簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 楊春榮
Yang, Chun-Jung
論文名稱: Mapping Applicatives in Taiwan Southern Min: A View from Cartography
以製圖理論談閩南語施用結構
指導教授: 蔡維天
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan
口試委員: 蔡維天
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan
曹逢甫
Tsao, Feng-Fu
楊中玉
Yang, Chung-Yu Barry
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 人文社會學院 - 語言學研究所
Institute of Linguistics
論文出版年: 2011
畢業學年度: 99
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 101
中文關鍵詞: 施用結構多重施用結構施用論元製圖理論閩南語
外文關鍵詞: Applicative construction, Multiple applicative construction, Applied argument, Cartographic Approach, Taiwan Southern Min
相關次數: 點閱:2下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • This thesis aims to identify and map out the applicative construction in Taiwan Southern Min from the cartographic viewpoint, and further to specify the syntactic structure of multiple applicative constructions. In Taiwan Southern Min, applicatives are of two types. One is characterized by the applicative marker ka, introducing the applied argument, while the other is expressed without any marker, where the applied argument does not have any overt introducer. Following Tsai’s (2010) analysis of Mandarin applicatives, I propose that Taiwan Southern Min applicative constructions can be divided into three types, namely, high applicatives, middle applicatives, and low applicatives, each corresponding to CP, vP, and VP, respectively. Moreover, Taiwan Southern Min also exhibits multiple applicative constructions in which two or even three single applicatives are combined together. Three restrictions need to be strictly observed. First, the first element must be a ka-marked construal. Second, no semantic conflict takes place. Third, no competition for one single slot between two applicatives merged at the same place occurs.


    在此論文中,主要架構的核心在於探討閩南語中的施用結構 (Applicative construction),並且從製圖理論 (Cartographic Approach) 的角度來描繪施用結構的句法層級。此外,又更進一步去分析閩南語多重施用結構 (Multiple applicative construction) 的句法架構。在閩南語中,施用結構的表現方式分為兩種:第一種是透過顯性的施用標記ka (Applicative marker) 來引介施用論元 (Applied argument)。另一種表現則呈現無標的結構,亦即施用論元前並無顯性的引介者。在本篇論文,我採用Tsai (2010) 國語施用結構的分析,提出閩南語的施用結構可分為三種類型—高階施用結構、中階施用結構以及低階施用結構,每一種類型分別對應到句法結構的CP層次、vP層次以及VP層次。除此之外,在閩南語中也發現存有多重施用結構,也就是說有兩個或甚至三個單一施用結構相結合所組合而成,但這樣組合必須遵守三個限制。第一是多重施用結構的第一個成份必須是一個有標的施用結構。第二是不能產生語意衝突 (Semantic conflict)。第三則是不能有兩個單一施用結構同時競爭一個句法位置的現象發生。

    Chinese Abstract i English Abstract ii Acknowledgement iii Table of Contents iv CHAPTER 1. Introdcution 1 CHAPTER 2. Previous Studies on Applicative Constructions 4 2.1 Setting the Stage 4 2.2 Literature Review on Applicative Constructions 8 2.2.1 Baker (1988) 8 2.2.2 Marantz (1993) 9 2.2.3 Pylkkänen (2000, 2002) 10 2.2.4 McGinnis (2001) 14 2.2.5 Mai (2007) 17 2.2.6 Tsai (2010) 19 2.3 Methodology and Some Problems 23 CHAPTER 3. Topography of Applicatives in Taiwan Southern Min 26 3.1 Introduction 26 3.2 The Syntactic Role of Ka 26 3.3 Categorization of Applicatives in Taiwan Southern Min 29 3.3.1 An Overview 29 3.3.2 Applicatives in the Left Periphery 31 3.3.2.1 Applicativity Tests 31 3.3.2.2 Peripheral Properties of High Applicatives 37 3.3.2.3 Topography of High Applicatives 41 3.3.3 Applicatives at the Edge of vP 44 3.3.3.1 Middle Benefactive/Goal Applicatives 44 3.3.3.2 Middle Affective Applicatives 52 3.3.3.3 Topography of Middle Applicatives 59 3.3.4 Applicatives in the VP Shell 64 3.4 Some Contrasts between Taiwan Southern Min and Mandarin Chinese 68 3.5 Interim Summary 74 CHAPTER 4. Multiple Applicatives in Taiwan Southern Min 76 4.1 Introduction 76 4.2 Possible Combinations of Multiple Applicatives in Taiwan Southern Min 77 4.2.1 Applicatives Formed by a High Affective and a Middle Benefactive 81 4.2.2 Applicatives Formed by a High Affective and an Unmarked Middle Affective 84 4.2.3 Applicatives Formed by a High Affective and a Marked Middle Affective 86 4.2.4 Applicatives Formed by a High Affective and a Low Benefactive 88 4.2.5 Applicatives Formed by a Middle Benefactive and a Low Benefactive 90 4.2.6 Applicatives Formed by a Marked Middle Affective and a Low Benefactive 92 4.3 Interim Summary 94 CHAPTER 5. Concluding Remarks 96 References 98

    鄭縈、曹逢甫. 1995. 閩南語「ka」用法之間的關係. 《台灣閩南語論文集》. 頁23-46.
    曹逢甫. 2003. 台灣閩南語的Ka7字句. 載戴昭銘主編《漢語方言語法研究和探索—首屆國際漢語方言語法學術研討會論文集》,頁114-136. 黑龍江人民出版社.
    曹逢甫. 2005. 台灣閩南語的Ka7與賓語的前置. 《漢語學報》2005年第1期:21-30.
    蔡維天、鍾叡逸. 2010. 談論元的引介策略—以客語蒙受結構為例. 紀念朱德熙教授誕辰90週年和慶祝陸儉明教授從教50週年國際學術研討會,北京大學,2010年8月.
    Bresnan, Joan and Lioba Moshi. 1990. Object Asymmetries in Comparative Bantu Syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 21: 147-186.
    Baker, Mark. 1988. Incorporation. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
    ¬¬¬Baker, Mark. 1997. Thematic Roles and Syntactic Structure. In Elements of Grammar, ed. L. Haegeman, 73-137. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
    Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts/London.
    Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. Michael Kenstowicz, 1-52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Cheng, Lisa L.-S., C.-T. James Huang, Y.-H. Audrey Li and C.-C. Jane Tang. 1996. Hoo, Hoo, Hoo: Syntax of the Causative, Dative, and Passive Constructions in Taiwanese. Ms.
    Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Cuervo, M. 2003. Datives at Large. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.
    Chung, Jui-Yi. 2007. A Comparative Study of Affective Construction: A Case on Mandarin Chinese and Hakka. M.A. Thesis, National Tsing Hua University.
    Chen, Yu-Tzu. 2008. A Non-unified Analysis of Taiwanese ka Construction. M.A. These, National Chiao Tung University.
    Hung, Su-Jen. 1995. A Study of the Taiwanese Preposition KA and its Corresponding Mandarin Prepositions. M.A. Thesis, National Tsing Hua University.
    Harley, Heidi. 2002. Possession and the double object construction. Yearbook of Linguistic Variation 2: 29-68.
    Hole, Daniel. 2006. Extra Argumentality – Affectees, Landmarks, and Voice. Linguistics 44: 383-424.
    Jeong, Y. 2006. The Landscape of Applicatives. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.
    Ko, Heejeong. 2005. Syntax of why-in-situ: Merge into [Spec, CP] in the overt syntax. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23(4): 867-916.
    Li, Audrey Y.-H. 2001. The ba construction. Ms.
    Lin, Tzong-Hong Jonah. 2001. Light Verb Syntax and the Theory of Phrase Structure. Ph.D. Dissertation, UC Irvine.
    Marantz, Alec. 1984. On the nature of grammatical relation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Machobane, Malillo. 1989. Some restrictions of transitivizing morphemes in Sesotho. Ph.D. Dissertation, McGill University, Montréal.
    Marantz, Alec. 1993. Implications of Asymmetries in Double Object Constructions. In Theoretical aspects of Bantu grammar, ed. Sam. Mchomobo, 113-150. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
    McGinnis, Martha. 2000. Phases and the syntax of applicatives. In Proceedings of NELS 31, eds. Min-Joo Kim and Uri Strauss, 333-349. GLSA Publications, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
    McGinnis, Martha. 2001. Variation in the Phase Structure of Applicatives. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 1: 105-146.
    McGinnis, Martha, and Donna B. Gerdts. 2003. A Phase-theoretic Analysis of Kinyarwanda Multiple Applicatives. In Proceedings of the 2003 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association, ed. Sophie Burelle and Stanca Somesfalean, 154-165. Départment de linguistique et de didactique des langues, Université du Québec à Montréal.
    Mai, Hsin-Yi. 2007. Applicative Construction in Taiwanese Southern Min. M.A. Thesis, National Tsing Hua University.
    Pylkkänen, Liina. 2000. What Applicative Heads Apply To. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium. U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 6.4.
    Pylkkänen, Liina. 2002. Introducing Arguments. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
    Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized Minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, ed. L. Haegeman, 281-338. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
    Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 1999. The Hows of Why and The Whys of How. In Francesca Del Gobbo and Hidehito Hoshi (eds.), UCI Working Papers in Linguistics 5, 155-184.
    Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 2005. Causality, Comitativity, Contrastivity, and Selfhood. Paper presented in the 3rd Theoretical East Asian Languages Workshop, Harvard University.
    Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 2006. Lectures on the Syntax and Semantics of How and Why. Nanzan Consortium.
    Tsai, W.-T. Dylan, Shengli Feng, and C.-T. James Huang. 2008. On the Origin of Chinese Affective Constructions. Paper presented in The Past Meets the Present: A Dialogue between Historical Linguistics and Theoretical Linguistics, Academia Sinica, Taiwan.
    Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 2010a. EPP as a Topic Feature: Evidence from Chinese Applicatives and Reflexive Adverbials. Paper presented in FOSS-7, Academia Sinica, Taiwan.
    Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 2010b. High Applicatives are not High Enough: A Cartographic Solution. Ms., National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan.
    Yang, Chung-Yu Barry. 2006. Syntactic Structure of Ka-construction in Taiwanese Southern Min. USTWPL 2: 141-171.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)

    QR CODE