簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳盈安
Chen, Ying-An
論文名稱: 台灣華語與漢語普通話單元音構音與聲學的比較研究
A Comparative Study of Monophthongs in Standard Chinese and Taiwanese Mandarin: Articulation and Acoustics
指導教授: 謝豐帆
Hsieh, Feng-Fan
口試委員: 張月琴
Chang, Yueh-Chin
黃慧娟
Huang, Hui-Chuan
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 人文社會學院 - 語言學研究所
Institute of Linguistics
論文出版年: 2019
畢業學年度: 107
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 56
中文關鍵詞: 華語普通話單元音共振峰構音
外文關鍵詞: monophthong, articulatory
相關次數: 點閱:2下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 摘要
    本論文探討台灣華語和漢語普通話的單元音 [i] [y] [u] [ɤ] 和 [a] 在構音與聲學上的表現。前人曾比較過兩個語言的單元音的聲學差異,但尚未有人做過構音的研究。本論文探討兩個語言的五個單元音的中點的共振峰值與共振峰走勢,以及其舌位前後高低.並用線性混合模式分析共振峰與舌位的關係。從研究結果中發現,元音中點的共振峰值與共振峰走勢的結果並不一致。[ɤ] 的第一及第二共振峰走勢在這兩個語言中的表現很不一樣。舌位方面將以舌頭上三點 TD TB 和 TT 呈現舌位圖。台灣華語的 [u] [ɤ] 和 [a] 的位置似乎比漢語普通話還前面。在這兩個語言中觀察到的共同現象是 TB 可以區分前元音 [i] [y] 和非前元音 [u] [ɤ] 和 [a] 的高低,且 TD 可以區分 [u] [ɤ] 和 [a] 的高低。最後,在共振峰與舌位的關係中,第一共振峰和TB的高低位置有著很大的關聯,且第二共振峰和TB的前後位置也有很大的關聯。


    Abstract
    This thesis investigates the articulatory and the acoustic properties of the five monophthongs [i], [y], [u], [ɤ] and [a] in Standard Chinese (SC) and Taiwanese Mandarin (TM), using electromagnetic articulography (EMA). Although the acoustic differences of monophthongs in SC and TM were reported in previous studies, little is known about the articulatory differences of the monophthongs in SC and TM. In the thesis, formants at the midpoint of a vowel and formant trajectories will be illustrated and compared, as well as the tongue positions of SC and TM speakers. Moreover, the relationship between tongue height and F1, tongue backness and F2 will be examined by a Linear mixed models analysis. The results suggest that the formant values at the midpoint of a vowel and formant trajectories in SC and TM speakers are not always consistent. The formant trajectories of [ɤ] are particularly distinct between the two varieties. Regarding the articulatory results, the backness and height of tongue dorsum (TD), tongue body (TB) and tongue tip (TT) of the Mandarin speakers will be demonstrated. TB in TM appears to be more fronted in [u], [ɤ] and [a] than that in SC. In both SC and TM, the height of TB can distinguish front vowel [i] and [y] from non-front vowels [u], [ɤ] and [a], and the height of TD can distinguish between [u], [ɤ] and [a]. The results, based on articulatory and acoustic data, suggest that TB is the only articulator that correlates F1 and tongue height, and correlates F2 and tongue backness in the two Mandarin dialects.

    TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract I Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Chapter 2 Literature Review 2 2.1 Vowels in SC and TM 2 2.2 Research on articulatory and acoustic relationship 2 Chapter 3 Method 4 3.1 Stimuli 4 3.2 Participants 5 3.3 Data collection 5 3.4 Data analysis 6 Chapter 4 Acoustical Results 8 4.1 An overlook to the monophthongs 8 4.2 Static and Dynamic results for the monophthongs 15 Chapter 5 Articulatory Results 28 5.1 Standard Chinese speakers 28 Chapter 6 Articulatory-Acoustical Relationship 50 Chapter 7 Discussion 52 Chapter 8 Conclusion 54 REFERENCES 56 List of Figures Figure 3-1: Positions of the sensors mounted on the tongue front, tongue middle and tongue back and the fixed reference sensors on the nasion and left and right mastoids. 6 Figure 4-1: Steady state formant values from all SC speakers’ tokens 10 Figure 4- 2: Steady state formant values from all TM speakers’ tokens 11 Figure 4-3: The vowel spaces of the speakers 12 Figure 4-4: Male formant trajectories 16 Figure 4-5: Female formant trajectories 16 Figure 4-6: F1 trajectories of [i] for male speakers 18 Figure 4-7: F2 trajectories of [i]for male speakers 18 Figure 4-8: F1 trajectories of [y] for male speakers 18 Figure 4-9: F2 trajectories of [y]for male speakers 18 Figure 4-10: F1 trajectories of [u] for male speakers 19 Figure 4-11: F2 trajectories of [u] for male speakers 19 Figure 4-12: F1 trajectories of [ɤ] for male speakers 20 Figure 4-13: F2 trajectories of [ɤ]for male speakers 20 Figure 4-14: F1 trajectories of [a] for male speakers 21 Figure 4-15: F2 trajectories of [a] for male speakers 21 Figure 4-16: F1 trajectories of [i] for female speakers 21 Figure 4-17: F2 trajectories of [a] for female speakers 21 Figure 4-18: F1 trajectories of [y] for female speakers 22 Figure 4-19: F2 trajectories of [y] for female speakers 22 Figure 4-20: F1 trajectories of [u] for female speakers 23 Figure 4-21: F2 trajectories of [u] for female speakers 23 Figure 4-22: F1 trajectories of [ɤ] for female speakers 24 Figure 4-23: F2 trajectories of [ɤ]for female speakers 24 Figure 4-24: F1 trajectories of [a] for female speakers 24 Figure 4-25: F2 trajectories of [a] for female speakers 24 Figure 5-1: Tongue contours and tongue positions for SC male speaker 01 (left: back, right: front) 30 Figure 5-2: Tongue contours and tongue positions for SC male speaker 02 (left: back, right: front) 32 Figure 5-3: Tongue contours and tongue positions for SC female speaker 01 (left: back, right: front) 35 Figure 5-4: Tongue contours and tongue positions for SC female speaker 02 (left: back, right: front) 37 Figure 5-5: Tongue contours and tongue positions for TM male speaker 01 (left: back, right: front). 40 Figure 5-6: Tongue contours and tongue positions for TM male speaker 02 (left: back, right: front) 42 Figure 5-7: Tongue contours and tongue positions for TM female speaker 01 (left: back, right: front) 44 Figure 5-8: Tongue contours and tongue positions for TM female speaker 02 (left: back, right: front) 46 List of Tables Table 3-1: The SURFACE vowel inventory of Taiwanese Mandarin 4 Table 3- 2: Test monosyllabic words used in the study 5 Table 4-1: SC speakers’ means and standard deviations for F1 and F2 in Hz 9 Table 4-2: TM speakers’ means and standard deviations for F1, F2 and F3 in Hz 11 Table 4-3: Results for F1 and F2 distinction in male speakers (where n.s=not significant and *=significant) 13 Table 4-4: Results for F1 and F2 distinction in female speakers by T Test (where n.s=not significant and *=significant) 15 Table 4-5: Comparison of static results and dynamic results (where n.s=not significant and *=significant (for dynamic results, * means more than 50% of the trajectory in the interval are significantly different )) 27 Table 5-1: Pairwise comparisons of five monophthongs [i], [y], [u], [ɤ] and [a] for SC male speaker 01 31 Table 5-2: Pairwise comparisons of five monophthongs [i], [y], [u], [ɤ] and [a] for SC male speaker 02 33 Table 5-3: Pairwise comparisons of five monophthongs [i], [y], [u], [ɤ] and [a] for SC female speaker 01 35 Table 5-4: Pairwise comparisons of five monophthongs [i], [y], [u], [ɤ] and [a] for SC female speaker 02 37 Table 5-5: Pairwise comparisons of five monophthongs [i], [y], [u], [ɤ] and [a] for TM male speaker 01 40 Table 5-6: Pairwise comparisons of five monophthongs [i], [y], [u], [ɤ] and [a] for TM male speaker 02 42 Table 5-7: Pairwise comparisons of five monophthongs [i], [y], [u], [ɤ] and [a] for TM female speaker 01 44 Table 5-8: Pairwise comparisons of five monophthongs [i], [y], [u], [ɤ] and [a] for TM female speaker 02 46 Table 5-9: The orders of vowel backness (back<front). M represents male speakers and F represents female speakers 49 Table 5- 10: The orders of vowel height (low<high). M represents male speakers and F represents female speakers. 49 Table 6-1: Correlation between formants and tongue position in SC 50 Table 6- 2: Correlation between formants and tongue position in TM 51

    REFERENCES
    Arwen Blackwood Ximenes, Jason A. Shaw, Christopher Carignan. (2016). Tongue
    positions corresponding to formant values in Australian English vowels. 2016
    ASSTA, 109-112.
    Blevins, J., 1995. The syllable in phonological theory. In: J.A. Goldsmith (ed.), The handbook of phonological theory, 206-244. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
    Clements N. and Hume E. (1995). The internal organization of speech sounds. In: J.A. Goldsmith (ed.), The handbook of phonological theory, 206-244. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
    Ladefoged, P. (2006). A course in phonetics (international student edition). Australia:
    Thomson Wardsworth.
    Ladefoged, P. 2002. Vowels and Consonants. Oxford: Blackwell.
    Ledefoged, P., Maddieson, I. 1998. The Sounds of the World’s Languages. Oxford: Blackwell.
    Matthew Winn. (2016, February 26). Working with Vowels part 2: Plotting vowel
    data. Retrieved from http://www.mattwinn.com/tools/HB95_2.html
    Thomas, E. R., & Kendall, T. (2015). NORM: The vowel normalization and plotting
    suite. Online resource at: http://lingtools.uoregon.edu/norm/norm1.php
    Wu, C. H., Shih, Chilin. Mandarin Vowels Revisited: Evidence from Electromagnetic Articulography. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 329-340. doi:10.3765/bls.v35i1.3622
    Winter, B. (2013). Linear models and linear mixed effects models in R: Tutorial 1.
    Retrieved from http://www.bodowinter.com/tutorial/bw_LME_tutorial1.pdf
    Winter, B. (2013). Linear models and linear mixed effects models in R: Tutorial 2.
    Retrieved from http://www.bodowinter.com/tutorial/bw_LME_tutorial1.pdf
    李蕙心.,2016。廣州話元音發音與聲學之關係。語言暨語言學,頁477-500。張月琴,1998。從聲學角度描寫台灣國語的單元音。清華學報,28(3),頁255。

    QR CODE