部落格的日益普及逐漸形成所謂改變媒體生態的「草根媒體」、「人人都是記者」的社會新興現象，就傳播學的觀點而論，這是一種消除閱聽眾被動特質、轉而成為積極的資訊撰寫者、傳播者的「賦能」見證過程。然而，正如蔡珮（2005）在有關網路成癮的研究中所表示，以往的討論大多關注在「人」的身上，卻沒有追問過「科技本身」為何讓使用者如此使用著，意即忽略了媒介本質與人參與其中所可能建構的行為。因此筆者以部落格為例，並且以其物質形式為出發點，說明：做為一種技術物（artifact），部落格透過互動式介面而組織起內含的各種設計元件，在每一位部落客獨有的書寫實作脈絡下，在「某時某地」的「行動者網絡」中，物與人之間的關係皆是不斷地在更新、變動，不但開展了有關「某物究竟是什麼」這種事物本身（things-in-themselves）的認識，此外，部落格特有的物質形式同時形塑了一個高度自我指涉的時空，部落客在其中藉由詮釋實作與自我象徵化等意義生成機制，亦是持續地重新形構主體與認知他者。透過特定的研究對象在深度訪談中所論及的生活事件史，亦可以看到研究對象如何在部落格的物質基礎上，將個人書寫視為一種連結日常生活的藝術品創作，在其中試圖追求、完成生存的美感，藉由不斷的創作而獲得個人精神、行為的安頓，因而所顯現筆者所謂「適性哲學」、「關照自身」的生存方式與態度。

Barad, K., (1998). "Getting Real: Technoscientific Practices and the Materialization of Reality." Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 10(2): 87-128.

Barad, K., (2003). "Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter." Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Social Studies 28(3): 801-31.

Barry, A., (2001). Political Machines. London & NY: The Athlone Press.

Bash, H. H., (2000). "A Sense of Time: Temporality and Historicity in Sociological Inquiry." Time & Society 9(2/3): 187-204.

Bauman, Z., (2001). The Individualized Society. Malden, MA: Polity Press.

Bolter, D., (1977). The Writing Space: The Computer, Hypertext and the History of Writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Brey, P., (2005). Artifacts as Social Agents. Inside the Politics of Technology: Agency and Normativity in the Co-Production of Technology and Society. H. Harbers. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press: 61-84.

Brown, N. and M. Michael, (2001). "Switching between Science and Culture in Transpecies Transplantation." Science, Technology, & Human Values 26(1): 3-22.

Casey, E. S., (1996). The Ghost of Embodiment: Is the Body a Natural or a Cultural Entity? The Incorporated Self: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Embodiment. M. O'Donovan-Anderson. London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.: 23-43.

Cicourel, A. V., (1973). Cognitive sociology: language and meaning in social interaction. Harmondsworth: Penguin Education.

de Certeau, M., (1984). The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Debord, G., (1990). Comments on the Society of the Spectacle. London & NY: Verso.

Debord, G., (1994). The Society of the Spectacle. NY: Zone Books.

Featherstone, M. and R. Burrows, (1995). Cultures of Technological Embodiment: An Introduction. Cyberspace / Cyberbodies / Cyberpunk: Cultures of Technological Embodiment. M. Featherstone and R. Burrows. London: SAGE Publications: 1-19.

Fernback, J., (1997). The Individual within the Collective: Virtual Ideology and the Realization of Collective Principle. Virtual Culture: Identity & communication in cybersociety. S. G. Jones. London: SAGE Publications: 36-54.

Foucault, M., (1990 / 1978). The History of Sexuality: Volume 1. NY: Random House.

Foucault, M., (1990 / 1985). The History of Sexuality: Volume 2. NY: Random House.

Foucault, M., (1990 / 1986). The History of Sexuality: Volume 3. NY: Random House.

Foucault, M., (1994). Dits et écrits. Vol. I-IV. Paris: Gallimard.

Foucault, M., (2001). The Hermeneutics of Subjects. Paris: Gallimard.

Frisby, D. and M. Featherstone, Eds. (1997). Simmel on Culure: Selected Writings. London: Sage.

Gane, N. and H. Hansen-Magnusson, (2006). "Materiality is the Message?" Theory, Culture & Society 23(7-8): 315-328.

Gergen, K. J., (1996). Technology and the Self: From the Essential to the Sublime. Constructing the Self in a Mediated World. D. Grodin and T. R. Lindlof. London: Sage: 127-40.

Gergen, K. J., (2000). The Saturated Self: Dilemmas of Identity in Contemporary Life. New York: Basic Books.

Goffman, E., (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.

Gomart, E. and A. Hennion, (1999). A Sociology of Attachment: Music Amateurs, Drug Users. Actor Network Theory and After. J. Law and J. Hassard: Blackwell Publishing: 220-247.

Grodin, D. and T. R. Lindlof, (1996). The Self and Mediated Communication. Constructing the Self in a Mediated World. D. Grodin and T. R. Lindlof. London: Sage: 3-12.

Harbers, H., (2005). Epilogue: Political Materials - Material Politics. Inside the Politics of Technology: Agency and Normativity in the Co-Production of Technology and Society. H. Harbers. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press: 257-272.

Harbers, H., (2005). Introduction: Co-Production, Agency, and Normativity. Inside the Politics of Technology: Agency and Normativity in the Co-Production of Technology and Society. H. Harbers. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press: 9-25.

Hermans, H. J. M. and H. J. G. Kempen, (1993). The Dialogical Self: Meaning as Movement. New York: Academic Press, Inc.

Herring, S. C., L. A. Scheidt, et al., (2005). "Weblos as a Bridging Genre." Information Technology & People 18(2): 142-167.

Hevern, V. W., (2004). "Threaded Identity in Cyberspace: Weblogs & Positioning in the Dialogical Self." Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research 4(4): 312-335.

Hillis, K., (1999). Digital Sensations: Space, Identity, and Embodiment in Virtual Reality. London: University of Minnesota Press.

Holstein, J. A. and J. F. Gubrium, (2000). The Self We Live By: Narrative Identity in a Postmodern World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jones, S. G., (1997). The Internet and its Social Landscape. Virtual Culture: Identity & communication in cybersociety. S. G. Jones. London: SAGE Publications: 1-35.

Jones, S. G., (1998). Information, Internet, and Community. CyberSociety 2.0: Revisiting computer-mediated communication and community. S. G. Jones. London: SAGE Publications: 1-34.

Jorgensen, D. L. 朱. 王.，1999，《參與觀察法》。台北：弘智。

Kockelkoren, P., (2005). Art and Technology Playing Leapfrog: A History and Philosophy of Technoèsis. Inside the Politics of Technology: Agency and Normativity in the Co-Production of Technology and Society. H. Harbers. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press: 147-167.

Lash, S., (2002). Critique of Information. London: Sage.

Latour, B., (1987). Science in Action. Cambridge: Havard University Press.

Lee, B. and E. Lipuma, (2002). "Cultures of Circulation: The Imaginations of Modernity." Public Cultures 14(1): 191-213.

Levin, J. D., (1992). Theories of the Self. Washington: Hemisphere Pub. Co.

Lifton, R. J., (1993). The Protean Self: Human Resilience in An Age of Fragmentation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Lupton, D., (1995). The Embodied Computer / User. Cyberspace / Cyberbodies / Cyberpunk: Cultures of Technological Embodiment. M. Featherstone and R. Burrows. London: SAGE Publications: 97-112.

Mackenzie, A., (2005). "The Performativity of Code: Software and Cultures of Circulation." Theory, Culture & Society 22(1): 71-92.

Martin, L. H., H. Gutman, et al., Eds. (1988). Technologies of the Self. Cambridge: The University of Massachusetts Press.

Mead, G. H., (1962). Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: The University of Chicago press.

Mirzoeff, N., (1999). An Introduction to Visual Culture. London: Routledge.

Mol, A., (2002). The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Druham & London: Duke University Press.

Noveck, L., (1996). Identity and the Subject in Performance: Body, Self and Social World. The Incorporated Self: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Embodiment. M. O'Donovan-Anderson. London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.: 65-76.

O'Donovan-Anderson, M., (1996). In Search of Real Bodies: Theories and / of Embodiment. The Incorporated Self: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Embodiment. M. O'Donovan-Anderson. London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.: 1-10.

Poster, M., (1995). Postmodern Virtualities. Cyberspace / Cyberbodies / Cyberpunk: Cultures of Technological Embodiment. M. Featherstone and R. Burrows. London: SAGE Publications: 79-95.

Reed, A., (2005). "'My Blog Is Me': Texts and Persons in UK Online Journal Culture (and Anthropology)." Ethnos 70(2): 220-242.

Robins, K., (1995). Cyberspace and the World We Live In. Cyberspace / Cyberbodies / Cyberpunk: Cultures of Technological Embodiment. M. Featherstone and R. Burrows. London: SAGE Publications: 135-155.

Taylor, C., (1989). Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. New York: Harvard University Press.

Tyler, T. R., (2002). "Is the Internet Changing Social Life?" Journal of Social Issues 58: 195-205.

Verbeek, P.-P., (2005). Artifacts and Attachment: A Post-Script Phiolosophy of Mediation. Inside the Politics of Technology: Agency and Normativity in the Co-Production of Technology and Society. H. Harbers. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press: 125-146.

Watson, N., (1997). Why We Argue about Virtual Community: A Case Study of the Phish.Net Fan Community. Virtual Culture: Identity & communication in cybersociety. S. G. Jones. London: SAGE Publications: 102-132.

安東尼．紀登斯著，趙旭日、方文譯，2002，《現代性與自我認同：晚期現代的自我與社會》。台北：左岸文化。

江宜樺，（2005），〈西方政治概念之分析〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》12：1-57。

吳佳煇＆林以正，（2005），〈依戀型態對網路他人信任感與網路自我確定度之影響〉，《資訊社會研究》9：325-342。

希瑞爾．菲飛特＆愛蜜莉．杜赫提尼，施瑞瑄譯，2006，《誰沒部落格》。台北：商周。

尚．布希亞，林志明譯，2001，《物體系》。上海：人民出版社。

林文源，（2007），〈漂移之作：由血液透析病患的存在與行動談社會本體論〉，《台灣社會學》12：69-140。

林淑芬，（2006），〈重探政治－評《回歸政治》〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》16：301-310。

林遠澤，（2005），〈生命的終極關懷能否超越正義的觀點？試論宗教與形上學思考在生命倫理學爭議中的實踐意義〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》15：131-174。

邱承君，（2006），〈網誌、網誌活動與網誌世界：在理論與實踐間遞迴往覆〉，《資訊社會研究》10：107-146。

施力群，2005，《想像的觀望：論網誌中的自我觀看》。國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。

唐士哲，（2004），〈民族誌學應用於網路研究的契機、問題、與挑戰〉，《資訊社會研究》6：59-90。

容格，葉頌濤譯，1971，《未發現的自我》。台北：晨鐘。

高宣揚，2004，《傅科的生存美學：西方思想的起點與終結》。台北：五南。

張筱涵＆曹立勳等，（2005），〈部落格之發展與概況：以臺灣地區為例〉，《世新印刷學報》11：211-228。

郭佩宜＆王宏仁，2006，《田野的技藝：自我、研究與知識建構》。台北：巨流。

陳光興，2006，《去帝國－亞洲作為方法》。台北：行人。

陳佳靖，（2003），〈網路空間．人際關係：線上線下．生 活世界〉，《資訊社會研究》4：141-179。

陳淑玲, 趙必教, et al.，（2001），〈新人類工作價值觀、工作生活品質與工作滿足關係之研究〉，《勞資關係論叢》10：75-101。

雪莉．特克，譚天、吳佳真譯，1998，《虛擬化身：網路世代的身分認同》。台北：遠流。

湯志傑，（2004），〈藉公共領域建立自主性（下）〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》11：173-255。

湯志傑，（2004），〈藉公共領域建立自主性（上）〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》10：121-184。

萬毓澤，（2007），〈從日常戰術到新革命主體：論de Certeau、Holloway與Negri筆下的權力與抵抗〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》20：57-131。

雷蒙．威廉士，劉建基譯，2004，《關鍵詞：文化與社會的詞彙》。台北：巨流。

趙彥寧，（2006），〈情感政治與另類正義：在台大陸配偶的社會運動經驗〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》16：87-152。

劉江釗，2005，《部落格之社會網絡與自我呈現初探》。國立中山大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。

蔡珮，（2005），〈複合媒介的成癮現象探討〉，《資訊社會研究》8：121-154。

蔡鴻濱，（2004），〈語藝批評方法在網路文化研究之應用與探討〉，《資訊社會研究》6：91-126。

蘇珊．桑塔格，陳耀成譯，2004，《旁觀他人之痛苦》。台北：麥田。