研究生: |
梁綺靜 Leong, I-Cheng |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
車用語音系統之人機介面設計 Human-Machine Interface Design of In-Vehicle Speech Interaction System: Talking Car System |
指導教授: |
黃雪玲
Hwang, Sheue-Ling |
口試委員: |
李英聯
Lee, Ying-Lien 姚怡然 Yau, Yi-Jan |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
工學院 - 工業工程與工程管理學系 Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management |
論文出版年: | 2012 |
畢業學年度: | 100 |
語文別: | 英文 |
論文頁數: | 93 |
中文關鍵詞: | 車用語音介面 、可用性測試 、主觀心智負荷問卷 、駕駛分心 |
外文關鍵詞: | In-vehicle voice-based interface, in-vehicle user interface, NASA-TLX, driving distraction |
相關次數: | 點閱:3 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究計畫主要在研發安全好用的車用語音系統。整合及歸納出目前少數汽車製造廠的語音介面優缺點,經由使用情境分析、操作流程設計(含語音對話流程設計)、面版設計、收集對話流程中使用者之語音指令,以發展語音介面Talking Car車用影音系統。並根據美國國家公路交通安全管理局(NTHSA)對駕駛分心的定義,模擬LUXGEN Think+的廣播和音樂功能進行駕駛模擬實驗並比較Talking Car 和LUXGEN Think+間之差異。
在駕駛模擬實驗中,利用攝影機拍攝受測者正前方的眼動情形和側面的操作情況,以記錄在受測者操作任務時的單次凝視系統介面的時間、前方出現“STOP!!!”剎車訊息時踩剎車的反應時間、車道偏移次數和完成任務時間,並在實驗後請受測者完成主觀心智負荷問卷(NASA-TLX)和主觀喜好問卷,以評量使用者的工作負荷和主觀感受。
從可用性測試的實驗數據和NASA-TLX問卷分析,使用語音指令和結合方向盤按鍵操作的Talking Car與LUXGEN對比,無論在凝視系統介面的時間、凝視系統的次數、反應時間和工作負荷皆比LUXGEN的需求低,因此駕駛者在操作車用影音系統時亦能專注在路面情況,以安全反應各種突發狀況。
This research is aimed at developing an in-vehicle voice-based interface. Integrating and generalizing those pros and cons of the few existing speech control systems and through user scenario analysis, operational process (including the voice dialogue design), panel interface design and voice commands collection in different operational process, a voice-based interface is developed which is called Talking Car. By conducting a driving simulation experiment, the driving performance of Talking Car and that of simulated LUXGEN Think+ system in radio and music functions were compared.
Two cameras were set to capture eye movements and drivers response to collect users’ every single glance time, to measure the reaction time of users before stepping on the brakes when a “STOP!!!” message appears on the display, to determine times of lane change and also task completion time, while carrying out the driving task. The NASA-TLX and a subjective questionnaire were also applied to evaluate subjects’ mental workload.
Regarding subjects’ response and workload, the Talking Car System required less glance time, less manual distraction occurred and the mental workload was less than that of using the LUXGEN Think+ System. Therefore, with the Talking Car System drivers are able to focus on their driving when they are controlling the AV System in-vehicle and so have a safer response towards road situations.
Angkititrakul, P., Petracca, M., Sathyanarayana, A., Hansen, John H.L. (2007). UTDrive: Driver Behavior and Speech Interactive Systems for In-Vehicle Environments. IEEE Intelligent Vehicle Symposium, June 13-15, 2007, Istanbul, Turkey.
Araki, M., Matsuda, T., Takahashi, M., Ohtaki, R., Obuchi, Y. (2008). Evaluation of interface and in-car speech - many undesirable utterances and sever noisy speech on car navigation application. IEEE Signal Processing Society, MMSP, 956-959.
Archbishop Stephen Fumio Hamao (2002). First European Meeting of National Directors for the Apostleship of the Road. Retrieved December 12, 2011, form http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/migrants/docu ments/rc_pc_migrants_doc_20021209_road_1eur_hamao_en.html
Baron, A., Green, P. (2006). Safety and Usability of Speech Interfaces for In-Vehicle Tasks while Driving: A Brief Literature Review. University of Michigan, Transportation Research Institute. Technical Report UMTRI 2006-5.
Carter, C., Graham, R. (2000). Experimental Comparison of Manual and Voice Controls for the Operation of In-Vehicle Systems. Proc. 14th Triennial Congress Int"l Ergonomics Assoc. and 44th Ann. Meeting Human Factors and Ergonomics Soc. (IEA 2000/HFES 2000), Human Factors and Ergonomics Soc., 2000, 286–289.
Chang, Jackie C., Lien, A., Lathrop, B., Hees, H. (2009). Usability Evaluation of a Volkswagen Group In-Vehicle Speech System. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI 2009), ACM New York, NY, USA. ISBN: 978-1-60558-571-0.
Forlines, C., Schmidt-Nielsen, B., Raj, B., Wittenburg, P., Wolf, P. (2005). A Comparison between Spoken Queries and Menu-based interfaces for In-Car Digital Music Selection. TR2005-020, Cambridge, MA: Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories.
Garay-Vega, L., Pradhan, A.K., Weinberg, G., Schmidt-Nielsen, B., Harsham, B., Shen, Y., Divekar, G., Romoser, M., Knodler, M., Fisher, D.L. (2010). Evaluation of Different Speech and Touch Interfaces to In-Vehicle Music Retrieval Systems. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42(3), 913-920.
Gruenstein, A., Reimer, B., Orszulak, J., Mehler, B., Liu, S., Seneff, S., Roberts, S., Glass, J., Zabel, J., Coughlin, J. (2009). City Browser: Developing a Conversational Automotive HMI. Proc. CHI, 4291-4296, Boston, April 2009.
Hart, S. G. & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. In P. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human mental workload (pp. 139-183). Amsterdam: North Holland.
Hataoka, N., Araki, M., Matsuda, T., Takahashi, M., Ohtaki, R., Obuchi, Y. (2008). Evaluation of interface and in-car speech - many undesirable utterances and sever noisy speech on car navigation application. Multimedia Signal Processing, 2008 IEEE 10th Workshop on, 956-959.
Hua, Zhang and Ng, Wei Lieh (2010). “Speech Recognition Interface Design for In-Vehicle System”. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI 2010), November 11-12, 2010, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Itoh, K., Miki, Y., Yoshitsugu, N., Kubo, N., Mashimo, S. (2004). Evaluation of a voice-Activated system using a driving simulator. SAE paper 2004-01-0232, 2004.
Jenness, J. W., Lattanzio, R.J., O'Tolle, M., Taylor, N. (2002). Voice-activated dialing or eating a cheeseburger: Which is more distracting during simulated driving? Proceddings of the Human factors and Ergonomics Society, USA, 46, 592-596
Klauer, S. G., Dingus, T. A., Neale, V. L., Sudweeks, J. D., Ramsey, D. J. (2006). The Impact of Driver Inattention on Near-Crash/Crash Risk: An Analysis Using the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Data. DOT HS 810 594. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Lee, J. D., Caven, B., Haake, S.n, Brown, T. L. (2001). Speech-based interaction with in-vehicle computers: The effect of speech-based e-mail on drivers' attention to the roadway. Human Factors, 43, 631-640, 2001.
Maciej, J., Vollrath, M. (2009). Comparison of manual vs speech-based interaction with in-vehicle information systems. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 41(5), 924-930.
Mitsopoulos-Rubens, P., Trotter, M., Lenne, M. (2011). Effects on driving performance of interacting with an in-vehicle music player: a comparison of three interface layout concepts for information presentation. Applied Ergonomics, 42, 583-591.
Nakano, Teppei (2008). Flexible Shortcuts: Designing a New Speech User Interface for Command Execution. CHI Extended Abstracts, page 2621-2624, ACM, 2008.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2010). Overview of the NTHSA Distraction Plan. Retrieved 26 January, 2011, from http://www.nhtsa.gov/ staticfiles/nti/distracted_driving/pdf/811299.pdf
Nishimoto, T., Shioya, M., Takahashi, J., Daigo, H. (2005). A study of dialogue management principles corresponding to the driver's workload. Biennial Workshop on Digital Signal Processing for In-Vehicle and mobile systems, Sesimbra, Portugal, Sep 2005.
Sodhi, M.S., Reimer, B., Llamazares, I. (2002). Glance analysis of driver eye movements to evaluate distraction. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computing, 34 (4), 2002, pp. 529-538.
Tchankue, P., Wesson, J L. and Vogts,D. (2010). Design and Evaluation of a Multimodal Interface for In-Car Communication Systems. Annual Research Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists (SAICSIT 2010), Bela Bela, South Africa, 11-13 Oct 2010. Christopher D. Wickens & Justin G. Hollands, “Attention, Time-sharing and Workload”, Nancy Roberts, and Bill Webber, Engineering Psychology and Human Performance (3rd edition), Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, pp.439-499, 2000.
Transport Canada, Standards Research and Development Branch Road Safety and Motor Vehicle Regulations Directorate (2003). Strategies for Reducing Driver Distraction from In-Vehicle Telematics Devices: A Discussion Document. Retrieved 28 March, 2011, from http://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/ roadsafety/tp-tp14133-menu-147.htm
Tsimhoni, O., Smith, D., Green, P. (2002). Destination Entry while Driving: Speech Recognition versus a Touch-Screen Keyboard. University of Michigan, Transportation Research Institute. Technical Report UMTRI-2001-24.
Weng, F., Varges, S., Raghunathan, B., Ratiu, F., Pon-Barry, H., Lathrop, B., Zhang, Q., Bratt, H., Scheideck, T., Xu, K., Purver, M., Mishra, R., Lien, A., Raya, M., Peters, S., Meng, Y., Russell, J., Cavedon, L., Shriberg, E., Schmidt, H., Prieto, R. (2006). CHAT: A conversational helper for automotive tasks. INTERSPEECH: International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Pittsburgh PA (2006).
Wikipedia (2012). Speech recognition, Retrieved 26 January, 2012, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speech_recognition
Yan, B., Weng, F., Feng, Z., Ratiu, F., Raya, M., Meng, Y., Varges, S., Purver, M., Lin, F., Lien, A., Scheideck, T., Raghunathan, B., Mishra, R., Lathrop, B., Bratt, H., Peters, S. (2007). A Conversational In-car Dialog System. In Proceedings of NAACL/HLT, Rochester, New York, April 22-27, 2007.
Young, K., Mitsopoulos-Rubens, P., Rudin-Brown, C., Lenne, M. (2011). The effects of using a portable music player on simulated driving performance and task-sharing strategies. Applied Ergonomics, 43, 738-746.
曾建基 (2004)。應用駕駛模擬系統探討車內資訊介面對行車安全的影響,國立中央大學機械工程研究所碩士論文。
行政院衛生署 (2009),2009年度死因統計 。2010年12月27日,取自: http://www.doh.gov.tw/CHT2006/DM/DM2_2_p02.aspx?class_no=440&now_fod_list_no=11468&level_no=1&doc_no=77184。
內政部統計署 (2011)。一○○年第十六週內政統計通報(99年致人傷亡之道路交通事故統計)。2011年12月12日。取自: http://www.moi.gov.tw/ stat/news_content.aspx?sn=5131