研究生: |
張景敦 Chang, Ching-Tun |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
運用資料探勘技術協助專利維護決策 Supporting Patent Maintenance Decision: A Data Mining Approach |
指導教授: |
魏志平
Wei, Chih-Ping 林福仁 Lin, Fu-Ren |
口試委員: | |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
科技管理學院 - 服務科學研究所 Institute of Service Science |
論文出版年: | 2010 |
畢業學年度: | 98 |
語文別: | 英文 |
論文頁數: | 53 |
中文關鍵詞: | 專利維護 、資料探勘 、專利分析 |
外文關鍵詞: | Patent maintenance, Patent renewal, Data mining, Patent analysis |
相關次數: | 點閱:3 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
專利的功能除了保護發明者的智慧心血不被侵害之外,對於企業在日漸激烈的商業環境上也愈顯重要。然而許多國家的專利制度,在專利申請獲准之後,必須要定期繳交維護費用,才能確保此專利在期限內仍然有作用。然而,並非所有的專利都需要進行維護。對於企業而言,找出「重要專利」進行維護,並將「不重要專利」進行放棄,這同時包含許多不同的決策思維。本研究預計透過德菲法(Delphi method)獲得實務上認為會影響專利是否維護的因素,且運用資料探勘的方式建立系統支援專利維護決策。這種以資料探勘為基礎的專利維護決策系統,可以協助組織在進行維護決策時,增進其效率且降低維護決策的成本。實證結果顯示,我們所提出的維護模型表現優於基準模型(所使用的變數僅由文獻中所建議組成)。
Protecting the rights of inventor is not the only purpose of patents, and it is becoming more and more important under the keen competitive business environment nowadays. In the patent systems of many countries, patent holders are required to pay a maintenance fee after the initial application to retain patent protection on any invention until the expiration of the protection period. However, not all patents are worth maintaining by patent holders. Thus, organizations need to identify “important patents” for maintenance and abandon “unimportant patents.” In this study, we attempt to examine factors influencing patent maintenance via a Delphi study and propose a data mining approach to support patent maintenance decision. Such a data-mining-based patent maintenance decision support system can help organizations improve the effectiveness of patent maintenance decisions and, at the same time, decrease the cost of maintenance decision. Our empirical evaluation results suggest that our proposed model outperforms the benchmark model (i.e., involving the variables suggested by the literature only).
References
Barney, J. (2003). Comparative Patent Quality Analysis. NACV Wh/w Pass.
Bessen, J. (2008). The value of US patents by owner and patent characteristics. Research Policy, 37(5), 932-945.
Cockburn, I., Kortum, S., & Stern, S. (2002). Are all patent examiners equal? The impact of characteristics on patent statistics and litigation outcomes. NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES.
Crampes, C., & Langinier, C. (1998). Information disclosure in the renewal of patents. Annales d'Economie et de Statistique, 265-288.
Dueker, K. (1996). Trademark Law Lost in Cyberspace: Trademark Protection for Internet Addresses. Harv. JL & Tech., 9, 483.
Ernst, H. (2003). Patent information for strategic technology management. World Patent Information, 25(3), 233-242.
Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey. Journal of Economic literature, 28(4), 1661-1707.
Guellec, D., & van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2000). Applications, grants and the value of patent. Economics Letters, 69(1), 109-114.
Hall, B., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2001). The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. NBER Working Paper.
Harhoff, D., Narin, F., Scherer, F., & Vopel, K. (1999). Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(3), 511-515.
Harhoff, D., Scherer, F., & Vopel, K. (2003). Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights. Research Policy, 32(8), 1343-1363.
Jones, T., Norris, M., & Solomon, I. (2002). Strategies for maximizing value from intellectual capital in a technology-driven business. The Licensing Journal, 22(6), 1-7.
Lanjouw, J. O., Pakes, A., & Putnam, J. (1998). How to count patents and value intellectual property: The uses of patent renewal and application data. Journal of Industrial Economics, 46(4), 405-432.
Liu, K., Arthurs, J., Cullen, J., & Alexander, R. (2008). Internal sequential innovations: How does interrelatedness affect patent renewal? Research Policy, 37(5), 946-953.
Maurseth, P. (2002). Lovely but dangerous: The impact of patent citations on patent duration.
Moore, K. (2005). Worthless patents. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 20, 1521.
Pakes, A. (1986). Patents as options: Some estimates of the value of holding European patent stocks. Econometrica, 54(4), 755-784.
Pakes, A., Simpson, M., Judd, K., & Mansfield, E. (1989). Patent renewal data. Brookings papers on economic activity. Microeconomics, 1989, 331-410.
Schankerman, M., & Pakes, A. (1986). Estimates of the value of patent rights in European countries during the post-1950 period. The economic journal, 1052-1076.
Tao, J., Daniele, J., Hummel, E., Goldheim, D., & Slowinski, G. (2005). Developing an effective strategy for managing intellectual assets. Research-Technology Management, 48(1), 50-58.
Thomas, P. (1999). The effect of technological impact upon patent renewal decisions. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 11(2), 181-197.