中文摘要
本篇論文旨在探討節律(prosody)與構詞(morphology)之間的交互作用，即重音指派與重疊詞形式之交互作用，在多納魯凱語的重音分析中，我所採用的理論架構為優選理論(Optimality Theory)並採用共同音韻(co-phonology)的方法加以解釋多納方言之中，不同詞類重音表現不一的情況，此種作法不僅可以避免傳統音韻規則使用中的抽象層次(abstractness)也可以避免音韻規則在理論上或是語料處理中無法解決之問題；而在重疊詞形式的分析中，我主要採用的架構是非板模的作法(non-templatic approach)，但是傳統的作法在解決語料上仍有瑕疵不足之處，於是在本篇論文中，將針對無法處理的語言現象提出修正的方法，本文中的解決方案為設置一個節律信實制約(prosodic faithfulness constraint)，並將該制約設置在制約排序的頂端，使得該制約能有效將詞基(base)中顯著的音段複製入重疊詞之中，進而，可以使得一般的節律制約得以發揮其效用將重疊詞的大小予以限定，如此的制約互動便可以有效地控制重疊形式的大小，而該制約如以下所示：
(1) MAX-HEAD(B/R)
The segment linked to the prosodic head in the base must have a correspondent linked to the prosodic head in the reduplicant.
（詞基中，連結至重音之音段必須在重疊詞中的重音位置裡頭找到對應。）
該制約的提出根本於Kager (1999a, 1999b)以及Beckman (1998)的觀察，他們共同認為在重音位置上的音段享有更多的保留權或是更多的差異性，而本篇中的節律信實制約便是延伸他們的觀察進而同理發展成為詞基與重疊詞的對應，並在此對應中將重音位置上的音段予以保留並且使其享有重音的差異性。因此，該信實制約可以是根據語言的事實所提出的方法，而在理論機制上，該信實制約的機制也不脫離McCarthy and Prince(1995)所提出之對應理論(correspondence theory)的機制。

English Abstract
This thesis aims to investigate on the interface between the prosody (stress assignment) and the morphology (reduplication). In terms of stress assignment of Tona Rukai, I adopt Optimality Theory and co-phonology approach to solve the problems to avoid the abstractness and technical/theoretical problems of rule-based framework. To account for reduplication data, non-templatic approach is favored in this thesis. However, conventional non-templatic approach cannot account for Tona Rukai data properly because of the blind operation of markedness constraints. Accordingly, this thesis proposes a modified account for the unsolved disyllabic reduplicant problem of Tona Rukai—a prosodic faithfulness constraint undominated in the tableaux, as stated below:
(1) MAX-HEAD(B/R)
The segment linked to the prosodic head in the base must have a correspondent linked to the prosodic head in the reduplicant.
Among the constraints: MAX-IO, MAX-HEAD(B/R) » PHONO-CONSTRAINTS » MAX-BR, the undominated prosodic BR-faithfulness constraint can specifically determine the content and the crucial element of the reduplicant. Therefore, the dominated markedness constraints can properly control the size of the reduplicant.
The prosodic BR-faithfulness constraint is extended from the observation and the operation of Kager (1999a, 1999b) and Beckman (1998), who consider the element in the stressed position unique in terms of preservation and contrasts. Analogously, Tona Rukai reduplicant must parse the elements of the stressed position of the reduplicative base. Therefore, the BR-faithfulness constraint is well-motivated in the language fact. In addition, the theoretical operation of MAX-HEAD(B/R) can follow the correspondence theoretical mechanism in McCarthy and Prince (1995).

Bibliography
Academia Sinica Formosan Language Archive: http://formosan.sinica.edu.tw/formosan/default.htm
Alderete, John. 1995. Faithfulness to Prosodic Heads. Paper presented at Tilburg Conference on The Derivational Residue in Phonology. Massachusetts: University of Massachusetts, Amherst. (Also ROA #94)
_____. 1999. Head dependence in stress-epenthesis interaction. The derivational residue in phonological Optimality Theory, ed. by Ben Hermans and Marc van Oostendorp, 29-50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (Also ROA #453)
_____. 2001a. Morphologically Governed Accent in Optimality Theory. Routledge Publishing Series, Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics. New York: Routledge. [Revised 1999 Ph.D. Dissertation of University of Massachusetts, Amherst] (Also ROA #309)
_____. 2001b. Root-controlled accent in Cupeño. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 455-501. (Also ROA #453)
Anttila, Arto. 2002. Morphologically conditioned phonological alternations. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 1-42.
Austin, Peter. 1981. A grammar of Diyari, South Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Beckman, Jill. 1998. Positional Faithfulness. Massachusetts: PH.D. Dissertation of University of Massachusetts, Amherst. (Also ROA #234)
Benua, Laura. 1995. Identity effects in morphological truncation. Papers in Optimality Theory, ed. by Jill Beckman, Suzanne Urbanczyk & Laura Walsh Dickey, 77-136. University of Massachusetts Occasional papers in Linguistics 18. Amherst, MA: Graduate Linguistic Student Association.
Blust, Robert. 1997. Rukai Stress Revisited. Oceanic Linguistics 36 (2): 398-403.
Chen, Cheng-Fu. 1999. Wh-Words as Interrogatives and Indefinites in Rukai. MA Thesis of National Taiwan University.
_____. 2002. Nominalization of Interrogatives in Kucapungan Rukai. Language and Linguistics 3 (2): 369-392.
Crowhurst, Megan. 2004. Mora Alignment. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 127-177.
Fitzgerald, Colleen. M. 2001. The morpheme-to-stress principle in Tohono O'odham. Linguistics 39:5: 941-972.
(Also http://www.faculty.english.ttu.edu/fitzgerald/msp.pdf)
Green, Thomas and Michael Kenstowicz. 1995. The Lapse Constraint. Manuscript. Massachusetts: MIT. (Also ROA #101)
Hayes, Bruce. 1989. Compensatory Lengthening in Moraic Phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 20, 253–306.
Hendricks, Sean. 1999. Reduplication without Templatic Constraints: A Study in Bare-consonant Reduplication. PH.D. Dissertation of University of Arizona, Tucson. (Also ROA #511)
_____. 2001. Bare-consonant Reduplication without Prosodic Templates: Expressive Reduplication in Semai. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 10: 287-306.
Hsin, Tien-Hsin. 2000. Aspects of Maga Rukai Phonology. PH.D. Dissertation of University of Connecticut.
_____. 2003. The Mid Vowels of Maga Rukai and Their Implications. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 12 (1): 59-81.
Inkelas, Sharon. 1999. Exceptional stress-attracting suffixes in Turkish: Representations versus the grammar. The Prosody-Morphology Interface, ed. by Kager, René, Harry van der Haulst, and Wim Zonneveld, 134-187. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kager, René. 1994. Ternary rhythm in alignment theory. Manuscript. Utrecht: Utrecht University.
(Also http://www.let.uu.nl/~Rene.Kager/personal/papers/ternary_97.pdf)
_____. 1999a. Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
_____. 1999b. Surface opacity of metrical structure in optimality theory. The Derivational Residue in Phonological Optimality Theory, ed. by Ben. Hermans & Marc van Oostendorp, 207-245. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(Also http://www.let.uu.nl/~Rene.Kager/personal/papers/opacity.pdf)
_____. 2000. Stem stress and peak correspondence in Dutch. Optimality Theory: Phonology, Syntax, and Acquisition, ed. by Joost Dekkers, Frank van der Leeuw, and Jeroen van de Weijer, 121-150. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(Also http://www.let.uu.nl/~Rene.Kager/personal/papers/stemstress.pdf)
Li, Paul Jen-Kuei. 1973. Rukai Structure. Special Publication No. 64-2. Taipei: Institute of History and Philology, Academic Sinica.
_____. 1977. The Internal Relationship of Rukai. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academic Sinica 48.1: 1-92. Taipei: Institute of History and Philology, Academic Sinica.
_____. 1997 。Tona Dialect (＜多納方言＞). Formason Languages in Kaohsiung County, ed. by Paul Jen-Kuei Li, 119-157 (《高雄縣南島語言》李壬癸編). Kaohsiung: Government of Kaohsiung County. (See Chinese Reference)
Lubowicz, Anna. 2002. Derived environment effects in Optimality Theory. Lingua 112: 243-280.
Marantz, Alec. 1982. Re reduplication. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 453-483.
McCarthy, John and Alan S. Prince. 1986. Prosodic Morphology. Unpublished Manuscript. Massachusetts: University of Massachusetts, Amherst and Brands University, Waltham. [http://ruccs.rutgers.edu/pub/papers/pm86all.pdf]
_____. 1990. Foot and word in prosodic morphology: the Arabic broken plural. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8: 209-284.
_____. 1991a. Prosodic minimality. Handout from talk presented at University of Illinois Conference The Organization of Phonology.
_____. 1991b. Linguistics 240: Prosodic Morphology. Lectures and handouts from 1991 LSA Linguistic Institute Course, University of California, Santa Cruz.
_____. 1993a. Generalized Alignment, Yearbook of Morphology. 79–154.
_____. 1993b. Prosodic Morphology I: Constraint Interaction and Satisfaction. Technical Report no. 3, Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
_____. 1994. The Emergence of the Unmarked: Optimality in Prosodic Morphology, ed. by Mercè Gonzàlez, 333-379. Proceedings of the North East Linguistics Society 24. Massachusetts: GLSA, Amherst.
_____. 1995. Faithfulness and Reduplicative Identity. Papers in Optimality Theory, ed. by Jill Beckman, Suzanne Urbanczyk & Laura Walsh Dickey, 249-384. University of Massachusetts Occasional papers in Linguistics 18. Massachusetts: Graduate Linguistic Student Association, Amherst.
_____. 1999. Faithfulness and Identity in Prosodic Morphology. The Prosody Morphology Interface, ed. by René Kager, Harry van der Hulst, and Wim Zonneveld, 218-309. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ogawa, Naoyoshi and Erin Asai. 1935. The myths and traditions of Formosan native tribes. Taihoku: Taihoku Teikoku Daigaku Gango-ganu Kenkyu-shitsu. 783.
Poser, William. 1982. Why cases of syllable reduplication are so hard to find. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Manuscript, MIT,.
_____. 1989. The prosodic foot in Diyari. Phonology 6:117–148.
Prince, Alan. 1983. Relating to the Grid. Linguistic Inquiry 14.5: 19-100.
_____. 1990. Quantitative consequences of rhythmic organization. Chicago Linguistic Society 26.2: 355–98. (Also http://ling.rutgers.edu/gamma/qcro.pdf)
Prince, Alan and Paul Smlensky. 1993. Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Technical Report no. 2, Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science. Massachusetts: MIT Press. (Also ROA #537)
ROA (Rutgers Optimality Archive): http://roa.rutgers.edu
Rosenthall, Sam. 1994. Vowel/Glide Alternation in a Theory of Constraint Interaction. PhD Dissertation of University of Massachusetts, Amherst. (Also ROA #126)
Ross, Malcolm. 1992. The Sound of Proto-Austronesian: an Outsider’s View of the Formosan Evidence. Oceanic Linguistics 31: 23-64.
Su, Yi-Ching. 2002. Syllable Weights in Stress Assignment of Two Rukai Dialects, Proceeding of The Eighth International Symposium on Chinese Languages and Linguistics. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
Tsuchida, Shigeru. 1971. List of words of Formosan languages. Unpublished Manuscript.
_____. 1976. Reconstruction of Proto-Tsouic phonology. Tokyo: Institute for the Study of Language & Cultures of Asia & Africa; Monograph Series No. 5. 329.
Wang, Jeffery Pei-shou. 2004. Tona Rukai Stress Assignment. Proceedings of 2004 National Conference on Linguistics. Chayi: Chung-Cheng University.
Wang, Shiu-mei. 2004. Morphosyntactic Manifestations of Participants in Tona (Rukai). MA Thesis of National Taiwan Normal University.
Tu, Wen-chiu. 1994. A Synchronic Classification of Rukai Dialects in Taiwan: A Quantitative Study of Mutual Intelligibility. PhD Dissertation of University of Illinois, Urbana.
Yu, Alan C.L. 2000. Stress assignment in Tohono O’odham. Phonology 17, 1: 117-135.
Zeitoun, Elizabeth. 1997. The Pronominal System of Mantauran (Rukai). Oceanic Linguistics 36 (2): 312-346.
_____. 2000a. Rukai Grammar (魯凱語參考語法). Taipei: Yinliu (遠流). (see Chinese Reference)
_____. 2000b. Dynamic vs. Stative Verbs in Mantauran (Rukai). Oceanic Linguistics 39 (2): 415-427.
_____. 2000c. Nominalization in Mantauran Rukai. Paper read at the Workshop on Nominalization in Formosan Languages. Taipei.
_____. 2002. Nominalization in Mantauran (Rukai). Language and Linguistics 3 (2): 241-282.
Zeitoun, Elizabeth and Tien-Hsin Hsin. Glottal Hopping in Mantauran Rukai. Proceeding of The Eighth International Symposium on Chinese Languages and Linguistics. Taipei: Academic Sinica.

參考文獻
李壬癸。1997 。＜多納方言＞在《高雄縣南島語言》李壬癸編。高雄：高雄縣政府。119-157。
齊莉莎。2000。《魯凱語參考語法》。台北：遠流。