科技演變對綠色產品策略之影響｜國立清華大學博碩士論文庫

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表

研究生：	王麗雅 Wang, Liya
論文名稱：	科技演變對綠色產品策略之影響 The impact of technology evolution on green product strategies
指導教授：	蘇哲平
口試委員:
學位類別：	碩士 Master
系所名稱：	工學院 - 工業工程與工程管理學系 Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management
論文出版年：	2009
畢業學年度：	97
語文別：	英文
論文頁數：	173
中文關鍵詞：	耐用產品、綠色供應鏈、科技演變、市場架構、產品上市策略
外文關鍵詞：	durable products, green supply chain, technology evolution, market structure, the timing of introduction strategy
相關次數：	點閱：1 下載：0
分享至:	分享至facebook 分享至twitter

查詢本校圖書館目錄查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統勘誤回報

隨著環保議題越來越受世人重視，以往產品汰換速率極快的消費性產品為了環保及法規等相關因素，從產品定位、政府規範、到產品上市策略等都必須重新審視。雖然綠色產品對環境有利，但仍有不少消費者不願付出較高的價格購買較環保的產品，且綠色產品伴隨而來的高成本也令廠商對推出綠色產品裹足不前。
本研究首先利用數學模型決定最佳的價格、功能品質(functional quality)以追求利潤最大化，並探討廠商在什麼情境下願意發展成本相對較高，但是可使用較久的耐用性產品。
本文研究當提升傳統品質(traditional quality)與環保品質(environmental quality)的成本是互相衝突(Zero-sum)或是相得益彰(Synergy)其中一種情境時對綠色產品策略的影響。
在傳統品質與環保品質對不同消費群有不同效益的前提下，本研究利用數學模型決定最佳的價格、傳統品質、與環保品質以追求利潤最大化，我們也探討政府是否應該輔助廠商發展相關技術，在提高環保品質的同時也兼顧傳統品質。
此外，環保產品的上市策略可由推出的產品數與上市時機(timing of introduction)兩方面來探討。首先，在產品數方面，我們探討在什麼情況下廠商會提供不同的產品給不同的客戶群以達到市場區隔 (Market Segmentation)的目的；在什麼情況下廠商則採取單一產品（Mass Marketing）策略，即僅生產一種產品給所有客戶群。並討論政府對環保品質的規範如何影響這兩種策略的選擇。同時，我們也研究廠商在何種情況下將採用同時上市(Simultaneous Introduction)策略，即在同一時期同時推出高階與低階產品，以及何種情況下將採用高低階產品前後兩期分別上市（Sequential Introduction）策略。

Due to the rising awareness of environmental protection and stringent regulations, the ability to manage environmental friendly or so called green product become an important and competitive advantage.
In this paper, we develop the mathematical models to decide the optimal price and functional quality to maximize profit. The closed form solutions are found, and we derive the conditions under which manufacturers are willing to offer durable products which can last for two periods.
We also study how two technologies, Zero-Sum and Synergy, impact the green product strategy such as how the green product is positioned, the impact of government regulation, and the timing of introductions. Zero-sum means that the improvement of environmental quality comes at a cost of decreasing traditional quality. On the other hand, Synergy indicates the technology which can improve environmental and traditional quality at the same time.
We develop mathematical models to decide the optimal price, traditional quality, and environmental quality to maximize profit. IWe explore the conditions when the company adopts Market Segmentation strategy which two products are offered to two different market segments, or Mass Marketing strategy in which only one product is offered. We also discuss the effects of government regulations on the strategies and whether the government should subsidize the development of Synergy technology.
We also study how technology impacts the strategy of green product introduction. If two products are offered, should company adopt simultaneous introduction strategy in which two products are introduced at the same time, or sequential introduction strategy where the two products are introduced sequentially.

摘要    i
ABSTRACT    ii
致謝辭    iii
Chapter 1 Introductions    1
Chapter 2 Literature Review    5
2.1 The durable products    5
2.2. Market Structure    5
2.3 The introduction of new products    7
Chapter 3 Problem Definition    10
3.1 Durable Products    10
3.2 Market Structure    11
3.3 Timing of Introductions    13
Chapter 4 Models    15
4.1 Durable Products    15
4.1.1 Durable Product    15
4.1.2 Ordinary Product    16
4.2 Market Structure    19
4.2.1 The Mass Marketing strategy    19
4.2.2 The Market Segmentation strategy    21
4.3 Timing of Introduction    25
4.3.1Commitment    25
4.3.2Not Commitment    35
Chapter 5 Discussions    43
5.1 Durable products    43
5.2 The market structure    50
5.2.1 The incentives for Market Segmentation    50
5.4The timing of introductions    67
5.4.1 Commitment    67
5.4.2Not Commitment    84
5.4.3 Discussion    98
Chapter 6 Conclusions    100
Reference    102
Appendix A.1    104
Appendix A.2    106
Appendix A.3    109
Appendix A.4    110
Appendix A.5    111
Appendix A.6    112
Appendix A.7    113
Appendix A.8    114
Appendix A.9    115
Appendix A.10    116
Appendix A.11    117
Appendix A.12    118
Appendix A.13    119
Appendix B.1    120
Appendix B.2    122
Appendix B.3    124
Appendix B.4    127
Appendix B.5    130
Appendix B.6    131
Appendix B.7    132
Appendix B.8    133
Appendix B.9    134
Appendix B.10    135
Appendix B.11    136
Appendix B.12    137
Appendix B.13    140
Appendix B.14    141
Appendix B.15    142
Appendix B.16    145
Appendix B.17    148
Appendix B.18    151
Appendix B.19    154
Appendix B.20    155
Appendix C.1    156
Appendix C.2    157
Appendix C.3    158
Appendix C.4    161
Appendix C.5    164
Appendix C.6    167
Appendix C.7    170
Appendix C.8    172

                                

[1] Kai-Uwe KÜhn, Intertemporal Price Discrimination in Frictionless Durable Goods Monopolies. The journal of Industrial Economics,1998. 46:101-114
[2] Panagiotis Kouvelis and Samar K.Mukhopadhyay, Modeling the Design Quality Competition for Durable Products. IIE Transactions, 1999. 31: p. 865-880.
[3] Cheryl T.Druehl, Glen M.Schmidt, and Gilvan C.Souza, The Optimal Pace of Product Updates. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009. 192: p. 621-633.
[4] Laurens G.Debo, L. Beril Toktay, and Luk N. Van Wassenhove, Market Segmentation and Product Technology Selection for Remanufacturable Products. Management Science, 2005. 51: p. 1193-1205.
[5] Mark E.Ferguson, and L. Beril Toktay, The Effect of Competition on Recovery Strategies. Production and Operations Management, 2006. 15: p. 351-368.
[6] David Besanko and Wayne L. Winston, Optimal Price Skimming by a Monopolist Facing Rational Consumers. Management Science, 1990. 36: p. 555-567.
[7] Jinn-Tsair Teng and Gerald L. Thompson, Optimal strategies for general price-quality decision models of new products with learning production costs European Journal of Operational Research, 1996. 93: p. 476-489.
[8] Chialin Chen, Design for the Environment: A quality-based model for green product development. Management Science, 2001. 47: p. 250-263.
[9] Kilsun Kim and Dilip Chhajed, Product Design with Multiple Quality-Type Attributes. Management Science, 2002. 48: p. 1502-1511.
[10] Michael S.Pangburn and Euthemia Stavrulaki, Capacity and Price Setting for Dispersed, Time-sensitive Customer Segments. European Journal of Operational Research, 2008. 184: p. 1100-1121.
[11] Lynn O.Wilson and John A. Norton, Optimal Entry Timing for a Product Line Extension. Marketing Science, 1989. 8: p. 1-17.
[12] K. Sridhar Moorthy and I.P.L. PNG, Market Segmentation, Cannibalization, and the Timing of Product Introductions. Management Science, 1992. 38: p. 345-359.
[13] Laura J.Kornish, Pricing for a Durable-Goods Monopolist under Rapid Sequential Innovation. Management Science, 2001. 47: p. 1552-1564.
[14] Gilvan C.Souza, Product introduction decisions in a duopoly. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004. 152: p. 745-757.
[15] Sanjiv Erat and Stylianos Kavadias, Introduction of New Technologies to Competing Industrial Customers. Management Science, 2006. 52: p. 1675-1688.

全文公開日期本全文未授權公開 (校內網路)
全文公開日期本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

相關論文