研究生: |
陳依琦 |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
北埔史蹟導覽之擴增實境介面設計研究 |
指導教授: | 廖冠智 |
口試委員: | |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
|
論文出版年: | 2013 |
畢業學年度: | 101 |
語文別: | 中文 |
中文關鍵詞: | 擴增實境 、北埔史蹟 、情境設計 、介面評估 |
外文關鍵詞: | augmented reality, Beipu historical region, scenario, interface design |
相關次數: | 點閱:2 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究目的旨在建置新竹北埔史蹟探索之擴增實境導覽系統,運用情境故事法為設計基礎,解析「人」、「事」、「境」、「物」作為互動設計考量,經實地勘察與專家訪談深入瞭解當地場域環境、歷史背景與文化典故,規劃導覽動線以建構史蹟的探索過程,研究最後採用LAYAR進行互動媒體整合,完成介面設計。
研究成果整合LAYAR擴增實境作為呈現史蹟文化知識的方法,引導使用者互動探究文化知識內容,研究過程經結合虛擬與真實環境,辨認虛擬物件、真實物件以及環境相對的空間關係,有助於使用者對場域環境的認識。而結合虛擬與真實的互動效果,易於吸引使用者注意,引導使用者駐足在場域景點以充分探索內容,期待未來以其他場域環境為主的數位內容設計,提供作為擴增實境互動介面之設計參考。
The study aims at based on the concept of scenario methods, and develops the scenario with augmented reality for cultural exploration of Beipu historical region in Taiwan. The research attempts to understand spatial environment, historical background, and cultural characteristics through field research and in-depth interview research to experts. The information is utilized to plan guided tour for people to realize the construction of the historical region. Finally, this study adopt LAYAR to integrate interactive media and complete the interface design.
The contribution of this study integrates knowledge of historic places and culture into LAYAR augmented reality system. Users are guided to explore the cultural knowledge through interactions with the digital contents. Virtual objects, real objects and relative spatial relationship in environment are linked together to help user perceive the environment. In addition, the interesting interaction effect can attract user’s attention so as to fully explore the contents. This study proposes an interactive augmented reality interface design, which is a reference to digital content design for other historical place.
中文參考文獻
1. 余少卿 (2003),行動數位導覽之博物館應用探討,圖書資訊學刊,第2期第1卷,頁1-24。
2. 耿鳳英 (2006)。虛與實:新世紀的博物館展示趨勢。博物館學季刊,20,科技、社會與博物館。
3. 張譽騰(2004)。生態博物館。臺北市:五觀。
4. 溫振華(1996)。村廟與鄉土史教學。鄉土文化教育。鄉土文化教育學術研討會,國立台南師範學院。
5. 郭世文(2008)。擴增實境應用於博物館展示的初探。科技博物,12(4),25-37。
6. 林宏熒(2006)。從語音到影音:談博物館如何規劃掌上型數位導覽。博物館學季刊,20(1),97-114。
7. 游孝國、林國平(2006)。博物館觀眾對新科技應用於博物館解說媒體之滿意度探索。博物館學季刊,20(1),35-53,臺中市。
8. 高心怡(2002),當代博物館展示的再思考。國立臺南藝術大學博物館學研究所。
9. 李青蓉 (1998),人機介面設計,碩士論文,國立空中大學,台北。
10. 莊錦昌(2001)。網站介面使用性之探討與意象之研究,國立成功大學,碩士論文。
11. 蔡學鏞(譯) (2005)。操作介面設計模式,Jenifer, T. (著)。台北:美商歐萊 禮。
12. 郭學武(譯)(2009)。人機介面互動式系統設計。臺北市:臺灣培生教育。
13. 梁宇元,2000,清末北埔客家聚落之構成。頁38,新竹縣竹北市:新竹縣文化中心。
14. 新竹縣文化局(2008),移墾北埔,北埔老聚落數值測量及多媒體製作計畫,多媒體互動光碟。
15. 新竹縣文化局網站,2012,〈縣內文化資產〉,網址:http://www.hchcc.gov.tw/ch/06culture/cul_02.asp,檢索日期:2012年9月23日。
英文參考文獻
1. Abowd, G.D. and E.D. Mynatt. “Charting Past, Present, and Future Research in Ubiquitous Computing.” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 7, 1 (March 2000): 29-58
2. Belcher, M(1991). ”Exhibitions in museums.” Leicester: Leicester University Press.
3. Benyon, D., Turner, P., & Turner, S. (2005). Designing Interactive Systems: People, Activities, Contexts, Technologies: Addison-Wesley.
4. Billinghurst, M.(2001), “The MagicBook: a transitional AR interface,”Computers & Graphics 25, pp. 745–753.
5. Bitgood, S. (1996). Visitor Orientation and Circulation: Some General Principles. In G. urbin (Ed.) Developing Museum Exhibitions for Lifelong Learning. London: Group for Education in Museums. 149151.
6. Carroll, J. M. (2000). Five reasons for scenario-based design. Design Studies, 13 (1), 43-60.
7. Henrysson, A., Billinghurst, M., & Ollila, M. (2005). Face to Face Collaborative AR on Mobile Phones, Proceedings of the 4th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality,80 - 89.
8. Klopfer, E., Squire, K., & Jenkins, H. (2002). Environmental detectives: PDAs as a window into a virtual simulated world. Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, pp. 95-98.
9. Mac Donald G. F. “The Future of Museum in the Global Village.” Museum News 155, 1987, pp.209~216.
10. Masaaki, K. & Kashimura, K. (1995). Apparent usability vs. inherent usability: experimental analysis on the determinants of the apparent usability. Conference on human factors and computing systems. New York: ACM Press.
11. Nardi, B. A. (1992). The use of scenarios in design. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 24(4), 13-14.
12. Nielsen, J. (Ed.) (1990). Designing User Interfaces for International Use. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, ISBN 0-444-88428-9.
13. R. T. Azuma, “A Survey of Augmented Reality,” Journal of Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, vol. 6, pp. 355–385,August 1997.
14. Scagliarini, D., Coralini, A., Vecchietti, E., Cinotti, S. T., Roffia, L., Galasso, S., Malavasi, M, Pigozzi, M., Romagnoli, E., Sforza, F. (2001) Exciting understanding in Pompeii through on-site parallel interaction with dual time virtual models, Proceedings of the 2001 conference on Virtual reality, archeology, and cultural heritage:83-90.
15. Tidwell, J. (2005). Designing Interfaces. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol, USA.
16. UNC Ultrasound/Medical Augmented Reality Research
http://www.cs.unc.edu/Research/us/
17. Verplank, B., Fulton, J., Black, A., & Moggridge, B. (1993). Observation and invention: Use of scenarios in interaction design. Tutorial at INTERCHI'93, Amsterdam