研究生: |
呂科論 Lu, Ko-Lun |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
不同款式籃球襪之足底壓力與運動學比較 Comparison of Foot Pressure and Kinematics of Different Styles of Basketball Socks |
指導教授: |
邱文信
Chiu, Wen-Hsin |
口試委員: |
許維君
Hsu, Wei-Chun 劉強 Liu, Chian |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
竹師教育學院 - 體育學系體育碩士在職專班 In-service Master Program of Physical Education |
論文出版年: | 2019 |
畢業學年度: | 107 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 33 |
中文關鍵詞: | 足底壓力 、踝關節角度 、屈膝垂直跳 |
外文關鍵詞: | Plantar pressure, Ankle angle, Knee flexion |
相關次數: | 點閱:2 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
目的:探討不同款式籃球襪之足底壓力與運動學比較,以做為日後襪子選擇及設計上之參考。方法:足底壓力使用DYNAFOOT 2足壓測量系統配合高速攝影擷取頻率為120Hz,時間為5秒,實驗者做屈膝垂直跳動作於落地時收集足底壓力資料匯出後,再以Microsoft office Excel軟體進行計算;踝關節角度使用反光球黏貼於小腿後方並利用探照燈照射,配合高速攝影機高速攝影機(CASIO EX-F1,300Hz)拍攝,使用Silicon COACH動作分析軟體進行分析,所產生的資料再以Microsoft office Excel軟體進行計算,採用相依樣本單因子變異數分析(Repeated measure ANOVA)進行統計考驗,顯著水準訂為α=.05。結果:如下:(一)三款籃球襪於前足區有達到顯著差異。(二)三款籃球襪踝關節角度無顯著差異。(三)在選手知覺的部分,T牌足壓感受、包覆性比其他兩款好,舒適度與透氣度N牌與M牌優於T牌。結論:M牌籃球襪在平均足底壓力的功能上明顯優於其他兩款籃球襪,而在踝關節角度上T牌在平均角度變化上小於其他兩款籃球襪;建議未來在選購專業籃球襪上,可朝這兩方面做為參考及選購的依據。
關鍵詞:足底壓力、踝關節角度、屈膝垂直跳
Introduction:To explore the comparison of foot pressure and kinematics of different styles of basketball socks, as a reference for future socks selection and design.Methods:The sole pressure is measured by the DYNAFOOT 2 full-pressure measurement system with high-speed camera capture frequency of 120 Hz and the time is 5 seconds. The experimenter performs the knee-bending vertical jump action to collect the foot pressure data after landing, and then use Microsoft Office Excel software. Calculation; the ankle joint angle is attached to the back of the calf using a reflective ball and illuminated by a searchlight. It is taken with a high-speed camera high-speed camera (CASIO EX-F1, 300Hz) and analyzed using the Silicon COACH motion analysis software. The generated data is then Microsoft Office Excel. The software was calculated and the statistical test was performed using the dependent sample ANOVA. The significant level was set to α=.05.Results:As follows: (1) Three basketball socks have achieved significant differences in the forefoot area. (2) There is no significant difference in the angles of the ankle joints of the three basketball socks. (3) In the part of the player's perception, the T-brand feels better than the other two, and the comfort and breathability are better than the T-brand.Conclusions:The M brand basketball socks are obviously superior to the other two basketball socks in the function of the average foot pressure, and the T card is smaller than the other two basketball socks in the angle of the ankle joint; it is recommended to purchase professional basketball socks in the future. Can be used as a reference and purchase basis for these two aspects.
Keywords:Plantar pressure, Ankle angle, Knee flexion
參考文獻
一、中文部分
汪旖文,陳家祥,李尹鑫(2013)。不同設計概念之襪子對自行車踩踏力量之分
析。屏東教大體育,16,1-8。
李宜芸(2013)。下床一踩地就足跟痛,我得了足底筋膜炎。健康雜誌,174。
蔣憶德(1997)。籃球運動的體能結構。大專體育,29,56-60
孫民治,張玉國,張雄(2008)。我國籃球職業聯賽引進外籍球員的多維思考。
武漢體育學院學報,42(12),66-70。
許太彥,柯柏任(2010)。從鞋子的構造及足底壓力淺談足底病變。台中教育大
學體育學系系刊,5,1-6。
曾莉雯、許維君、劉強、王翔星(2013)。運動緊身服飾對運動疲勞與促進恢復
之影響-系統性回顧。體育學報,46(4),309-318。
莊訓達、陳五洲(2000)。穿著厚底鞋對步態的影響。體育學報,28,315-328。
徐國峰、莊茗傑(譯)(2015)。 羅曼諾夫博士的姿勢跑法(原作者:N.L.
Romanov ,K. Brungardt)。台北市:臉譜出版社。
鍾祥賜(2002)。國小學童以不同負重方式與速度行走對足底壓力的影響。國立
台灣師範大學碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
張曉昀、李元淵、張耘齊 (2012)。肌內效貼紮在生物力學及運動表現之系統
性回顧。華人運動生物力學期刊,6,1-8。
蔡佳良、黃啟煌(2000)。「慣用腳」的謎思。中華體育, 13(4),14-21。
黃彥慈,邱文信(2008)。探討足底壓力之運用與展望。大專體育,97,146-153。
邱宏達、相子元、林桓正(1998)。市售鞋墊之足底壓力及避震功能分析。大專
體育,39,53-59。
汪旖雯、陳家祥、李尹鑫(2013)。不同設計概念之襪子對自行車踩踏力量之分
析。屏東教大體育,16,1-8。
劉秀玲(2005)。跑者常見運動傷害及處理原則。輔仁大學體育學刊,4,278-286。
相子元、邱宏達、楊文賓(1998)。鞋類功能測試儀器之比較。鞋技通訊,72,
75-78。
陳五洲、林逸錄(1999)。國內男青年走與跑之足底壓力分析。國立體育學院論叢,
10(1),189-204。
王思涵、陳振昇、陳景璿、蔚順華、楊雅雲、邱榮基(2012)。穿戴不同踝關節
護具在踝關節受力及穩定度之差異。大專體育學刊,14(4),458-466。
蔣至傑,王金城(1996)。跑鞋鞋底磨損程度與跑步速度對踝關節外翻角度之影
響。體育學報,27,117-126。
周明熙(2008)。射箭選手足底壓力分布之特徵。國立台灣體育大學碩士論文,
未出版,桃園縣。
劉秀玲(2005)。跑者常見運動傷害及處理原則。輔仁大學體育學刊,4,278-286。
二、英文部分
Scheffler,N.M.,(2001).All about socks.Diabetes Forecast,57,80-81
Okazaki, V. H. A., Rodacki, A. L. F., & Okazaki, F. H. A. (2007). Biomecânica do
arremesso de jump no basquetebol. Lecturas: Educacio´n Fı´sica y Deportes, 11(105), 1-13
Ball, K. A. (2011). Kinematic comparison of the preferred and non-preferred foot punt
kick. J Sports Sci, 29(14), 1545-1552.
Kevin, N. (2007). Socks Appeal: The technology of the athletic uniform for feet Coach
and Athletic Director 77 (3).
Barone, R., Macaluso, F., Traina, M., Leonardi, V.,Farina, F., & Di Felice, V. (2011).
Soccer players have a better standing balance in nondominantone-legged stance. Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, 2. doi:10.2147/OAJSM.S12593
KleiN, E. E., Crews, R. T., Wu, S. C., Wrobel, J. S., & ArMsTroNg, D.G.(2008).
CLEAR CleaT:A proof-of-CoNcepT Trial of aN Aerobic AcTiviTy FaciliTaTor To Reduce PlaNT ForefooT Pressures aNd Their PoTeNTial iN Those wiTh FooT Ulcers. JourNal of The AMericaN PodiaTric Medical AssociaTioN, 98(4), 261-267.
Lake, M. J. (2000). DeTerMiNiNg The proTecTive fuNcTioN of sporTs fooTwear.
ErgoNoMics, 43(10), 1610-1621.
Chew-Bullock, T. S., Anderson, D. I., Hamel, K. A.,Gorelick, M. L., Wallace, S. A., &
Sidaway,B. (2012). Kicking performance in relation tobalance ability over the support leg. Human Movement Science, 31(6), 1615-1623.
MaThesoN, G. O., MaciNTyre, J. G., TauNToN, J. E., CleMeNT, D.B., & Lloyd-
SMiTh,R.(1989). MusculoskeleTal iNjuries associaTed wiTh physical acTiviTy iN older adulTs. MediciNe aNd ScieNce iN SporT aNd Exercise, 21(4), 379-385.
Newton, R. U., Gerber, A., Nimphius, S., Shim, J.K., Doan, B. K., Robertson, M., ...
Kraemer, W.J. (2006). Determination of functional strengthimbalance of the lower extremities. The Journal ofStrength & Conditioning Research, 20(4), 971-977.
SNeyers, J. L., LyseNs, R., Feys, H., & ANdical, R. (1995). INflueNce of
MalaligMeNTof oN The plaNTar pressure paTTerN iN ruNNiNg. FooT & ANkel INTerNaTioNal, 16, 624-632.