研究生: |
楊小平 |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
不同閱讀障礙亞型學習行為特徵之比較研究-以桃園縣國小學生為例 |
指導教授: | 孟瑛如 |
口試委員: | |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
竹師教育學院 - 特殊教育學系 Special Education |
論文出版年: | 2011 |
畢業學年度: | 99 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 113 |
中文關鍵詞: | 學習障礙 、識字 、閱讀理解 、閱讀障礙亞型 |
外文關鍵詞: | learning disabilities, word recognition, reading comprehension, subtypes of reading disabilities |
相關次數: | 點閱:2 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究欲了解不同閱讀障礙亞型在識字及閱讀理解行為特徵上的差異,因此自編「國民小學學生閱讀行為特徵量表」,根據研究對象在問卷中識字及閱讀理解兩大向度的得分進行集群分析,結果如下:
本研究以桃園縣168位國小閱讀障礙學生為研究對象,將閱讀障礙分為四種亞型,其特質如下:1.「閱讀理解障礙型」佔研究樣本人數41.07%,具備不錯的識字能力,字形再現能力好,但是字義、句子、文章以及監控理解能力很差; 2.「識字障礙型」佔研究樣本人數的21.43%,識字能力區於弱勢,但在字義、句子、文章及監控理解方面有良好的表現;3.「混合障礙型」佔研究樣本人數的19.64%,識字、理解能力都不佳,在各樣測驗的表現上都居四組之末4.「監控理解障礙型」佔研究樣本人數的17.86%,識字與理解能力均較佳,監控理解能力較弱,智力表現為四組之首。
本研究閱讀障礙亞型與國內、外的研究結果比較,皆可找到性質接近的亞型類別,研究者發現1.「閱讀理解障礙型」音韻能力良好、但口語表達容易出現詞語誤用、敘事短少的情形,與國外研究一致; 2.「識字障礙型」在「字音辨讀分量表」上的表現落後,與國外研究聲韻能力落後結果相同;此外學生對相似字辨識、看過的字再寫出來有困難,是國外沒有提到的特徵;3.「混合障礙型」認知能力低落,「字音辨讀」能力差,「語用」表現錯誤、句法錯置的情形,皆與國外研究結果相符。然而,本亞型對字形辨識的能力亦居四組之末,國外研究並未提及4.「監控理解障礙型」無論識字與理解能力均佳,與國內外研究結果相似,但國外研究未提及相似亞型的監控能力。
The purpose of this study was to understand the subtypes of reading disabilities and the different behavioral characteristics of word recognizing and reading comprehension. Therefore the researcher established the reading behavioral characteristics questionnaire for elementary school students, investigated four subtypes of students with reading disabilities according to their questionnaire scores.
In this study, 168 reading disabilities students at Taoyuan County elementary school are studied.The study divided students with reading disabilities into four subtypes. 1." low-achiever in reading comprehension type " includes 41.07% of all students who have reading disabilities. They are good at word recognition and copy, but weak at meaning of words,sentence ,articles and monitoring comprehension. 2." Low-achiever in word recognition type "includes 21.43%of all. They are good at meaning of words,sentence ,articles and monitoring comprehension, but weak at word recognition.3. "Low-achiever both in word recognition and reading comprehension type "includes 19.64% of all. All performances are behind the other three subtypes in every test. 4." Low-achiever in metacognitive ability type "includes 17.86%of all .They are good at word recognition and reading comprehension;Intelligence is on top in four subtypes but metacognitive ability is not good .
Researcher compared the study with others and found similar subtypes at home and abroad. The study result of 1. "low-achiever in reading comprehension type "is corresponding with foreign study. They are good at phonology, but weak at oral expression of phrase misuse and sentence shortage. 2.The poor performance of" low-achiever in word recognition type "in pronunciation subscale is as foreign study in backward phonology. Students have difficulties in identifying similar words and writing down words learned before are not mentioned in foreign study.3. The study result of" low-achiever both in word recognition and reading comprehension type "is corresponding with foreign study. Students have low cognitive abilities, poor phonology, using wrong words, and syntax misplaced.However, it is not mentioned in foreign study that their abilities of word recognition is behind other subtypes. 4. The study of" Low-achiever in metacognitive ability type "is similar as domestic and foreign study in good recognition and reading comprehension but metacognitive ability is not mentioned with foreign studies.
參考文獻
中文部份
孔繁鐘、孔繁錦(1998)。DSM -IV精神疾病的診斷準則手冊。台北:合記。
王佳玲(2001)。國小不同閱讀理解能力學生在不同難度、文體文章閱讀理解表現及方式之比較研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。
王英君(2000)。國小閱讀障礙學生閱讀理解策略之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。
王瓊珠(1992)。國小六年級閱讀障礙兒童與普通兒童閱讀認知能力之比較研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
王瓊珠(2002)。學習障礙:家長與教師手冊。心理出版社。
王瓊珠(2004)。故事結構教學與分享閱讀。台北:心理。
吳怡潔(1997)。「閱讀簡單觀點模式」於中文一般及閱讀困難學童之驗證研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育系碩士學位論文。
吳明隆(2009)。SPSS操作與應用-問卷統計分析實務。台北:五南。
吳芳香(1998)。國小二年級優讀者與弱讀者閱讀策略使用與覺識之研究。國立高雄師範大學特殊教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。
呂宗學、石台平、賴華山、李麗雪、李孟智、周明智(1995)。國際疾病分類簡史與第十版簡介。公共衛生。21(4),221-229。
孟瑛如(2002)。學習障礙與補救教學—教師及家長實用手冊。台北:五南。
林尹(1971)。文字學概說。台北:正中。
林宜真(1998)。閱讀障礙學生與普通學生閱讀理解方式之比較研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。
林秉武(2003)。交互教學策略對不同組型閱讀障礙兒童增進閱讀理解效果之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所未出版博士論文。
林俊銘(1989)。閱讀障礙。特殊教育季刊,30,17-25。
林清山譯(R. E. Mayer著)(1992)。教育心理學-認知取向。台北:遠流出版社。
邵慧綺(2002)。閱讀障礙者的視、聽知覺功能對其識字學習之影響。屏師特殊教育,3,9-16。
邱上真(1997):國語文低成就學生閱讀表現之追蹤研究(II)----國民小學國語文低成就學童篩選工具系列發展之研究(II)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。(編號:NSC86-2413-H-017-002-F5)
邱上真、洪碧霞(1999)。國語文低成就學童閱讀表現之追蹤研究(Ⅰ)—國民小學國語文低成就學生篩選工具系列發展之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究報告(NSC84-2421-H017-002-F5)。
柯華葳(1991-1992):台灣地區閱讀研究文獻回顧。載於曾志朗編:中國語文心理學研究第一年度結案報告, 31-76 。嘉義:國立中正大學認知科學研究中心。
柯華葳(1997)。中文閱讀歷程成分研究:兒童在閱讀理解上的困難。載於:第五屆世界華語文教學研討會論文集(教學應用組,上冊),399-405。
柯華葳(1999)。閱讀理解困難篩選測驗。行政院國家科學委員會印行。
柯華葳、李俊仁(1996)。國小低年級學生語音覺識能力與與認字能力的發展:一個縱貫的研究。國立中正大學學報社會科學分冊,7(1),49-66。
柯華葳、詹益綾(2007)。國民小學閱讀理解測驗指導手冊。台北:教育部特殊工作小組。
洪麗瑜(1995)。學習障礙者教育。台北: 心理出版社。
洪儷瑜、王瓊珠、張郁雯、陳秀芬(2006)。常見字流暢性測驗。台北:教育部。
洪儷瑜、陳淑麗、王瓊珠、方金雅、張郁雯、陳美芳、柯華葳(2009)。閱讀障礙篩選流程的檢驗--篩選或教師轉介之比較。特殊教育研究學刊,34,1-22。
洪蘭、曾志朗、張稚美(1993)。閱讀障礙兒童的認知心理學基礎。輯於台北市教師研習中心(主編),學習障礙與資源教室(頁74-86) 。
胡永崇(2003)。國小四年級閱讀困難學生識字相關因素及不同識字教學策略之教學成效比較研究。屏東師院學報,19,177-216。
胡志偉、顏乃欣(1995)中文字的心理歷程。載於曾進興主編,病理語言學,1。台北市:心理。
特殊教育法(2009)。中華民國九十八年十一月十八日華總(一)義字第零九八零零二八九三八一 號令發布。
教育部(2006)。身心障礙及資賦優異學生鑑定標準。台北:教育部。
許天威(1990)。學習障礙者之教育。台北市:五南圖書公司。
許瑛珍(2003)。閱讀障礙的成因與類別 ~從認知神經心理學的角度探討。國教世紀, 207 ,23-30。
郭為藩(1978)。我國學童閱讀缺陷問題的初步調查及探討。台灣師大特殊教育研究所集刊,20,57-58。
陳美芳(2007)。聽覺理解測驗指導手冊。台北:教育部特殊工作小組。
陳美芳、吳怡潔(2006)。圖畫式聽覺理解測驗。教育部。
陳榮華編(1997)。魏氏兒童智力量表第三版(中文版)指導手冊。台北市:中國行為科學社。
曾世杰(1996)。閱讀障礙:研究方法簡介。語言病理學基礎,2,323-369。台北:心理。
曾世杰(1999)。國語文低成就學童之工作記憶、聲韻處理能力與唸名速度之研究。載於學童閱讀困難的鑑定與診斷研討會文集(pp. 5-28)。國立中正大學心理學系認知科學研究中心。
曾世杰(2004):聲韻覺識、唸名速度與中文. 閱讀障礙。台北:心理出版社。
曾志朗(1991)。華語文的心理學研究--本土. 化的沈思。載於楊中芳(主編),中國. 人、中國心—發展與教學篇。
黃秀霜(1996)。中文年級認字量表之編製及國語低成就兒童認字困難診斷。國科會專題研究計畫成果報告,未出版。
黃秀霜、詹欣蓉(1997)。閱讀障礙兒童之音韻覺識、字覺識及聲調覺識之分析。特殊教育與復健學報,5,125-138。
黃淑君(2003)。國小學童聽覺理解能力與閱讀理解能力之相關研究。國立臺中師範學院教育測驗統計研究所碩士論文,未出版。
楊坤堂(2002)。學習障礙導論。台北:五南。
萬雲英(1991)。兒童學習漢字的心理特性與教學。載於楊中芳及高尚仁主編:中國人中國心--發展與教學篇(401-446頁)。臺北市:遠流出版公司。
西文部份
Aaron, P. G., & Joshi, R. M. (1992). Reading problems : Consultation and remediation. New York: The Guilford Press.
Barchers,Suzanne I.(1998) Reading:from process to practice. NY:Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Bender(2001). Learning disabilities: Characteristics, identification, andteaching strategies (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Bender, W. N.(2004)Learning disabilities:Characteristics, identification, and teaching strategies. MA:Allyn & Bacon.
Bishop, D. V. M.,& Snowling, M. J. (2004). Developmental dyslexia and specific language impairment: Same or different? Psychological Bulletin,130 , 858-886.
Boder E.(1973) Developmental dyslexia: a diagnostic approach based on three atypical reading-spelling patterns. Dev Med Child Neurol , 15, 663–87.
Catts, H. W., & Kamhi, A. G. (1999). Language and reading disabilities. Needham Heights, MA:Allyn and Bacon.
Catts, HW, & Kamhi, AG (2005). Language and reading disabilities. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Dickman, G. E. (2003), Theme editors summary: The nature of learning disabilities through the lens of reading research, Perspecitives, 29(2), 1-4.
Ekwall, E., & Shanker, J.L. (1988). Diagnosis and remediation of the disabled reader (3rd edition). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
Feagans, L. (1983).Discourse Processes in learning disabled children. In J. D. McKinney & L.Feagans(Eds.),Current topics in learning disabilities, Vol. 1. Norwood, NJ:Ales.
Feagans, L.V., & Merriwether, A.(1990). Visual discrimination of letter-like forms and its relationship to achievement over time in children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23(7),417-424.
Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41(1), 93–99.
Gagne’,E. D.,Yekovich, C. W. & Yekovich, F. R.(1993)The cognitive psychology og school learning(2nd ed.)New York:Harper Collins Publishers.
Gearheart, B. R., & Gearheart, C. T.(1985). Learning disabilities:educational strategies(4th ed.). St. Louis:The C. V. Mosby Company.
Gibson,Eleanor J.& Harry Levin(1975) The Psychology of Reading. Cambridge,Massachusetts:The MIT Press.
Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E.(1986). Decoding, reading and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10.
Hoover,W. A.,& Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple viewof reading.Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2,127–160.
Houck, C.K.(1984).Learning disabilities understanding concepts, characteristic, and issues. New Jerssey:Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Joshi, R., & Aaron, P. G. (2000). The component model of reading: Simple view of reading made a little more complex. Reading Psychology, 21, 85-97.
Just, M. A. & Carpenter, P. A. (1980).A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review 87(4), 329-354.
Kamhi, A. G. (1991). Causes and consequences of reading disabilities. In A. G. Kamhi & H. W. Catts (Eds.), Reading disabilities: a developmental language perspective. Needham Heights , Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon.
Kaulgar, G. & Kolson, C.J.(1978).Reading and learning disabilities. Second Edition Columbus:Bell & Howell company.
Legein, C.P. & Bouma, H.(1984).Vibal recognition experiments in dyslexia. In Pavlidis, G.T. & Miles, T.R.(ed) Eyeslexia research and its applications to Education. Chisthoester:John wiley & vans Ltd.
Leonard, C. M.(2001)Imaging brain structure in children:Differentiating language disability and reading disability. Learning Disability Quarterly, 24, 158-176.
Lerner, J. (2009). Learning disabilities: Theories, diagnosis, and teaching strategies (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Co.
Lerner, J. W., & Kline, F. (2006). Learning Disabilities: Theories, diagnosis, and teaching strategies (10th ed.). New York: Houghton Mifflin.
Lerner, J.W., & Johns, B. (2009). Learning disabilities and related mild disabilities:Characteristics, teaching strategies, and new directions (11th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Lyon, G. R. (1995). Research initiatives in learning disabilities: Contributions from scientists supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Journal of Child Neurology, 10 (suppl. 1), 120–126.
Max, H., & Jungmann, T. (2000). Dependency of reading comprehension development on listening and basic reading skills: An examination of the Simple View of Reading.Zeitschrift fur Entwicklungspsychologie und Padagogische Psychologie, 32(2), 81-93.
McCardle, P., Scarborough, HS, & Catts. HW (2001). Predicting,explaining, and preventing reading difficulties.Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 16,230-239.
Mercer, C. D. (1987).Student with learning disabilities (3rded.). New York: Merrill.
Mercer, C. D. (1997). Students with learning disabilities (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/ Prentice.
Mercer,C.D.,& Mercer,A,R.,(2001) Teaching students with Learning Problems (6th Ed.) Upper Saddle River NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Miller, S. D., & Yochum, N. (1991). Asking students about the nature of their reading difficulties. Journal of Reading Behavior, 23, 465-485.
Nation, K. (2005). Why reading comprehension fails: Insights from developmental disorder. Topics in Language Disorders,25(1), 21-32.
Orton, S. (1937)Reading, writing, and speech problems in children. New York:Nortin.
Pearson, P.D., & Johnson, D.D. (1978). Teaching reading comprehension. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Perfetti , C . A., & Hogaboam, T. (1985) . Rel a tionship between single word decoding and reading comprehension skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 461-469.
Raskind, W. H. (2001).Current understanding of the genetic basis of reading and spelling disability. Learning Disability Quarterly, 24, 141-157.
Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs , NJ : Prentice-Hall.
Rozin, P., Poritsky, S., & Sotsky, R. (1971). American Childrenwith Reading Problems Can Easily Learn to Read English Represented by Chinese Characters. Science, 171(3977), 1264-1267.
Siegel, L. S. & Mestala, Jamie.(1992).An alternative to the food processor approach to subtypes of learning disabilities. In singh, N. N., & Beaie(Eds.).Learning disabilities:Nature, theory, and treatment. New York:Springer-Verlag. pp.44-60
Susan Winebrenner(2008)Teaching Kids With Learning Difficulties in the Regular Classroom: Ways to challenge & motivate struggling students to achieve proficiency with required standards.
Spodek,B.(1985).Teaching in early years. N.J.:Prentuce- Hall,Inc.
Taylor, B., Harris, L. A., Pearson, P. D. & Garcia, G.(1995) .Reading difficulties : Instruction and assessment (2nded.) .New York : McGraw-Hill.
Vellutino, F.R., Fletcher, J.M., Snowling, M.J., Scanlon, D.M.(2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): Whathave we learned in the past four decades? Journal of Child Psychological Psychiatry, 45, 2-40.
Wiig, E. H., & Semel, E. M.(1976).Language disabilities in children and adolescents. Columbus,OH:Merrill.
Williams, J. P. (1993). Comprehension of students with and without learning disabilities: Identification of narrative themes and idiosyncratic text representations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 631-641.
Wolf, M., Bowers, P. G., (2000). Naming-speed processes and developmental Reading disabilities: An introduction to the special issue on the double-deficit hypothesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 322-324.
Wren, S. (2003). The cognitive foundations of learning to read: A framework. Retrieved October 3, 2003, from http://www. sedl. org/reading/framework.
Wren, S. (2006). The simple view of reading: R=D×C. Retrieved July, 07, 2006, from http://www.balancedreading.com/simple.html