十二年國教新課綱頒布之後，素養導向教學成為了此次課程改革的焦點，也引起了 各界的注意及討論。本研究以釋意理論探究國中現場英語教師對素養導向英語教學的理 解與詮釋的過程，旨在瞭解國中英語教師對十二年國教英語領域課綱與素養導向英語教 學的釋意內容以及釋意來源。本研究的研究參與者為三位國中教學現場的正式英語教師， 採用質性研究的方式，透過半結構性的訪談蒐集資料。
本研究的結果如下:
壹、教師對十二年國教英語領域課綱與素養導向英語教學的釋意內容大部分符合英語課綱理念，少部分是似真性的想法，接觸素養導向英語教學概念後，教師皆改變了原本的教學方式，但在趕課壓力下易回復到傳統的教學模式。

貳、教師的釋意來源包含英語學習經驗、教學經歷、研習、英語專業養成背景以及其他來源，學校環境與同儕對教師的釋意較無影響。 關鍵詞: 釋意、國中英語教師、素養導向教學、課綱、英語教學

After the Curriculum Guidelines of 12-year Basic Education was issued, competence- oriented teaching has become the focus of the curriculum reform and attracted attention and discussion. This study investigated the content and sources pertaining to junior high school teachers’ sensemaking for the Curriculum Guidelines of 12-year Basic Education for Elementary, Junior High Schools and General Senior High Schools Language Arts – English and competence-oriented English teaching in Taiwan. In this study, the participants were three formal junior high school English teachers. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to procure the participants’ perceptions and interpretation regarding the Curriculum Guidelines of 12-year Basic Education for Elementary, Junior High Schools and General Senior High Schools Language Arts – English and competence-oriented English teaching.
The finds are as follows:
(1) Most of the teachers’ sensemaking content of the Curriculum
Guidelines of 12-year Basic Education for Elementary, Junior High
Schools and General Senior High Schools Language Arts – English and
competence-oriented English teaching was in accordance with the
ideas of the Curriculum Guidelines of 12-year Basic Education for
Elementary, Junior High Schools and General Senior High Schools
Language Arts – English and a minor part of their sensemaking
pertained to the ideas of plausibility.
(2) The sources of the teachers’ sensemaking included their English
learning experiences, teaching experiences, in service teachers
training courses, English major development background, and other
sources. Schools and peer interactions had less influence on
teachers’ sensemaking.

Keywords: sensemaking, junior high school teachers, competence-oriented
teaching, curriculum guidelines, English teachin

中文部分
王為國(2020)。國小教師對綜合活動領域課綱之釋意研究。當代教育研究季刊，
28(1)，75-108。
王勝忠(2016)。十二年國教英語教學可行的方向。檢索自
https://flipedu.parenting.com.tw/article/1996
台中市政府教育局十二年國教課綱資源整合平台(2020)。領域新舊課綱差異比較。檢索
自 https://12hope.st.tc.edu.tw/
何瑞萍(2014)。Dervin 與 Weick 意義建構理論之分析與比較。大學圖書館，18(1)，83-
105。
林永豐(2014)。素養的概念及其評量。教育人力與專業發展，31(6)，35-48。
林秀貞(2016)。培養小學生英語素養與能力-從基礎教學與行動學習中做起。國家教育 研究院教育脈動電子期刊，5，1-14。
林明佳(2018)。從「能力」到「素養」的英語教學:溝通式教學觀的情境與活用。教育研究月刊，294，72-90。
林政逸(2017)。十二年國教新課綱核心素養評量。臺灣教育評論月刊，6(3)，28-29。
林家五、黃國隆、鄭伯壎(2004)。從認同到開創:創業家的動態釋意歷程。中山管理評
論，12(2)，337-397。
林淑媛(2018)。英語學習素養，從生活中培養。檢索自
https://flipedu.parenting.com.tw/article/4376
林肇基、張嘉育(2019)。十二年教課綱實施後技術型高中英語教育的挑戰。教育脈動， 18，1-7-004
洪欣玫(2019)。以素養導向教學提升偏鄉國小四年級學生英語學習動機與口說能力之行動研究。臺中教育大學教師專業碩士學位學程碩士論文，未出版，臺中。
孫瑞麟(2019)。國小教師對十二年國教課程綱要的釋意—以社會學習領域為例。清華大學教育與學習科技學系碩士論文，未出版，新竹。
國家教育研究院課程及教學研究中心核心素養工作圈(2015)。核心素養發展手冊。檢索自 https://www.naer.edu.tw/files/15-1000-9423,c1174-1.php
張瀞文(2018)。面向未來的能力-素養導向教學教戰手冊。臺北市:教育部。 教育部(2011)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要語文學習領域(英語)。檢索自
https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/WebContent/index.aspx?sid=9&mid=231
教育部(2017)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要-總綱。檢索自
https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/Guildline/index.aspx?sid=11
教育部(2018)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要語文領域-英語文。檢索自 https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/WebContent/index.aspx?sid=11&mid=5875
章菁(2018)。英語文領綱研修的特色與重點。國教課綱向前行電子報。檢索自 http://newsletter.edu.tw/2018/06/08/6256/
許家菁(2019)。從十二年國教英語領綱淺談雙語教育的可能性。臺灣教育評論月刊， 8(9)， 76–81。
陳禹彤(2019)。高中英語教師素養導向教學之個案研究。淡江大學教育政策與領導研究所碩士班碩士論文，未出版，新北。
曾芬蘭、鍾長宏、陳世玉、張銘秋(2018)。國中課室素養導向標準本位評量的設計與應 用:以英語科閱讀為例。教育科學研究期刊，63(4)，119-155
鈕文英(2016)。質性研究方法與論文寫作(二版)。臺北市:雙葉書廊。
葉明政(2014)。國小教師實施重大議題課程政策:釋意理論的多重個案研究。臺中教育大學教育學系博士論文，未出版，臺中。
葉明政(2014)。國小教師對重大議題課程政策實施之個人釋意分析。課程與教學季刊，
17(4)，173-206。
葉俊巖、楊雅晴(2018)。素養導向的英語寫作課程轉化。臺灣教育評論月刊，7(1)，
182-189
葉錫南(2019)。十二年國教英語文教科書之設計與使用。教育研究月刊，303，52-65。
潘慧玲、張淑涵(2014)。策劃學校發展的資料運用:一所高中個案研究。教育科學研究 期刊，59(1)，171–195。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2014.59(1).06
鄭雅娟(2020)。十二年國教國小英語素養教育的規劃與落實。臺灣教育，723，79-87。

英文部分
Allen, C. D., & Penuel, W. R. (2014). Studying teachers’ sensemaking to investigate teachers’ responses to professional development focused on new standards. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(2), 136–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487114560646
Ancona, D. (2012). Sensemaking: Framing and acting in the unknown. In S. Snook, N. Nohria, & R. Khurana (Eds.), The Handbook for Teaching Leadership : Knowing, Doing, and Being (pp. 3–19). Los Angeles, CA.: Sage.
Baber, C., Attfield, S., Conway, G., Rooney, C., & Kodagoda, N. (2016). Collaborative sense- making during simulated intelligence analysis exercises. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 86, 94–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.10.001c
Coburn, C. E. (2001). Collective sensemaking about reading: How teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(2), 145–170. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737023002145
Coburn, C. E. (2004). Beyond decoupling: Rethinking the relationship between the
institutional environment and the classroom. Sociology of Education, 77(3), 211–244.
https://doi.org/10.1177/003804070407700302
Coburn, C. E. (2005). Shaping teacher sensemaking: School leaders and the enactment of reading policy. Educational Policy, 19(3), 476–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904805276143
Coburn, C. E., & Woulfin, S. L. (2012). Reading coaches and the relationship between policy and practice. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(1), 5–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.008
Coburn, C. E., Mata, W. S., & Choi, L. (2013). The embeddedness of teachers’ social networks. Sociology of Education, 86(4), 311–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040713501147
Cohen, D.K. (1990). A revolution in one classroom: The case of Mrs. Oublier. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 311-329.
Heredia, C. S. (2015). Dilemmas of reform: An exploration of science teacher's collective sensemaking of formative assessment practices (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado.
Muñiz, R. (2020). Muddy sensemaking: Making sense of socio-emotional skills amidst a vague policy context. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 28(114), 1-38.
Rangel, V. S., Bell, E., & Monroy, C. (2019). Teachers’ sensemaking and data use implementation in science classrooms. Education and Urban Society, 51(4), 526-554.
Wang, Shu-Kuan (2020). Teachers’ perceptions of the learning performance items in the 12- year basic education curriculum guidelines for senior high school English (Unpublished Master’s thesis). College of Liberal Arts National Taiwan Normal University.
Weick, K. E. (2005). The experience of theorizing : Sensemaking as topic and resource. In Smith, Ken G. & Hitt, Michael A.(Ed.), Great Minds in Management: The Process of Theory Development(pp.394–413). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0133