近年來液晶顯示器產業快速發展之下，企業為求生存，需要不斷地投資建廠。建廠速度與生產，成為液晶產業關注的焦點。而選擇一項自動化搬運系統，關係著工廠能否順利生產的關鍵。本研究以分析網路程序法（Analytic Network Process ，ANP）整合群體決策流程，在效益、成本、風險，三種策略考量之下，進行自動化搬運系統的評選。透過實證分析可以了解，以分析網路程序法結合其軟體Super Decision 來協助專家小組進行評選，可以了解決策目標的多層面與相互依賴的問題，其建構評選模式，可提供業界參考。

With the fast Development of the liquid-crystal display industry in recent years, enterprises striving for their survivals need to invest unceasingly to build factories. The build up speed and productivity of the factories become a focal point of the liquid-crystal display industry. Therefore, Selection of an automatic transporting system is definitely a key factor for smooth production. This research uses analytic network process (ANP) and group decision process to evaluate automatic transporting systems using benefit, cost and risk as fundamental factors. Analysis of a real case implementation demonstrated that ANP in association with the use of Super Decision software can effectively facilitate efficient team evaluation and inlaid the interrelated factor armory the multitude of decision criteria. The model for system selection can be reused for future applications.

1.Wilson, E.J., “The Relative Importance of Suppliers Selection Criteria: a Review and Update”, Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Vol.30, No.3, 35-41, 1994.
2.Dickson, G.W. ”An Analysis of Vendor Selection Systems and Decisions”, Journal of Purchasing, Vol.2, No.1, 5-17, 1966.
3.Weber, C.A., Current, J.R., Benton, W.C. ”Vendor Selection Criteria and Methods”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.50, 2-18, 1991.
4.Weber, C.A., Current, J.R., Benton, W.C.,”A Multi-objective Approach to Vendor Selection”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.68, 173-184, 1993.
5.Muralidharan, C., Ananthaaraman, N., Deshmukh, S.G.,”A multi-Criteria Group Decision-making Model for Supplier Rating”, Journal of Supply Chain Management, 38, 4, 22-33, 2002.
6.Hwang, C.L., Lin, M.J. ”Group Decision Making under Multiple Criteria: Methods and Applications: A State of the Art Survey”, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, (164), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1987.
7.Iz, P., Gardiner, R.L. ”Analysis of Multiple Criteria Decision Support Systems for Cooperative Groups”, Group Decision and Negotiation, (2:1), 61-79, 1993.
8.Matsatsinis, N.E., Samaras, A.P.,”MCDA and Preference Desegregation in Group Decision Support Systems”, European Journal of Operational Research, (130), 414-429, 2001.
9.Guitouni, A., Martel, J-M. ”Tentative Guidelines to Help Choosing an Appropriate MDCA Method”, European Journal of Operational Research, (109), 501-521, 1998.
10.Cook, W.D., Kress, M. ”Ordinal Ranking with Intensity of Preference”, Management Science, (31), 26-32, 1985.
11.Ali, I., Cook, W.D., Kress, M., “Ordinal Ranking and Intensity of Preference: A Linear Programming Approach”, Management Science, (32), 1642-1647, 1986.
12.Beck, M.P., Lin, B.W. ”Some Heuristics for the Consensus Ranking Problem”, Computers and Operations Research, (10:1), 1-7, 1983.
13.Aczel, J., Saaty, T.L.,”Procedures for Synthesizing Ratio Judgments”, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, (27), 93-102, 1983.
14.Ray, T., Triantaphylious, E., “Evaluation of Ranking with Regard to the Possible Number of Agreements and Conflicts”, European Journal of Operational Research,
15.Cook, W.D., Kress, M.,”A Multiple Criteria Decision Model with Ordinal Preference Data”, Management Science, (54), 191-198, 1991.
16.Iz, P., Belasis, M.T. “An Interactive Group Decision Aid for Multiobjective Problems: An Empirical Assessment”, Omega, (18:6), 595-604, 1990.
17.Islei, G., Lockett, A.G., “Group Decision Making: Suppositions and Practices”, Socio Economic Planning Sciences, (25:1), 67-81, 1991.
18.Saaty, T.L.,” The Analytic Hierarchy Process”, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980.
19.Saaty, T.L., “Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: the Analytic Network Process”, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, 1996.
20.Tom Feglar，Jason K. Levy “Dynamic analytic network process: improving decision support for information and communication technology “ ，ISAHP 2005， Honolulu, Hawaii, July 8-10, 2003.
21.Tom feglar，Jason K. Levy “ The BOCR and Business Rules Motivation model “ ，ISAHP2005，Honolulu,Hawaii,July 8-10,2003.
22.Kochoke Poonikom, Christopher O’Brien and Chuvej Chansa-ngavej “An Application of the Analytic Network Process (ANP) for University Select Decisions”, Science Application, 2004.
23.Majid Azizi, Mohammad Modarres “A Strategic Model for Location Selection of Wood Industry: An Application of ANP”, Journal of Applied Sciences, 2007.
24.Saaty, T.L.,” Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process: Decision Making with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs, and Risks”, RWS Publication, Pittsburgh, 2001.
25.http://www.superdecisions.com/
26.紀岱玲，「應用網絡分析程序選擇委外協力廠商」，國立政治大學資訊管理系碩士論文，2006。
27.陳文雄，「應用網絡分析程序選擇委外協力廠商」，國立交通大學工業工程與管理學系碩士論文，2007。
28.林家豪，營造廠現場管理人力配置之研究，國立台灣科技大學營建工程系碩士論文，2002。
29.許淑瑜，企業資源規劃（ERP）系統評選之研究應用分析網路程序法（ANP），淡江大學資訊管理學系碩士論文，2000。
30.陳俞如，建構一個策略性績效評估模型以提昇公司競爭優勢之研究，國立彰化師範大學商業教育學系碩士論文，2000。
31.黃雪晴，國內資訊電子業聯盟夥伴選擇模式之研究，國立成功大學工業管理學系碩士論文，1999。
32.陳虹遐，「應用分析網路程序法於液晶電視之生態效益評估」，國立成功大學工業設計學系研究所碩士論文，2004 。
33.黃仲龍, “LCD自動化設備製程與原理簡介”, 工研院IEK系統能源組, 2004.