研究生: |
陳威廷 Wei-Ting Chen |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
核二廠斷然處置措施之安全度評估 A Probabilistic Safety Assessment of Ultimate Response Guidelines of Kuosheng Nuclear Power Plant |
指導教授: |
李敏
Lee, Min |
口試委員: |
李敏
Lee, Min 陳詩奎 Chen, Shih-Kuei 王琅琛 Wang, Lang-Chen 趙椿長 Chao, Chun-Chang |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
原子科學院 - 核子工程與科學研究所 Nuclear Engineering and Science |
論文出版年: | 2013 |
畢業學年度: | 101 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 98 |
中文關鍵詞: | 核二廠 、機組斷然程序指引 、安全度評估 、爐心熔損頻率 |
外文關鍵詞: | Kuosheng nuclear power plants |
相關次數: | 點閱:2 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
福島事件發生後,台電發展出一套稱之為「斷然處置措施(Ultimate Response Guidelines, URG)」的緊急處置方法,以因應電廠遭遇類似福事故等超出設計基準的複合式災害,其發展理念為早期洩壓、注水、透過圍阻體排氣移除衰變熱,確保燃料為水掩蓋,並防止燃料棒護套溫度上升超過1500℉,造成放射性物質自燃料棒釋出。在URG中提出了許多指引與新增設備,增加嚴重事故後電廠救援的能力,本論文的目的是將核二廠URG納入一階安全度評估中,將深入探討核二廠URG對爐心熔損頻率(Core Damage Frequency, CDF)的影響。
本論文使用RELAP5-3D模擬電廠全黑(包含高壓灑水系統柴油發電機不可用)事故發生後,有無早期爐心隔離冷卻系統(RCIC)與釋壓閥開啟後有無成功關回對燃料護套尖峰溫度的影響,以及事件樹成功準則的判定。本研究採用核研所發展之核二廠安全度評估模式,使用WinNUPRA3.0建立相關事件樹與故障樹,將可能影響一階安全度評估的URG策略分別量化,以驗證URG是否能有效影響CDF。
評估結果顯示,URG對類似福島二號機的事故序列,改善效果顯著,能將CDF降低兩個數量級。在所模擬的URG策略中,RCIC延長至24小時對一階安全度評估的改善最大,可將其所影響的事故序列之CDF降低53.4%。
Probabilistic Safety Assessment (PSA) is a powerful tool to assess the safety of nuclear power plants (NPP). The purpose of the study is to evaulate the impact of Ultimate Response Guidelines (URGs) on the Level-1 PSA of Kuosheng NPP of Taiwan Power Company.
After the core damage accidient of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant, Ultimate Response Guidelines (URGs) were developed by Taiwan Power Company to help operators mitigating the consequences of events similar to the Fukushima accident. The purpose of URG is to prevent the peak cladding temperature during the accident from rising above 1500℉, which is the imitation temperature of the release of the gap activity. URG is activated in a seismic event, an event of Station Blackout or an event of losing water injection to core. According to URG, the emergency response staff of the plant is required to implement movable or portable A.C. power and alternate water source within a specific time after the motivation of the accident. If the continuous removal of decay heat can not be assured, operators are directed to depressurize the vessel in order to bring the non-conventional low pressure water keeping the core covered. The decay heat is removed via containment venting. The actions may damage the economic values of the plant due to the injection of dirty or sea water into the core. It can be expected that URG can lower the Core Damage Frequency (CDF) of events similar to Fukushima accident.
In the present study, the impact of URG on the CDF of Kuosheng NPP of Taiwan Power Company is assessed. The plant employs Boiling Water Reactor (BWR6) designed by General Electric. The plant specific PSA model of the plant is adopted on the study. The thermal-hydraulic responses of the system during the assicdent are simulated using RELAP5-3D code. WinNUPRA3.0 code is used in performing PSA analysis.
The results show that in a Station Blackout event, the URG can reduce CDF by 53.4% when the RCIC (Reactor Core Isolation Cooling system) operates 24 hours. For a sequence similar to Fukushima accident, the CDF can be reduced by two orders of magnitude. Nevertheless, the URG has no impact on the sequence with failure of RCIC injection. In such an event, the time to core uncover is too short to implement any extra mitigation actions beyond the design basis.
1. “Reactor Safety Study”, WASH-1400, NUREG-75/014, U.S. Nuclear Regular Commission, Washington, 1975.
2.李敏編輯,「核電廠安全度評估方法之理論與應用」,台灣電力公司核能安全處/國立清華大學工程與系統科學系,民國85 年7 月
3.鄭至欽著,「模糊理論於安全度評估之應用」,國立清華大學工程與系統科學系,民國88年6月
4.葛禹志著,“嚴重事故處理指引(SAMG)對核三廠二階安全度評估結果的影響”,國立清華大學工程與系統科學系,民國93年6月
5.核能研究所,“核能二廠功率運轉活態安全度評估第一階段結果報告”,台灣電
力公司/核能研究所核子工程組,民國84 年12 月
6.核能研究所,「核能二廠安全度評估第一階段結果報告」,民國101年
7.台灣電力公司,「機組斷然處置指引」(編號1451,第30版),民國101年12月5日
8.劉興漢,「核能機組斷然處置措施程序及有效性」,2013核能電廠斷然處置措施研討會,民102年1月23日
9. Code Development Team, “RELAP5/MOD3.3 Code Manual” , Vol.1~Vol.8, NUREG/CR-5535, 2006
10. USNRC, “Reevaluation of Station Blackout Risk at Nuclear Power Plants, Analysis of Loss of Offsite Power Events: 1986-2004,” NUREG/CR-6890, December 2005
11.台灣電力公司,「核能二廠訓練教材」,民國98年
12. USNRC, “Accident Source Terms for Light-Water Nuclear Power Plant,” NUREG-1465, February 1995
13. 蔡國樑著,“核能一廠爐心損毀程度評估導則之建立”,國立清華大學工程與系統科學系,民國94年6月
14.台灣電力公司第二核能發電廠,「核二廠電力中心設備與緊急柴油發電機故障及回復有效記錄」,台灣電力公司
15.徐郁芬著,「核二廠斷然處置程序分析報告」,國立清華大學原子科學技術發展中心,民國100年