研究生: |
林奇洲 Robert Lin |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
友訊科技的選擇:品牌或代工? |
指導教授: | 洪世章 |
口試委員: | |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
科技管理學院 - 高階經營管理碩士在職專班 Executive Master of Business Administration(EMBA) |
論文出版年: | 2005 |
畢業學年度: | 93 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 158 |
中文關鍵詞: | 策略 、品牌業務 、代工業務 、雙主軸 |
外文關鍵詞: | Strategy, OMB, ODM/OEM, Dual-Axis Strategy |
相關次數: | 點閱:1 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本論文以台灣最大的網路通信製造商-友訊科技為研究標的,探討個案公司從1986年創立至2003年期間,經歷了四個重要的階段,(1)從專注經營品牌業務附帶少量經營白牌業務、(2)專注品牌經營之外,透過國外代工客戶的協助,精進研發管理與能力,並提昇製造水準、(3)代工機會大量到來時,進行變革以抓住另一個擴大代工事業版圖的機會,並透過雙主軸策略的執行與落實,同時兼顧品牌業務與代工業務的發展、(4)因應內、外部變化,對雙主軸策略進行調整;最後,因為品牌與代工業務相互產生負面的影響:代工客戶對於同一組織之下運作的品牌業務有戒心與深深的疑慮,造成代工事業發展的瓶頸;而策略性外包的配合廠商,對於代工部門的虎視眈眈,也造成配合上的問題,使得外購產品的長遠發展受到嚴重影響;加上內部人員對於同時兼顧品牌與代工業務也有衝突。在這些難題的影響下,發生的兩難的情況;時序推進到2003年2月,公司經營階層必須要對於這樣的內、外部衝突,與影響未來成長與發展的難題:品牌或代工?做出釜底抽薪的策略更動,進一步謀求個案公司的長治久安與永續經營。本研究採用個案研究法,探討個案公司的發展歷程與最後發生的難題,並對個案公司進行一些分析與總結。
This paper analyzes the No.1 Networking manufacturer in Taiwan - D-Link Corporation. D-Link was founded in 1986, from 1986 to 2003, D-Link went through four important stages (1). Focus on developing D-Link OBM (Ordnance Bench Mark) business with few non-brand businesses, (2). Focus on D-Link OBM business, at the same time, leveraging the capabilities and expertise of ODM/OEM clients to assist D-Link in improving the Product Development and Management System, and Quality Control System on production, (3). When ODM/OEM opportunities was booming since 1995, D-Link started changing its core mindset and system in order to gain more growth from ODM/OEM business, and utilized the Dual-Axis strategy to catch both OBM business and ODM/OEM business, (4). D-Link modified the Dual-Axis strategy to adopt more and more challenges from internal and external environment. Finally, conflicts were likely to break out between the OMB and ODM/OEM: ODM/OEM clients had serious concern because OBM was doing better and better, so this serious concern caused ODM/OEM department had bottleneck to gain more growth, and the Strategic Outsourcing Partners had serious concern as well because D-Link ODM/OEM department had strong R&D capability to take over their business, so this situation would damage D-Link OBM at the same time. Furthermore, employees had critical problems because there were mindset and process conflict between OBM and ODM/ODM process and nature. It became to a dilemma to D-Link for keeping both OBM and ODM/OEM under one organization. Feb. 2003, top management team had to take action to deal with this crisis from external and internal right away. OMB or ODM/OEM? Create new sustainable strategy rather than the Dual-Axis Strategy? This paper adopts case study methodology to analyze the evolution of D-Link Corporation and the dilemma that was happened to the company in the end, and have some analyses and conclusions.
1. 友訊科技公司,1999年7月1日,八十七年年報。
2. 友訊科技公司,2001年5月8日,八十九年年報。
3. 友訊科技公司,2002年5月10日,九十年年報。
4. 友訊科技公司,2003年4月25日,九十一年年報。
5. 友訊科技公司,2004年5月12日,九十二年年報。
6. 台灣證卷交易所,2000年,改進上市(櫃)制度及上市(櫃)後管理制度問答集。
7. 吳美瑋,1998年5月19日,「友訊挑戰75億元營業額」,電子時報。
8. 明泰科技公司,2003年11月18日,公開說明書。
9. 柳中岡,1997年5月14日,談友訊營運的革新做法。(公司內部同仁溝通文件)
10. 柴方文,1998年8月7日,「專業就是致勝之道」,資訊傳真週刊。
11. 高次軒,2003年3月10日,有關OEM事業之分割。(公司內部同仁溝通文件)
12. 陳慧玲,2002年8月20日,「董事長高次軒運籌帷幄 全球品牌業務總監高鶴軒領軍招兵買馬D-Link品牌火力全開 友訊高層親掌舵記」,電子時報。
13. 智邦科技,1999年6月28日,八十七年年報。
14. 智邦科技,2001年8月20日,八十九年年報。
15. 智邦科技,2002年5月23日,九十年年報。
16. 權福生,2002,台灣區域網路產業供應商轉型實務研究-以友訊科技為例,交通大學碩士論文。
17. Amit, R. and Schoemaker, P. J. H. 1993. “Strategic assets and organizational rent”, Strategic Management Journal, 14: 33-46.
18. Barney, J. B. 1991. “Company reaources and sustained competitive advantage”, Journal of Management, 17: 99-120.
19. Berman, S. L., Down, J., and Hill, C. W. L. 2002. “Tacit knowledge as a source of competitive adgantage in the national basketball association”, Academy of Management Journal, 45(1):13-33.
20. Besanko D., Dranove, D., and Shanley, M. 1996. Economics of Strategy. New York: Wiley.
21. Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A. 1990. “Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation”, Admoinistrative Science Quarterly, 35: 128-152.
22. Crosby, P. N. 1980. Quality Is Free. NewYork: Mentor.
23. Cusumano, M. 1989. The Japan Automobile Industry. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
24. Charles, F. 1998. Clockspeed: Winning Industry Control in the Age of Temporary Advantage. Reading, Mass.: Perseus Books.
25. Gabor, A. 1990. The Man Who Discovered Quality. New York: Times Books.
26. Garvin, D. 1984. “What does product quality really mean”, Sloan Management Review, 26: 25-44.
27. Ghemawat, P. 1991. Commitment: The Dynamic of Strategy.New York: Free Press.
28. Hamel, G. and Prahalad, C. K. 2004. Competing for the Future: Breakthrough Strategies for Seizing Control of Your Industry and Creating the Markets of Tomorrow. Beren and UCC Copyright Convention.
29. Hannah, M. T. and Freeman, J. 1984. “Structural inertia and organizational change”, American Sociological Review, 49: 149-164.
30. Hill, C. W. L. and Jones, G. R. 2004. Stragetic Management Theory. (6th ed) Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Publishing.
31. Kampas, P. J. 2003. “Shifting cultural gears in technology-driven industries”, MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(2): 41-48.
32. Kotter, J. P. and Heskett, J. L. 1992. Corporate Culture and Performance. New York: The Free Press.
33. Mahoney, J. T. and Pandian, J. R. 1992. “The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management”, Strategic Management Journal, 13: 63-380.
34. Mansfield, E. 1981. “How economists see R&D”, Harvard Business Review (November-Decemer): 98-106.
35. Peteraf, M. A. 1993. “The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view”, Strategic Management Journal, 14: 179-191.
36. Reed, R. and DeFillippi, R. J. 1990. “Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and stainable competitive advantage”, Academy of Management Review, 15: 88-102.
37. Breyer, R. and Riley, S. 1999. Switched, Fast, and Gigabit Ethernet. (3rd ed.) Indianapolis, IN: Macmillan Technical Publishing.
38. Simchi-Levi, D., Kaminsky, P. and Simchi-Levi, E. 2003. Designing and Managing the Supply Chain. McGraw-Hill.Smircich, L. 1983. “Concepts of culture and organizational analysis”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 28: 339-358.
40. Spear, S. and Bowen, H. K. 1999. “Decoding the DNA and the Toyota production system”, Harvard Business Review, (September-October): 96-108.
41. Stalk, G. and Hout, T. M. 1990. Competing Against Time. New York: Free Press.
42. Yin, R. K. 1994. Case Study Research, Design and Methods. (2nd ed.) Newbury Park: Sage Publications.