研究生: |
余璧安 Yu, Pi-An |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
所得不均、所得重分配與經濟成長:兼論政體制度之角色 Inequality, Redistribution and Growth: The Role of Political Institution |
指導教授: |
蔡攀龍
Tsai, Pan-Long |
口試委員: |
黃朝熙
Huang, Chao-Hsi 劉文獻 Liu, Wen-Hsien |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
科技管理學院 - 經濟學系 Department of Economics |
論文出版年: | 2014 |
畢業學年度: | 103 |
語文別: | 英文 |
論文頁數: | 43 |
中文關鍵詞: | 所得不均 、所得重分配 、經濟成長 、吉尼係數 、政體制度 、民主政體 |
外文關鍵詞: | inequality, redistribution, growth rate, Gini coefficient, political institution, democracy |
相關次數: | 點閱:2 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
近二、三十年來,經濟學家主要致力於討論所得不均和經濟成長之間的影響關係。早期的學者主要研究庫茲涅茨倒U曲線,此倒U曲線是為探討經濟成長對於所得不均的影響關係;然而,近期研究將此兩因素的探討關係作對調,是為探討所得不均對於經濟成長是否存在顯著的影響。此外,所得重分配政策亦在此所得不均與經濟成長關係中扮演一影響要素,但在之前較少研究涉及此方面。因此,在此篇研究中不僅探討所得不均的影響關係,亦討論所得重分配對於經濟成長的影響,另外也兼論政體制度所扮演的角色。此研究主要的結果如下:壹、所得不均對於經濟成長有負面顯著的影響效果,而所得重分配是為正面顯著的影響效果。貳、在民主政體中所得不均(所得重分配)對於經濟成長為負面(正面)顯著的影響效果;然而在獨裁政體中僅有所得不均為負面顯著影響效果。參、當加入時間變數以控制景氣波動,發現主要的結果並無太大的改變,表示此研究結果是穩建的。
The relations between income inequality and economic growth have long been discussed by economists. While the Kuznets inverted-U used to be the focus of the discussions, in recent years there is an evident trend toward investigating whether inequality retards economic growth. The redistributive policy is also an important element in the inequality-growth nexus, but it is less touched in the existing literature. As a result, I simultaneously study the impact of income inequality and income redistribution on economic growth in this thesis. Most importantly, a country’s political institution is taken into account in the analysis, given that the political institution might play an important role in determining the impact of income inequality, redistribution, on economic growth. The major findings of this thesis are: (1) In general, income inequality has a negative impact on economic growth while redistribution has positive influence on economic growth. (2) In democratic countries inequality (redistribution) is negatively (positively) and significantly associated with economic growth; however, in autocratic countries only inequality has negative and significant impact on growth. (3) There are no significant changes in the main results when various time dummy variables are added to control the fluctuations from business cycles.
[1] Acemoglu, D. and J. A. Robinson, 2000, “Why Did the West Extend the Franchise? Democracy, Inequality, and Growth in Historical Perspective,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(4): 1167-1199.
[2] Barro, R. J., 2000, “Inequality and Growth in a Panel of Countries,” Journal of Economic Growth, 5(1): 5–32.
[3] Barro, R. J., 2008, “Inequality and Growth Revisited,” Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration No. 11, Manila: Asian Development Bank.
[4] Deininger, K. and L. Squire, 1998, “New Ways of Looking at old Issues: Inequality and Growth,” Journal of Development Economics, 57: 259-287.
[5] Feenstra, R. C., R. Inklaar and M. P. Timmer, 2015, “The Next Generation of the Penn World Table” forthcoming American Economic Review, available for download at www.ggdc.net/pwt
[6] Heston, A., R. Summers and B. Aten, 2013, Penn World Table Version 8.0, Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices at the University of Pennsylvania, available for download at www.ggdc.net/pwt
[7] Kuznets, S., 1955, “Economic Growth and Income Inequality,” American Economic Review, 45(1): 1-28.
[8] Kaldor, N., 1957, “A Model of Economic Growth,” The Economic Journal, 67(268): 591–624.
[9] Meltzer, A. H. and S. F. Richard, 1981, “A Rational Theory of the Size of Government,” Journal of Political Economy, 89: 914-997.
[10] Neves, P. C. and S. T. Silva, 2010, “Inequality and Growth: Uncovering the main conclusions from the empirics,” FEP Working Paper, No. 381.
[11] Ostry, J. D., A. Berg and C. G. Tsangarides, 2014, “Redistribution, Inequality, and Growth,” IMF Staff Discussion Note, SDN/14/02, International Monetary Fund.
[12] Okun, A. M., 1975, Equality and Efficiency: the Big Trade-Off, Washington: Brookings Institution Press.
[13] Persson, T. and G. Tabellini, 1994, “Is Inequality Harmful for Growth?” American Economic Review, 84(3): 600–621.
[14] Polity IV, 2014, Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800-2014.
[15] Saint-Paul, G. and T. Verdier, 1993, “Education, Democracy and Growth,”Journal of Development Economics, 42(2): 399–407.
[16] Solt, F., 2009, “Standardizing the World Income Inequality Database,” Social Science Quarterly, 90(2): 231-242.
[17] Solt, F., 2014, “The Standardized World Income Inequality Database,” Working paper, SWIID Version 4.1.
[18] World Bank, 2013, World Development Indicators, available for download at http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators