簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 楊立婕
Yang, Li Chieh
論文名稱: 高中生之英語學習動機模式──從華人文化角度探討
An English Learning Motivation Model of Senior High Students in Taiwan—From Perspective of Chinese Psychology
指導教授: 陳舜文
Chen, Shun Wen
口試委員: 劉政宏
Liu, Cheng Hung
黃虹慈
Huang, Hung Tzu
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 清華學院 - 學習科學研究所
Institute of Learning Sciences
論文出版年: 2015
畢業學年度: 103
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 64
中文關鍵詞: 英語學習動機角色義務華人成就目標華人文化儒家文化
外文關鍵詞: English learning motivation, Chinese achievement goals, role obligation, Chinese psychology, Confucianism
相關次數: 點閱:2下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 台灣高中生為了什麼學習英文呢?為什麼許多學生對英文沒興趣卻還是時時刻刻努力背英文單字?由於全球化的影響,英語的地位與其他外語非常不同。再者,過去研究顯示,華人學習動機具有文化特殊性。台灣學生的外語學習動機與行為,難以完全從「外語學習動機自我系統」或「自我決定理論」等西方理論加以解釋。故本研究加入「華人成就目標理論架構」,以探討台灣高中生學習英語的動機與相關行為。本研究參與者為334位高中生(男168人,女156人)。研究採用問卷法,測量參與者各項英語學習動機、課內與課外英語學習投入程度,以及英語測驗成績。結構方程模式路徑分析結果顯示:(1)「文化興趣」只與「課外學習行為」呈正向關聯卻與「課內學習行為」無關聯。(2)「內在動機」正向預測「課外學習行為」與「課內學習行為」。(3)「學生義務」與「考試導向」皆正向預測「課內學習行為」。(4)「英語理想我」無法預測「課內學習行為」或「課外學習行為」。(5)「英語應然我」負向預測「課內學習行為」。(6)「課內學習行為」與「課外學習行為」皆正向預測「學業成績」。此結果再次驗證了學習動機的文化特殊性,同時亦展現出多元的英語學習動機。


    Why do senior high students in Taiwan learn English? How come many of them whoare not interested in English still try to memorize English vocabulary all the time? Due to globalization, the status of English becomes different from that of other languages. Moreover, according to the past studies of cultural psychology, the learning motivation of Chinese students isnot only universal but also culturally specific. Therefore, motivational self system of second language (L2), self-determination theory and some western theories may hardly explain Taiwanese students’ English learning motivations and behaviors. The present study adopted the perspectives of the theoretical framework of Chinese achievement goals to investigate high school students’ learning motivations of English. Scales were developed to measure multiple English learning motivations and learning behaviors of in- and out-class. Participants included 334 senior high students (168 males, 156 females) from 3 senior high schools. The results of path analysis indicated that (1) “cultural interest” waspositivelycorrelatedwith out-class learning behavior,butnotwithin-class learning behavior; (2) “intrinsic motivation” wasbothpositivelycorrelatedwithin-and out-class learning behavior;(3) “role obligation” and “exam orientation” were positively correlatedwith in-class learning behavior; (4) “ideal L2 self” could predict neither in- classnor out-class learning behavior; (5)“ought-to L2 self”wasnegativelycorrelatedwith in-class learning behavior, and(6) in-and out-class learning behaviorwere positively correlatedwith academic achievement. These results show that there are multiple English learning motivations among Taiwanese high school students and some motivations may be culturally salient.

    中文摘要.........................................................................................................................i 英文摘要........................................................................................................................ii 謝誌........................................................................................................................iii 目次..............................................................................................................................iv 表目次...........................................................................................................................v 圖目次...........................................................................................................................vi 第一章 研究動機與國內相關文獻回顧....................................................................1 第一節 研究動機....................................................................................................1 第二節 國內英語學習動機文獻回顧....................................................................2 第三節 小結............................................................................................................5 第二章 西方外語學習動機與華人學習動機理論....................................................7 第一節 外語學習動機與全球化──從社會文化觀點至自我定位......................7 第二節 自我決定理論..........................................................................................11 第三節 華人文化下的學習意義與學習動機......................................................13 第四節 本研究之假設與模式..............................................................................15 第三章 研究方法......................................................................................................19 第一節 參與者......................................................................................................19 第二節 研究工具..................................................................................................19 第三節 研究程序..................................................................................................24 第四章研究結果......................................................................................................26 第一節量表之信、效度檢驗..............................................................................26 第二節主要變項之描述統計..............................................................................31 第三節 結構方程模型分析..................................................................................32 第四節 小結..........................................................................................................36 第五章討論..............................................................................................................38 第一節 研究結果摘述......................................................................................38 第二節 研究結果討論......................................................................................39 第三節 本研究之限制以及對未來研究之建議..............................................44 參考文獻......................................................................................................................47 附錄一:施測問卷......................................................................................................60 附錄二:家長同意書..................................................................................................64

    王珩(2005):〈從ARCS模式探討英語學習動機之激發策略〉。《臺中教育大學學報》,19,89-100。[Wang, H. (2005). Research on Strategies for Stimulating the Motivation of English Learning-Using ARCS Model as a Framework. Journal of National Taichung University:Education, 19, 89-100.]
    王秋香(2010):《國中生對參加全民英檢的期望與英語學習動機之研究》。國立高雄師範大學教育所,碩士論文。[Wang, C. H. (2010). The Junior High School Students' Expectations of Participating in the GEPT and their Motivation to Learn English. Unpublished master’s thesis,National Kaohsiung Normal University. ]
    方婉鈺(2014):《互動式多媒體融入英語教學對國中生英語學習成效之研究》。國立高雄師範大學英語學系,碩士論文。[Fang, W. Y. (2014). The Effects of the Interactive Multimedia (IMM)-facilitated English Teaching on Junior High Students’ Learning Effectiveness. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University. ]
    毛國楠、劉政宏、彭淑玲、李維光、陳慧娟(2008):〈能力信念、學業自我價值後效與學業成就對國小學生學習動機與學習情緒之影響〉。《教育心理學報》,39(4),569-588。
    吳和典(2008):《高中生英語學習動機與其對英文老師教學行為之觀感》。國立交通大學英語教學研究所,碩士論文。[Wu, H. T. (2008). High School Students’ Motivational Orientations and their Views on Teachers’ Teaching Behviors. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chiao Tung University.]
    吳美齡(2007):《國中學習障礙學生英語學習動機與學習策略之相關性研究》。國立臺南大學特殊教育學系碩士班,碩士論文。[Wu, M. L. (2007). A Study on the Relationship Between English Learning Motivation and Learning Strategies of Students with Learning Disability in Junior High School. Unpublished master’s thesis, National University of Tainan. ]
    吳素卿(2012):〈以結構方程模式探討-高中生英語學習動機、學習策略使用與英語學習成就之研究〉。《英語文暨口筆譯學集刊》,9,159-190。[Wu, S. Q. (2012). Exploring Senior High School EFL Students' Motivation, Strategy Use, and English Achievement via Structural Equation Modeling. SPECTRUM: NCUE Studies in Language, Literature, T, 9, 159-190.]
    吳雨桑、林建平(2009):〈大學生英語學習環境、學習動機與學習策略的關係之研究〉。《臺北市立教育大學學報:教育類》,40 (2),181-222。[Wu, Y. S, &Lin, C. P. (2009). A Study of the Relationship among English Learning Environment, Learning Motivation and Learning Strategies of College Students. Journal of Taipei Municipal University of Education: Education,40(2), 181-222. ]
    余安邦、楊國樞(1991):〈成就動機本土化的省思〉。見楊中芳、高尚仁(主編):《中國人‧中國心─人格與社會篇》,頁201-290。台北:遠流。[Yu, A. B., & Yang, K. S. (1991). Cheng jiu dongji ben tu hua de xing si. In C. F. Yang & H. S. Kao (Eds.), Zhong guo ren, zhong guo xin -- Ren ge yu shehui pian (pp. 210-290). Taipei: Yuan Liou.]
    林震岩(2007):《多變量分析:SPSS的操作與應用》。台北:智勝文化。[Lin, Z. Y. (2007). Duobianliang fenxi: SPSS de caozuo yu yingyong. Taipei: Best-Wise.]
    張心慧(2005):《英文系學生語言學習內外在動機與語言學習策略之間關係之研究》。銘傳大學應用英語學系碩士班,碩士論文。[Chang, H. H. (2005). The Relationship between Extrinsic/Intrinsic Motivation and Language Learning Strategies among College Students of English in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, Ming Chuan University.]
    張春興(2007):《教育心理學:三化取向的理論與實踐》。台北:東華。[Zhang, C. X. (2007). Jiaoyu xinlixue: Sanhua quxiang de lilun yu shijian. Taipei: Tung-Hua.]
    黃光國(2004):〈儒家社會中的生活目標與角色義務〉。《本土心理學研究》,22,121-192。[Hwang, K. K. (2004). Life goals and role obligation in a Confucian society. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 22, 121-192.]
    黃光國(2011):〈含攝文化的心理學〉。《本土心理學研究》,6,79-110。[Hwang, K. K. (2011). On Culture-inclusive Psychology. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 6, 79-110.]
    陳其南(1987):〈儒家文化與傳統商人的職業倫理〉。《當代》,10,54-61。[Chen, C. N. (1987). Confucian culture and professional ethics of traditional
    merchants. Contemporary Monthly, 10, 54-61.]
    陳舜文(2005):《華人的社會目標與成就動機:以台灣大學生為例》。國立台灣大學心理學研究所,博士論文。[Chen, S. W. (2005). Chinese goals of achievement and motivations: The case of Taiwanese college students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, National Taiwan University, Taipei.]
    陳舜文、魏嘉瑩(2013):〈大學生學習動機之「雙因素模式」:學業認同與角色認同之功能〉。《中華心理學刊》,55 (1),1-15。[Chen, S. W., & Wei, C. Y. (2013). A Two-Factor Model of Learning Motivation for Chinese Undergraduates: On the Function of Academic Identity and Role Identity. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 55(1), 1-15. ]
    陳坤虎、雷庚玲、吳英璋(2005):〈不同階段青少年之自我認同內容及危機探索之發展差異〉。《中華心理學刊》,47(3),249-268。[Chen, K. H., Lay, K. L., & Wu, Y. C. (2005). The Developmental Differences of Identity Content and Exploration among Adolescents of Different Stages. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 47(3), 249-268. ]
    廖柏森(2005):〈以英語為國際語(EIL)之義涵與教學觀〉。《英語教學期刊》,30(1),1-14。[Liao, P. S. (2005). The Features of English as an International Language(EIL) and its Teaching Approach. English Teaching & Learning, 30(1), 1-14. ]
    榮泰生(2009):《AMOS與研究方法》。台北:五南。[Rong, T. S. (2009). AMOS yu yan jiu fan fa. Taipei: Wu-Nan.]
    蔡鵑霙(2014):《合作學習對國中生英語單字習得、閱讀理解及學習動機之效益》。國立高雄師範大學英語學系,碩士論文。[Tsai, C. Y. (2014). The Effects of Using Cooperative Learning on Junior High School Students’ English Vocabulary Acquisition, Reading Comprehension, and Learning Motivation. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University. ]
    Arnett, J. J. (2002). The psychology of globalization. American psychologist,57(10), 774.
    Bandura, A. (1994). Self‐efficacy. John Wiley & Sons, Inc..
    Benson, P. (2013). Teaching and researching: Autonomy in language learning. Routledge.
    Belmechri, F., & K. Hummel, 1998. Orientations and Motivation in the Acquisition of English as a Second Language Among High School Students in Quebec City. Language Learning, 48, 219-244.
    Brown, H. D. (1990). M and Ms for language classrooms? Another look at motivation. In J. E. Alatis (Ed.), Georgetown University round table on language and linguistics 1990 (pp. 383–393). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
    Chen, J., & Warden, C. Chang. (2005). Motivators That Do Not Motivate: The Case of Chinese EFL Learners and the Influence of Culture on Motivation. TESOL Quarterly, 39(4), 609-634.
    Chen, S. W., Wang, H. H., Wei, C. F., Fwu, B. J., & Hwang, K. K. (2009). Taiwanese students’ self attributions for two types of achievement goals. Journal of Social Psychology, 149, 179-193.
    Chihara, I., & Oller, J.W. (1978). Attitudes and attained proficiency in EFL:A sociolinguistic study of adult Japanese speakers. Language Learning,28, 55–68.
    Chularut, P., & DeBacker, T. K. (2004). The influence of concept mapping on achievement, self-regulation, and self-efficacy in students of English as a second language. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(3), 248-263.
    Clément, R., & Kruidenier, B. G. (1983). Orientations in second languageacquisition: I. The effects of ethnicity, milieu and target language on theiremergence. Language Learning, 33, 272–291.
    Coetzee-Van Rooy, S. (2006) Integrativeness: Untenable for world Englishes learners? World Englishes, 25 (3), 437-450.
    Crookes, G., & Schmidt, R. (1991). Motivation: Reopening the research agenda. Language Learning, 41,469-512.
    Csizér, K., & Kormos, J. (2009). Learning experiences, selves and motivated learning behaviour: A comparative analysis of structural models for Hungarian secondary and university learners of English. Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 98-119.
    D’Ailly, H. (2003). Children’s autonomy and perceived control in learning: A model of motivation and achievement in Taiwan. Journal of EducationalPsychology, 95, 84-96.
    Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (1985) Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination inHuman Behaviour. New York: Plenum.
    Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.
    De Vos, G. (1985). Dimensions of the self in Japanese culture. In A. Marsella, G., De Vos, & F. L. K. Hsu (Eds.), Culture and self (pp.149-184). London: Tavistock .
    Dickinson, L. (1995). Autonomy and motivation: A literature review. System, 23, 165-174.
    Dörnyei, Z. (1990).Conceptualizing motivation in foreign-language learning. Language Learning, 40, 45–78.
    Dörnyei, Z. (1994a) Motivation and motivating in the foreign language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 78, 273-284.
    Dörnyei, Z. (1994b). Understanding L2 motivation. On with the challenge! The Modern Language Journal, 78, 515–523.
    Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and Researching Motivation. Harlow: Longman.
    Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The Psychology of the Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The L2 Motivational Self System. In Z. Dörnyei and E. Ushida (Eds.), Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self (pp. 9-42). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
    Dörnyei, Z., Csizér, K., & Németh, N. (2006). Motivation, language attitudes and globalisation: A Hungarian perspective. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
    Edwards, J. E., & Waters, L. K. (1982). Involvement,ability, performance, and satisfaction as predictorsof college attrition. Educational and PsychologicalMeasurement, 42, 1149-1152.
    Ehrman, M. E., & Dörnyei, Z.(1998). Interpersonal dynamics in second language  education: The visible and invisible classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Erikson, E. (1950). Identification as the basis for a theory of motivation.American Psychological Review, 26,14-21.
    Galtung, J. (1981). Structure, culture, and intellectual style: An essay comparing Saxonic, Teutonic, Gallic and Nipponic approaches. Social Science Information, 20, 817-856.
    Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.
    Gardner, R. C. (1990). Attitudes, motivation, and personality as predictors of success in foreignlanguage. In: Parry, T. S. & Stansfield, C. W. (Eds.) Language aptitude reconsidered.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Gardner, R.C. (2001) Integrative motivation and second language acquisition. InZ. Dörnyei and R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and Second Language Acquisition(pp. 1-20). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
    Gardner, R. C. and Lambert, W. E. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
    Gardner, R. C., & Tremblay, P. F. (1994). On motivation, research agendas and theoretical frameworks.The Modern Language Journal, 78, 359–68.
    Hamaguchi, E. (1985). A contextual model of the Japanese: Toward amethodological innovation in Japan studies. Journal of Japanese Studies, 77,289-321.
    Henrich, J., Heine S. J., &Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466, 29.
    Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: a theory relating self and affect.Psychological review, 94(3), 319.
    Higgins, E. T, Klein, R., & Strauman, T. (1985). Self-concept discrepancy theory: A psychological model for distinguishing among different aspects of depression and anxiety. Social Cognition, 3, 51 -76.
    Holland, D., & Quinn, N. (1987). Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    Hsu, F. L. K. (1985). The self in cross-cultural perspective. In A. J. Marsella, G. De Vos, & F. L. K. Hsu (Eds.), Culture and self (pp.24-55). London: Tavistock.
    Hsu, C. C., Huang, H.T., & Chen, S. W. (2013). Beliefs of social role obligation in EFL college students’ L2 motivation. The 22nd International Symposium on English Teaching, November 8-10, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Hwang , K. K. (2001) . The deep structure of Confucianism: A social psychological approach. Asian Philosophy, 11, 179-204.
    Hwang, K. K. (2011). Foundations of Chinese psychology: Confucian social relations (Vol. 1). Springer.
    Huang, H. T., Hsu, C. C., & Chen. S. W. (2015). Identification with social role obligations, possible selves, and L2 motivation in foreign language learning. System, 51, 28-38.
    Irie, K. (2003) What do we know about the language learning motivation of university students in Japan? Some patterns in survey studies. JALT Journal,25 (1), 86-100.
    Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (1999). Rethinking the value of choice: A cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 349-366.
    Johnson, F. (1985). The Western concept of self. In A. Marsella, G. De Vos, & F. L. K. Hsu (Eds.), Culture and self London: Tavistock.
    Julkunen, K. (1989). Situation- and task-specific motivation in foreign-language learning. Joensuu: University of Joensuu.
    Kelman, H. C. (1958). Compliance, identification and internalization, three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 51–60.
    Kondo, D. (1982). Work, family and the self: A cultural analysis of Japanese family enterprise. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.
    Kormos, J., & Csizér, K. (2008). Age‐related differences in the motivation of learning English as a foreign language: Attitudes, selves, and motivated learning behavior. Language Learning, 58(2), 327-355.
    Kormos, J., Kiddle, T., & Csizér, K. (2011). Systems of goals, attitudes, and self-related beliefs in second-language-learning motivation. Applied Linguistics,32(5), 495-516.
    Lamb, M. (2004). Integrative motivation in a globalizing world. System, 32, 3-19.
    Lepper, M. R. (1983). Social control processes and the internalization of social values: An attributional perspective. In E. T. Higgins, D. N. Ruble,&W.W. Hartup (Eds.), Social cognition and social development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Li, J. (2012). Cultural foundations of learning: East and West. Cambridge University Press.
    Lukmani, M. (1972). Motivation to learn a second language and second language proficiency. Language Learning, 7, 261–273.
    Mackinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L., & Lockwood, C. M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation,confounding and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1(4), 173‐181.
    Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological review, 98(2), 224-253.
    Markus, H.R. and Nurius, P. (1986) Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954-969.
    Markus, H.R. (2006) Foreword. In C. Dunkel and J. Kerpelman (eds) Possible Selves: Theory, Research and Applications (pp. xi_xiv). New York: Nova Science.
    Marsella, A., De Vos, G, & Hsu, F. L. K. (1985). Culture and self. London: Tavistock. Meissner, W. W. (1988). Treatment of patients in the borderline spectrum. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
    Miller, J. G. (1988). Bridging the content-structure dichotomy: Culture and the self. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The cross-cultural challenge to social psychology (pp. 266-281). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
    Mohammadi, A. (Ed.). (1997). International communication and globalization: a critical introduction. Sage.
    Noels, K.A. (2001). Learning Spanish as a second language: Students' orientations and Perceptions of teachers' communicative style. Language Learning, 51, 107-144.
    Noels, K.A. (2005). Orientations to learning German: Heritage background and motivational processes. Canadian Modern Language Review, 62, 285-312.
    Noels, K.A. (2009). The internalization of language learning into the self and social identity. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.) Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self. (pp.295-313). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
    Noels, K.A., Clément, R., & Pelletier, L. (2001). Intrinsic, extrinsic, and integrative orientations of French Canadian learners of English. Canadian Modern Language Review, 57, 424-442.
    Noels, K. A., Stephan, S., &Saumure, K.D. (2007). Supporting the motivation of heritage and nonheritage learners of German. In L. Christoph, J. L. Plews & C. L. Rieger (Eds.).Intercultural literacies and German in the classroom(30-48). Tubingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
    Oller,J.W.,Hudson,A.J.,&Liu,P.F. (1977).Attitudes and attained proficiency in ESL:A sociolinguistic study of native speakers of Chinese in the United States. Language Learning, 77, 1–27.
    Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological bulletin, 128(1), 3.
    Oxford, R., & Shearin, J. (1994). Language learning motivation: Expanding the theoretical framework. Modern Language Review, 78, 12–28.
    Papi, M. (2010). The L2 motivational self system, L2 anxiety, and motivated behavior: A structural equation modeling approach. System, 38(3), 467-479.
    Perls, F. S. (1973). The Gestalt approach and eyewitness to therapy. Ben Lomond, CA: Science and Behavior Books.
    Phillips, D. C. (1976). Holistic thought in social science. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    Pike, G. R. (1991) . The effect s of background,coursework, and involvement on students’ grades andsatisfaction. Research in Higher Education, 32, 15-30.
    Roland, A. (1988). In search of self in India and Japan: Toward a crosscultural psychology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    Ryan, R. M. (1993). Agency and organization: Intrinsic motivation, autonomy and the self in psychological development. In J. Jacobs (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Developmental perspectives on motivation (Vol. 40, pp. 1–56). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
    Ryan, S. (2009). Self and identity in L2 motivation in Japan: The ideal L2 self and Japanese learners of English. Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 120-43.
    Ryan, R. M., Connell, J. P.,& Deci, E. L. (1985).Amotivational analysis of self-determination and self-regulation in education. In C. Ames&R.E. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: The classroom milieu (pp. 13–51). New York: Academic.
    Sass, L. A. (1988). The self and its vicissitudes: An "archaeological" study of the psychoanalytic avant-garde. Social Research, 55, 551-607.
    Schafer, R. (1968). Aspects of internalization. New York: International Universities Press.
    Shweder, R. A., & Bourne, E. J. (1984). Does the concept of the person vary cross-culturally? In R. A. Shweder & R. A. LeVine (Eds.), Culture theory: Essays on mind, self, and emotion (pp. 158-199). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    Shweder, R. A., & LeVine, R. A. (Eds.). (1984). Culture theory: Essays onmind, self, and emotion. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    Shweder, R. A., Goodnow, J. J., Hatano, G., LeVine, R. A., Markus, H. R., & Miller, P. J. (1998). The cultural psychology of development: One mind, many mentalities. Handbook of child psychology.
    Skehan, P. (1989). Individual differences in second-language learning. London: Edward Arnold.
    Sluss, D.M., & Ashforth, B.E. (2007). Relational identity and identification: Defining ourselves through work relationships. Academy of Management Review, 32, 9-32.
    Sugita McEown, M., Noels, K.A., Saumure, K.D. (2014). Students' self-determined and integrative orientations and teachers' motivational support in a Japanese as a foreign language context. System, 45, 227-241.
    Taguchi, T., Magid, M., & Papi, M. (2009). The L2 motivational self system among Japanese, Chinese and Iranian learners of English: A comparative study. Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 66-97.
    Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
    Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
    Umbach, P. D., & Porter, S. R. (2002). How do academicdepartments impact student satisfaction? Research inHigher Education, 43, 209-234.
    Ushioda, E. (1996). Learner autonomy 5: The role of motivation. Dublin: Authentik.
    Ushioda, E. (1998). Effective motivational thinking: A cognitive theoretical approach to the study of language learning motivation. In Soler E.A., & Espurz, V.C. (Eds.). Current issues in English language methodology (pp. 77-89). Universitat Jaume I, Castello de la Plana, Spain.
    Ushioda, E. (2003). Motivation as a socially mediated process. In D. Little, J. Ridley and E. Ushioda (Eds.), Learner Autonomy in the Foreign Language classroom: Teacher, Learner, Curriculum and Assessment (pp. 90- 102). Dublin: Authentik.
    Ushioda, E., & Dörnyei, Z. (2012). Motivation. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 396-409). New York: Routledge.
    Warden, C. and Lin, H.J. (2000) Existence of integrative motivation in Asian EFL setting. Foreign Language Annals, 33, 535-547.
    White, G. M., & Kirkpatrick, J. (Eds.). (1985). Person, self and experience: Exploring Pacific ethnopsychologies. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
    Yashima, T. (2000) Orientations and motivations in foreign language learning: A study of Japanese college students. JACET Bulletin, 31, 121-133.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校內網路)
    全文公開日期 本全文未授權公開 (校外網路)

    QR CODE