研究生: |
王聖翔 Wang, Sheng-Hsiang |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
技術追趕的成功因素:以發光二極體產業為例 Drivers for Successful Catch-Up : The Case of Light-Emitting Diode Industry |
指導教授: |
胡美智
Hu, Mei-Chih |
口試委員: |
胡美智
Hu, Mei-Chih 張元杰 何秀青 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
科技管理學院 - 科技管理研究所 Institute of Technology Management |
論文出版年: | 2011 |
畢業學年度: | 99 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 129 |
中文關鍵詞: | 發光二極體 、科技體制 、技術追趕 |
相關次數: | 點閱:2 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
LED是發光二極體(Light-Emitting Diode)的簡稱,發光二極體可以說是人類開使用火,以及1879年愛迪生發明電燈後,照明市場的另一次革命性光源。
在發光二極體產業中,日本、美國及歐洲的廠商較早進入此產業,因此掌握住許多關鍵專利與技術,為發光二極體產業的領導者,而台灣及韓國的廠商則較晚進入此產業,專利佈局與技術水準較為落後,為此產業的後進者。但近幾年來,領導者開始願意與後進者進行專利的交叉授權,甚至與後進者合資成立新公司,顯示後進廠商似乎有追趕上領導者的現象。故我想要研究後進者成功追趕上領導者的關鍵因素為何?影響後進者追趕領導者速度快慢的因素為何?以及影響後進者與領導者提升技術能力的因素為何?
本研究主要使用Lee, Keun(2010)的研究架構,亦即藉由建立迴歸模型來分析科技體制(Technological regimes)與技術追趕(Technological catch-up)之間的關係,並且使用美國專利局(United States Patent and Trademark Office)的專利資料以及專利引證資料來計算科技體制(Technological regimes)與技術追趕(Technological catch-up)。
經過迴歸分析,本研究發現專利對後進者提升技術能力有較大的關聯性,但對技術追趕的關聯性較小。因為不只是專利會影響技術追趕,仍然有許多其他因素會影響技術追趕。但是專利卻對提升技術能力有最直接的影響。
Albert, M. 1998, The new innovators: Global patenting trends in five sectors, US
Department of Commerce, Office of Technology Policy.
Amsden, A., and Chu, W. 2003, Beyond Late Development, MIT Press.
Archibugi, D. and M. Pianta, 1996, Measuring technological change through patents
and innovation surveys, Technovation 16(9)
Basberg, 1987, Patents and the measurement of technological change: A survey of
the literature, Research Policy 16.
Bell, R.M., and Pavitt, K. 1993. Technological accumulation and industrial growth:
Contrasts between developed and developing countries. Industrial and
Corporate Change, 2(2).
Breschi, Stefano, Franco Malerba, and Luigi Orsenigo, 2000, Technological Regimes
and Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation, Economic Journal, Vol. 110, No.
463, pp 388-410, 2000.
Choung, Jae-Young and Hwang, Hye-Ran, 2000, National systems of innovation –
institutional linkages and performance in the case of Korea and Taiwan, Scientometrics, Vol. 48, No.3
Dijk, M.V., 1998, Technological Regimes and Industrial Dynamics: The evidence
from Dutch Manufacturing, working paper.
Dosi, G. 1982, Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories, Research
Policy, 11: 147-162.
Dosi, G, 1988, Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation,
Journal of Economic Literature, 26: 1120-1171.
Dosi, G., Pavitt, K. and Soete, L. 1990, The Economics of Technical Change and
International Trade, Harvester Wheatsheaf, London.
Freeman, C. and L. Soete, 1997, Development and the diffusion of technology in
Freeman, C. and L. Soete (eds.), The Economics of Industrial Innovation, Pinter
Publishers, London.
Grandstrand, O., P. Patel, and K. Pavitt, 1997, Multi-technology corporations: why
they have "distributed core" competencies, California management review,
Vol. 39, No.4
Griliches, Z., 1990, Patents statistics as economic indicators: a survey, JEL vol.
XXVIII, pp. 1661-1707; NBER WP 3301; R&D and Productivity? The
econometric evidence, 1998
Hall, Bronwyn H, Adam B. Jaffe and Manuel Trajtenberg, 2001, The NBER patent
citation data file: lessons, insights and methodological Tools, NBER Working
Paper No. 8498
Hu, A.G.Z and A. Jaffe, 2003, Patent citations and international knowledge flow: the
cases of Korea and Taiwan, International Journal of Industrial Organization 21
Jaffe, A., and M. Trajtenberg, 2002, Patents, Citations, and Innovations : A Window
on the Knowledge Economy, MIT press.
Jaffe, Adam, Manuel Trajtenberg, and Rebecca Henderson, 1993, Geographic
localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations,
Quarterly Journal of economics 108.
Kim, C.W and K. Lee, 2003, Innovation, technological regimes, and organizational
selection in industry evolution: a „history friendly model‟ of DRAM industry,
Industrial and Corporate change, vol.12 no.5.
Laursen, K. and Meliciani, V. 2002, The relative importance of international vis-à-vis
national technological spillovers for market share dynamics, Industrial and
Corporate Change, vol. 11(4), pp. 875-894.
Lee, Keun. 2010, What makes more successful and less successful Technological
Catch-up: Analyzing the 10 late-comer countries, Department of Economics,
Seoul National University.
Lee, Keun, C. Lim and D. Park, 2003, The Role of Industrial Property rights in
Technological Development in the Republic of Korean, WIPO, 2003.
Lee, Keun and C. Lim, 2001, Technological Regimes, Catching-up and Leapfrogging:
Findings from the Korean Industries, Research Policy 30, pp459-483
Lee, Keun, Chaisung Lim, and W. Song, 2005, Emerging Digital Technology as a
Window of Opportunity and Technological Leapfrogging: Catch-up in Digital TV by the Korean Firms, International Journal of Technology Management. Vol. 29, No. 1-2, 40-63, No.1.
Mahmood, Ishtiaq P and Jasjit Singh, 2003, Technological dynamism in Asia,
Research Policy 32
Malerba et al, 1997, Persistence of innovative activities, sectoral patterns of
innovation and international technological specialization, International Journal of Industrial Organization 15
Malerba, Franco and Luigi Orsenigo, 1996, Schumpeterian patterns of innovation
are technology-specific, Research Policy, Volume 25, Issue 3, May 1996, Pages
451-478
Malerba, Franco, 2002, Sectoral systems of innovation and production, Research
Policy 31
Mathews, John A. 2005, “Strategy and the Crystal Cycle,” California Management
Review vol. 47, no. 2, Winter.
Mathews, J.A., 2002, Competitive Advantages of the Latecomer Firm: A
Resource-Based Account of Industrial Catch-Up Strategies, Asia Pacific Journal
of Management, 19.
Mu, Qing, and Lee, Keun, Knowledge diffusion, market segmentation and
technological catch-up: The case of the telecommunication industry in China,
Research Policy, 2005.
Nelson, R. and S. Winter, 1982, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.
Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA
OECD, 1994, The measurement of scientific and technological activities using
patent data as science and technology indicators (patent manual).
Patel, P. and K. Pavitt, 1997, The technological competencies of world's largest
firms: complex and path-dependent, but not much variety, Research Policy 26
Pavitt, K., 1985, patent statistics as indicators of innovative activities: possibilities
and problems, Scientometrics 7(1-2)
Perez, C., and L. Soete, 1988. Catching-up in technology: entry barriers and
windows of opportunity. In: Dosi, ed., Technical Change and Economic Theory.
Pinter Publishers. London.
Stolpe, Michael, 2002, Determinants of knowledge diffusion as evidenced in patent
data: the case of liquid crystal display technology, Research Policy 31, p.1193
Swann, P., and J. Gill, 1993. Corporate Vision and Rapid Technological Change: The
Evolution of Market Structure. Routledge, London.
Trajtenberg, M., 2001, Innovation in Israel 1968-97: A Comparative Analysis Using
Patent Data, Research Policy 30 pp. 363-389
Trajtenberg, Manuel, Rebecca Henderson, and Adam B. Jaffe, 1997, University vs.
Corporate Patents: A Window on the Basicness of Innovations", Economics of
Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 5, no. 1
Winter, G, 1984, Schumpeterian competition in alternative technological regimes,
Journal of economic behavior and organization 5