研究生: |
蕭惠尤 Hsiang Hui Yu |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
結合即時反饋系統之同儕學習教學模式對國小四年級學童自然與生活科技領域學習風險承擔之影響 The effects of 'IRS plus PI' teaching method on the forth grader students' IRT in the subject of science and living technology |
指導教授: |
許春峰 博士
Shey Chung Feng |
口試委員: | |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
|
論文出版年: | 2011 |
畢業學年度: | 99 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 125 |
中文關鍵詞: | 學習風險承擔 、同儕教學 、即時反饋系統 |
外文關鍵詞: | Intellectual Risk Taking, Peer Instruction, Interactive Response System |
相關次數: | 點閱:1 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究目的在探討結合即時反饋系統(Interactive Response System, IRS)之同儕教學法(Peer Instruction, PI)和僅使用IRS的教學法,對於國小四年級學童學習風險承擔( Intellectual Risk Taking, IRT)之影響。採不相等控制組設計,以台中市某國小四年級學童兩個班共56人為研究樣本,其中一個班級為IRS+PI組(29人),另一個班為IRS組(27人)。IRS+PI組接受為期九週的IRS+PI教學法,IRS組則使用IRS為教學輔具的教學法。教學介入前一週,兩組學生均接受研究者自編之「學習風險承擔量表」前測,並於實驗教學結束後於一週內進行後測。另外亦將對本校四年級其他班級進行「學習風險承擔量表」前、後測,以當作為實驗結果對照之用。
研究結果發現:
一、 結合IRS之同儕教學法及僅使用IRS的教學法應用於自然與生活科技領域教學有助於提升學生之學習風險承擔意願,其教學結果顯著優於傳統教學。
二、 結合IRS之同儕教學法與僅使用IRS教學法對提升學生在自然與生活科技領域學習風險承擔未達顯著差異。
三、 不論以結合IRS之同儕教學法或僅使用IRS的教學法應用於自然與生活科技領域教學,使用同一種教學模式對於男、女生及低、中、高學習成就學生之間未達顯著差異。
A pretest-posttest quasi-experimental study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of Interactive Response System (IRS) combined with Peer Instruction (PI) (IRS+PI), and only using IRS in promoting the Intellectual Risk Taking (IRT) of elementary school students. The subjects were six fourth-grade classes. There were 29 students in the IRS+PI class, 27 students in the IRS class, and the other four classes were taught using the traditional method (no IRS or PI, n=115). All classes were taught during the intervention period lasting nine weeks altogether. All the samples were conducted pre- and post-IRT-test.
The main findings of the study are as follows:
1. Both the IRS+PI and the IRS teaching method increased the fourth grade students’ willingness to take intellectual risk when learning science.
2. There were no significant difference on students’ IRT between the IRS+PI and the IRS class.
3. Both teaching methods had no significant difference between males and females in the class, and had no significant difference among high, middle, and low level groups in the class.
中文部分
王緒溢、梁仁楷、劉子鍵、柯華葳、陳德懷、黃智偉(2001)。應用教室內之高互動教學環境設計─無線測驗系統與網路教學資訊管理系統之整合應用(教育部補助研究計劃,編號 89-H-FA07-1-4)。桃園縣:台灣中央大學。
田運虹(2001)。國小學童家庭社經地位、挫折容忍力與違規行為之關係。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義市。
吳金蓮(1989)。同儕個別教學對國中英語低成就學生輔導效果之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版。
吳康寧(1993)。課堂教學中的角色類別及主要特徵。南京師大學報,3,20-30。
呂素幸(1991)。同儕輔導對國小學生數學學習輔導效果之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版。
林怡貞(1994)。國中生的教師期望、歸因型態、失敗容忍力與失敗反應關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
林明美(1997)。小兵也可以立大功-談同儕輔導。學生輔導,52,62-67。
林淑美(1994)。目標設定、失敗容忍力、歸因型態與失敗反應的關係。國立政治大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
俞明宏(2006)。小學科學教室中運用無線回應輔具進行同儕教學之研究。國立交通大學理學院網路學習學程碩士班碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。
紀杏姿(2004)。建設性思考之班級輔導課程增進國小學同挫折容忍力之研究。國立花蓮師範學院輔導碩士班碩士論文,未出版,花蓮市。
國立編譯館主編(2000)。教育大辭書〈三〉。台北:文景。
康淳惠(2006)。國中資優生挫折容忍力及其相關因素之探討。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系所研究所碩士論文,未出版,彰化市。
康嘉玲(2007)。人事智能取向情意教學方案對國小四年級學童挫折容忍力之影響。國立台南大學教育學系課程與教學碩士班碩士論文。未出版,台南市。
張春興(2001)。教育心理學。台北:東華。
張瓊文(2001)。同儕教導對國小聽覺障礙國語文學習成效之研究。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所碩士論文,未發表,嘉義。
許永熹(1997)。同儕輔導的功能及兩種方案模式。學生輔導,52,43-51。
陳玉芬、俞明宏、呂昀真、梁仁楷、王緒溢(2008,5月)。在小學三年級自然課使用Clicker的教育理論基礎與成效。林秋斌教授(主持),行動與無所不在學習環境的建置及應用。第三屆行動與無所不在數位學習研討會,台南市 。
黃美凰(2007)。同儕教導對護理技能學習之成效研究─以身體評估課程為例。人文社會科學研究,1 (1),50-71。
黃善美(2003)。同儕師徒制輔助教學策略之個案研究。國立臺東教育大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
黃善美(2004)。國小運用「同儕師徒制」輔助教學策略探析。網路社會學通訊期刊,40。
黃琳惠(2009)。同儕教學對提升低閱讀能力兒童閱讀理解之研究。國立台北教育大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
黃湘武(1980)皮亞傑認知心理學與科學教育。科學教育雙月刊,37,12-17。
葉兆祺、張麗雲(2006)。國中生物科同儕學習輔導成效─一個行動研究。國民教育研究集刊,15,205-224。
賈惠文(2003)。同儕個別教學對國小英語低學習成就學生字母拼讀學習成就及學習態度影響之研究。國立台北師範學院兒童英語教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
廖純雅(2005)。嘉義市國小高年級學童知覺父母教養方式與挫折容忍力之相關研究。國立嘉義大學家庭教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義市。
趙金祁、許榮富、黃芳裕(1994):當今通識教育理念賦予科學教育的新功能。科學教育月刊,171期,頁2-11。
歐陽誾、朱南旭(2007)。高雄市國小學童電腦網路學習的使用意願及其相關影響因素之探討。TANET2007台灣網際網路論文集(二),TrackI-中小學網路教學與數位學習。http://210.240.189.212/dctelearning/type_resources/01_papers/9612_digital_papers//1_chinese/BIT095103/
蔡淑玲(1998)。一位自閉症兒童在融合教育政策實施下的狀況。台灣師範大學家政教育研究所碩士論文,台北市。
謝毓雯(1998)。青少年挫折經驗與挫折容忍度之間關係研究:建設性思考與社會支持的角色。國立政治大學心理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
魏麗敏(1997)。同儕輔導的理論與實務。學生輔導,52,52-61。
羅俊男(2004)。國小中年級自然與生活科技領域實施小組式同儕教學之研究。國立臺南大學教師在職進修自然碩士學位班碩士論文,未出版。
二、英文部分
Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64, 359-372.
Atkinson, J. W. (1964). An introduction to motivation. Princeyon, NJ: Van Nostrand.
Atkinson, J. W., & Birch, D. (1978). The Dynamics of action. New York: Wiley.
Atkinson, J. W., & Raynor, J. O. (1974). Motivation and achievement. NewYork: Wiley.
Beghetto, A. (2009). Correlates of Intellectual Risk Taking in Elementary School Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46 ( 2 ) , 210-223.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bruner, J. S. (1985). Vygotsky: a historical and conceptual perspective. In Wertsch, J. V. (ED.). Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives(p.21-34). NY: Cambridge University Press.
Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D., & Schafer, W. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 367-383.
Clifford, M. M. (1984).Thoughts on a theory of constructive failure. Educational Psychologist, 19, 108-120.
Clifford, M. M. (1986). The comparative effects of strategy and effort attributions. British Journal of Educational Psychologist, 56, 75-83.
Clifford, M. M. (1988).Failure tolerance and academic risk in ten to twelve year-old students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 15-27.
Clifford, M. M. (1991). Risk taking:theoretical, empirical, and educational consideration. Educational Psychologist, 26, 263-297.
Clifford, M. M., Chou, F. C., Mao, K., & Lan, W. Y. (1990). Academic risk taking, development, and external constraint. Journal of Experimental Education, 59, 45-64.
Clifford, M. M., Lan, W. Y., Chou, F. C., & Qi, Y. (1989). Academic risk- taking: Development and cross-cultural observations. Journal of Experimental Education, 57, 321-338.
Cutrim, E. S. (2008). Using a Voting System in Conjunction with Interactive Whiteboard Technology to Enhance Learning in the English Languuage Classroom. Computers & Education, 50 (1), 338-355.
Slain, D., Abate, M., Hodges, B.M., Stamatakis, M. K., & Wolak, S. (2004). An Interactive Response System to Promote Active Learning in the Doctor of Pharmacy Curriculum. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education,68 (5) Article 117.
Edward, W. (1953). Probability-preferences in gambling. American Journal of Psychology, 66, 349-364.
Ehly, S., & Larsen, S. (1980). Peer tutoring for individualized instruction. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Flavell, J. H. (1963).The Developmental psychology of Jean Piaget, D. Van Nostrand Company, 1963.
Fischer, K. W. (1980). Learning as the development of organized behavior. Journal of Structural Learning, 3, 253-267.
Harter, S. (1978). Pleasure derived from challenge and the effects of receiving grades on children’s difficulty level choices. Child Development, 49, 788-799.
Jones, E. E., & Berglas, S. (1978). Control of attributions about the self through self-handicapping strategies. The appeal of alcohol and the role of underachievement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 200-206.
Judson, E., & Sawada, D. (2002). Learning from past and present: Electronic response systems in college lecture halls. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 21(2), 167-181.
Kogan, N., & Wallach, M. A. (1967). Risk taking as a function of the situation, the person and the group. In Mandler, G., Mussen, P., Kagon, N., & Wallach, M. A. (Eds.), New directions in psychology (Vol. 3, pp.111~278). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Kuhl, J. (1978) Standard setting and risk performance: An elaboration of the theory of achievement motivation and an empirical test. Psychological Review, 85, 239-248.
Kuhl, J., & Blankenship, V. (1979). Behavioral change in a constant environment: Shift to more difficult tasks with constant probability of success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 551-563.
Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., Spence, J. C., Poulsen, C., Chambers, B., & d’Apollonia, S. (1996), Within-class grouping: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, (66) ,423-458.
Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: Getting students to think in class. In Redish, E. F., & Ridgen, J. S. (Eds.), The changing role of physics departments in modern university. Proceedings of ICUPE. (pp.981-987). New York: American Institute of Physics.
Meyer, W. U., Folkes, V. S., & Weiner, B. (1976). The perceived informational value and affective consequences of choice behavior and intermediate difficulty task selection. Journal of Research in Personality, 10, 410-423.
Nussbuaum, J. (1989). Classroom conceptual change: philosophical perspectives. International Journal of Science Education, 11(5), 530-554.
Ravner, C. (1991). Vygotsky’s sociohistorical psychology and its contemporary applications. New York: Plenum.
Sachs, P. R. (1982). Avoidance of diagnostic information in self-evaluation of ability. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 242-246.
Schneider, K., & Posse, N. (1982). Risk taking in achievement-oriented situations: Do people really maximize affect or competence information? Motivation and Emotion, 6, 259-271.
Snyder, M. L., Stephan, W. G., & Rosenfield, D. A. (1978). Attributional egotism. In Harvey, J. H., Ickes, W., & Kidd, R. F. (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 2, pp. 91-117). Hillsdale, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Strube, M. J., Lott, C. L., Le-Xuan-Hy, G. M., Oxenberg, J., & Deichmann, A. K. (1986). Self-evaluation of abilities: Accurate self-assessment versus biased self-enhancement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 16-25.
Strub, M. M., & Roemmele, L. A. (1985). Self-enhancement, self-assessment, and self-evaluative task choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 981-993.
Stuart, S. A. J., Brown, M. I., & Draper, S. W. (2004). Using an electronic voting system in logic lectures: one practitioner’s application. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 95-102.
Susan, V.Z., & Elaine, B. (2002).Unlocking peer potential for tutoring. Education Digest, 67(5), 44-45.
Trope, Y. (1975). Seeking information about one’s own ability as a determinant of choices among tasks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 1004-1013.
Trope, Y. (1980). Self-assessment, self-enhancement, and task preference. Journal of Experiment Social Psychology, 16, 116-129.
Tsai, C. C., & Huang, C. M. (2002). Exploring students’ cognitive structures in learning science: A review of relevant methods. Journal of Biological Education, 36, 163-169.
Topping, K. (2000). Tutoring. Educational Practices Series-5. (ERIC Reproduction Service No. ED 447111).
Topping, K., & Ehly, S. (1998). Peer-assisted learning. Mahwah, NJ: London, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Van der Veer, R., & Valsiner, J. (1991). Understanding Vygotsky: A quest for syntgesis. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
Vaughn, S., Elbaum, B., Schumm, J. S., & Hughes, M. T. (1998) . Social outcomes for students with and without Learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities; 29, 598-608.
Weiner, B. (1980). Human motivation. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Weiner, B., Frieze, I., Kukla, A., Reed, L., Rest, S., & Rosebaum, R. M. (1971). Perceiving the causes of success and failure. In Jones, E. E., Kanouse, D., Kelly, H. H., Nisbett, R. E., Valins, S., & Weiner, B. (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 95-135). Morristown, NY: General Learning Press.