知識的原創與應用在產學合作研究中扮演十分重要的角色，產學合作研究在執行時，有效運用學術界知識原創與應用的能力，有助於目標之達成，進而提升產學合作研究績效。由於產學合作相關的課題，在實務方面日益重要，因此在學術上亦被視為重要課題。產學合作之研究依過去學者的研究方向多數在討論哪些政策面或制度面的因素會影響學術研究成果商業化，但卻鮮少有研究針對研究人員本身，探究其知識原創與應用能力兩者對產學合作研究績效之影響，因此值得深入探討。
本研究的目的是探討知識原創與應用、產學合作研究計畫性質與產學合作研究績效之間的關係。研究結果顯示研究人員之知識原創能力與產學合作研究績效有正向關係，而研究人員知識應用能力與應用型之產學合作研究計畫的交互作用對於產學合作研究績效會產生正向影響。本研究也發現學術研究人員執行產學合作研究計畫時，並非要同時兼顧知識原創與應用二項能力才能提升績效，而是要擇一專注於其中一項能力。

Abramson, H. N., Encarnacao, J., Reid, P. P., & Schmoch, U. 1997. Technology Transfer Systems in the United States and Germany: Lessons and Perspectives. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Aiken, L. S. & West, S. G. 1991. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting interactions. Newbury Park CA: Sage.
Altlan, T. 1987. Bring Together Industry and University Engineering Schools. Getting More Out for R&D and Technology, The Conference Board, Research Report No. 904.
Amit, R. & Schoemaker, P. J. H. 1993. Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14(1): 33-46.
Attuahene-Gima, K. & Ko, A. 2001. An empirical investigation of the effect of market orientation and entrepreneurship orientation alignment on product innovation. Organization Science, 12(1): 54-74.
Atuahene-Gima, K. & Murray, J. Y. 2007. Exploratory and exploitative learning in new product development: A social capital perspective on new technology ventures in China. Journal of International Marketing, 15(2): 1-29.
Azaroff, L. V. 1982. Industry-university collaboration: How to make it work. Research Management, 25(3): 31-34.
Barnes, T., Pashby, I., & Gibbons, A. 2002. Effective university-industry interaction: A multi-case evaluation of collaborative R&D projects. European Management Journal, 20(3): 272-285.
Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99-120.
Beckman, C. M. 2006. The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4): 741-758.
Beckman, C. M., Haunschild, P. R., & Phillips, D. J. 2004. Friends or strangers? Firm-specific uncertainty, market uncertainty, and network partner selection. Organization Science, 15(3): 259-275.
Bekkers, R. & Bodas Freitas, I. M. 2010. Catalysts and Barriers: Factors that Affect the Performance of University-Industry Collaborations. Conference paper International Schumpeter Society Conference 2010.
Bierly, P. E., Damanpour, F., & Santoro, M. D. 2009. The Application of External Knowledge: Organizational Conditions for Exploration and Exploitation. Journal of Management Studies, 46(3): 481-509.
Bishop, K., D'Este, P., & Neely, A. 2011. Gaining from interactions with universities: Multiple methods for nurturing absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 40(1): 30-40.
Blumenthal, D., Campbell, E. G., Causino, N., & Louis, K. S. 1996. Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry. New England Journal of Medicine, 335(23): 1734-1739.
Bonaccorsi, A., Daraio, C., & Simar, L. 2006. Advanced indicators of productivity of universities. An application of robust nonparametric methods to Italian data. Scientometrics, 66(2): 389-410.
Bonaccorsi, A. & Piccaluga, A. 1994. A theoretical framework for the evaluation of university-industry relationships. R&D Management, 24(3): 229-247.
Bozeman, B. & Corley, E. 2004. Scientists' collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33(4): 599-616.
Brown, S. L. & Eisenhardt, K. M. 1997. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1): 1-34.
Bruhn, J. G. 1995. Beyond discipline: Creating a culture for interdisciplinary research. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science, 30(4): 331-341.
Bruneel, J., D'Este, P., & Salter, A. 2010. Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university-industry collaboration. Research Policy, 39(7): 858-868.
Burgelman, R. A. & Grove, A. S. 2007. Let chaos reign, then rein in chaos-repeatedly: Managing strategic dynamics for corporate longevity. Strategic Management Journal, 28(10): 965-979.
Caldera, A. & Debande, O. 2010. Performance of Spanish universities in technology transfer: An empirical analysis. Research Policy, 39(9): 1160-1173.
Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., & Zhang, H. P. 2009. Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organization Science, 20(4): 781-796.
Christensen, C. M. & Overdorf, M. 2000. Meeting the challenge of disruptive innovation. Harvard Business Review, 78(2): 66-76.
Cohen, W. M. & Levinthal, D. A. 1990. Absorptive capacity; a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 128-152.
Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. 2002. Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48(1): 1-23.
Collis, D. J. & Montgomery, C. A. 1995. Competing on resources. Harvard Business Review, 73(4): 118-128.
Collis, D. J. & Montgomery, C. A. 1998. Creating corporate advantage. Harvard Business Review, 76(3): 70-83.
Conner, K. R. & Prahalad, C. K. 1996. A resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism. Organization Science, 7(5): 477-501.
Cordis 2000. Getting More Innovation from Public Research. Innovation policy: Studies.
Crespi, G., D'Este, P., Fontana, R., & Geuna, A. 2011. The impact of academic patenting on university research and its transfer. Research Policy, 40(1): 55-68.
Cyert, R. M. & Goodman, P. S. 1997. Creating effective university-industry alliances: An organizational learning perspective. Organizational Dynamics, 25(4): 45-57.
D'Este, P. & Patel, P. 2007. University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Research Policy, 36(9): 1295-1313.
Dasgupta, P. & David, P. A. 1987. Information disclosure and the economics of science and technology. In Feiwel, G. R., Arrow and the Ascent of Modern Economic Theory, 519-542. New York: NY University Press.
Davenport, S., Davies, J., & Grimes, C. 1999. Collaborative research programmes: building trust from difference. Technovation, 19(1): 31-40.
Debackere, K. & Veugelers, R. 2005. The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links. Research Policy, 34(3): 321-342.
Di Gregorio, D. & Shane, S. 2003. Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? Research Policy, 32(2): 209-227.
Dosi, G. 2000. Innovation, Organization and Economic Dynamics: Selected Essays. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Drucker, P. F. 1993. Post Capitalist Society. New York: HarperBusiness.
European Commission. 2000. Trends in European Innovation Policy and the Climate for Innovation in the Union. EC Working Paper SEC 1564. European Commission.
Fabrizio, K. R. & Di Minin, A. 2008. Commercializing the laboratory: Faculty patenting and the open science environment. Research Policy, 37(5): 914-931.
Faulkner, W. & Senker, J. 1994. Making sense of diversity: public-private sector research linkage in three technologies. Research Policy, 23(6): 673-695.
Feldman, M. P. & Florida, R. 1994. The geographic sources of innovation- technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United-States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 84(2): 210-229.
Florida, R. 1995. Toward the learning region. Futures, 27(5): 527-536.
Florida, R. 1999. The role of the university, leveraging talent not technology. Issues on Science and Technology, 15(4): 67-73.
Florida, R. & Cohen, W. M. 1999. Engine or infrastructure? The university role in economic development. In Branscomb, L. M., Kodama, F., & Florida, R., Industrializing Knowledge: University-Industry Linkages in Japan and the United States, 589-610. London: MIT Press.
Freddi, D. 2009. The integration of old and new technological paradigms in low- and medium-tech sectors: The case of mechatronics. Research Policy, 38(3): 548-558.
Freeman, C. 1987. Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.
Freeman, C. 1994. The economics of technical change. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 18(5): 463-514.
George, G., Zahra, S. A., & Wood, D. R. 2002. The effects of business-university alliances on innovative output and financial performance: a study of publicly traded biotechnology companies. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(6): 577-609.
Gibbons, M. & Johnston, R. D. 1974. The roles of science in technological innovation. Research Policy, 3(3): 220-242.
Gilsing, V., Nooteboom, B., Vanhaverbeke, W., Duysters, G., & van den Oord, A. 2008. Network embeddedness and the exploration of novel technologies: Technological distance, betweenness centrality and density. Research Policy, 37(10): 1717-1731.
Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine Publishing Company.
Grant, R. M. 1996. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue): 109-122.
Grant, R. M. & Baden-Fuller, C. 2004. A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management Studies, 41(1): 61-84.
Groysberg, B. & Lee, L. E. 2009. Hiring Stars and Their Colleagues: Exploration and Exploitation in Professional Service Firms. Organization Science, 20(4): 740-758.
Gulbrandsen, M. & Smeby, J. C. 2005. Industry funding and university professors' research performance. Research Policy, 34(6): 932-950.
Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. 2006. The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4): 693-706.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. 1998. Multivariate Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hall, B. H. 2004. University-Industry Research Partnerships in the United States. EUI Working Paper ECO N° 2004/14.
Hall, B. H., Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. 2001. Barriers inhibiting industry from partnering with universities: evidence from the advanced technology program. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1-2): 87-98.
He, Z. L. & Wong, P. K. 2004. Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4): 481-494.
Howells, J., James, A., & Malik, K. 2003. The sourcing of technological knowledge: distributed innovation processes and dynamic change. R&D Management, 33(4): 395-409.
Huang, K. G. & Murray, F. E. 2009. Does patent strategy shape the long-run supply of public knowledge? Evidence from human genetics. Academy of Management Journal, 52(6): 1193-1221.
Hurmelinna, P. 2004. Motivations and Barriers Related to University-Industry Collaboration - Appropriability and the Principle fo Publicity. Seminar on Innovation, UC Berkeley.
Im, G. Y. & Rai, A. 2008. Knowledge sharing ambidexterity in long-term interorganizational relationships. Management Science, 54(7): 1281-1296.
Jiang, X. & Li, Y. 2009. An empirical investigation of knowledge management and innovative performance: The case of alliances. Research Policy, 38(2): 358-368.
Johnson, W. H. A. & Johnston, D. A. 2004. Organisational knowledge creating processes and the performance of university-industry collaborative R&D projects. International Journal of Technology Management, 27(1): 93-114.
Katila, R. & Ahuja, G. 2002. Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6): 1183-1194.
Kim, N. & Atuahene-Gima, K. 2010. Using exploratory and exploitative market learning for new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(4): 519-536.
Kyriakopoulos, K. & Moorman, C. 2004. Tradeoffs in marketing exploitation and exploration strategies: The overlooked role of market orientation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(3): 219-240.
Landry, R. & Amara, N. 1998. The impact of transaction costs on the institutional structuration of collaborative academic research. Research Policy, 27(9): 901-913.
Laukkanen, M. 2003. Exploring academic entrepreneurship: drivers and tensions of university-based business. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 10(4): 372-382.
Lavie, D. & Rosenkopf, L. 2006. Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4): 797-818.
Leonard-Barton, D. 1995. Wellsprings of Knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Levinthal, D. A. & March, J. G. 1993. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(Winter Special Issue): 95-112.
Lin, Z., Yang, H. B., & Demirkan, I. 2007. The performance consequences of ambidexterity in strategic alliance formations: Empirical investigation and computational theorizing. Management Science, 53(10): 1645-1658.
Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. 2006. Ambidexterity and performance in small- to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32(5): 646-672.
Lundvall, B.-Å. 1992. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter.
Luo, Y. D. 2002. Capability exploitation and building in a foreign market: Implications for multinational enterprises. Organization Science, 13(1): 48-63.
Mahoney, J. T. & Pandian, J. R. 1992. The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 13(5): 363-380.
Mansfield, E. 1991. Academic research and industrial innovation. Research Policy, 20(1): 1-12.
March, J. G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1): 71-87.
Markman, G. D., Gianiodis, P. T., & Buchholtz, A. K. 2009. Factor market rivalry. Academy of Management Review, 34(3): 423-441.
Menguc, B. & Auh, S. 2008. The asymmetric moderating role of market orientation on the ambidexterity-firm performance relationship for prospectors and defenders. Industrial Marketing Management, 37(4): 455-470.
Meyer-Krahmer, F. & Schmoch, U. 1998. Science-based technologies: University-industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy, 27(8): 835-851.
Milgrom, P., Qian, Y. Y., & Roberts, J. 1991. Complementarities, momentum, and the evolution of modern manufacturing. American Economic Review, 81(2): 84-88.
Milgrom, P. & Roberts, J. 1990. The economics of modern manufacturing: technology, strategy, and organization. American Economic Review, 80(3): 511-528.
Mom, T. J. M., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. 2007. Investigating managers' exploration and exploitation activities: The influence of top-down, bottom-up, and horizontal knowledge inflows. Journal of Management Studies, 44(6): 910-931.
Motohashi, K. 2005. University-industry collaborations in Japan: The role of new technology-based firms in transforming the national innovation system. Research Policy, 34(5): 583-594.
Mowery, D. C. & Nelson, R. R. 1999. Sources of Industrial Leadership. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R., Sampat, B. N., & Ziedonis, A. A. 2004. Ivory Tower and Industrial Innovation. University-Industry Technology Transfer Before and After the Bayh-Dole Act. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
Nelson, R. R. 1991. Why do firms differ, and how does it matter? Strategic Management Journal, 12(S2): 61-74.
Nelson, R. R. 1993. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nelson, R. R. & Rosenberg, N. 1993. Technical innovation and national systems. In Nelson, R. R., National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, 3-21. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nemanich, L. A. & Vera, D. 2009. Transformational leadership and ambidexterity in the context of an acquisition. Leadership Quarterly, 20(1): 19-33.
Nerkar, A. 2003. Old is gold? The value of temporal exploration in the creation of new knowledge. Management Science, 49(2): 211-229.
Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. 1995. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
OECD. 1996. The Knowledge-Based Economy. OECD STI-Report. France: OECD.
OECD. 1999. University Research in Transition. OECD STI-Report. France: OECD.
OECD. 2003. Promoting Better Public-Private Partnerships: Industry-University Relations. Business and Industry Advisory Committee to the OECD paper. OECD.
OECD. 2004. Science, Technology and Industry Outlook. Paris: OECD.
Owen-Smith, J. & Powell, W. W. 2001. To patent or not: Faculty decisions and institutional success at technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1-2): 99-114.
Penrose, E. T. 1959. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY.
Perkmann, M. & Walsh, K. 2007. How firms source knowledge from universities: Partnerships versus contracting (forthcoming). In Bessant, J., & Venables, T. (Eds.), Creating Wealth from Knowledge, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Perkmann, M. & Walsh, K. 2008. Engaging the scholar: Three types of academic consulting and their impact on universities and industry. Research Policy, 37(10): 1884-1891.
Peteraf, M. A. 1993. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3): 179-191.
Porter, M. E. 1996. What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, 74(6): 61-78.
Powell, W. W. 1998. Learning from collaboration: Knowledge and networks in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. California Management Review, 40(3): 228-240.
Powers, J. B. & McDougall, P. P. 2005. University start-up formation and technology licensing with firms that go public: A resource-based view of academic entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(3): 291-311.
Rappert, B., Webster, A., & Charles, D. 1999. Making sense of diversity and reluctance: academic-industrial relations and intellectual property. Research Policy, 28(8): 873-890.
Romer, P. 1993. Ideas and things. The Economist, 11 September: 70-72.
Rosenberg, N. & Nelson, R. R. 1994. American universities and technical advance in industry. Research Policy, 23(3): 323-348.
Rosengrant, S. & Lampe, D. R. 1992. Route 128: Lessons from Boston's High-Tech Community. New York Harper Collins, Basic Books.
Rosenkopf, L. & Nerkar, A. 2001. Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22(4): 287-306.
Rothaermel, F. T. & Alexandre, M. T. 2009. Ambidexterity in technology sourcing: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Organization Science, 20(4): 759-780.
Rothaermel, F. T. & Deeds, D. L. 2004. Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 25(3): 201-221.
Salter, A. J. & Martin, B. R. 2001. The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review. Research Policy, 30(3): 509-532.
Santoro, M. D. & Chakrabarti, A. K. 2002. Firm size and technology centrality in industry-university interactions. Research Policy, 31(7): 1163-1180.
Saxenian, A. 1994. Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Schartinger, D., Rammer, C., Fischer, M. M., & Frohlich, J. 2002. Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: Sectoral patterns and determinants. Research Policy, 31(3): 303-328.
Schildt, H. A., Maula, M. V. J., & Keil, T. 2005. Explorative and exploitative learning from external corporate ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4): 493-515.
Sidhu, J. S., Commandeur, H. R., & Volberda, H. W. 2007. The multifaceted nature of exploration and exploitation: Value of supply, demand, and spatial search for innovation. Organization Science, 18(1): 20-38.
Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. 2003. Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: Improving the effectiveness of university-industry collaboration. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14(1): 111-133.
Smith, W. K. & Tushman, M. L. 2005. Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16(5): 522-536.
Spender, J. C. 1992. Limits to learning from the west: How western management advice may prove limited in eastern Europe. The International Executive, 34(5): 389-410.
Spender, J. C. & Grant, R. M. 1996. Knowledge and the firm: Overview. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue): 5-9.
Taylor, S. J. & Bogdan, R. 1984. Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: The Search for Meanings. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Teece, D. J. 1986. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for intergration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6): 285-305.
Uotila, J., Maula, M., Keil, T., & Zahra, S. A. 2009. Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: Analysis of S&P 500 corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 30(2): 221-231.
Utterback, J. M. 1994. Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation: How Companies Can Seize Opportunities in the Face of Technological Change. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
Van Looy, B., Ranga, M., Callaert, J., Debackere, K., & Zimmermann, E. 2004. Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect? Research Policy, 33(3): 425-441.
Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2): 171-180.
Wernerfelt, B. 1995. The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after. Strategic Management Journal, 16(3): 171-174.
Wong, S. S. 2004. Distal and local group learning: Performance trade-offs and tensions. Organization Science, 15(6): 645-656.
Wu, F. S. 2005. University-Industry Linkage - the Case of Taiwan. OECD Report, Taiwan R.O.C.
Yalcinkaya, G., Calantone, R. J., & Griffith, D. A. 2007. An examination of exploration and exploitation capabilities: Implications for product innovation and market performance. Journal of International Marketing, 15(4): 63-93.
Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E., & Sapienza, H. J. 2001. Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7): 587-613.
Zahra, S. A. & George, G. 2002. Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2): 185-203.