本研究旨在探討遠距工作環境下，MBTI性格類型與工作績效、工作滿意度之間的關係。隨著科技發展和遠距工作模式的普及，尤其在COVID-19大流行後，越來越多企業採用遠距工作，對其影響進行深入研究成為必須。研究以MBTI性格類型為基礎，針對不同人格特質的員工如何在遠距工作環境中展現其工作績效和滿意度進行探討。

本研究通過調查七個構面，包括「能量態度」、「處理資訊思維」、「決策思維」、「生活方式」、遠距工作量表、工作績效及工作滿意度，採用皮爾森相關係數和迴歸分析，進行假設驗證。結果顯示，遠距工作與工作績效、工作滿意度之間存在顯著正相關，工作績效在遠距工作與工作滿意度之間起到中介作用。研究亦發現不同的MBTI人格特質對工作績效和滿意度的影響存在差異，內向型人格在遠距工作中的工作績效呈現負相關，未顯示出預期的正向調節效果。

本研究的結果表明，遠距工作環境下，個體的性格特質會顯著影響其工作表現和工作滿意度，並且工作績效在其中扮演了關鍵的中介角色。研究結果可為企業在設計遠距工作政策時，提供針對不同人格特質的管理建議，以提升員工的整體績效與滿意度。

This study aims to explore the relationship between MBTI personality types, job performance, and job satisfaction in the context of remote work. With the advancement of technology and the widespread adoption of remote work, especially following the COVID-19 pandemic, it has become essential to conduct in-depth research on its impact. This study investigates how employees with different personality traits, based on MBTI personality types, demonstrate job performance and satisfaction in a remote work environment.
The study examines seven dimensions, including "Energy Attitude," "Information Processing Thinking," "Decision-Making Thinking," "Lifestyle," remote work scale, job performance, and job satisfaction, using Pearson correlation and regression analysis to test hypotheses. The results show a significant positive correlation between remote work, job performance, and job satisfaction, with job performance acting as a mediator between remote work and job satisfaction. Additionally, the study found that different MBTI personality traits have varying effects on job performance and satisfaction, with introverted personalities showing a negative correlation with job performance in remote work, contrary to the expected positive moderating effect.
The findings of this study indicate that in a remote work environment, an individual's personality traits significantly influence their job performance and satisfaction, with job performance playing a key mediating role. The results provide valuable insights for companies in designing remote work policies, offering management recommendations tailored to different personality traits to enhance overall employee performance and satisfaction.

中央社，2024年5月01日。勞工可要求週休3日！新加坡「彈性工作原則」12月上路。檢索自：https://w.gvm.com.tw/article/112043
行政院主計總處，2021。人力運用調查統計結果。檢索自：https://ws.dgbas.gov.tw/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9VcGxvYWQvNDYzL3JlbGZpbGUvM-TA5ODAvMjA3OTI4LzExMOW5tOaWsOiBnueov%2bacrOaWhy5wZGY%3d&n=MTEw5bm05paw6IGe56i%2f5pys5paHLnBkZg%3d%3d
余德成，1996。 品質管理人性面系統因素對工作績效之影響, 國立中山大學企業管理學系, 博士學位論文.
吳琍雅，2019。 資訊人員人格特質, 工作滿意度與工作績效之關聯性研究-以 C 公司為例. 臺灣師範大學科技應用與人力資源發展學系學位論文, 2019, 1-65.
陳俊良，2009。 工作壓力, 工作滿足及情緒管理對工作績效影響之研究─ 以壽險業銷售人員為例. 長榮大學高階管理碩士在職專班 (EMBA) 學位論文, 2009, 1-92.
劉傳仁，2012。 人格特質對工作績效影響之研究-以工作特性為干擾變數. 中原大學企業管理學系學位論文, 2012, 1-86.
蔡妍昕，2021。新型冠狀病毒影響下遠距工作型態的發展對工作績效之影響—以溝通效能、工作自主性為中介變項〔碩士論文，淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2021.00601
蔡欣嵐，2001。工作特性、人格特質與工作滿意度之關係-以半 導體業為例，國立中央大學企業管理研究所，碩士論文。
韓繼成，2002，國民中學訓導人員角色壓力、人格特質與工作滿 意度的關係之研究，國立彰化師範大學教育研究所，碩士論文。
讀者太太／英國職場放大鏡，2024。請求「彈性工作」是你的權利！2024 勞基法上路，英國求職不可不知。檢索自：https://crossing.cw.com.tw/article/18831
顾雪英、胡湜，2012。 MBTI 人格类型量表: 新近发展及应用. 心理科学进展, 20(10), 1700.
Allport, Gordon W. 1961. Pattern and growth in personality. Ox-ford, England: Holt, Reinhart & Winston
Borman, W. C. & Motowidlo, S. J. 1993, Expanding the Criterion Domain to Include Elements of Contextual Performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Byars LL, Rue LW . 2001. Human Resource Management (4th edition) Irwin McGraw-Hill Boston, U.S.A.
Cooper, C. D., & Kurland, N. B. (2002). Telecommuting, professional isolation, and employee devel-
Cooper, C. D., & Kurland, N. B. ,2002. Telecommuting, professional isolation, and employee development in public and private organizations. Journal of Organi-zational Behavior, 23(4), 511-532.
Egan B. 1997. Feasibility and Cost Benefit Analysis. International Telework Asso-ciation Annual International Conference: Crystal City, VA
Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. 1959. The motivation to work (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Holcomb-McCoy, C., & Addison-Bradley, C. 2005. African American counselor edu-cators’ job satisfaction and perceptions of departmental racial climate. Coun-selor Edu-cation & Supervision, 45(1), 2-15.
Holland , J.L. 1973, Making Occupational Choice : A Theory of Career , Englewood , New York : Prentice-Hall.
Holland, J. L. 1997. Making vocational choices. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assess-ment Resources.
Hoppock, R. 1935. Job Satisfaction. New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers.
Hunton, J. E., & Norman, C. S. 2010. The impact of alternative telework arrange-ments on organizational commitment: Insights from a longitudinal field exper-iment (retracted). Journal of Information Systems, 24(1), 67-90.
Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. 2001. Relationship of Core Self-Evaluations traits - self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability - with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta- analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 80-92.
Kim, S. 2016. Perceived organizational support as a mediator between distributive justice and sports referees ́ job satisfaction and career commitment. Annals of Leisure Research, 20 (2), 169-187.
Kramer, A., & Kramer, K.Z. 2020. The potential impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on occupational status, work from home, and occupational mobility, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 119.
Kurland, N. B., & Bailey, D. E. ,1999. Telework: The advantages and challenges of working here, there anywhere, and anytime. Organizational Dynamics, 28(2), 53-68.
Kurland, N.B., & Cooper, C.D. 2002. Manager Control and Employee Isolation in Telecommuting Environments. Journal of High Technology Management Re-search, 13(1), 107-126.
Motowidlo S J and Van Scotter J R,1994, Evidence that task performance should bedistinguished from contextual per⁃ formance, Journal of Applied psychology, 79(4).
Myers, I. B., & McCaulley, M. H. ,1985. Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Nilles J.M. 1975. Telecommunications and organizational decentralization. IEEE Transactions On Communications, 23(10), 1142-1147.
opment in public and private organiza-tions. Journal of Organizational Behav-ior, 23(4), 511–532.
Rousseau, D. 1995. Psychological contracts in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Shamir B., & Salomon I. 1985. Work-at-home and the quality of working life. Acad-emy of Management Review, 10(3), 455-464.
Simpson, L., Daws, L., Pini, B., & Wood, L. 2003. Rural Telework: Case Studies from the Australian Outback. New Technology, Work and Employment, 18(2), 115-126.
Spillane, R. 1973. Intrinsic and extrinsic job satisfaction and labour turnover: A Questionnaire study of Australian Managers. Occupational Psychology, 47(1-2), 71-74.
Toffler, A. 1980. Third Wave . New York, NY: Bantam.
Törnroos, M., Jokela, M., &Hakulinen, C. 2019. The relationship between personality and job satisfaction across occupations. Personality and Individual Differences, 145, 82-88.
Turetken, O., Jain, A., Quesenberry, B. & Ngwenyama, O. 2011. An empirical inves-tigation of the impact on Individual and Work Characteristics on Telecommut-ing Success, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 54(1), 56-67.
Wade, M., & Shan, J. 2020. Covid-19 Has Accelerated Digital Transformation, but May Have Made it Harder Not Easier. MIS Quarterly Executive, 19(3), 213-220.
Weiss, D. J., Dawis, R. V., England, G. W., & Lofquist, L. H. 1967. Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.