. Educational Leadership Quarterly,41(5), 777-800.
Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2004). Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(1), 3-34.
Suranna, K. J., & Moss, D. M. (2000). Perceptions of teacher leadership: A case study of inservice elementary school teachers. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 440966)
Wasley, P.A.(1991). Teachers who lead: The rhetoric of reform and the realities of practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
Whitaker, T., Whitaker, B., & Lumpa, D. (2000). Motivating and inspiring teachers: The educational leader’s guide for building staff morale. Larchmont, N.Y.: Eye on Education.
Wong, K. (1996). Prospects, special analyses, final reports. Chicago, IL: US Department of Education.
York-Barr, J., & Duke, K. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of educational research, 74 (3), 255-316.
Yukl, G. (2009). Leadership in organizations (5nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Zepeda, S. J., Mayers, R. S., & Benson, B. N. (2003). The call to teacher leadership. NewYork: Eye On Education.