激發式動態呈現是指在數位教材畫面中以一物件做為激發器，控制一連串物件動態出現的一種呈現方式。其能協助教學者適時且適當地呈現教材訊息、激發學習者注意力、減少工作記憶負擔並且降低認知負荷。適性指標是一種視覺物件，透過激發式動態呈現的方式，教學者能彈性地操控這些視覺物件，使之在前注意處理歷程自動化運作，發揮其視覺特徵的功能，以動態引導學習者的注意力，使其適時注意教學訊息的關鍵所在，進而產生有效的學習。
本研究旨在探究數學科激發式動態呈現教材中「適性指標」對學習者「眼球運動」的導引情形，並藉此評估教材設計是否得當。研究者以眼動追蹤系統EyeGaze為工具，蒐集六位國中一年級學生在觀看適性指標教材時的眼動資料，並輔以問卷、學習成效測驗及個人背景資料等，做不同型態資料之間的比較並進行質性分析。研究結果發現：
一、適性指標確實具有吸引視線、幫助對重要訊息聚焦及定位之效果。
二、學習者認為自己在觀看適性指標教材時所需的感知負荷量不高，且對於教材的導引有正面評價。
三、學習成效測驗答題正確性與眼球移動是否能受到適性指標的導引沒有相對應的關係。
四、適性指標設計應考量訊息突顯程度的比重、同一瞬間突顯的訊息個數、訊息重複性、視線傾向及提示線索等因素。

Trigger-based animation is the use of objects as triggers to control a series of animations in digital materials. It can help the instructors to present the teaching materials timely and suitably, attract the learners’ attention, and reduce working memory load and cognitive load. Adaptive Pointer is a visual object, by the trigger-based animation, instructors can control the presentation adaptively, causing Adaptive Pointer to be attracted automatically in preattentive processing, guiding students’ attention adaptively in order to make them notice the essential messages and to promote the learning effects.
The purpose of this study is to explore the effects of the “Adaptive Pointer” on learner’s eye movement in the triggered-based animated instructional design, and to evaluate whether the instructional design is appropriate or not. This research used the eye-tracker “EyeGaze” as the tool to collect and analyze the eye movement data of six seventh-grade students during learning the teaching material designed by Adaptive Pointer. We also adopted questionnaire, learning performance test, and students’ demographic data to do qualitative analyses.
The major findings of this study are as follows:
1.Adaptive Pointer can attract learners and to help them focus and locate important messages.
2.Learners considered that their perception load is less when they learned the teaching materials, and they have more positive evaluation regarding the guidance of the teaching materials.
3.The results of the learning performance test and the eye movement guided by Adaptive Pointer are not related.
4.Designers should consider factors such as the highlight degree of messages, the number of the highlight messages in simultaneous time, the repetition of messages, the tendencies of vision line, and the cues while using Adaptive Pointer.

一、 中文部分
吳協衡（2004）。局部特徵取代法輔以視覺認知探討應用於本土化設計-以茶壺設計為例。國立台灣科技大學設計研究所碩士論文。
李玉琇、蔣文祈（譯）（2005）。Sternberg, R. J. 著。認知心理學（Congnitive psychology）。台北：雙葉書廊。
李素卿（譯）（2003）。Eysenck, M. W., & Keane, M. T.著。認知心理學（Cognitive Psychology）。台北：五南。
林金盾（2004）。生理心理學－神經與行為。台北：藝軒圖書。
林煜庭（2007）。適性指標：多媒體學習中一種基於視覺認知理論的引導方式。國立交通大學理學院碩士在職專班網路學習學程碩士論文。
唐曉玲（2006）。多媒體演講式課程重點處之動態模式對學習者認知負荷與注意力的影響。大同大學工業設計學系碩士論文。
徐國銘（2006）。運用眼球追蹤技術探討國小教師對熱傳遞概念之研究。國立交通大學教育研究所碩士論文。
張格瑜（2007）。運用眼動儀探討不同學科背景大學生之細胞擴散和滲透作用的心智表徵建構。國立交通大學教育研究所碩士論文。
教育部（2003）。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。台北：教育部。
梁雲霞（譯）（2003）。Jensen, E.著。大腦知識與教學（Teaching with the Brain in Mind）。台北：遠流。
莊賢智（2004）。以眼動追蹤法探討圖文配置閱讀視線軌跡之研究。中國文化大學資訊傳播研究所碩士論文。
陳明璋（2006）。數學簡報系統－一個克服數位落差之教師專業發展環境。第十屆全球華人計算機教育研討會。
陳明璋（2008）。一個以授課為導向之數位教材設計及展演環境－Activate Mind Attention (AMA) 系統。國民教育月刊。
陳學志（主譯）（2004）。Ashcraft, M. H.著。認知心理學（Cognition）。台北：學富文化。
游恆山（譯）（2004）。Zimbardo, P. G., & Gerrig, R. J.著。心理學（Psychology and Life）。台北：五南。
隋雪（2006）。學習困難兒童觀看圖片的眼動研究。中國特殊教育，74(5)，61-65。
葉素玲（1999）。視覺空間注意力。載於李江山（主編），視覺與認知：視覺知覺與視覺運動系統（291-323頁）。台北：遠流。
趙居蓮（譯）（1997）。Gagne, R.著。學習與教學（The conditions of learning and theory of instruction）。台北：心理。
蔡介立、顏妙璇、汪勁安（2005）。眼球移動測量在中文閱讀研究之應用。應用心理研究，28期，91-104。
蔡金成（2006）。運用眼球追蹤法探討國小科學與非科學教師在電流動畫中的注意力分佈與其概念之研究。國立交通大學教育研究所碩士論文。
鄭昭明（1993）。認知心理學—理論與實踐。台北：桂冠圖書。
黎煒（譯）（2000）。Kurt Koffka著。格式塔心理學原理（上）（Principle of Gestalt Psychology）。台北：昭明。

二、 英文部分
Abrams, R. A., & Christ, S. E. (2003). Motion onset captures attention. Psychological Science, 14(5), 427-432.
Albert, W. S. (2002). Do web users actually look at ads? A case study of banner ads and eye-tracking technology. Paper presented at the 11th Annual Conference of the Usability Professionals' Association.
Altonen, A., Hyrskykari, A., & Räihä, K. (1998). 101 Spots, or how do users read menus? Paper presented at the CHI 98 Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press.
Atkinson, C., & Mayer, R. E. (2004). Five ways to reduce PowerPoint overload. Sociable Media.
Backs, R. W., & Walrath, L. C. (1992). Eye movement and pupillary response indices of mental workload during visual search of symbolic displays. Applied Ergonomics, 23, 243-254.
Bobis, J., Sweller, J., & Cooper, M. (1993). Cognitive Load Effects in a Primary-School Geometry Task. Learning & Instruction, 3, 1-21.
Calvi, C., Porta, M., & Sacchi, D. (2008). e5Learning, an E-Learning Environment Based on Eye Tracking. Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference, Santander, Cantabria.
Carlson, N. R. (2001). Human Visual System. In Physiology of behavior (7 ed., pp. 160-200). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Chen, M. J. (2003). A Conceptual Structure of Mathematical Presentation System. Paper presented at the Asia Technology Conference in Mathematic.
Chen, M. J., & Tan, N. C. (2007). A study of interactive mathematical environments for teacher with trigger-based animation. Paper presented at the Asian Technology Conference in Mathematics.
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2003). E-Learning and the science of instruction: proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.
Cook, M. P. (2006). Surface and Semantic Processing of Cellular Transport Representations by High School Students with Low and High Prior Knowledge. North Carolina State University.
Cowen, L. (2001). An Eye Movement Analysis of Web-Page Usability. Lancaster University, UK.
Cowen, L., Ball, L. J., & Delin, J. (2002). An eye-movement analysis of web-page usability. In X. Faulkner, J. Finlay & F. Détienne (Eds.), People and Computers XVI—Memorable yet Invisible: Proceedings of HCI 2002 (pp. 317-335). London: Springer-Verlag Ltd.
D'Zmura, M., Lennie, P., & Tiana, C. (1997). Color search and visual field segregation. Perception and Psychophysics, 59(3), 381-388.
Dodd, D. H., & White, R. M. (1980). Cognition, mental structures and processes. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Dougherty, R. F., Smith, A., Verardo, M. R., & Mayer, M. J. (1996). Visual search for flicker: high temporal frequency targets capture attention. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 37, S296.
Duchowski, A. T. (2003). Eye tracking methodology: theory and practice. Secaucus, NJ: Springer-Verlag New York.
Ellis, S., Candrea, R., Misner, J., Craig, C. S., Lankford, C. P., & Hutshinson, T. E. (1998). Windows to the soul? What eye movements tell us about software usability. Paper presented at the Usability Professionals' Association Conference 1998.
Enns, J. T., Austen, E. L., Lollo, V. D., Rauschenberger, R., & Yantis, S. (2001). New Objects Dominate Luminance Transients in Setting Attentional Priority. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27(6), 1287-1302.
Fischer, M. H. (1999). An investigation of attention allocation during sequential eye movement tasks. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 52(3), 649-677.
Fitts, P. M., Jones, R. E., & Milton, J. L. (1950). Eye movements of aircraft pilots during instrument-landing approaches. Aeronautical Engineering Review, 9(2), 24-29.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary Covert Orienting Is Contingent on Attentional Control Settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18(4), 1030-1044.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Wright, J. H. (1994). The Structure of Attentional Control: Contingent Attentional Capture by Apparent Motion, Abrupt Onset, and Color. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20(2), 317-329.
Franconeri, S. L., & Simons, D. J. (2003). Moving and looming stimuli capture attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 65(7), 999-1010.
Franconeri Steven, L., Hollingworth, A., & Simons Daniel, J. (2005). Do New Objects Capture Attention? Psychological Science, 16, 275.
Godijn, R., & Theeuwes, J. (2002). Oculomotor capture and inhibition of return: evidence for oculomotor suppression account of IOR. Psychological Science, 66(4), 234.
Goldberg, H. J., & Kotval, X. P. (1999). Computer interface evaluation using eye movements: Methods and constructs. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 24, 631-645.
Goldberg, J. H., & Kotval, X. P. (1998). Eye movement-based evaluation of the computer interface. In S. K. Kumar (Ed.), Advances in Occupational Ergonomics and Safety (pp. 529-532). Amsterdam: ISO Press.
Goldberg, J. H., Stimson, M. J., Lewenstein, M., Scott, N., & Wichansky, A. M. (2002). Eye tracking in web search tasks: design implications. Paper presented at the Eye Tracking Research & Applications Symposium 2002, New York, ACM.
Gompel, R. P. G. V., Fischer, M. H., & Murray, W. S. (2007). Eye-movement research: An overview of current and past development. In R. P. G. V. Gompel, M. H. Fischer, W. S. Murray & R. L. Hill (Eds.), Eye movements: A window on mind and brain (pp. 1-28). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
Gould, J. D., & Schaffer, A. (1965). Eye movements parameters in pattern recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 74, 521-535.
Graf, W., & Krueger, H. (1989). Ergonomic evaluation of user-interfaces by means of eye-movement data. In M. J. Smith & G. Salvendy (Eds.), Work with Computers: Organizational, Management, Stress and Health Aspects (pp. 659-665). Elsevier Science Publishers, B.V.: Amsterdam.
Hauland, G. (2003). Measuring team situation awareness by means of eye movement data. Paper presented at the HCI International 2003, Mahwah, NJ.
Hendrickson, J. J. (1989). Performance, preference, and visual scan patterns on a menu-based system: implications for interface design. Paper presented at the ACM CHI' 89 Human Factors in Computing System Conference, ACM Press.
Hillstrom, A. P., & Chai, Y. C. (2006). Factors that guide or disrupt attentive visual processing. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(4), 648-656.
Hoffman, J. E., & Subramaniam, B. (1995). The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements. Perception and psychophysics, 57(6), 787-795.
Jacob, R. J. K., & Karn, K. S. (2003). Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research: Ready to deliver the promises. In R. Radach, J. Hyona & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 573-605). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1976). Eye fixations and cognitive processes. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 441-480.
Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1999). Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13(4), 351-371.
Kandel, E. R., James, H. S., & Thomas, M. J. (2000). Principles of neural science. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Kolers, P. A., Duchnicky, R. L., & Ferguson, D. C. (1981). Eye movement measurement of readability of CRT displays. Human Factors, 23, 517-527.
Kotval, X. P., & Goldberg, J. H. (1998). Eye movements and interface components grouping: an evaluation method. Paper presented at the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica.
Landauer, T. (1995). The Trouble with Computers. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
LeComlte, M. D., Preissle, J., & Tesch, R. (1993). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research (2 ed.). New York: Academic Press.
Marcus, N., Cooper, M., & Sweller, J. (1996). Understanding Instructions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), 49-63.
Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2005). The cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (1998). A Split Attention Effect in Multimedia Learning: Evidence for Dual Processing System in Working Memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 312-320.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational psychologist, 38(1), 43-52.
Megaw , E. D., & Richardson, J. (1979). Target uncertainty and visual scanning strategies. Human Factors, 21, 302-315.
Mello-Thoms, C., Nodine, C. F., & Kundel, H. L. (2004). What attracts the eye to the location of missed and reported breast cancers? Paper presented at the Eye Tracking Research and Applications Symposium 2002, New York.
Miller, J. (1989). The control of attention by abrupt visual onsets and offsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 45(6), 567-571.
Moreno, R., Mayer, R. E., Spires, H. A., & Lester, J. C. (2001). The case for social agency in computer-based teaching: Do students learn more deeply when they interact with animated pedagogical agents? Cognition & Instruction, 19(2), 177-213.
Mousavi, S. Y., Low, R., & Sweller, J. (1995). Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 319-334.
Norman, D. A. (1993). Things that make us smart. New York: Addison-Wesley.
Oonk, H. M., & Abrams, R. A. (1998). New perceptual objects that capture attention produce inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5(3), 510-515.
Paas, F. (1992). Training strategies for attaining of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 429-434.
Paas, F., Renkle, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1-4.
Paas, F., & Van Merrienboer, J. J. G. (1994). Variability of Worked Examples and Transfer of Geometrical Problem-Solving Skills: A Cognitive-Load Approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 122.
Pashler, H. E. (1998). The Psychology of Attention. London: MIT Press.
Patrick, M. D., Carter, G., & Wiebe, E. N. (2005). Visual Representations of DNA Replication: Middle Grades Students' Percceptions and Interpretations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 14(3), 353-366.
Pivec, M., Trummer, C., & Pripfl, J. (2006). Eye-Tracking Adaptable e-Learning and Content Authoring Support. Informatica, 30, 83-86.
Poole, A., & Ball, L. J. (2005). Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research: Current status and future prospects. In C. Ghaoui (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human computer interaction (pp. 211-219). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
Poole, A., Ball, L. J., & Phillips, P. (2004). In search of salience: A response time and eye movement analysis of bookmark recognition. In S. Fincher, P. Markopolous, D. Moore & R. Ruddle (Eds.), People and Computers XVIII-Design for Life: Proceedings of HCI 2004. London: Springer-Verlag Ltd.
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422.
Roblyer, M. D. (2003). Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching (3 ed.). NJ: Pearson Education.
Salvucci, D. D., & Anderson, J. R. (1998). Tracing eye movement protocols with cognitive process models. In Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 923-928). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schneider, M., Heine, A., Thaler, V., Torbeyns, J., Smedt, B. D., Verschaffel, L., et al. (2008). A Validation of Eye Movements as a Measure of Elementary School Children's Developing Number Sense. Cognitive Development, 23(3), 424-437.
Schubo, A., Wykowska, A., & Muller, H. J. (2007). Detecting pop-out targets in contexts of varying homogeneity: Investigating homogeneity coding with event-related brain potentials (ERPs). Brain Research, 1138, 136-147.
Sheliga, B. M., Riggio, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1995). Spatial attention and eye movements. Exp Brain Res, 105(2), 261-275.
Shih, S. I., & Sperling, G. (1996). Is there feature-based attentional selection in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22(3), 758-779.
Sibert, J. L., Gokturk, M., & Lavine, R. A. (2000). The Reading Assistant: Eye gaze triggered auditory prompting for reading remediation. Paper presented at the Thirteenth Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, New York: ACM Press.
Slykhuis, D. A., Wiebe, E. N., & Annetta, L. A. (2005). Eye-Tracking Students' Attention to PowerPoint Photographs in Science Education Setting. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(5), 509-520.
Sohlberg, M. M., & Mateer, C. A. (1989). Introduction to Cognitive Rehabilitation. New York: Guilford Press.
Sweller, J. (1989). Cognitive technology: Some procedures for facilitating learning and problem solving in mathematics and science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(4), 457-466.
Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4, 295-312.
Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251-296.
Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 97-136.
Treisman, A., & Gormican, S. (1988). Feature Analysis in Early Vision: Evidence From Search Asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95(1), 15-48.
Turatto, M., Galfano, G., Gardini, S., & Mascetti, G. G. (2004). Stimulus-driven attentional capture: an empirical comparison of display-size and distance methods. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 57(2), 297-324.
von Grunau, M. W., Faubert, J., Iordanova, M., & Rajska, D. (1999). Flicker and the efficiency of cues for capturing attention. Vision Research, 39(19), 3241.
Wang, H., Yang, J., Chignell, M., & Ishizuka, M. (2007). Character Agents in E-Learning Interface Using Multimodal Real-Time Interaction. In Human-Computer Interaction. HCI Intelligent Multimodal Interaction Environments (pp. 225-231). Springer Berlin: Heidelberg.
Ware, C. (2004). Information visualization (2 ed.). Morgan Kaufmann.
Wiebe, E. N., & Annetta, L. A. (2007). Animation and narration: Using eye tracking to understand visual attention distribution. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
Wiebe, E. N., & Annetta, L. A. (2008). Influences on Visual Attentional Distribution in Multimedia Instruction. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 17(2), 259-277.
Wiebe, E. N., Slykhuis, D. A., & Annetta, L. A. (2007). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Scientific Visualization In Two PowerPoint Delivery Strategies on Science Learning for Preservice Science Teachers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5, 329-348.
Williams, L. M., Loughland, C. M., Green, M. J., Harris, A. W. F., & Gordon, E. (2003). Emotion perception in schizophrenia: An eye movement study comparing the effectiveness of risperidone vs. haloperidol. Psychiatry Research, 120(1), 13-27.
Yamamoto, S., & Kuto, Y. (1992). A method of evaluating VDT screen layout by eye movement analysis. Ergonomics, 35, 591-606.
Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10(5), 601-621.
Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1996). Attentional Capture by Abrupt Onsets: New Perceptual Objects or Visual Masking?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22(6), 1505-1513.
Yeung, A. S. (1999). Cognitive load and learner expertise: Split-attention and redundancy effects in reading comprehension tasks with vocabulary definitions. Journal of Experimental Education, 67(3), 197-217.
Young, L., & Sheena, D. (1975). Survey of eye movement recording methods. Behav. Res. Meth. Instrum, 7(5), 397-429.
Zeki, S. (1992). The visual image in mind and brain. Scientific American, 267, 68-76.