簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表
研究生： 白 雅
Arbia Taillandier, Baya Zohra Francoise
論文名稱： 核能電力公司私有化之下的管理困境：以法國EDF公司為例
The challenge of managing nuclear assets under privatization: the case of the company Electricité de France (EDF)
指導教授： 錢克瑄
Chien, Ker-Hsuan
口試委員: 洪漢年
Fung, Hon-Ngen
王振源
Wong, Chan-Yuan
學位類別： 碩士
Master
系所名稱： 科技管理學院 - 國際專業管理碩士班
International Master of Business Administration(IMBA)
論文出版年： 2023
畢業學年度： 111
語文別： 英文
論文頁數： 53
中文關鍵詞： 私有化 、管理實踐 、核資產 、公共服務
外文關鍵詞： privatization, managerial practices, nuclear assets, Public service
相關次數： 點閱：37  下載：0 
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

    • N/A

    The privatization of EDF has been the subject of many criticisms regarding its efficiency and its impact on the company. This study investigates the challenges stemming from the privatization and how it was conducted by the government, focusing on the evolution of managerial techniques and internal organization while discussing the characteristics of the nuclear sector and the difficulty associated with managing its assets. By reviewing literature and analyzing different issues around management, the strong identity of EDF, the restructuring of the company and the change of competitive environment, this research explores how the company tried to implement new managerial techniques in this new landscape.
    Key aspects include examining documented issues regarding management problems in the nuclear sector, the impact of the restructuring of the company on employees’ work, the clash between EDF long-lasting values and purpose and the expected outcome of privatization regarding managerial techniques and productivity of the employees. The
    research also assesses the significance of public companies in the French economic and social ecosystem in order to understand choices made during privatization. This study is entirely based on qualitative research from various sources and an in-depth interview.
    This study aims to provide valuable insights for the conduct of liberal measures in the complex and highly protected nuclear sector in France.

    TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 3 LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES 6 I - Introduction 7 1. Research motivation and background 7 2. Research objectives 8 3. Research questions 9 4. Research scope and limitations 9 II - The discussion of privatization in the literature 11 1. The opposition of public and private in traditional theories 12 2. A discussion of the different layers of privatization under Villalonga model 15 3. An assessment of the differences between managers in public and private companies 20 4. Unpacking characteristics of nuclear energy and the associated managerial practices 23 III - Methodology 26 IV - Case : Organizational and managerial changes at EDF under privatization 28 Chapter IV.1 - Structure and organization of EDF as a private company 29 a) The creation of a board and the State as the main shareholder 29 b) The increase operational efficiency : the restructuring of the company through decentralization and controlled internationalization 32 c) The redefinition of the company's mission and objectives : a mix of public service missions inside a private company 35 Chapter IV.2 - The evolution of management techniques after privatization 37 1. The adoption of management techniques from the private sector 37 a) Management by objectives : the figure of the “salesperson” 37 b) The focus on quality and continuous improvement - the “client” at the core of preoccupations 39 c) The difficult integration of the idea of working in a competitive environment 40 2. The failure to implement a new corporate culture and the impact on social relations 42 a) The disrupted relationship between management and employees through the allotment of new responsibilities - from supervisor to manager 42 b) The underestimation of the importance of the Public Service idea and its systems at EDF 45 V - Conclusion : The assessment of the impact of privatization on EDF's management techniques - challenges encountered and lines for thoughts 48 VI – BIBLIOGRAPHY 50

    Ait Abdeslam, S. (2008) Du monopole au marché : cas d'EDF une entreprise en mutation. Economies et finances.
    Ait Abdeslam, S., & Merad, M. (2013). Du public au marché: le changement par l’apprentissage au sein des structures commerciales d’EDF. Gestion et management public, (2), 36-62.
    Bonnet, F. (2012). Evolutions sociétales et mutations de la relation client. Une approche communicationnelle de la relation au client développée par EDF (Doctoral dissertation, Celsa-Université Paris Sorbonne).
    Boyne, G. A. (2002). Public and private management: what’s the difference?. Journal of management studies, 39(1), 97-122.
    Brillet, E. (2004). Le service public “ à la française ” : un mythe national au prisme de l'Europe. L'Économie politique, 24, 20-42.
    Chelet, J. (2016). Pourquoi les Français n’ont-ils pas encore tous quitté EDF ?. Capital https://www.capital.fr/votre-argent/pourquoi-les-francais-n-ont-ils-pas-encore-tous-quitte-edf-1140236
    Clavier, H. (2023). Pourquoi EDF continue à s’endetter ?. Public Sénat https://www.publicsenat.fr/actualites/politique/pourquoi-edf-continue-a-s-endetter-236789
    Cuervo, A., & Villalonga, B. (2000). Explaining the variance in the performance effects of privatization. Academy of management review, 25(3), 581-590.
    50
    D'Souza, J., Nash, R. C., & Megginson, W. L. (2000). Determinants of performance
    improvements in privatized firms: The role of restructuring and corporate governance.
    Available at SSRN 243186.
    De Alessi, L. (1980). The economics of property rights: a review of the evidence. Rsch. in L.
    & Econ., 2, 1.
    Debrégeas, A., & Garcia, D. (2022, September 15). Qui veut la mort d’EDF ? Le Monde Diplomatique. https://www.monde diplomatique.fr/2021/02/DEBREGEAS/62795#partage
    Desmarais, C., & Abord de Chatillon, E. (2008). Existe-t-il encore des différences entre le travail des managers du public et ceux du privé? 1. Revue française d’administration
    publique, (4), 767-783.
    Delvolvé, P. (2006). La privatisation du service de l'État. Pouvoirs, 117, 107-120.
    EDF, l’autodestruction se poursuit par son bureau d’ingénieurs. (2022). Blast Le Souffle de
    l’info
    https://www.blast-info.fr/articles/2022/edf-lautodestruction-se-poursuit-par-son-bureau-dinge
    nieurs-Kbew4VIvQgS_UP3ivCNiXw
    Électricité de France. (2020). Document d’enregistrement universel
    https://edf.publispeak.com/document-enregistrement-universel-2020/article/10/
    Finon, D. (2019). Scission d’EDF : Logique financière ou projet industriel ?. Encyclopédie de
    l'Énergie https://www.encyclopedie-energie.org/scission-edf-logique-financiere-ou-projet-industriel/
    Folz, J. M. (2019). La construction de l’EPR de Flamanville. Rapport au Président Directeur Général d’EDF. 51
    Henry, C. (2005). EDF, La privatisation qu'il fallait éviter.
    International Atomic Energy Agency (2021). Asset Management for Sustainable Nuclear Power Plant Operation, IAEA Nuclear Energy Series No. NR-T-3.33
    Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency
    costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360.
    Le Galès, Y. (2013). Google et EDF : employeurs préférés des étudiants de grandes écoles.
    Le Figaro Etudiant. https://etudiant.lefigaro.fr/les-news/palmares/detail/article/google-et-edf-employeurs-preferes
    -des-etudiants-de-grandes-ecoles-2950/
    Mahiou, I. (2013). Le métier perdu des encadrants d'EDF. Santé et travail https://www.sante-et-travail.fr/metier-perdu-encadrants-dedf
    Martin, E. (2012). Manager en dernier ressort: le travail de l'encadrement de proximité à EDF (Doctoral dissertation, École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales (EHESS)).
    Ministère de l'Économie et des Finances. (2019). Rapport financier Agence de Participation
    de l’Etat
    https://www.economie.gouv.fr/files/files/directions_services/agence-participations-etat/APE_
    Rapport_Financier_2022_0.pdf?v=1683020782
    Radić, M., Ravasi, D., & Munir, K. (2021). Privatization: Implications of a shift from state to private ownership. Journal of Management, 47(6), 1596-1629.
    Rodríguez, G. C., Espejo, C. A. D., & Cabrera, R. V. (2007). Incentives management during privatization: An agency perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 44(4), 536-560. 52
    Santana, D. (2017). Manager la culture de sûreté: construction, représentations et usages de la" culture de sûreté" dans l’industrie nucléaire (Doctoral dissertation, Institut d'études
    politiques de Paris-Sciences Po).
    Sénat. (2017). La politique de dividendes de l'État actionnaire, Rapport d'information n° 335
    (2016-2017)
    Sénat. (2022). Chantier de l’EPR de Flamanville, Texte n°383
    https://www.senat.fr/leg/exposes-des-motifs/ppr21-383-expose.html
    Stoffaës, C. (2022). EDF : entre crise et nostalgie de l’âge d’or. Commentaire, 180, 817-828.
    Tarcoiz, Y. « Le treizième travail d’Hercule : privatiser l’électricité française », Institut Rousseau, 25 novembre 2020.
    https://institut-rousseau.fr/le-treizieme-travail-dhercule-privatiser-lelectricite-francaise/
    Villalonga, B. (2000). Privatization and efficiency: differentiating ownership effects from political, organizational, and dynamic effects. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 42(1), 43-74.

    QR CODE