研究生: |
李孟蓁 Li, Meng-Jhen |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
快時尚風潮與永續發展趨勢下之大學生族群的消費選擇行為 The Consumer Choice of Under graduated Students in the Trend of Fast Fashion and Sustainable Development |
指導教授: |
倪進誠
Ni, Chin-Cheng |
口試委員: |
趙芝良
Chao, Chih-Liang 陳曉偉 Chen, Hsiao-Wei |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
竹師教育學院 - 環境與文化資源學系所 Department of Enivonmental and Cultural Resources |
論文出版年: | 2024 |
畢業學年度: | 113 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 127 |
中文關鍵詞: | 快時尚風潮 、永續發展 、永續消費 、購衣決策 、Z世代 |
外文關鍵詞: | Fast Fashion Trends, Sustainable Development, Sustainable Consumption, Clothing Purchase Decisions, Generation Z |
相關次數: | 點閱:3 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
時尚與永續的議題一直被認為是相悖的概念,過去時尚遙不可及,時至今日,衣服改變了過往的價值,尤其是快時尚(fast fashion)一詞的出現,時尚潮流服飾,在生活中扮演重要的角色。此外,受到聯合國2015年所提出的永續發展目標影響,各國紛紛朝整體社會與環境的永續發展邁進,並透過永續發展教育以改進人民的知識、技能與態度,進一步透過實踐達成目標。
本研究源自於對生活中的好奇,希望透過調查了解對於消費者而言,快時尚一詞是如何在他們的認知中存在,面對永續發展目標第十二項負責任的消費與生產的推動,對於消費者而言,永續消費又是什麼樣的概念呢?面對快時尚風潮以及永續發展趨勢的雙重夾擊下,身處於夾縫中的人是如何從中進行內心的掙扎以及做出最後的消費決策,正是筆者所好奇的。
綜合上述,本研究採用質性研究中的深入訪談方法,並結合半結構式訪談的靈活性,旨在揭示受訪者內心最真實的想法與決策過程。受訪族群選擇18至25歲的大學生族群,是當今被稱為Z世代的一群人,他們的出生與成長,恰與快時尚風潮和永續發展趨勢並行,因此,透過了解這群Z世代人們處在快時尚風潮和永續發展趨勢的真實環境下,如何在各項決策因素拉扯之中取得自身對於服飾消費的平衡。
研究結果發現,將快時尚消費與永續消費特質進行比較,從購衣頻率與淘汰衣服的頻率這類的產品生命週期來看,快時尚消費的產品生命週期是短於永續消費的產品生命週期。另外產品風格的部分,快時尚消費的產品風格會根據時尚潮流不斷變化,反之永續消費的產品風格卻不太隨著時間改變。最後從快時尚消費與永續消費的產品價格與產品價值進行比較,發現快時尚消費更在意產品價格,而永續消費則更在意產品價值。
此外,研究結果發現大學生族群的消費決策因素可以分為個體因素、他人因素、產品價格因素與產品相關資源因素,藉由主要與次要的決策因素排列發現,大學生族群之消費者類型可以被分為「心理兼顧社會型消費者」、「社會兼顧心理型消費者」、「社會兼顧經濟型消費者」、「心理兼顧經濟型消費者」、「經濟兼顧心理型消費者」、「經濟兼顧社會型消費者」、「心理兼顧資源型消費者」、「社會兼顧資源型消費者」、「經濟兼顧資源型消費者」九個類型,此九個類型之消費者又可根據其快時尚特質與永續特質程度進一部分為三大類,分別為:極具快時尚特質,幾乎不具永續特質;頗具快時尚特質,有些永續特質;有些快時尚特質,頗具永續特質。
除了上述的研究結果之外,本研究發現,即使接受了永續發展相關的教育與宣導,對於大學生族群而言,相較於當前環境問題的「資源因素」,更在乎的是自身的偏好、社會的潮流與經濟狀況等「心理因素」、「社會因素」、「經濟因素」。故本研究發現大學生族群之消費者類型缺少了「資源兼顧心理型消費者」、「資源兼顧社會型消費者」和「資源兼顧經濟型消費者」。
Fashion and sustainability have traditionally been seen as opposing concepts. In the past, fashion seemed distant and unattainable, but today, clothing has transformed its value, especially with the rise of "fast fashion." Fashionable clothing now plays a significant role in our lives. Influenced by the United Nations' 2015 Sustainable Development Goals, countries are increasingly moving towards overall societal and environmental sustainability, using sustainable development education to improve people's knowledge, skills, and attitudes, and achieving goals through practical implementation.
This study arises from a curiosity about everyday life, aiming to understand how the term "fast fashion" exists in consumers' perceptions. In the face of the push for Goal 12 of the Sustainable Development Goals—responsible consumption and production—what does sustainable consumption mean to consumers? Amid the dual pressures of the fast fashion trend and sustainability, how do people navigate their internal struggles and make final consumption decisions? This is the focus of the study.
To address these questions, the research employs qualitative methods, specifically in-depth interviews combined with the flexibility of semi-structured interviews. The goal is to reveal respondents' genuine thoughts and decision-making processes. The study targets university students aged 18 to 25, known as Generation Z, who have grown up during the rise of fast fashion and sustainability trends. By understanding how this group balances clothing consumption decisions in the context of both trends, we gain insights into their decision-making processes.
The study finds that comparing fast fashion consumption with sustainable consumption reveals that fast fashion products have a shorter lifecycle than sustainable ones. Regarding product style, fast fashion items frequently change with trends, while sustainable items remain more stable over time. Furthermore, the study shows that consumers of fast fashion are more concerned with product price, while sustainable consumers focus more on product value.
Additionally, the research identifies that university students' consumption decision factors can be categorized into individual factors, social factors, product price factors, and product-related resource factors. The primary and secondary decision factors reveal nine consumer types: "Psychologically and socially balanced consumers," "Socially and psychologically balanced consumers," "Socially and economically balanced consumers," "Psychologically and economically balanced consumers," "Economically and psychologically balanced consumers," "Economically and socially balanced consumers," "Psychologically and resource-balanced consumers," "Socially and resource-balanced consumers," and "Economically and resource-balanced consumers." These types can be further divided into three main categories based on their fast fashion and sustainability traits: those with strong fast fashion traits and minimal sustainability traits; those with notable fast fashion traits and some sustainability traits; and those with some fast fashion traits and significant sustainability traits.
Moreover, the study finds that despite receiving education and advocacy on sustainable development, university students are more concerned with personal preferences, social trends, and economic conditions—i.e., psychological, social, and economic factors—rather than the environmental "resource factors." Consequently, the study notes the absence of "resource-balanced psychological consumers," "resource-balanced social consumers," and "resource-balanced economic consumers" among university students.
2020 台灣網路報告. (2020).
Abosag, I., Ramadan, Z. B., Baker, T., & Jin, Z. (2020). Customers' need for uniqueness theory versus brand congruence theory: The impact on satisfaction with social network sites. Journal of Business Research, 117, 862-872. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.03.016
Barnes, L. (2008, Nov 18-21). FAST CONSUMERS. [86th textile institute world conference, vol 3, conference proceedings]. 86th Textile-Institute World Conference, Hong Kong, PEOPLES R CHINA.
Barta, S., Belanche, D., Flavián, M., & Terré, M. C. (2023). How implementing the UN sustainable development goals affects customers’ perceptions and loyalty. Journal of Environmental Management, 331, 117325. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117325
Bhardwaj, V., & Fairhurst, A. (2010a). Fast fashion: response to changes in the fashion industry. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 20(1), 165-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593960903498300
Bhardwaj, V., & Fairhurst, A. (2010b). Fast fashion: Response to changes in the fashion industry. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 165-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593960903498300
Binet, F., Coste-Manière, I., Decombes, C., Grasselli, Y., Ouedermi, D., & Ramchandani, M. (2019). Fast Fashion and Sustainable Consumption. In (pp. 19-35). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1268-7_2
Bowling, N. A., Beehr, T. A., Wagner, S. H., & Libkuman, T. M. (2005). Adaptation-level theory, opponent process theory, and dispositions: an integrated approach to the stability of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1044.
Bowling, N. A., Beehr, T. A., Wagner, S. H., & Libkuman, T. M. (2005). Adaptation-Level Theory, Opponent Process Theory, and Dispositions: An Integrated Approach to the Stability of Job Satisfaction [Article]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1044-1053. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1044
Bradshaw, J. (1972). Taxonomy of social need.
Brewer, M. K. (2019). Slow fashion in a fast fashion world: Promoting sustainability and responsibility. Laws, 8(4), 24.
Bruce, M., Daly, L., & Towers, N. (2004). Lean or agile a solution for supply chain management in the textiles and clothing industry? International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 24(2), 151-170. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 24, 151-170. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570410514867
Buzzo, A., & Abreu, M. J. (2019). Fast Fashion, Fashion Brands & Sustainable Consumption. In (pp. 1-17). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1268-7_1
Camargo, L. R., Pereira, S. C. F., & Scarpin, M. R. S. (2020). Fast and ultra-fast fashion supply chain management: an exploratory research. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 48, 537-553.
Caro, F., & Martínez-de-Albéniz, V. (2015). Fast Fashion: Business Model Overview and Research Opportunities.
Chang, A. (2020). The Impact of Fast Fashion on Women. Journal of Integrative Research & Reflection, 3, 16-24. https://doi.org/10.15353/jirr.v3.1624
Dangelico, R. M. (2016). Green Product Innovation: Where we are and Where we are Going. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(8), 560-576. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1886
Dedy Ansari Harahap, D. A. (2018). Online Purchasing Decisions of College Students in Indonesia.
Dobbelstein, T., & Lochner, C. (2023). Factors influencing purchase intention for recycled products: A comparative analysis of Germany and South Africa. Sustainable Development, n/a(n/a). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2504
Dumitru, M. (2015). Important elements in consumer’s decision-making process.
Edwards, J. (2018). Harry Helson's adaptation-level theory, happiness treadmills, and behavioral economics. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 40, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1053837216001140
Gao, M., & Cui, B. (2016). Literature Review on Product Distinctiveness Evaluation and Consumer Choice Based on Need for Uniqueness. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 06, 840-845. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2016.67079
Gasper, D., Shah, A., & Tankha, S. (2019). The Framing of Sustainable Consumption and Production in SDG 12. Global Policy, 10(S1), 83-95. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12592
Ghinea, C., Campean, T., & Gavrilescu, M. (2017). INTEGRATING SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS FOR TRACKING ANTHROPOGENIC PRESSURE ON THE EARTH THE FOOTPRINT FAMILY. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 16(4), 935-948. https://doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2017.095
Giacomucci, A. D. d. C. L. (2002). Green procurement activities: some environmental indicators and practical actions taken by industry and tourism. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 59-72. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijesd.2002.000718
Gunawan, J., Permatasari, P., & Tilt, C. (2020). Sustainable development goal disclosures: Do they support responsible consumption and production? Journal of Cleaner Production, 246, 118989. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118989
H&M. (2012). H & M HENNES & MAURITZ AB
FULL-YEAR REPORT.
Hakala, I., Autio, M., & Toppinen, A. (2015). Young Finnish and German consumers’ furniture acquisition – wooden, inherited or just low price? International Journal of Consumer Studies, 39(5), 445-451. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12189
Han, H., & Ryu, K. (2012). The theory of repurchase decision-making (TRD): Identifying the critical factors in the post-purchase decision-making process. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(3), 786-797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.09.015
Helson, H. (1964). Adaptation-level theory: An experimental and systematic approach to behavior.
Jangid, M. (2022). ZARA'S CASE STUDY -the Strategy of the Fast Fashion Pioneer The Strategy of the Fast Fashion Pioneer
Joshi, Y., & Rahman, Z. (2015). Factors Affecting Green Purchase Behaviour and Future Research Directions. International Strategic Management Review, 3(1), 128-143. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ism.2015.04.001
Karimi, S., Holland, C. P., & Papamichail, K. N. (2018). The impact of consumer archetypes on online purchase decision-making processes and outcomes: A behavioural process perspective. Journal of Business Research, 91, 71-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.038
Kim, J., Park, J., & Glovinsky, P. L. (2018). Customer involvement, fashion consciousness, and loyalty for fast-fashion retailers. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 22(3), 301-316. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfmm-03-2017-0027
Kinard, B. R., Capella, M. L., & Bonner, G. (2013). Odd pricing effects: an examination using adaptation‐level theory. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 22(1), 87-94.
Leal Filho, W., Barbir, J., Özuyar, P. G., Nunez, E., Diaz-Sarachaga, J. M., Guillaume, B., Anholon, R., Rampasso, I. S., Swart, J., & Velazquez, L. (2022). Assessing provisions and requirements for the sustainable production of plastics: towards achieving SDG 12 from the consumers’ perspective. Sustainability, 14(24), 16542.
Lee, J., & Hwang, J. (2019). Factors affecting the fashion purchase decision-making of single Koreans. Fashion and Textiles, 6(1), Article 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-019-0189-x
Levitt, T. (1965). Exploit the product life cycle. Harvard business review, 43(6), 81-94.
Lin, S.-Y. (2022). Democracy in female fast-fashion: A case study in Taiwan. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/f8xqv
Linden, A. R. (2016). An Analysis of the Fast Fashion Industry.
Lozano, R., Barreiro-Gen, M., Pietikäinen, J., Gago-Cortes, C., Favi, C., Jimenez Munguia, M. T., Monus, F., Simão, J., Benayas, J., Desha, C., Bostanci, S., Djekic, I., Moneva, J. M., Sáenz, O., Awuzie, B., & Gladysz, B. (2022). Adopting sustainability competence-based education in academic disciplines: Insights from 13 higher education institutions. Sustainable Development, 30(4), 620-635. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2253
Lynn, M., & Harris, J. (1997). The desire for unique consumer products: A new individual differences scale. Psychology & Marketing, 14(6), 601-616. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199709)14:6<601::AID-MAR5>3.0.CO;2-B
Lynn, M., & Snyder, C. R. (2002). Uniqueness seeking. Handbook of positive psychology, 395-410.
Makower, J., Elkington, J., & Hailes, J. (1993). The green consumer. (No Title).
Marcon, A., Ribeiro, J. L. D., Dangelico, R. M., de Medeiros, J. F., & Marcon, É. (2022). Exploring green product attributes and their effect on consumer behaviour: A systematic review. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 32, 76-91. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.04.012
Michel, J. O., Holland, L. M., Brunnquell, C., & Sterling, S. (2020). The Ideal Outcome of Education for Sustainability: Transformative Sustainability Learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2020(161), 177-188. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20380
Mihm, B. (2010). Fast Fashion In A Flat World: Global Sourcing Strategies. International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER), 9. https://doi.org/10.19030/iber.v9i6.585
Miklosik, A. (2015). Changes in purchasing decision-making process of consumers in the digital era.
Morgan, L. R., & Birtwistle, G. (2009). An investigation of young fashion consumers' disposal habits. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33(2), 190-198. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2009.00756.x
Morse, S. (2008). Post-sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 16(5), 341-352. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.354
Nguyen, H. V., Nguyen, C. H., & Hoang, T. T. B. (2019). Green consumption: Closing the intention-behavior gap. Sustainable Development, 27(1), 118-129. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1875
Niinimäki, K., Peters, G., Dahlbo, H., Perry, P., Rissanen, T., & Gwilt, A. (2020). The environmental price of fast fashion. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 1(4), 189-200.
Odell, V., Molthan-Hill, P., Martin, S., & Sterling, S. (2020). Transformative Education to Address All Sustainable Development Goals. In (pp. 905-916).
Parker-Strak, R., Barnes, L., Studd, R., & Doyle, S. (2020). Disruptive product development for online fast fashion retailers. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-08-2019-0170
Parker, H., Bhatti, W. A., Chwialkowska, A., & Marais, T. (2022). Factors influencing green purchases: An emerging market perspective. Sustainable Development, n/a(n/a). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2426
Raiklin, E., & Uyar, B. (1996). On the relativity of the concepts of needs, wants, scarcity and opportunity cost. International Journal of Social Economics, 23(7), 49-56. https://doi.org/10.1108/03068299610122416
Rau, H., Wu, J.-J., & Procopio, K. M. (2023). Exploring green product design through TRIZ methodology and the use of green features. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 180, 109252. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2023.109252
Ren, X. (2023). Analysis on the Development of Fast Fashion- Based on the Influence of New Media. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 8, 2537-2542. https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v8i.5027
Samdanee, A. (2021). Fast fashion business model: business model features, trends,
prospects Business model fast fashion: features of business model, trends, prospects
Samson, A., & Voyer, B. G. (2014). Emergency purchasing situations: Implications for consumer decision-making. Journal of Economic Psychology, 44, 21-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2014.05.004
Sasikarn Chatvijit Cook, J. Y. (2017). Fast fashion environments: consumer's heaven or retailer's nightmare?
Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., & Gross, B. L. (1991). Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. Journal of Business Research, 22(2), 159-170. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(91)90050-8
Snyder, C. R. (1992). Product Scarcity by Need for Uniqueness Interaction: A Consumer Catch022 Carousel? [Article]. Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 13(1), 9-24. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1301_3
Sonali Srivastava, T.-A. W. a. J. S. (2022). Girls portrayals in fast fashion advertisements.
Sook Fern Yeo , C. L. T., Ajay Kumar, Kim Hua Tan, Jee Kit Wong. (2022). Investigating the impact of AI-powered technologies on Instagrammers’ purchase decisions in digitalization era–A study of the fashion and apparel industry.
Sterling, S. (2001). Sustainable education.
Sterling, S. (2021). Concern, Conception, and Consequence: Re-thinking the Paradigm of Higher Education in Dangerous Times. Frontiers in Sustainability, 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2021.743806
Tian, K. T., Bearden, W. O., & Hunter, G. L. (2001). Consumers' Need for Uniqueness: Scale Development and Validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 50-66. https://doi.org/10.1086/321947
Tu, J.-C., Chu, K.-H., Gao, D.-Z., & Yang, C. (2022). Analyzing Decision-Making Factors of Green Design for Kid’s Toys Based on the Concept of Product Lifecycle. Processes, 10(8), 1523. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/10/8/1523
Twigg, J., & Majima, S. (2014). Consumption and the constitution of age: Expenditure patterns on clothing, hair and cosmetics among post-war 'baby boomers'. Journal of Aging Studies, 30, 23-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2014.03.003
UN. (1982). World Charter for Nature.
UN. (1992). Agenda 21.
UN. (2012). The Future We Want.
UN. (2015). Agenda for Sustainable Development web.
UN. (2022). The Sustainable Development Goals Report.
Valerie, M., Elvina, J., Cristie, L., Litania, L., Tjoandra, M., & Widjojo, H. (2022). KEY SUCCESS FACTORS IN THE FAST FASHION BUSINESS DURING A PANDEMIC. Ultima Management : Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, 183-195. https://doi.org/10.31937/manajemen.v14i2.2680
Vernon, R. (1966). International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle. The Quarterly journal of economics, 80(2), 190-207. https://doi.org/10.2307/1880689
Wraeg, C., & Barnes, L. (2008). FAST FASHION: A MARKETING TOOL?
Yan, B., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2018). Needs, wants and values in China: reducing physical wants for sustainable consumption. Sustainable Development, 26(6), 772-780. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1847
Zehir, C., Sehitoglu, Y., Narcikara, E., & Zehir, S. (2014). E-S-Quality, Perceived Value and Loyalty Intentions Relationships in Internet Retailers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 150, 1071-1079. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.120
ZHANG, L. Y. a. J. (2018). Research on the Development Status and Strategy on Sustainable Fashion of Fast Fashion Brands.
Zhenxiang, W. (2011). Case Study of Online Retailing Fast Fashion Industry. International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJEEEE.2011.V1.31
Zhu, T. (2022). International Business Strategy of fast fashion Brands (On the example of Zara). Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 4, 221-227. https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v4i.2770
于健, & 黃淑玲. (2015). 學童綠色消費知識與綠色消費行為之關係研究-以雲林縣國小中、高年級為例 [A Study on The Relationships among Green Consumption Knowledge and Behaviors of Junior and Senior Students of Elementary Schools in Yunlin county]. 觀光與休閒管理期刊, 3, 102-118. https://doi.org/10.6510/jtlm.3(s).11
王順美. (2016). 臺灣永續發展教育現況探討及行動策略之芻議 [Examining the Status of Education for Sustainable Development in Taiwan and Its Action Plan]. 環境教育研究, 12(1), 111-139. https://doi.org/10.6555/jeer.12.1.111
王嘉陵. (2016). 大學永續發展教育之檢視與展望 [The Review and Prospect of Higher Education for Sustainable Development]. 高雄應用科技大學人文與社會科學學刊, 2(2), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.6554/jktuhs.2016.0202.02
王麗卿. (2017). 消費者對於茶葉購買行為的決策因素之研究
-以永康商圈為例.
石之瑜. (2003). 「全球化」的方法論與反方法論 [Methodologies and Counter-methodologies of Globalization]. 政治與社會哲學評論(6), 141-194. https://doi.org/10.6523/168451532003090006005
行政院消費者保護委員會. (2016). 「消費者保護-推動永續消費」政策綱領.
何昕家. (2020). 永續發展目標(SDGs)教育手冊-臺灣指南. 教育部: 潘文忠
吳明燁, & 許絲茜. (2014). 我「受創」故我「消費」:比較家庭與同儕關係對於大學生流行消費之影響 [I Suffered Therefore I Buy: Family and Peer Effects on Fashion Consumption among College Students]. 中華心理衛生學刊, 27(3), 379-408. https://doi.org/10.30074/fjmh.201409_27(3).0003
呂佳茹, 拾已宇, 曾可芸, 李宣蓉, & 林奕綾. (2022). 應用消費價值理論探討消費者選擇主題旅館之因素-旅館類型及人格特質之調節效果 [Applying the Theory of Consumption Value to Explore the Factors of Consumers' Choice of Theme Hotels - The Moderating Effects of Hotel Types and Personality Traits]. 華人經濟研究, 20(1), 1-18.
李勇輝, 黃靖文, & 邱怡嘉. (2016). 以消費價值理論與理性行為理論探討Instagram使用者實際行為之研究 [The Study of the Actual Behavior of Instagram Users: Theory of Consumption Value and Theory of Reasoned Action]. 管理研究學報, 16(2), 31-57.
李威霆. (2021). 「快時尚」的社會動力學考察 [Investigation on the socio-dynamics of fast fashion]. 休閒研究, 11(2), 91-112.
李炳昭, & 陳秋曇. (2009). 論述休閒、休閒活動與休閒運動. 臺中教育大學體育學系系刊(4), 48-57. https://doi.org/10.29781/ntcupe.200906.0007
沈有忠. (2005). 賽局理論在兩岸關係研究的應用:一個介紹性的討論 [The Application of Game Theory in the Cross-Strait Relation Studies: An Introductory Discussion]. 展望與探索月刊, 3(6), 14-32.
周斌. (2015). 消費心理學 (初版 ed.). 元華文創股份有限公司.
林建宏, 吳孟采, 黃俊淵, 蔡宜靜, & 黃俊欽. (2015). 商店氣氛、消費者情緒、體驗價值對顧客滿意度之影響:以提卡異國料理餐廳為例 [The Impact of Store Atmosphere、Consumer Emotion and Experiential Value on Consumer Satisfaction: A Case Study of Tika Cuisines Restaurant]. 興國學報(16), 107-126.
林淑瓊, 張銀益, & 張宏裕. (2016). 以消費價值觀點探討線下到線上商務服務模式之使用意願 [Investigating the Usage Intention of Offline to Online Commerce: The Perspective of Consumption Value Theory]. 商略學報, 8(3), 177-194.
柯舜智. (2012). 電視不逝,只是轉形:從科技觀點再論電視與社會的互動 [Television Never Fades Away, It Merely Transforms: A Technological Perspective to Re-Examine the Dynamics between Television and Society]. 中華傳播學刊(22), 19-44. https://doi.org/10.6195/cjcr.2012.22.02
洪富峰. (2008). 茶飲文化在全球化資本主義潮流的角色 [The Role of the Culture of Drinking Tea in the Trend of Globalized Capitalism]. 環境與世界(17), 37-55. https://doi.org/10.6304/eaw.2008.17.3
胡同來, 林明佳, 高楷雲, & 鐘偉鵬. (2016). 精品與快速時尚當道服飾品牌新未來. 產業管理評論, 9(1), 65-86.
徐振國. (2009). 生產方式和消費形態辯證互動的全球化趨勢 [Globalization under the Dialectical Interactions between the Changing Ways of Production and Consumption]. 問題與研究, 48(1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.30390/isc.200903_48(1).0001
柴松林. (1987). 消費者主義發展的新方向.
張珍悅, & 徐勝一. (2010). 永續發展教育脈絡探討:「聯合國永續發展教育十年計畫」之回顧 [Towards the Context of Education for Sustainable Development: Reviewing of Contexts for 「United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development (DESD, 2005-2014)」]. 地理研究(52), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.6234/jgr.2010.52.01
曹語珊. (2019). 年輕族群網路購物及其購買前決策之資訊實務 (Publication Number 2019年) 淡江大學]. AiritiLibrary.
梁明煌. 永續發展教育.
莊惠婷. (2019). 消費者服飾租賃行為影響因素之研究.
許言, & 謝富淵. (2008). 以賽局理論分析蘋果公司之產品設計策略. 工業設計(119), 236-243. https://doi.org/10.29918/id.200811.0013
陳昀暄. (2021). 國小兒童的外觀管理、自我概念與幸福感知相關研究
曾忠蕙. (2012). 贈品促銷中價格訊息的內在評估機制之實證研究 [A Research of Internal Evaluation Mechanism of Price Information in Gift Promotion]. 中山管理評論, 20(3), 945-986. https://doi.org/10.6160/2012.09.07
黃佩鈺, & 謝佳純. (2010). 名牌聖教圈外的時尚消費-年輕族群在低價時尚市場的消費行為 [Outside the Cult of Luxury Brand-Young Tribal Group's Consumption Behavior in Low Price Fashion Market]. 輔仁民生學誌, 16(2), 131-147. https://doi.org/10.29440/fjjhe.201006.0008
黃秋韻. (2007). 從現代大學生特質談“人生哲學”之課程任務 [On the Curriculum Task of "Philosophy of Life" through the University Student's Special Characteristic]. 育達學院學報(13), 53-67. https://doi.org/10.7074/ydaj.200709.0053
楊冠政. (1992). 環境教育發展簡史. 博物館學季刊, 6(3), 3-9. https://doi.org/10.6686/MuseQ.199207_6(3).0002
楊政學, & 林靖亞. (2013). 消費者綠色消費行為意向之研究 [A Study on the Consumers Behavioral Intention of Green Consumption]. 明新學報, 39(2), 219-232.
楊惟任. (2015). 賽局理論與國際氣候談判 [Game Theories and Climate Change Negotiations]. 淡江國際與區域研究, 4(1), 1-28.
萬文隆. (2004). 深度訪談在質性研究中的應用. 生活科技教育, 37(4), 17-23. https://doi.org/10.6232/lte.2004.37(4).4
葉坤霖&李家嫻. (2020). 影響電動機車購買決策因素之研究.
葉欣誠. (2017). 探討環境教育與永續發展教育的發展脈絡 [Exploring the Developmental Discourse of Environmental Education and Education for Sustainable Development]. 環境教育研究, 13(2), 67-109. https://doi.org/10.6555/jeer.13.2.67
劉育成. (2012). 快速時尚潮流的消費美學:加速的救贖與宰制?. 文化研究月報(129), 2-27. https://doi.org/10.7012/csm.201206.0002
賴偉嘉. (2018). 大學生社群媒體使用現況與社交焦慮. 圖文傳播藝術學報(2018), 62-70.
駱尚廉. (2019). 綠色科技與綠色消費. 消費者報導(464), 032-035.
戴曉霞. (2002). 從福特主義到後福特主義及其對高等教育課程之影響 [From Fordism to Post-Fordism: Beyond the Change of Production Mode and Its Impact on Higher Education Curriculum]. 教育研究集刊(48:2), 199-231. https://doi.org/10.6910/ber.200206_(48-2).0006
蘇碩斌. (2012). 「快速平價時尚」專題導言. 文化研究月報(129), 1-1. https://doi.org/10.7012/csm.201206.0001
https://www.picupipress.com/single-post/%E5%8F%B0%E7%81%編號3%E6%B0%B8%E7%BA%8C%E6%99%82%E5%B0%9A%E8%AA%BF%E6%9F%A5%E5%A0%編號5%E5%91%8A
世界自然基金會.(2020). 水足跡定義. https://wwf.panda.org/discover/knowledge_hub/all_publications/living_planet_report_timeline/lpr_2012/demands_on_our_planet/water_footprint/
洪明.(2017).财商教育:从“想要”到“需要”——基于“消费”的视角. 中国德育(21),26-28. doi:.
大學暨技專校院.課程資源網
https://course-tvc.yuntech.edu.tw/