掌握產業標準對於廠商績效甚至是國家競爭力相當重要，尤其在與關鍵專利結合後，更是能提升市場地位以及在價值鏈中的議價能力。然而，過去研究皆以西方先進國家經驗為主要觀點，東亞後進國家的廠商究竟如何透過產業標準獲利，是目前研究較少探討的。故本研究深入探討產業標準對於後進國家廠商的重要性究竟為何？以及這些廠商如何透過內部資源組織能力、外部動態環境制度與產業標準互動，進而產生經濟效益。透過彙整文獻與企業訪談中得到影響公司營運績效之因素。本研究所提七項評估構面是以DEMATE為評估方法，經由訪談獲得專家資料，再經由DEMATE方法計算，得出構面間的因果關係。
研究結果發現，影響利基型公司營運績效之前三項最重要關鍵因素為「領導與企業策略」、「產業環境」、「組織能力」；影響量產型公司營運績效之前三項最重要關鍵因素為「領導企業與策略」、「產業標準掌握」、「產業環境」;從研究機構的角度來看，影響公司營運績效之前三項最重要關鍵因素為「領導企業策略」、「產業標準掌握」、「專利價值展現」。故依廠商類別不同而有不同之因果關係，若要改善其公司營運績效，所運用的策略也將不同。利基型廠商較難利用內部領導、或組織能力等方式去影響掌握標準專利;而量產型產商欲改善其營運績效，可由「產業環境」此構面對標準掌握進行改善，使公司營運績效提升。

Holding the industry standard for company operating performance and even national competitiveness is very important. Especially when combined with key patent, it is able to enhance its market position and bargaining power among the industry value chain. However, previous studies begin with the Western experience of advanced countries as the main point of view. The exactly how the East Asian following company gain profits through industry standard is less discussed. Therefore, this study further investigates how importance the industry standard for latecomers companies. And how these companies utilize organizational capacity through internal resources, external environment, dynamic systems to interact with industry standards, and produce economic benefits. Collecting the factor affecting the company opearting performance through literature review and interview. The study proposes seven evaluation criteria by taking decision making trial and evaluation (DEMATE) as the evaluation method and conducting interview to obtain expert data. And then it calculates the casual-effect relationship among the criteria via DEMATE method.

The results found that for niche company, the three most important key factors for operating performance are "Leadership and Corporate Strategy", "industrial environment", "organizational skills". In addition, for mass production company, the three most important key factors are "leader and strategy", " embeddedness industrial standard", "industrial environment"; from the perspective of research institutions, the key factors for company's operating performance are "leader strategy","embeddedness industrial standard", "the market value of patents." Therefore, according to the different types of company have different categories of causal relationship, to improve their company's operating performance, the strategies used will be differently. Niche manufacturers is difficult using internal leadership or organizational skills and other ways to influence the control of a standard patent; however, mass production companies will improve their operating performance through "industrial environment" this factor will also improve the "embeddedness industrial standard", eventually the company operating performance get improvement.

Arora, A., & Gambardella, A. (1990). Complementarity and external linkages: the strategies of the large firms in biotechnology. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 361-379.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120.
Baum, J. A., Calabrese, T., & Silverman, B. S. (2000). Don't go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic management journal, 21(3), 267-294.
Bekkers, R., Bongard, R., & Nuvolari, A. (2011). An empirical study on the determinants of essential patent claims in compatibility standards. Research Policy, 40(7), 1001-1015.
Berger, F., Blind, K., & Thumm, N. (2012). Filing behaviour regarding essential patents in industry standards. Research Policy, 41(1), 216-225.
Bessen, J. (2008). The value of US patents by owner and patent characteristics. Research Policy, 37(5), 932-945.
Bianchi, M., Cavaliere, A., Chiaroni, D., Frattini, F., & Chiesa, V. (2011). Organisational modes for Open Innovation in the bio-pharmaceutical industry: An exploratory analysis. Technovation, 31(1), 22-33.
Blind, K., Edler, J., Frietsch, R., & Schmoch, U. (2006). Motives to patent: Empirical evidence from Germany. Research Policy, 35(5), 655-672.
Blind, K., & Thumm, N. (2004). Interrelation between patenting and standardisation strategies: empirical evidence and policy implications. Research Policy, 33(10), 1583-1598.
Chesbrough, H., & Crowther, A. K. (2006). Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Management, 36(3), 229-236.
Chesbrough, H., & Rosenbloom, R. S. (2002). The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox Corporation's technology spin‐off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 529-555. doi: 10.1093/icc/11.3.529
Collis, D. J. (1994). Research note: how valuable are organizational capabilities? Strategic management journal, 15(S1), 143-152.
Coombs, J. E., & Bierly, P. E. (2006). Measuring technological capability and performance. R&D Management, 36(4), 421-438.
Cooper, A. C., Gimeno-Gascon, F. J., & Woo, C. Y. (1994). Initial human and financial capital as predictors of new venture performance. Journal of business venturing, 9(5), 371-395.
Duncan, R. B. (1972). Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty. Administrative science quarterly, 313-327.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic management journal, 21(10-11), 1105-1121.
Ernst, D., Lee, H., & Kwak, J. (2014). Standards, innovation, and latecomer economic development: Conceptual issues and policy challenges. Telecommunications Policy, 38(10), 853-862.
Farrell, J., & Saloner, G. (1988). Coordination through committees and markets. The RAND Journal of Economics, 235-252.
Grant, R. M. (1996). Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization science, 7(4), 375-387.
Hu, M.-C., & Hung, S.-C. (2014). Taiwan's pharmaceuticals: A failure of the sectoral system of innovation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 88, 162-176.
Hu, M.-C., & Mathews, J. A. (2005). National innovative capacity in East Asia. Research Policy, 34(9), 1322-1349.
Huizingh, E. K. (2011). Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives. Technovation, 31(1), 2-9.
Jaskyte, K. (2004). Transformational leadership, organizational culture, and innovativeness in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 15(2), 153-168.
Jing, F. F., & Avery, G. C. (2011). Missing links in understanding the relationship between leadership and organizational performance. International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER), 7(5).
Kang, B., & Bekkers, R. (2015). Just-in-time patents and the development of standards. Research Policy, 44(10), 1948-1961.
Kastelle, T., Hu, M.-C., & Dodgson, M. (2013). Editorial: Innovation in Taiwan: What is next? Innovation, 15(4), 396-404.
Kline, D. (2000). Rembrandts in the attic: Unlocking the hidden value of patents: Harvard Business Press.
Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market orientation: the construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. The Journal of Marketing, 1-18.
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). Legal determinants of external finance. Journal of finance, 1131-1150.
Lichtenthaler, U. (2009). Outbound open innovation and its effect on firm performance: examining environmental influences. R&D Management, 39(4), 317-330.
Mathews, J. A. (2002). Competitive advantages of the latecomer firm: A resource-based account of industrial catch-up strategies. Asia Pacific journal of management, 19(4), 467-488.
Mathews, J. A. (2006). Dragon multinationals: New players in 21st century globalization. Asia Pacific journal of management, 23(1), 5-27.
Mathews, J. A., Hu, M.-C., & Wu, C.-Y. (2011). Fast-follower industrial dynamics: the case of Taiwan's emergent solar photovoltaic industry. Industry and Innovation, 18(02), 177-202.
Meeus, M. T., Faber, J., & Oerlemans, L. (2002). Why do firms participate in standardization? An empirical exploration of the relation between isomorphism and institutional dynamics in standardization. University of Utrecht. Working Paper Department of Innovation Studies.
Pohlmann, T., Neuhäusler, P., & Blind, K. (2015). Standard essential patents to boost financial returns. R&D Management.
Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy.
Putnam, R. D. (1995). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. PS: Political science & politics, 28(04), 664-683.
Rousseau, D. M. (1996). Changing the deal while keeping the people. The Academy of Management Executive, 10(1), 50-59.
Rysman, M., & Simcoe, T. (2008). Patents and the performance of voluntary standard-setting organizations. Management science, 54(11), 1920-1934.
Schreyögg, G., & Kliesch‐Eberl, M. (2007). How dynamic can organizational capabilities be? Towards a dual‐process model of capability dynamization. Strategic management journal, 28(9), 913-933.
Suarez, F. F., & Utterback, J. M. (1995). Dominant designs and the survival of firms. Strategic management journal, 16(6), 415-430.
Van de Ven, A. H. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management science, 32(5), 590-607.
Weerawardena, J. (2003). The role of marketing capability in innovation-based competitive strategy. Journal of strategic marketing, 11(1), 15-35.
Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., & Perrone, V. (1998). Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization science, 9(2), 141-159.
Zahra, S. A., & Bogner, W. C. (2000). Technology strategy and software new ventures' performance: Exploring the moderating effect of the competitive environment. Journal of business venturing, 15(2), 135-173.
Zak, P. J., & Knack, S. (2001). Trust and growth. The economic journal, 111(470), 295-321.
陳智凱. (2008). 社會資本與知識經濟競爭力. 資訊管理學報, 15(4), 79-97.