本論文研究《菸草控制框架公約》於臺灣之法律實踐。分別自法律體系之內部觀點（法釋義學）與外部觀點（法學與跨學門研究），探究《菸草控制框架公約》於臺灣之國內法效力，以及《菸草控制框架公約》對於臺灣法律實踐產生之影響與反應出的制度困難。

法釋義學的觀點，幫助本文確立《菸草控制框架公約》於臺灣之法律定性。《菸草控制框架公約》經國會審議通過，並由總統頒發加入書，亦影響《菸害防制法》之修正。然而，《菸草控制框架公約》並未經總統公布，亦未制定施行法，其國內法效力於實務上履生疑義。本文整理實務上對於《菸草控制框架公約》國內法效力之質疑，並檢驗這些主張是否有理由。

法學與跨學門研究的觀點，則將法律體系作為觀察對象，借助法律與社會科學之理論—包括：遵循理論、跨國法律理論、管制理論—描繪《菸草控制框架公約》對於臺灣法律實踐的影響。隨著科技之發展，菸品的種類日新月異，產生了新的管制需求與管制困難。《菸草控制框架公約》透過每兩年一次的締約方大會，結合全球的力量，緊追菸品發展的腳步，不斷作成新的決議回應管制需求。相對於此，臺灣自2009年最後一次修正公布《菸害防制法》後，已逾十年未為修正。在這其間，菸品市場快速發展，電子煙、加熱式菸品、非法菸品貿易等等的菸草控制議題層出不窮。雖然實務對於《菸草控制框架公約》國內法效力迭有爭論，但是立法、司法、與行政機關在近十餘年來，仍不乏有在修法草案、立法理由、判決、函釋等，提及《菸草控制框架公約》之情況。也有許多法律實務嘗試在《菸害防制法》等菸草控制國內法規範不足的艱困情況下，借助《菸草控制框架公約》回應新興菸品等管制議題。藉由這些實務文件中，可以觀察出立法、司法、與行政之互動。

最後，本文依據研究臺灣《FCTC》法律實務之經驗，融會前述的不同理論，嘗試提出一個以臺灣經驗出發的法學研究理論框架。

This Thesis focuses on Taiwan’s legal practice of Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) from two perspectives: one is from the interior of the legal system (doctrinalism) and the other is from the exterior of the legal system (legal-sociology).

From the doctrinal perspective, this Thesis examines FCTC’s legal nature in Taiwan. Congress passed FCTC, and the President executed FCTC’s Instrument of Accession. After then, in the spirit of FCTC, Tobacco Hazard Prevention Act was revised in 2009. However, FCTC has not been promulgated by the President, neither any act to implement FCTC adopted. Therefore, in practice, there is a debate about whether FCTC per se is domestic law in Taiwan. This Thesis reviews the opposite arguments and examines whether these arguments are sound.

From the legal-sociological perspective, Taiwan’s legal practice is observed by 3 theories, i.e. compliance theory, transnational legal theory, and regulatory theory. Through these theories, this Thesis portrays FCTC’s development and transformation in Taiwan. Regulatory demands and difficulties on tobacco control increase with innovations of tobacco products and developments of technology. By Conference of the Parties held every two years, FCTC makes decisions continuously to respond to regulatory urgencies. On the contrary, Taiwan has not revised Tobacco Hazard Prevention Act since 2009, although there have been many tobacco control issues popping out in the last 10 years, inter alia, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and illicit trade in tobacco products. Despite the debate about whether FCTC is domestic law, the government—including legislative, judicial, and executive—has mentioned FCTC still in a number of amendments, judgments, and other administrative practices. Some of these practices attempt to respond to regulatory difficulties, albeit relevant domestic regulations are lacking. Interactions amongst legislative, judicial, and executive agencies are observed via these legal practices.

中文文獻
Karl Larenz著，陳愛娥譯（1996），法學方法論，臺北：五南。[Larenz, Karl (1991), Methodenlehre der Rechtswissenschaft, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.]

王自雄（2010），人權兩公約之國內法化暨其施行法之實施，台灣法學雜誌，164期，頁113-122。

王泰升（2019），臺灣法律史的提出及學科化，中研院法學期刊，特刊，頁1-45。

王鵬翔、張永健（2011），經驗面向的規範意義—論實證研究在法學中的角色，中研院法學期刊，17期，頁205-294。

王騰坤、黃子庭（2006），全球化觀點與普世適用原則對加入世界衛生組織之探討：以台灣角度分析，研究台灣，創刊號，頁151-171。

丘宏達（2012），現代國際法，3版，臺北：三民。

江承軒（2013），台灣菸害治理機制的形成，國立清華大學社會學研究所碩士論文。

吳庚（2016），行政法之理論與實用，14版，臺北：自版。

吳信華（2011），憲法釋論，臺北：三民。

李建良（2014），論國際條約的國內法效力與法位階定序，收於：廖福特編，憲法解釋之理論與實務，頁175-275，臺北：中央研究院法律學研究所。

周桂田（2014），風險社會典範轉移，臺北：遠流。

林子儀、葉俊榮、黃昭元、張文貞（2005），憲法——權力分立，臺北：新學林。

林育生（2007），我國非營利組織在立法過程中的議題倡導策略—以董氏基金會推動「菸害防制法」修訂為例，國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程碩士論文。

林明昕（2016），基本國策之規範效力及其對社會正義之影響，臺大法學論叢，45卷特刊，頁1305-1358。

法治斌、董保城（2010），憲法新論，4版，臺北：自版。

姜皇池（2007），以台灣名義申請加入聯合國之法律意義，新世紀智庫論壇，第39期，頁18-32。

徐揮彥（2014），「公民與政治權利國際公約」與「經濟、社會與文化權利國際公約」在我國最高法院與最高行政法院適用之研究，臺大法學論叢，43卷特刊，頁839-909。

高聖惕（2013），臺灣與世界衛生組織：我國參與世界衛生組織幾個重要會議與機制的法律可行性評估，政大法學論叢，133期，頁133-224。

張文貞（2009），憲法與國際人權法的匯流—兼論我國大法官解釋之實踐，收於：廖福特編，憲法解釋之理論與實務，頁223-272。

莊智婷（2007），利益團體立法遊說之研究：以菸害防制法修正案為例，銘傳大學公共事務學系碩士論文。

許育典（2010），憲法，4版，臺北：元照。

陳怡凱（2015），國際人權法在我國法院之適用—以精障者是否可科處死刑為例，憲政時代，第40卷，第3期，頁311-359。

陳牧民（2010），主權理論與當前臺灣外交戰略，全球政治評論，31期，頁105-124。

陳春生（2003），憲法，臺北：自版。

陳敏（2002），行政法總論，2版，臺北：自版。

彭明敏、黄昭堂著，蔡秋雄譯（1995），台灣在國際法上的地位，臺北：玉山社。[彭明敏、黄昭堂（1976），台湾の法的地位，東京：東京大学出版会。]

黃昭元（2010），臺灣法律發展回顧—憲法，臺大法學論叢，第39卷，第2期，頁5-30。

黃異（2006），國際法在國內法領域中的效力，臺北：元照。

黃舒芃（2016），國際及區域人權公約在憲法解釋中扮演的角色，臺灣民主季刊，第13卷，第1期，頁85-129。

葉俊榮編（2014），轉型中的東亞法院：基本形貌、紛爭解決與行政治理，臺北：臺大出版中心。

———（2015），氣候變遷治理與法律，臺北：臺大出版中心。

———編（2016），變遷中的東亞法院：從指標性判決看東亞法院的角色與功能，臺北：臺大出版中心。

裘兆琳（2010），我國參與世界衛生組織之策略演變與美國角色分析：一九九七～二○○九，歐美研究，40卷2期，頁431-571。

詹鎮榮（2006），總統對「違憲法律」之拒絕公布權？，月旦法學教室，第46期，頁8-9。
蔡韻竹、蔡憶文（2015），我國菸害防制政策制定的政治分析，台灣公共衛生雜誌，34卷5期，頁447-462。

鄧玉珊（2015），從「敬菸」到「禁菸」—論臺灣反菸政治／1960-2012，東海大學社會學系碩士論文。

鄭端耀（1998），務實外交的發展與抉擇，問題與研究，37卷4期，頁1-20。

羅承宗（2009），將錯就錯的總統？——再訪總統拒絕公布法律權，台灣法學雜誌，137期，頁21-30。

羅金棟（2007），國家治理中非政府組織的角色與政策倡議策略：以菸害防制法為例，非政府組織學刊，2期，頁69-90。

蘇永欽（2002），法律案跨屆覆議的憲法問題，法令月刊，第53卷，第2期，頁3-12。

外文文獻
Abbott, Kenneth W. 2006. Toward a Richer Institutionalism for International Law and Policy. Journal of International Law and International Relations 1: 9-34.

Adler, Emanuel. 2002. Constructivism and International Relations. Pp. 95-118 in The Handbook of International Relations, edited by Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, and Beth A. Simmons. London: SAGE.

Baldwin, David A. 2002. Power and International Relations. Pp. 177-191 in The Handbook of International Relations, edited by Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, and Beth A. Simmons. London: SAGE.

Baldwin, Robert, and Martin Cave. 2012. Understanding Regulation. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Black, Julia. 1997. Rules and Regulators. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Brewster, Rachel. 2009. Unpacking the State's Reputation. Harvard International Law Journal 50:231-269.

Bronwen, Morgan, and Karen Yeung. 2007. An Introduction to Law and Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brownlie, Ian. 2008. Principle of Public International Law. 7th ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Cairney, Paul, Donley T. Studlar, and Hadii M. Mamuda. 2012. Global Tobacco Control: Power, Policy, Governance and Transfer. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

Calabresi, Guido. 2003. An Introduction to Legal Thought: Four Approaches to Law and to the Allocation of Body Parts. Stanford Law Review 55: 2113-2151.

Chayes, Abram, and Antonia Handler Chayes. 1993. On Compliance. International Organization 47: 175-205.

Chen, Lung-chu, and W. Michael Reisman. 1972. Who Owns Taiwan: A Search for International Title. Yale Law Journal: 81: 599-671.

Chen, Lung-chu. 2016. The U.S.-Taiwan-China Relationship in International Law and Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chen, Yu-Jie. 2019. Isolated but Not Oblivious: Taiwan’s Acceptance of the Two Major Human Rights Covenants. Pp. 207-225 in Taiwan and International Human Rights: A Story of Transformation, edited by Jerome A. Cohen, William P. Alford, and Chang-fa Lo. Singapore: Springer.

Chung, Ho-Yi, Shu-Ying Lo, Yu-Juan Liu, Mei-Chu Lin, Li-Hui Yu, Ying-Wei Wang, and Yi-Ren Wang. 2018. Assessment of 2016 Taiwan Tobacco Control Performance Based on WHO MPOWER Guidelines. Tobacco Induced Disease 16:11.

Cooper, Rusell W. 1999. Coordination Games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Crawford, James. 2007. The Creation of States in International Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

───. 2012. Brownlie’s Principle of Public International Law. 8th ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Croley, Steven P. 1998. Theories of Regulation: Incorporating the Administrative Process. Columbia Law Review 98: 1-168.

Daintith, Terence. 1994. The Techniques of government. Pp. 209-246 in The Changing Constitution, 3rd ed., edited by Jeffrey L. Jowell and Dawn Oliver. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

DeLand, Katherine, Gemma Lien, and Heather Wipfli. 2014. The WHO FCTC and the Tobacco Free Initiative. Pp. 11-31 in The Global Tobacco Epidemic and the Law, edited by Andrew D. Mitchell and Tania Voon. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Fearon, James, and Alexander Wendt. 2002. Rationalism v. Constructivism: A Skeptical View. Pp. 73-94 in The Handbook of International Relations, edited by Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, and Beth A. Simmons. London: SAGE.

Goldsmith, Jack, and Eric Posner. 2005. The Limit of International Law. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Gostin, Lawrence O. 2014. Global Health Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Gunningham, Neil, and Darren Sinclair. 2017. Smart Regulation. Pp. 133-148 in Regulatory Theory: Foundations and Applications, edited by Peter Drahos. Acton: ANU Press.

Guzman, Andrew T. 2008. How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

───. 2002. A Compliance-Based Theory of International Law. California Law Review 90: 1823-1887.

Guzzini, Stefano. 2000. A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations 6(2): 147-182.

Halabi Sam Foster. 2010. The World Health Organization's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control: An Analysis of Guidelines Adopted by the Conference of the Parties. Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 39:121-183.

Halliday, Terence C., and Bruce Carruthers. 2007. The Recursivity of Law: Global Norm Making and National Lawmaking in the Globalization of Corporate Insolvency Regimes. American Journal of Sociology 112: 1135-1202.

Halliday, Terence C., and Gregory Shaffer. 2015. Researching Transnational Legal Orders. Pp. 475-528 in Transnational Legal Orders, edited by Terence C. Halliday and Gregory Shaffer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

───. 2015. Transnational Legal Orders. Pp. 3-72 in Transnational Legal Orders, edited by Terence C. Halliday and Gregory Shaffer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Henckaerts, Jean-Marie. 1996. The International Status of Taiwan in the New World Order: Legal and Political Considerations. London: Kluwer Law International.

Henkin, Louis. 1979. How Nations Behave. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Published for the Council on Foreign Relations by Columbia University Press.

Hood, Christopher, Henry Rothstein, and Robert Baldwin. 2001. The Government of Risk: Understanding Risk Regulation Regimes. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Jessup, Philip. 1956. Transnational Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Koh, Harold Hongju. 1996. Transnational Legal Process. Nebraska Law Review 75: 181-207.

───. 1999. How is International Human Rights Law Enforced? Indiana Law Journal 74: 1397-1417.

───. 2004. International Law as Part of Our Law. American Journal of International Law 98: 43-57.

───. 2005. Internalization through Socialization. Duke Law Journal 54: 975-982.

───. 2006. Why Transnational Law Matters. Penn State International Law Review 24: 745-753.

Krueger, Anne O. 1974. The Political Economy of the Rent-Seeking Society. The American Economic Review 64: 291-303.

Liberman, Johnathan. 2014. The Power of the WHO FCTC: Understanding its Legal Status and weight. Pp. 48-63 in The Global Tobacco Epidemic and the Law, edited by Andrew D. Mitchell and Tania Voon. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Lin, Ching-Fu. 2017. Toward a More Rounded Strategy to Eliminate Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products. Journal of World Trade 51(2): 265-284.

Lo, Chang-fa. 2014. Guidelines and Protocols under the Framework Convention. Pp. 32-47 in The Global Tobacco Epidemic and the Law, edited by Andrew D. Mitchell and Tania Voon. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

May, Peter J. 2007. Regulatory Regimes and Accountability. Regulation and Governance 1:8-26.

Murphy, Kristina, Tom R. Tyler, and Amy Curtis. 2009. Nurturing Regulatory Compliance: Is Procedural Justice Effective When People Question the Legitimacy of the Law? Regulation and Governance 3:1-26.

Oeter, Stefan. 2008. Toward a Richer Institutionalism for International Law and Policy-A Comment on Kenneth Abbott's Recent Work. University of Illinois Law Review 2008: 61-70.

Ogus, Anthony. 1995. Rethinking Self-Regulation. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 15: 97-108.
Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich. 1996. Constitutionalism and International Organizations, Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business. 17: 398-469.

───. 2007. Multilevel Judicial Governance of International Trade Requires a Common Conception of Rule of Law and Justice. Journal of International Economic Law 10(3): 529-551.

Putnam, Robert D. 1988. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization 42: 427-460.

Raustiala, Kal, and Anne-Marie Slaughter. 2002. International law, International Relations and Compliance. Pp. 538-558 in The Handbook of International Relations, edited by Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, and Beth A. Simmons. London: SAGE.

Roth, Brad R. 2009. The Entity that Dare Not Speak Its Name: Unrecognized Taiwan as a Right-Bearer in the International Legal Order. East Asia Law Review 4: 91-124.

Schmidt, Vivien A. 2013. Democracy and Legitimacy in the European Union Revisited: Input, Output and ‘Throughput’. Political Studies 61: 2-22.

Schmidt, Vivien A., and Matthew Wood. 2019. Conceptualizing Throughput Legitimacy: Procedural Mechanisms of Accountability, Transparency, Inclusiveness and Openness in EU Governance. Public Administration 97: 727-740.

Scott, Colin. 2000. Accountability in the Regulatory State. Journal of Law and Society 27: 38-60.

Shaffer, Gregory C. 2012. Transnational Legal Process and State Change. Law and Social Inquiry 37: 229-264.

Shaffer, Gregory C., and Terence C. Halliday. 2016. With, Within, and Beyond the State: The Promise and Limits of Transnational Legal Ordering. Research Paper No. 2016-59, UC Irvine School of Law. Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=2882851.

Scharpf, Fritz W. 2003. Problem-Solving Effectiveness and Democratic Accountability in the EU. Working Paper 03/1, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies. Available at https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/41664/1/639580440.pdf.

Shaw, Malcolm N. 2014. International Law. 7th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shelton, Dinah. 2011. Introduction. Pp. 1-22 in International Law and Domestic Legal Systems, Incorporation, Transformation, and Persuasion, edited by Dinah Shelton. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Slaughter, Anne-Marie, Andrew S. Tulumello, and Stepan Wood. 1998. International Law and International Relations Theory: A New Generation of Interdisciplinary Scholarship. The American Journal of International Law 92: 367-397.

Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2005. A New World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Steinitz, Maya. 2013. Transnational Legal Process Theories. Pp. 339-356 in Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication, edited by Cesare P. R. Romano, Karen J. Alter, and Yuval Shany. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Sunstein, Cass R. 1990. After the Rights Revolution: Reconceiving the Regulatory State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wu, Chuan-Feng. 2014. Tobacco Control in Taiwan. Pp. 279-301 in The Global Tobacco Epidemic and the Law, edited by Andrew D. Mitchell and Tania Voon. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.